Three reasons why England lost the first Test against the West Indies

By Amar / Roar Rookie

After that famous 4-0 series win in England in 1988, the West Indies have struggled to hold their own in the overseas conditions and are yet to win a series there in more than three decades.

But they have given themselves a chance at snatching a series win in the three-match series that is currently underway after a superbly scripted though nerve-wracking four-wicket victory in Southampton.

Whether they eventually manage to win the series or fail to deceive in the end, I have to give credit where it is due – they played a great match and deserved to win. But how could England, the number four Test team in the world, manage to lose to the lowly eighth-ranked team on their own soil?

The pundits are out there dissecting the reasons. But here are three plausible reasons as to why England lost.

1. The absence of Joe Root in an inexperienced batting line-up
This is a no-brainer. Their best Test batsman of this generation was sorely missed. The moment Dom Sibley got out in the first innings without bothering the scorers, how England fans wished for Joe Root to come out and save the day.

Instead we had one inexperienced batsman after the other stride to the crease and go back in a hurry. Within no time, England were five down for 87! No disrespect to the hardworking Joe Denly, but he shares nothing in common with Root except the first name.

England missed Joe Root in Southampton. (Julian Finney/Getty Images)

2. An iffy decision at the toss
In retrospect, it may be easy to blame the stand-in captain Ben Stokes for deciding to bat in overcast conditions. After the match, when he was asked if he regrets making that decision, he replied in the negative. He said that if they had batted well enough and put on a decent score, the result would have been different.

He is certainly right, especially considering how the West Indian top order struggled in the fourth-innings chase of a middling target. Had they got a slightly stiffer target, it could well have been a very different story.

However, considering the overhead conditions and an inexperienced and brittle batting line-up in the absence of their talismanic captain Joe Root, Stokes could have asked West Indies to bat. With the pace of Jofra Archer and Mark Wood, along with the wily James Anderson’s swing and Stokes’ own versatility with the ball, they could have put the West Indies under enormous pressure from Day 1.

With the pitch not expected to deteriorate, batting in the fourth innings should not have been a problem. In retrospect, he did make an error of judgment in exposing his brittle top order against a good bowling unit in bowler-friendly conditions.

3. Missed chances in the field
Neither side wrapped themselves in glory when it came to ground fielding and catching. There were no balls galore, especially at crucial moments on wicket-taking deliveries. It did not help that the home umpires failed to spot no balls on a regular basis, allowing the bowlers to be caught off guard when they were found to be no-balling at crucial moments.

However, it was the home team that made more errors on the field, and especially during the fourth innings, when the match was in the balance, and possibly with the advantage to England. The West Indies, while chasing a middling target of 200, were put under serious pressure when they lost their first three wickets with just 27 on the scorecard, and their opening batsman John Campbell retired hurt.

The English bowlers – led by a superb Archer – were on fire, with both Roston Chase and Jermaine Blackwood trying to steady the innings.

(Gareth Copley/Getty Images)

With the score on 42, Ben Stokes at slip decided to move to his right in anticipation of a shot from Blackwood, only to realise that the catch came straight to where he was a fraction of a second ago. Had he stayed his ground, it would have been a straight forward catch. Blackwood was on five then. He went on to add 90 more.

That was not the only chance fluffed by England. Jos Buttler missed a rather straight forward chance when he failed to react in time and missed a catch on the leg side. The bowler this time was captain Stokes and Blackwood was again the fortunate batsman, and had still not reached 30.

There were some run-out chances missed, notably by Zak Crawley to run out Blackwood before he had reached 50.

Had England been a little tidier in the field, and supported their bowlers well, it could well have been England who could have scripted a come-from-behind victory.

The Crowd Says:

2020-07-19T11:03:37+00:00

Cari

Roar Rookie


What to get near to 470? I doubt it.

2020-07-17T06:26:43+00:00

Charlie

Roar Rookie


Reason # 2 is not why England lost the test. It only looks like a bad decision with the benefit of hindsight, and covers up the fact they did not bat well enough in their first innings. Choosing to bat fourth is rarely a good decision. The simple fact is England didn't perform the basics well at crucial points of the match, whether that was their batting the first innings, or their fielding in the WIndies second innings.

2020-07-16T06:13:25+00:00

Nick

Roar Guru


Yup. To struggle - continuously - to make 300 at home is a sign of serious problems.

2020-07-16T06:09:24+00:00

13th Man

Roar Rookie


Not picking Broad was obviously a mistake. The guy is still their best test bowler, especially in English conditions. Going with Wood over him was a huge mistake. Overall however, I think it’s mainly because WI are a better test cricket side than them. They struggle to make big scores, 300 is a real stretch for them.

2020-07-16T03:43:39+00:00

Nick

Roar Guru


Holder and Roach are quality. Gabriel is extremely inconsistent.

2020-07-16T03:05:55+00:00

Irie

Roar Rookie


I wouldn't call the Windies attack "rag tag" with Roach averaging 27.6, Holder 25.5 and Gabriel 29.6, all pretty handy numbers. Joseph is the only one of the pace bowlers averaging over 30 (34) but he's only 10 matches into his career and not quite 24 years old yet. I think they deserve a lot of credit as a bowling group for how they've gone about their business in the last couple of years.

2020-07-16T01:54:29+00:00

Nick

Roar Guru


Three reasons. Quite simple really. 1. They can't bat 2. They can't bat 3. They can't bat. You can be a tactical whiz and you can stack the deck with an assortment of the best bowlers in the world right now, but they just can't score runs. When they are battling to make 300 in home conditions in July (!) against, lets be honest, a fairly rag tag bunch of bowlers, you have serious problems. So long as WI remain disciplined and focused, they'll beat England again.

2020-07-16T01:12:51+00:00

Rellum

Roar Guru


They can't catch, that is the main reason.

2020-07-16T00:54:39+00:00

Ruairidh MacDonald

Roar Rookie


*fewer :stoked:

2020-07-15T22:43:35+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


Good to see another person throwing up some ideas about England's performance. Thanks for this piece Amar. First of all, Joe Root was probably missed more for his captaincy than his batting IMO. Given how the English batsmen got out, where not one of them threw away their wicket in that first innings, I doubt his presence at the crease would have made a lot of difference. He's a far more experienced captain and might have had the courage to send the Windies in but also give his best bowler, Stokes, way more than the 24 overs Stokes gave himself. The chances you mentioned were half chances at best. Yes England missed them, but so did the West Indies. At the end of the day, Holder's guys were ready to play from minute one on day one and the Poms weren't. The Windies bowlers put it on the English batsman who were rusty and it showed. I suspect this next Test will be a very different game in terms of English intensity.

2020-07-15T22:41:23+00:00

Richie

Roar Rookie


All what if’s! The windies played better cricket. Well done. And of course they left out Broad.

2020-07-15T22:34:33+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


Yep, pretty hard to win cricket games when that happens

2020-07-15T21:40:28+00:00

G Len N

Roar Rookie


I and up with 2 reasons which are as follows Less runs Less wickets

2020-07-15T19:35:59+00:00

soapit

Roar Guru


if the on field umpires arent going to check no balls surely the third umpire needs to start checking them regularly while he's sitting around with his feet up. they can just have a quiet word to them between balls to adjust. does seem pretty unfair to not call all game until the critical moment with no way for the bowler to know before then

Read more at The Roar