Australia's death bowling being tested by Kiwis

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

Daniel Sams is cannon fodder at the death, while Pat Cummins, Mitchell Starc and Kane Richardson remain Australia’s best options in these dying overs in T20s.

That’s what was revealed when I painstakingly calculated using ball-by-ball data the performance of every Australian who’s bowled at least four times at the death in international T20s over the past two years.

An inability to close out innings with the ball has hurt Australia badly in three of their past four T20s. In their most recent match Australia bled 56 runs from the final five overs as New Zealand charged to a giant total.

The series opener in New Zealand saw the Kiwis hammer 66 from the last five overs. And two matches previous to that, in Sydney, Australia were powerless to halt the charge of India, who thrashed 54 from the final 4.4 overs as they completed a difficult chase.

The Aussies have experimented greatly with their death bowling in the past six months using no fewer than 13 bowlers in that period of the innings across just eight matches in that time.

Clearly they’ve been trying to determine their best death options ahead of the T20 World Cup in October. One bowler who has been badly exposed in this role is Sams.

The left-arm quick has been mauled at the death in all four of his international T20s. Sams has sent down 5.4 overs at the death and been thrashed for an extraordinary 93 runs. That equates to a scarcely believable economy rate of 16.4 runs per over.

Granted, Sams is early in his T20 career. He’s also handy with the bat, as we witnessed in the second T20 against New Zealand, when Sams pumped 41 from 15 balls. But he is in the side as a bowler, and with so many superior death options available to Australia, it’s very hard to see where Sams fits into Australia’s planning for the World Cup.

He is categorically not one of Australia’s six best T20 bowlers. Starc, Cummins, Kane Richardson, Jhye Richardson, Adam Zampa and Ashton Agar are streets ahead of Sams with the ball.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

And his batting is not potent enough to push him into the top six. The problem for Sams also is that he doesn’t have a clear role with the ball. Quite obviously he is not an international-standard death bowler, and he’s also not a particularly dangerous new-ball bowler, certainly not at the level of Starc, Cummins or Richardson.

That’s why it’s so hard to locate a spot for Sams in the Australian side beyond this series once the likes of Starc and Cummins return.

Here are Australia’s T20 bowling records at the death (overs 15 to 20) in the past two years:

What that data underlines is that Australia doesn’t need to search for new death bowlers. Their old crew was getting the job done.

Australia’s first-choice T20 attack of the past two years has been Starc, Cummins, Kane Richardson, Zampa and Agar.

(Mark Metcalfe/Getty Images)

The key to that five-man unit is its variety and versatility. Zampa and Agar complement each other beautifully, and both are ranked in the top six T20 bowlers in the world.

The three quicks, meanwhile, each offers something different. Starc provides a left-arm angle, extreme pace and new ball incisiveness. Cummins offers composure, experience, extreme accuracy and improving changeups.

Kane Richardson on the surface is innocuous compared to Starc and Cummins but his bowling style is tailored to the middle to late overs of T20s, when he’s proven consistently effective. His ability to bowl into the pitch and fool batsmen with slower balls and cutters has provided a valuable contrast to the attacking approaches of Starc and Cummins these past two years.

As the above stats show, no Aussie has taken more death wickets in that period than Richardson. Crucially all five of Richardson, Starc, Cummins, Zampa and Agar have done well at the death in the past two years. That has offered Australia great flexibility. They have used all five of those bowlers in the death in the same game at times, with each sending down just a single over.

Jhye Richardson. (Photo by Kai Schwoerer/Getty Images)

Australia also aren’t afraid of going spin-heavy at the death. In the second T20 against England six months ago Agar and Zampa bowled the 16th, 17th, 18th and 19th overs. That pair did a fine job, taking 2-37 from those four death overs, having been set a hugely difficult task, with England cruising at 2-121 before that.

Australia also have another appealing death option in BBL superstar Jhye Richardson. The young West Australian looks set to push hard for a starting spot at this year’s World Cup. If Australia are to win that tournament, they’ll need to nail their death bowling.

Fortunately, in spite of recent matches, they have plenty of good death options.

The Crowd Says:

2021-03-05T02:45:24+00:00

maverick

Roar Rookie


And Behrendorff was excellent. He or Sams must replace him in the 4th match. But it seems Kane is a lock for the t20 world cup. Selectors seem to love him a lot.

2021-03-03T23:02:10+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


Jhye is unproven at the death though. And as I said, if those two plus Starc are playing then there's no room for Kane (or Hazlewood). If Jhye Richardson is absent then I've got no issue with Hazlewood playing in his place, as Cummins and Starc have death bowling experience. But if one of those guys is missing I'd rather have Kane. Otherwise we're just too light on in the death overs.

2021-03-03T02:23:38+00:00

13th Man

Roar Rookie


Jhye will be good, just remember he is coming off a huge shoulder re construction. His economy rate this series, whilst not brilliant has still been the best of the quicks in the first two games.

2021-03-03T02:19:45+00:00

jose

Roar Rookie


Kane Richardson has already got enough chances I feel, better try other bowlers. Even in 2019 world cup, it was Richardson/ Coulter-nile initially in the XI and was later replaced by Behrendorff.

2021-03-03T02:18:06+00:00

jose

Roar Rookie


Jhye Richardson is yet to do well in death overs I think, even in domestic matches he leaks runs in death overs, that one day semi final against Victoria couple of years back is a good example, but I hope he improves in this area over time. Same with Kane also, the fact is none of the current Aussie bowlers are good at slog overs when compared to some one like Ian Harvey in the past.

2021-03-02T12:34:28+00:00

13th Man

Roar Rookie


Cummins and Jhye could bowl at the death though. Both have in international cricket and in the BBL respectively. Use Josh with the new rock, he would be extremely effective.

2021-03-02T01:06:37+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


The problem with Hazlewood is he's never really been a death bowler. That lack of tricks makes him hittable. How many overs does he normally bowl out of the last 10 in ODIs? He's a new ball specialist, so he's not going to fill the same role. He's competing with Cummins and Jhye Richardson.

2021-03-01T02:55:53+00:00

Dwanye

Roar Rookie


Hi Jacko. I feel it happening also, which makes sense. ‘Wickets in hand’, I never thought teams pushed that enough reading about economics and stats decades ago with ODI’s. Why finish the game with a stack of wickets in hand? It’s a balance cause you lose some for no runs, plus batsmen ‘set’ also. The mental hurdle on ‘12 runs an over’ isn’t holding them back no more

2021-03-01T02:26:11+00:00

13th Man

Roar Rookie


I'd probably be dropping Finch and playing Philippe as the WK which therefore would allow Smith to remain at 3 and play both Stoinis and Marsh.

2021-03-01T02:24:27+00:00

13th Man

Roar Rookie


See id rather Hazelwood to Kane if I was honest. I know a lot of people consider him a long form specialist and he perhaps has less tricks than Kane but he is just a better bowler. More quality and would do a job in all formats.

2021-02-28T23:42:15+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


Not in this format. His success has come at 4 in T20Is.

2021-02-28T23:41:05+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


Definitely. There's plenty to work with. It's just a steep learning curve to go from fooling BBL batsmen to fooling international ones on their home turf. Only one way to find out if he can do it.

2021-02-28T23:39:56+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


Kane's economy rate is pretty respectable for a guy who bowls a lot at the death. Not many of the other players listed above would regularly bowl more than one over in that 15-20 period, but he often does. With the development of Jhye Richardson he probably finds himself pushed out of a first choice side, behind Jhye, Cummins and Starc. But being next in line behind those bowlers - and IMO he absolutely is, in this format - is hardly a knock on him. With both Starc and Cummins out, Kane and Sams are in. Behrendorff is perhaps a little unlucky not to have played yet in this series, though.

2021-02-28T09:51:59+00:00

Bobbo7

Guest


Spot on U. The first game the Aussies were playing dinky cross bat poo to Boult and Southee and looked stupid.

2021-02-28T08:24:05+00:00

maverick

Roar Rookie


You are right. Ronan seems very high on Kane. But the reality is he hardly takes wickets at important times and despite his experience, he has leaked same amount of runs as Sams who is in his infancy as a player.

2021-02-28T06:27:20+00:00

U

Roar Rookie


That’s what happens when you go into international games with big bash stars who are bits and pieces players. Might as well just pick 11 Moises Henriques and Dan Christians.

2021-02-28T05:09:11+00:00

Jak

Guest


Perhaps Finch shouldn’t have been bowling him at the death.

2021-02-28T03:54:32+00:00


I think the whole stratergy of T20 is changing and thet last 5-8 overs ( depending on wickets lost ) are now about 12 plus runs an over and just going ballistic....NZ scored 107 runs off the last 10 over in game one and I think 135 in game 2 so some major scoring in the seconhalf of the innings

2021-02-28T01:28:19+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


Yep, he's another guy we have to give some match time. Zampa & Agar are not bulletproof and if either are injured, or if selectors decide to play 3 spinners in India(?), he could be the guy they rely on

2021-02-28T01:24:23+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


Or is Stoinis only capable of making runs in New Zealand conditions at international level? And Maxwell should not bat 4. He's better suited at 5 or 6, IMO.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar