India's concussion loophole sets dangerous precedent as Australia crumble in first T20

By Scott Pryde / Expert

Cricket’s concussion rule has to exist, but India have exposed its weaknesses as they claimed an emphatic 11-run victory over Australia on Friday night in Canberra during the first T20.

Now, let me clarify. I’m not a doctor. I have no medical knowledge surrounding whether Ravindra Jadeja was actually concussed or not when he was hit on the head during what was a powerful knock to propel India to a competitive total, which turned out to be more than enough.

But that simply isn’t the argument being made here.

The bottom line, from the evidence available, is that Jadeja never received an on-field concussion test. No doctor or physio came out to check whether he was okay to continue, which in this day and age of concussion protocols and sports taking a hard-line approach to players continuing on with such a potential injury was a surprise to say the least.

Of more concern to India and their fans was the leg injury Jadeja had picked up, reducing him to barely a hobble by the time he walked off Manuka Oval, not out with 44 from just 23 balls to his name.

In fact, the incident barely seemed worthy of a mention given the small amount of attention it received until Justin Langer and Aaron Finch were picked up in a heated discussion with match referee David Boon during the innings break.

Justin Langer fumed over India’s concussion sub. (Photo by Matt King – CA/Cricket Australia via Getty Images)

And just when the commentators were deliberating whether it was about Australia’s lousy over rate or not, out stepped Yuzvendra Chahal to field, with Jadeja nowhere to be seen.

Now, you could probably justify the replacement as being like-for-like, but the whole process and why it was allowed just smelt. Of course, India would have been allowed a sub fielder under conventional cricket rules for his injury, but it was deemed a concussion and so he sat in the dressing room as Chahal took a restrictive 3-25 from his four overs.

Chahal’s performance with the ball helped inspire India to push ahead in the series, which moves back to Sydney for the final two games on Sunday and Tuesday, but India have exposed a loophole in the concussion policy that the ICC need to urgently look at.

Again, Jadeja may well have been out with a concussion, but the fact no on-field test or reaction was carried out makes it smell like a rat, and sometimes, if it smells like that, well… you know, it is.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

But this isn’t designed to make an excuse for Australia either.

They are yet to beat India in a T20 series at home, and based on Friday night’s effort, you’d be more surprised if that record turned around over the next week in Sydney than if it didn’t.

The match started out promisingly for the Aussies. Their bowlers did a decent job and then pushed well onto the front foot, only to let up at the death and have their batting collapse trying to get to what was a very manageable score.

There are plenty of areas the Aussies must improve, but after having India 5-104 off 16, there is no way they should have ended up with 161.

That is 57 from the final four overs. In other words, a completely unacceptable closing performance with the ball.

Ravindra Jadeja, who is among the best limited-overs players in the world, teed off with remarkable success all around Canberra. But Australia bowled the wrong areas, set a poor plan in an attempt to limit him and paid the price as a result.

Ravindra Jadeja’s concussion substitution sparked controversy in Canberra. (Photo by Ryan Pierse – CA/Cricket Australia via Getty Images)

What will make the loss even more frustrating for the Aussies is their score at the end of the power play: 0-53 off six overs, the required run rate falling and momentum with the green and gold.

It was a position they shouldn’t have lost from.

But there was still nagging doubt. D’Arcy Short failed to get going, and when Aaron Finch departed followed by a mini collapse as Steve Smith and Glenn Maxwell came and went shortly afterwards, things started to get out of hand.

Short was a key offender of the Australian chase, falling short as he eventually got himself out in the 15th over for 34 at less than a run a ball. Chasing eight an over, you simply can’t afford a batsman to bat under a strike rate of under 100 for that long. It builds pressure, and digs a hole for the batsmen around him.

It cost Australia momentum and rhythm in their innings, and by the time Chahal had finished his four overs to go with Washington Sundar’s 0-16 off four, it was all too little too late for the Aussies despite a late flurry from Moises Henriques, who was one of the hosts’ best.

Despite dropped catches from Virat Kohli and an Indian team still not at their best, the tourists had the better of the T20 opener in Canberra by a considerable length, no matter what the 11-run gap at the end seems to suggest.

While Australia still haven’t seemed to figure out playing T20 cricket (remember, they have only made one final in six editions of the World Cup), the ICC also haven’t fully figured out the concussion substitute.

With a pair of World Cups on the horizon and cricket picking back up again (although with South Africa’s ODI against England postponed due to a COVID case and the problems Pakistan are facing in New Zealand, who knows), both Australia in the shortest form of the game and the ICC have plenty to figure out.

For now though, it’s short-term objectives for Australia, and that has to be getting their selection right, overcoming the loss of David Warner and finding a way to bounce back in Game 2 on Sunday in Sydney.

The Crowd Says:

2020-12-08T20:52:04+00:00

Censored Often

Roar Rookie


I solid solution Chris, although I do prefer the old school method of using the 12th man who can't bowl to replace injured players. Perhaps I'm just showing my age though.

2020-12-07T06:08:56+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


" ... the fact that he was unlikely to bowl anyway because of an injury incurred while batting ... "

2020-12-07T00:02:42+00:00

Chris Kettlewell

Roar Guru


The like for like thing is always going to be hard. India have to replace with someone available from their squad. The like for like rule really should enforce the most like for like available in the squad, but that's all it can do. If they don't really have another spin bowling allrounder in the squad then he may be the most like for like available. One thing that should probably be done with this rule is to force teams to nominate who the replacement would be for each given player on the team sheet before the game and you have to stick with that. So if Chahal was Jadeja's nominated replacement that would be the case whether India batted first or second. So you can't replace an allrounder with a bowler when they've finished batting or with a batsmen when they've finished bowling.

2020-12-06T23:57:31+00:00

Chris Kettlewell

Roar Guru


In the end you've got to say that India were extremely lucky that Jadeja copped a ball to the helmet that allowed them to invoke the concussion rule. It was a glancing blow, not a solid hit, and I think it's unlikely he had a concussion, but the fact the ball hit the helmet gave them the chance to use that loophole to sub out an injured player. I think they really do need to have independent doctors on hand to evaluate players and not just leave it up to team doctors, otherwise it really does open the door to this sort of thing more and more.

2020-12-06T23:06:16+00:00

Coss

Roar Rookie


Jadeja's ODI average is 37 and his T20 average just under 30. He has not been the bowler that devastated opposition teams on dusty Indian test wickets for quite a while now. There is no way he would be in that team as a specialist bowler.

2020-12-06T19:53:04+00:00

Censored Often

Roar Rookie


Perhaps the doctor could explain how replacing a batting allrounder with a bowler that can't bat whatsoever is like for like?

2020-12-06T19:51:44+00:00

Censored Often

Roar Rookie


How was the underarm cheating? I'll wait....

2020-12-06T18:39:41+00:00

Philip Singh

Guest


Are you a doctor? I think getting hit in the head and not protecting yourself doesnt make you an expert on concussion. The only issue was no doctor on the ground. Everything else was fine. Australia lost fair and square. Australia would do the exact same. Aussies are great and dictating what is good or bad and somehow the only ones to know the line between abuser and sledging. Tiring to see such poor sportsmanship from Aussies.

2020-12-06T06:01:21+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


The controversial part sheek is that he did his hammy...meaning he wouldn't've been able to bowl in any case, but they've gone down the exploitative route of claiming "concussion" despite that being dubious, and highly unlikely as to why they've subbed him off.

2020-12-06T05:55:39+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


Here's a hypothetical scenario for perspective: imagine travis head got concussed early and the doctors quickly diagnosed and there was time for Matthew wade to go in and bat in his stead as the like for like replacement. Then when Australia field, Alex Carey pulls a hamstring. Now ... because Wade is now in the playing XI as a like for like replacement, would he be allowed to take the keeping gloves? It's a can of worms that's been opened up ...

2020-12-06T03:46:28+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


Initially, I must confess I didn't really care about this, as I didn't watch the game. But having it explained to me by my brother, it ought to be a simple fix. You replace like with like. Sure, you can replace a specialist batsman with an all-rounder, but he will only be allowed to bat, & not bowl. Surely, that's not too difficult to comprehend. And if the replaced batsman is a part-time bowler who usually only bowls say, 5 overs, then that is the limit given to the replacement. It seems pretty straightforward to me, & the ICC can clarify this loopholed in a stroke.

2020-12-06T00:11:22+00:00

Bunney

Roar Rookie


Sour grapes Simon Jadeja is a fine spin bowler and was replaced by another spin bowler. I know he had injured his hamstring, but what do you want? Another bowler with a torn hammy to replace him?? Replacements like this will RARELY favour the side, as the sub wasn't deemed good enough to make the 11. In this very rare instance, it favoured India. Australia weren't good enough and that's all there is to it

2020-12-05T21:44:17+00:00

matth

Roar Guru


The umpires should have requested the assessment if they felt it necessary.

2020-12-05T20:34:13+00:00

Diamond Jackie

Roar Rookie


Yep. Correct.

2020-12-05T20:32:35+00:00


Will give you that from the player welfare side of things. I was more talking about the 'official' ICC process for HIA, which there doesn't appear to be any

2020-12-05T18:46:56+00:00

Mr Right

Roar Rookie


A team should only get the benefit of a full playing interchange if the player is accessed & concussion is confirmed at the time of the incident. Losing the delayed replacement option will result in team management being very diligent in ensuring player welfare & the credibility of this replacement option will be restored. Australian didn’t bat well on the night but that is a separate issue.

2020-12-05T15:53:12+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


You're not going to be able to bowl effectively either way. So it does seem suspicious.

2020-12-05T15:14:40+00:00

U

Roar Rookie


Those incidents were justly criticized by all commentators. It’s not the same

2020-12-05T11:14:37+00:00

Jason

Roar Rookie


What if that unlikely scenario was in our (Aus) favour , like Gilly did, keep walking.

2020-12-05T09:03:16+00:00

Bobbo7

Guest


Exactly. They were 50-0, well ahead and completely stuffed it up. That should be the main focus.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar