Each season of Super Rugby (and indeed the Wallabies), we as spectators start with a fresh slate, full of hope and optimism about the year ahead.
We wonder how our team will fare and whether the changes in the off-season are going to bear fruit. We read articles about this player being acquired or that coach being sacked. We wonder (and argue) about whether the new player or coach is a good fit until the results start to come in.
But what of the players?
Sure, they mouth the platitudes about being excited for the challenge of the new year ahead and during the trial games speak about the positives they’re taking out of a loss.
The reality of professional sports, however, is that often it’s only another year and the players are being paid to turn up to training, do various tasks according to the plan of the day then go out on the weekend and play a game of rugby.
While we fans hang off every dropped ball or missed tackle, the reality for many of the players is that it’s also just a job.
Yes, for some it’s just a job and they go through the motions with varying levels of effort week in and week out depending on their age, contract status and future prospects.
Before you object about the slight on players and their individual sacrifices (or conversely their undeserved opportunities), ponder this.
How many workplaces do you know where there is someone who doesn’t pull their weight? Or the talented bloke who gets away with anything, or the one who complains that it isn’t fair that he hasn’t been given a raise, or the one who takes shortcuts all the time and doesn’t work as hard as everyone else and management doesn’t do anything, or one who has a better deal elsewhere and just has to see out his time before he’s off, or the one who back-stabbed another worker to management, or the workers banding together against management until the boss is sacked?
And how often do you see a new bloke come in, full of enthusiasm, new ideas, optimism, energy and a willingness to give it his all, until over a few beers at a far-flung pub a couple of the old salts pull him aside and tell him how it is at this place, or the boss is a tool and they know better, or the boss made this mistake, or doesn’t back the lads and his best bet is to support his mates.
Conversely, how would a boss who backs the boys regardless of their output be supported? What would the favourites say about a boss who makes sure they get a run, or who smashes a door in anger and swears and sarcastically claps at the authorities when they pull the lads up for poor workmanship?
Eventually he’d be sacked for his lack of results and the lads would be sad to see him go.
The Waratahs appear to be so very much like many work places and reek of a poor culture with a number of senior players just going through the motions.
Why is that?
Workers (players) might think the boss (coach) is a tool and therefore they know better. They know what should be done. They know better how to run the company, or this new boss is upsetting the status quo. They’re not happy and the attitude is reflected in the outcome.
Sometimes, management gives them the chance to put up or shut up or to phrase it another way, the boys just got sick of it and they took control.
You could also call it a player-led revolution.
And after a week of revolution, what comes next? Where do the workers go now? Do they keep the new standard or go back to the safety of going through the motions, and the outcomes and results that entails?
The Waratahs need a clean out, and it’s extensive. This year can already be written off and will be a chance for some to stand up and be counted, while others can move on. The question is: does anyone have the stomach or authority to do it?
And what about the Wallabies? Do the rest of the workers know that with the new boss on board they are going to get a fair chance at a promotion for that new role? Or are the usual favourites going to slide in there?
Dave Rennie, more than any other coach of recent times, has a pivotal moment coming that will make or break his entire career as a Wallabies boss.
The workers have been told that they will be given a shot at promotion based on merit (form). Being a new boss, the workers are taking that at face value and it appears the result is already bearing fruit. Many workers have upped their output and are no longer going through the motions. Conversely, some of the older favourites have decided or know that with the new boss, they haven’t got a hope and are simply waiting to see out their time.
These are the ones who, although they would be expected to be leaders to the youth, are in reality marking time with dropped balls, half-hearted tackle efforts and jogging into position. The effort is obvious.
Dave Rennie will do more for the Wallabies culture than any new program by actually promoting or selecting and rewarding those players putting in the effort to go above and beyond that which they get paid for week in and week out than opting to play it safe and selecting a side filled with the regulars.
One team will energise and motivate all the workers, regardless of whether they are picked, the other will categorise him as just another boss in the eyes of the workers and his credibility for the rest of his Wallabies career.
I hope that Dave Rennie and his team select the players who’ve demonstrated the form, desire and culture the Wallabies need.
I’d rather they get flogged in every game and then go through a period of honourable losses, including the criticisms that come with not winning when they should, while the team beds down culture and the art of learning how to win than playing safe with a team of entitled players who treat it as a job.
I reckon the workers will be watching to see who gets selected and it will have a cultural effect on more than just the opening matches.
jeznez
Roar Guru
:laughing: haha. Yep, hope he hasn’t stopped on that front. Going to be even tougher recruiting in this environment, with this uncertainty. Was shocked by a comment on Fitzpatrick during the Brumbies match. Apparently Fitzpatrick tried to retire but they begged him to go around for one more year due to the lack of another hooker. Surely there is someone in club land or one of the young blokes like Cotton that we could be having a go with.
stillmissit
Roar Guru
Jez, we may as well keep these old threads going there's nothing new. The Tahs, Penny and the management need to take this opportunity to completely overhaul the tahs.
stillmissit
Roar Guru
Crazy Horse: This has been a big problem in our rugby over the last 20 years. The idea that any back should be able to play in any position is now proven wrong - I hope so anyway.
Crazy Horse
Roar Pro
On the retired list. You play the best player in each position. That includes the back three who are the ultimate attackers but also the last line of defence.
Frank
Guest
Oz rugby has never truly adjusted to true professionalism. It never had the chance with the amount of self interest and people in the boardroom running the show (many of them ex Wallabies) . It needs to go broke and then rise from the ashes to have any chance. So very sad
jeznez
Roar Guru
Unfortunately he wasn’t. Still 15 and still vice captain. At least Tafa was kept instead of McCauley but have to say Penney isn’t impressing me with his selections
Lano
Roar Guru
If Beale is not dropped until his performance improves then this proves Keith's point - the remainder of the team will not feel they are accountable either, and that's the slippery slope of a poisonous culture.
Train Without A Station
Roar Guru
Or that when you start losing players overseas it’s harder?
stillmissit
Roar Guru
TWAS: Shows something and it's either a culture thing with the Tah's players or most coaches in Australia are crap.
stillmissit
Roar Guru
Hi Crazy Horse, love the name and a great warrior. So where do you hide a Foley or a Beale?
Geoff
Roar Rookie
Love your idealism, unfortunately it does not work in the world we all live in.
Derek Murray
Roar Rookie
Who are the 7 Tahs jeznez? I can't really imagine a situation where there are more than 3
Crazy Horse
Roar Pro
Wingers are the ultimate attacking player but are also part of the last line of defence. You don’t play someone who can’t tackle on the wing opposite the other side’s speedsters.
Ken Catchpole's Other Leg
Roar Guru
The answer is simple Jez The logic goes like this - more extreme the language the mor likely that results will improve. Every complex problem has a simple solution, and it is usually wrong. And the Tahs are a complex problem..
Ken Catchpole's Other Leg
Roar Guru
“ Get them out of the soft city life doing hard work in the bush.” ✔️
Train Without A Station
Roar Guru
Haha seems good compared to today sure. Not compared to where they were when he took over though. And with the squad he had.
jeznez
Roar Guru
Win 10, lose 6? What I wouldn't give for that!
Train Without A Station
Roar Guru
Hickey's record looks decent, but the decline had commenced under him. He inherited a team that made the final going 9-1-3. They then went 9-4, 9-4 and 10-6. The results were dire under Foley in 2012, but he lost Beale, Vickerman, Waugh, Burgess, Mowen and Baxter from the 2011 team and only gained a physically broken Rocky Elsom and AAC. The squad Hickey had during his tenure was stacked.
Linphoma
Guest
Yes.
Tuc Du Nard
Roar Rookie
Exactly. To emphasise this is the Tah bench. They've got nothing! Penney brings on the bench and 5 tries later he must just think...oh crap, I have no one else.