Australian rugby: A blueprint for the future

By MDiddy / Roar Rookie

Tracey Chapman said it best: “Don’t you know? They’re talkin’ bout a revolution.”

The ongoing drama that is Australian rugby continues to throw up more plot twists than a Tom Clancy novel. I have no intention of reporting or dwelling on that and will leave it to the journalists, pundits and slaves to social media.

For the last six months I have been conducting my own inquiry into the current state of Australian rugby. This was prior to the COVID-19 outbreak. During this time I have had the good fortune of speaking to some of the country’s most revered rugby personalities, picking the brains of people who have played and coached at the highest level while also observing and absorbing as much relevant and contemporary material as is available in literature, podcasts and all manner of social media.

I am in the process of making a documentary about the current state of Australian rugby. However, given rugby in this country has been shaken to the core, I feel an obligation to put forward some of my preliminary findings now while we are in desperate need of ideas, innovation and, above all, positive conversation. To sit on this information would be disingenuous.

What follows is a blueprint for how the rugby landscape in Australia should look as soon as is feasible and, given the world’s current state of affairs, as soon as is safe. This is based on information I have gathered, evidence put forward to me, the views of influential rugby heads (some who have gone on and off the record) and the strong convictions of many people like me – fans who live and breathe this sport, who pay club registrations, buy tickets, purchase merchandise and take up pay-TV subscriptions.

(Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

Prologue: Not so Super Rugby

International rugby in Australia is looking increasingly unlikely in 2020. However, the premium content we have come to be presented with, that being Super Rugby, has been failing for some time, as evidenced by declining match attendances and viewership. This has been dramatically illustrated in Australia by the removal of one Super Rugby franchise from the competition and continuous financial strain being put on the remaining member unions.

It may not be decreed officially by SANZAAR, but word on the street is that Super Rugby is on the way out.

Thus the stage is set for a revolution. Whether wanted or not, COVID-19 has forced Australian rugby to consider the possibilities that had previously been unthinkable if not commercially viable. It will be a reboot that has the once-in-a-generation chance to breathe life back into a failing code that still has a rusted-on fan-base but has lost relevance with the common Aussie sports fan.

And so with absolutely nothing other than passion and purpose I wish to present the following blueprint for an Australian rugby schedule that would commence as soon as possible and extend to the international participants once travel restrictions are lifted.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

1. Welcome to the Pacific!

The first order of business must be to fill the gap that would be left by a Super Rugby tournament closing down.

Australia has approximately 160 professional men that are contracted to play premium rugby. We cannot lose this group. An exodus at this time may be inevitable, but there is always fresh blood coming through, not to mention plenty of journeymen looking for a second chance.

Broadcasters have expected 21 rounds of content played by up to 15 teams. Spectators and fans want to see high-quality rugby week in and week out prior to the midyear Wallabies schedule.

Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you the Pacific Pro 10!

The Pacific Pro 10 will include the following teams playing in a 21-round (18 regular season, three finals) tournament from February to July (not January, please leave summer reserved for cricket):

  1. NSW Waratahs
  2. Queensland Reds
  3. Canterbury Crusaders
  4. Waikato Chiefs
  5. Auckland Blues
  6. Wellington Hurricanes
  7. Otago Highlanders
  8. Fijian team
  9. Samoan team
  10. Japanese team

The competition will be played across five time zones as opposed to the current 17 time zones Super Rugby covers thanks to teams from South Africa and Argentina.

Removing South Africa and Argentina will lose the unfriendly time slots for games they host as well as reduce travel costs and player fatigue.

This competition harks back to the original ‘Super’ format – the short-lived Super Six competition of the 1990s. Re-engaging directly with the Pacific will create more opportunities for professional players from Fiji and Samoa to remain closer to home as opposed to plying their trade in Europe. Having these players will not only boost opportunities for local players but also give Australian audiences a chance to have regular exposure to the best from the Pasifika.

Tonga, while not ready to support a franchise, should be targeted for development and, when ready, inclusion.

The major consequence of this move will be the loss of revenue from a broadcast deal that doesn’t involve South Africa and will result in Rugby Australia struggling to be able to match the money that our best rugby players could otherwise receive in England or France. We may lose another Samu Kerevi or two, maybe even a Michael Hooper.

But the fact is we already have a leak in talent at the top level, and all we can do is keep stemming the flow of players overseas while creating the best possible domestic environment that may be the difference between our top players choosing to emigrate or to stay and play local. Paying a handful of the best players a million dollars to stay loyal is not currently sustainable. This is a hard truth we have to accept.

There will also be a loss of goodwill from South Africa and Argentina. This must be managed by Rugby Australia and made up through the ongoing Test international schedules.

Much closer to home, the Rebels and Brumbies will be filthy. See below for explanation.

(AAP Image/Dan Peled)

2. Rounding up the Wallabies

The creation of two top professional teams in Australia means that Wallabies, both current and potential, must be centralised and can play for only the Waratahs or the Reds. There are people in the rugby community who are better placed to explain in depth the rationale for this, but it will be the key requirement for getting the Wallabies to return to being consistently one of the top four teams in the world and becoming solid contenders to win Bledisloe Cups and a World Cup.

The key rationales for this decision are:

Every effort needs to be made to increase the likelihood of a successful Wallabies team, and there is solid evidence that concentrating talent and creating a cohesive environment is a significant indicator of long-term success that is built not bought.

Australian professional rugby is dependant on the Wallabies being successful. It underpins the commercial viability of the sport and is what brings new eyeballs to the screens, more bums on seats and increases the value of our product for international opponents. This equation is undisputed and will not change for the foreseeable future.

(Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

3. The best of the rest

So what now for the rest of the clubs, players and fans outside of the heartland rugby states?

Welcome to the NRC 7 series!

NRC 7 is a domestic competition played across Australia by semi-professional teams that have current fan recognition and a playing history and come from distinct regions that can create a genuine derby atmosphere and, more importantly, provide a platform for premium rugby. It is an extended revision of the current NRC format yet is without Fijian Drua, who will be transplanted as or absorbed into the Fijian team in the Pro Pac 10.

The NRC 7 series will include the following teams playing in a 14-round (12 regular season and two finals) home-and-away tournament from March to July:

  1. ACT Brumbies
  2. Melbourne Rebels
  3. Western Force
  4. NSW Waratahs Juniors
  5. Queensland Reds Juniors
  6. NSW Country
  7. Queensland Country

The Waratahs and Reds are included in this tournament, albeit as ‘juniors’. That’s because they will feature reserve-grade sides who are part of the Waratahs and Reds machines. The following reasons for this are given:

The Waratahs and Reds squads – including the players in the Pro Pac – will number 40 men each, and the remaining Super 7 sides will have 30-man squads. That is paid work for up to 230 players, an increase on the current slots available.

Players should play for their region of origin where possible but a player draft can also be considered to keep teams and the tournament competitive. Wallabies will not be playing in this tournament unless they are returning from injury and require a game before returning to Pro Pac 10. However, restrictions will be placed on the Waratahs and Reds so they can’t stack their junior team.

(Michael Dodge/Getty Images)

I understand that a proposal in which the country’s top players remain in NSW and Queensland will irk many outside of those states. For Force fans it is the status quo, Rebels may consider themselves lucky this didn’t happen to them in 2017 and Brumbies fans may well want to lynch me, but this is based on financial constraints no longer within our control.

This is also about serving the top and ensuring the Wallabies have every chance of being successful so that the fruits of their success can be shared in return back down the chain. The vegemite cannot be spread too thinly.

Consider the following:

COVID-19 has illuminated financial flaws that Australian rugby already had in its current business model. Sacrifices have to be made, but living within our means and supporting that middle tier correctly can pay dividends in the long term.

4. The Anzac Test

Anzac Day, 25 April, is well into the rugby season. So why not honour the proud Anzac history with Bledisloe 1 being played on this most auspicious day?

Aussie Rules and rugby league do it, but neither of them has the elevated rivalry that best represents that special relationship between Australia and New Zealand. I’m reliably informed that one rugby fan from Perth – full disclosure, my father – would happily fly across the country to attend such a match, and I’m sure he would not be alone.

The game will be played during a general bye in both Pro Pac 10 and NRC 7 tournaments. It will alternate years between Australia and New Zealand. There will be commemoration, there will be celebration, it will be watched by hordes of fans on both sides of the Tasman after a festive afternoon of two-up and boozing. A big earner that becomes an annual institution.

There could be challenges in scheduling a Wallabies versus All Blacks match so early in the year, but the fans will enjoy it and the overseas viewers may be more interested than normal in a match that just fits into the back end of the northern hemisphere season.

5. Wallabies international season

Business as usual.

With the exception of Bledisloe 1 on Anzac Day, the rest of the international Test season is played out from July to the autumn tour of Europe at the end of the year. This includes the remaining Bledisloe 2 and 3 matches and the Rugby Championship with Argentina and South Africa. The novelty of playing a South African team only twice a year may well increase interest in a rivalry that has been waning in recent years.

Although watch this space if Agustin Pichot gets his way.

(Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

6. In da club

Business as usual.

Club rugby is strong and always will be. It’s a solid community and volunteer-driven system that shouldn’t be messed with and should only be supported and nurtured by the member unions and Rugby Australia.

The nation’s top club rugby competitions, Shute Shield and Queensland Premier Rugby, continue to produce quality players and remain destinations for amateurs from around the country to use as a pathway. However, they should remain amateur and imbue the pure spirit of rugby union. A national club competition would be an overreach for these clubs and fail the emotional engagement test with fans outside of New South Wales and Queensland, who do not care for Shute Shield and Queensland Premier Rugby as much as people think.

However, once the Pro Pac 10 and NRC 7 tournaments conclude July, those players not playing for the Wallabies must be available for their clubs for the closing rounds and final series of their club competitions. Club rugby will enjoy the boost in the talent returning to their roots and the much-needed relationship between professional and amateur codes remains preserved.

(Mark Kolbe/Getty Images)

7. Hello, ladies!

Super W has provided a new pathway for female players and there is an obligation to preserve and grow it. While the sevens players are professional, a long-term goal needs to be set to continue the commitment to raise the profile for the women’s 15-a-side competition so it can become part of the rugby landscape with its own revenue potential and fan following.

The Super W tournament will include the following teams playing in a ten-round (eight regular season and two finals) tournament from April to July:

  1. NSW Waratahs
  2. Queensland Reds
  3. ACT Brumbies
  4. Melbourne Rebels
  5. Western Force

It will build upon the current format started in 2018 but expand the tournament and also run in parallel with the men’s games inclusive of a finals series. Super W games will be curtain raisers to the NRC 7 games, ensuring that the women’s game gets exposure and becomes part of the rugby experience. Ticket fees can be increased accordingly given spectators are getting two games in one sitting, and the marginal increase in a match fee will encourage attendees to come early.

It is imperative that rugby continues to support and boost the women’s code in order to continue the objective of making rugby a game for all, to widen the support base and ensure that both fathers and mothers are not deterred from introducing their son or daughter to a game that has historically and unfairly being viewed as too rough.

8. Sevens

Business as usual. This is managed by World Rugby and there are few if any players playing both sevens and 15-a-side at the same time.

This is what the newly aligned Australian rugby calendar year would look like.

I submit the above to you, readers, the many rugby fanatics out there and whichever architects will be sitting down and carving out the future of the game in this country over the coming months. There are financial considerations and consequences to deliver the above, and these largely hinge on a broadcaster who can pay what the above is worth. Free-to-air TV is not an option if we want to deliver high-quality international rugby and keep as many of the best Australian rugby players in Australia.

However, there is room to develop around this rugby package. Former Wallaby Ben Alexander has already started an open forum on ways that a dynamic streaming platform owned and operated by Rugby Australia could capitalise on old and new content to provide a future revenue source. The revolution is both physical and digital.

I expect to be challenged, criticised and rucked relentlessly by some for the above propositions, but I stand firm that these proposals are measured, supported by facts and at their core are about Rugby Australia doing what we have never been able to do, and that is become masters of our own domain.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2020-05-07T13:33:33+00:00

MDiddy

Roar Rookie


Appreciate your opinion. Hopefully you have something worthwhile to contribute. We have no shortage of punters screaming from the cheap seats.

2020-05-07T00:34:07+00:00

Steve 50

Roar Rookie


Yeah and fortune doesn’t favour incompetence like your decisions.

2020-05-05T11:12:11+00:00

Crazy Horse

Roar Pro


The best players from Fiji and Samoa are either playing in Europe or contracted to GRR. There are GRR teams in both countries. GRR teams are: Western Force Manuma Samoa Fijian Lautai Malaysian Valke South China Tigers (Hong Kong) China Lions (Shanghai) All teams and the organisation are financially sound. Perhaps GRR could play with New Zealand's 5 teams. Maybe add the Brumbies. Western Force players poached by the Rebels can come home. NSW and Queensland can do what they want. The Reds would be competitive but on current form you'd have to doubt the Tahs are.

2020-05-04T01:48:59+00:00

gatesy

Roar Guru


Newsflash! The Brumbies consistently outperform the other franchises, and you might recall that they were doing it pretty well when the season was so rudely interrupted. Why not leave out the Waratahs or the Reds? This old chestnut arises every year or so, and we Canberrans, or former ones who love the place and its team and everything it stands for grow a little sick and tired of those who think all Rugby revolves around Sydney and Brisbane. There are a few who happen to disagree, and if you think about it, some of Australia’s finest Wallabies of the modern era originated in the ACT – Roff, Gregan, Larkham, Giteau, Henjak, Rathbone, Caputo, Fenukitau, Powell, Lealiifano, Arnold, Carter, and a few more that I have forgotten about, who did not originate in Qld or NSW. This Brisbane and Sydney centric thinking has to stop – it is what is holding back our game. .. and what sort of idea is it that you could have “juniors” playing at the top level? Slightly off the planet, I would say!

AUTHOR

2020-05-04T00:05:01+00:00

MDiddy

Roar Rookie


Listen to the Kiwis? Never! In all seriousness, anything like a Pac Pro 10 tournament is obviously a joint venture with Aus and NZ and whoever else, working side by side. I think despite their designs on a national competition, NZ still need Australia. We may not have troubled them much in these last two decades on the field but our market is still valuable for them and may be even more so in the next 12 months as travel around the world is very likely to be restricted. I hear you about the Brumbies and my hope is that they would still preserve their style and system within a domestic season with future potential to move up a tier if it was both feasible and in the national interest of the Wallabies. I really think we have to go back and look more closely at history and ask the serious question of whether SR expansion has helped or hindered our national team.

2020-05-03T22:37:14+00:00

Waxhead

Roar Rookie


@MDiddy There's a fatal flaw in your argument about "saving the game and growing it". That is ..... you aren't saving the game by destroying its best and most successful province (Brumbies). You are just going backwards with no growth to follow. Brumbies are Australia's biggest asset imo. Their squads are always full of players either rejected by Tahs/Reds, or were unable to be successfully developed by them. These rejects then go to Brumbies and a few years later are transformed into great players. NZ won't see your proposal as saving anything either. I think it likely they'd decline your Reds/Tahs centric idea as a dog with fleas. I suggest you leave the good ideas to NZ, step back and listen to them for a change.

2020-05-03T22:14:30+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


Micko, True enough, but I keep coming back to historical structures. A hopefully vibrant district club premier comp in each capital city feeds into each province, which in turn, feeds into the Wallabies. It’s the same with metropolitan premier cricket comps feeding into the state teams. This works well, & we don’t want to lose this. The NRC, operating under a ‘house of reps’, system, has failed to be universally popular. With regards to popularity & growth, cricket understands that despite its popularity, it will never gain overwhelming popularity like Australian football or world football. It’s just not that kind of sport. It requires a kind of connoisseur love of the game, similar to rugby. Also, historically NSW has always fed fringe rep players towards the weaker states of Tasmania & SA, to everyone’s benefit. Also rugby is never going to claim massive support, because the game is in may ways, restrictive due to all its laws, often confusing & obtuse, & changes to the scrum due safety issues. Rugby is like cricket, it will only ever expand to a certain level, unlikely ever beyond. As for the ‘senate’ style comp, NSW, the biggest province, & Queensland, next biggest, will continue to feed fringe rep players to the weaker provinces, helping them lift their standards. Nothing is perfect, or the silver bullet. But in trying to lift the game out of the doldrums, let’s not throw the baby out with the bathwater.

2020-05-03T22:08:02+00:00

Mark

Guest


Get rid of the video ref. You win some, you lose some, suck it up and get on with it.

2020-05-03T21:10:44+00:00

Paulo

Roar Rookie


Totally agree we need to look at a long term solution not a gap-filler. Means there might be some short term pain. Especially if a massive overhaul of Aussie Rugby as your describe is taken up. I do like your structure though, I think it is the way to channel talent into the Wallabies. People need to understand if your want the national team to be the pinnacle, then the rest of the national machine needs to work towards that, even at there own local ‘loss’ eg dropping to NRC 7.

2020-05-03T20:50:36+00:00

Muglair

Roar Rookie


PvA was also a bit tongue in cheek regarding the depth of thought put into it. However, it is a choice for amateurism and the international results will reflect that. Even if the rest of the world stepped back Australia has lost its traditional national advantages as it has with other sports over the last 50 years. The big issue for me is that if you need to get each tier right. My comments on your proposal focused on the NRC7 comp and in also looking at Rob9's proposal I went deeper. The NRC does not work for anyone except that it does identify players demanding attention for a SR contract. It needs to pay for itself financially and also for the supporters not feeling the connection back to their clubs. That goes a level deeper for regional and sub-districts clubs whose players have left for the city. NRC suffers because the 1st attempt was sloppy, SR has passed its use by date and is not the right solution for Australia, and club rugby is not hitting the right spot either. Getting the NRC structure and its connections with club and local rugby right is critical. Tiers 1 and 2 will then look after themselves. The other epiphany for me is the resolution of the fears of parochialism infecting a national body. You get the premier divisions in the cities of the Tier 2 states (NSW Qld ACT) rigt, then the supporters whose main interest is those competitions are less likely to interfere with the affairs of a national body dedicated to lifting rugby across the country.

2020-05-03T20:48:56+00:00

Jwoody74

Roar Rookie


Hey MDiddy, nice piece mate and you have obviously gone to a lot of effort and thought into it. Quick disclaimer I’m an Aussie Rules guy so my knowledge of Rugby is nowhere near on a par with the guys who are contributing to the comments but I did live in NZ for a few years and learnt quickly that in order to fit in socially you had to learn Rugby and learn quick and once I started working for Sky NZ I didn’t really have a choice as the Rugby paid my bills. After returning home tho I quickly Wallabies aside slipped back into AFL fandom and that started paying the bills. Just a few thoughts of my own and again as I said I’m no expert. Firstly I adopted the Brumbies as my team when I left Christchurch, I kinda supported the Crusaders when I was there in order to fit in but that wasn’t going to happen when I moved to Auckland because I’m allergic to teams called the Blues. However when I think of Super Rugby I think of the Brumbies I still check their results and so going forward I can’t imagine them not being a part of your Pro Pac 10 proposal and I don’t really buy into the whole NSW- Qld = Rugby so I’d struggle to get on board. I should also point out that despite being an AFL fan I’m a sports nutter full stop and I don’t want to see any code struggle going forward as a result of Covid because our passions as sports fans are our passions regardless of the code. I think by losing the Brumbies you’d be missing something. The Rebels yeah I get that I could be wrong but I don’t think they’ve captured Melbourne’s public interest. The Storm have but I wonder if that’s cause they always are there or there abouts so 3 clubs makes more sense to me. The other thing is why bother with NZ or the PI teams? As mentioned wouldn’t the PI teams just need constant propping up financially? Why not a purely Australian competition with the 5 Aussie teams (bringing back the Force) and perhaps a team from FNQ and Northern NSW and maybe a team that’s from either the Shute Shield or the Queensland league that has history, is financially viable and has maybe outgrown its league? Kind of how Port Adelaide was desperate to join the AFL on the back of a century of success in the SANFL. The problem with the SR in my naive opinion is a lack of interest in the South African franchises and not knowing what they stand for as well as the time zone difference. Maybe that’s irrelevant and apologies if I’ve gone off track. A pro Aussie Rugby comp doesn’t need to be huge in regards to clubs involved it just needs to be competitive and capture the hearts and minds of Rugby fans. I’d rather watch an 8 team Oz Rugby tournament to rekindle my interest and show my Mexican mates all that’s good about the sport as opposed to watching the Brumbies play Waikato. Why give NZ rugby a leg up playing against our boys week in week out. Again sorry if I sound ignorant and have rambled. ????

2020-05-03T16:58:11+00:00

Tree Son

Roar Rookie


As a foreign viewer/fan of Super Rugby I really love the international aspect of it and would be sad to see it go, while acknowledging that the actual stakeholders may feel that is best. Your solution acknowledges and would preserve that aspect. :thumbup: :thumbup:

AUTHOR

2020-05-03T16:06:42+00:00

MDiddy

Roar Rookie


This would make for an entertaining domestic competition, but would probably mean that the Wallabies will become even lower in the world rankings than were they currently are.

AUTHOR

2020-05-03T15:57:33+00:00

MDiddy

Roar Rookie


So basically keep the Super Rugby as is but minus South Africa and Argentina? I did consider the state of origin but this would probably be somewhat of a disruption to the schedule and a bit of a repeat when you still have the Waratahs and Reds playing against each other.

AUTHOR

2020-05-03T15:54:49+00:00

MDiddy

Roar Rookie


Would welcome to hear your thoughts before you line people up against the wall. What are their crimes? Let's be specific. My honest opinion is that Australian rugby has been full of people with the right intentions but poor foresight and a lack of understanding of exactly why we have fallen so far and more importantly why we were actually so successfully for that brief period. We are in a position now where demoting (not cutting) two Super Rugby teams is probably the least of our problems.

AUTHOR

2020-05-03T15:52:03+00:00

MDiddy

Roar Rookie


Thanks for that. Yes, I've been working on the production of the documentary and it has been very fulfilling getting into the weeds of what has or hasn't been happening. Overall, I'm positive about the future but I think some hard and bold decisions need to be made. I do think that the supporter base needs to make itself heard while this is happening.

AUTHOR

2020-05-03T15:50:17+00:00

MDiddy

Roar Rookie


I believe there are current efforts to develop academies in the PI countries through the French rugby union and recent competitions like Global Rapid Rugby. Would definitely have to be factored in, costed and worked into any package deal for this competition but there is clearly value in the players coming out of that region and it will provide opportunities for the PI players to develop and eventually raise the standard of their national team. That then has future potential for us if we want to start playing them and being able to draw revenue. Yes, that's very long term but I think we need to start making these sorts of steps before someone else comes in and we become the follower rather than the leader.

AUTHOR

2020-05-03T15:45:45+00:00

MDiddy

Roar Rookie


In truth, it would not surprise me if the Kiwis reduced a team in a competition like this, given the expense of running one of these franchises and the fact that NZ is under similar financial pressure, albeit not in the same dire situation. The cutting down to two teams is more about creating the Wallaby funnel instead of having the talent spread amongst the four franchises. Not about saying that we are that many times worse than the Kiwis or equivalent to two PI teams. Agree on relegation. I think once a competition gets settled on and can grow they can look at future relegation/promotion to be added. It will increase the value added to every game rather than have a dead rubber between the cellar dwellers.

AUTHOR

2020-05-03T15:41:31+00:00

MDiddy

Roar Rookie


Agree, I hope they are reading. Given they are spending more time at home at the moment, I hope they are spending some of their work hours digesting these sorts of comment blogs.

AUTHOR

2020-05-03T15:39:43+00:00

MDiddy

Roar Rookie


Hi there, some of the people I've spoken to have been happy to go on the record, others haven't. I'm trying to put together the documentary quickly so that I can present as much as possible. However, at the moment this article serves as an initial thought process of where I think we have to go to turn things around, and yes the changes and decisions that need to get made are not pretty. No old school ties. I grew up in WA and played rugby there, then played rugby in Sydney, failed at becoming professional but haven't stopped loving the game or indeed the Wallabies. Before the Force came into the picture I went for the Brumbies and have always admired their style. The decisions for the above are commercial ones that are about both saving the game and growing it again. I appreciate they may seem skewed towards the establishment but I am far from it. I started this whole process because of my frustration at how the administration has run this game into the ground. On your point about the Wallaby golden period, that was far more about the progress that was made in the 1980s and early 90s, as well as the 3-4 year advantage we had over the northern hemisphere. Not to discredit the work Rod McQueen and the Brumbies did to advance the game, they definitely innovated and it came at the perfect time. But their success also helps my argument. While the Brumbies were on fire from 1999 to 2004, the other two Australian teams were poor. Out of those six years the Tahs were in the bottom 3 on the ladder and the Reds went from finishing 1st in 1999 (not winning the final) to last in 2004, the year the Brumbies won. Essentially across that period on average you had 1.5 Australian teams performing well while the rest were not.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar