'Only one team played to the conditions': Talking points from the Bulldogs' wild win in the wet

By Stirling Coates / Editor

After a tense first half, the Bulldogs blew the Bombers away in the second half – kicking eight goals to zip to claim an emphatic 49-point win.

Having come into the match on the back of three straight losses, there were fears an otherwise superb season for the Bulldogs could end in a flash. Instead, they’re well and truly back and will have the Brisbane Lions sweating in next week’s semi-final.

Here are my talking points from the last of this weekend’s finals.

Weightman didn’t deserve all of his free kicks, but he deserved his four goals

The small forwards were always going to be key given the wet conditions in Launceston, but kicking a bag of four on any day is a superb achievement for a crumber.

Cody Weightman earned the ire of Essendon fans after all four of his majors came off the back of free kicks – four of the six he was awarded on the afternoon.

Were all of them there? The one that led to his fourth goal sure wasn’t.

But that doesn’t change the fact he nailed some very difficult set shots to earn his scoreboard impact, with any right Bombers fans had to complain being reduced by their side’s inability to nail simpler chances down the other end.

His attack on the ball was also supreme, with 12 of his disposals coming off 11 contested possessions – fourth on the team.

The last free kick was a shocker, but Weightman put in an excellent small forward’s performance in the wet and deserves all the plaudits coming his way.

Bevo’s selection risks paid off

The Dogs had commentators scratching their heads in the leadup, swinging multiple late changes that saw 2016 Norm Smith medallist Jason Johannisen relegated to the medical sub role in place of Josh Schache for just his fifth game of the season.

With wet weather forecast for the afternoon, the idea of omitting a pacy rebounding defender for a tall forward seemed like utter madness, but the selection risk paid off handsomely.

Schache playing forward stretched Essendon’s undersized defence too thin and, while they predictably only managed six marks inside 50 in the conditions, their separate leads created plenty of space for the small forwards to work with.

Weightman, as mentioned, kicked four, Mitch Hannan was able to slot two goals and Laitham Vandermeer added another in a superb effort from the forward group.

(Photo by Steve Bell/AFL Photos/via Getty Images)

But it wasn’t just a supporting role for the ex-Lion, Schache kicked two goals himself, while directly setting up Vandermeer for a crucial fourth-quarter major. His presence also took some attention off Aaron Naughton, allowing him to kick three.

Dermott Brereton noted as such in the Fox Footy commentary at half time.

“It’s just given them a bit better balance … Schache can lead-up at the footy and that’s given a bit more space to Naughton,” he said.

With Josh Bruce not coming back this year and his absence being sorely felt, perhaps plonking another key forward in the mix was the simple solution we all missed.

After seeing Ben Brown cause nightmares for Brisbane’s defence all night, you’d back Luke Beveridge to stick with a similar mix next week.

The Dogs played wet weather footy, the Dons didn’t

It took until the second half of the rain to really hit the deck in Tasmania’s north, but the big reason the half time margin of three points ballooned to 49 by the final siren was simple; only one team played to the conditions.

The Dogs have may gone taller in their forward line, but they were prepared to pick the ball up and run, find teammates by hand, whack the ball forward and emphasise territory over clean possession. That allowed them to send dangerous kicks deep into their forward line from good positions and, as aforementioned, use their height advantage to bring the ball to ground and kick goals.

Their huge advantages in contested possessions (+33), inside 50s (+11) and clearances (+10) for the half were a testament to their superior approach.

Essendon, on the other hand, stuck to their original gameplan. They continually kicked too long wherever they were on the ground in conditions that meant they simply weren’t going to mark it.

Long kicks out of defence were dropped in vulnerable field positions. Long kicks in the midfield fell too shallow inside 50 to be of any threat – especially given their forwards were set up far too deep to begin with.

It meant that Peter Wright, just weeks after kicking a bag of seven against the Bulldogs, went virtually unsighted – having just seven touches and failing to take a mark.

Jake Stringer, after a blistering two-goal first half, finished with just nine touches. Archie Perkins and Aaron Francis also finished with fewer than ten disposals.

It was a big contributor to Essendon being the first team since 1956 to go goalless in the second half of a final. Their forwards just weren’t given a chance.

Bombers left to rue squandered early dominance

At quarter time, the Bombers had a 10-3 lead in the intercept marks tally and had kept the Dogs from taking a single mark inside 50.

Marcus Bontempelli had been restricted to two disposals, Josh Dunkley had one and the Bulldogs had just nine tackles on the board.

But, despite all that, the Bombers found themselves down three points on the scoreboard.

Jake Stringer’s early goal was the only major they managed, with Zach Merrett, Will Snelling, Aaron Francis and Tom Cutler all misfiring – Francis’ miss being notably poor.

Quick goals to Devon Smith and Darcy Parish in the second quarter got them on top briefly, but again they could only manage 1.3 despite dominating the time-on period before half time.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

As we all know, the rain came down and washed the Bombers away from there – but who knows how different the match would have been if it was the Dons emerging from the sheds with a two or three goal lead?

Do the Dogs, under pressure to mount a proper comeback in the wet, start playing more recklessly and turn it over? We’ll never know, but the Bombers will have the next six months to think about it.

The Crowd Says:

2021-08-30T21:52:30+00:00

DingoGray

Roar Guru


Birchall doing my head in. There was talk about 10 weeks ago about him extending for another season. Since then he's fallen off the cliff. I hope the last month has convince Coach Chris to tap him on the shoulder and say thanks very much. Lester I'm not a fan of, he's my wiping boy.

2021-08-30T10:08:48+00:00

Thom Roker

Roar Guru


Mitch Cleary said on AFL Exchange that Grandad should pick Archie Smith in the ruck and send Oscar McInerney forward to offer a dynamic in the forward line. I don't hate the idea.

2021-08-30T09:51:49+00:00

Chanon

Roar Rookie


:laughing:

2021-08-30T09:49:10+00:00

Chanon

Roar Rookie


Dougie lots of Demon supporters that deserve some happiness!

2021-08-30T07:23:14+00:00

Thom Roker

Roar Guru


McStay could have chopped out, so there's another hole to fill. Grandad was quick to say Lester would come straight in. I like Payne. He's a big boy with a big presence, but Lester has the experience. I'd have them both and send Birchall into retirement. It's the best defence in the AFL and those boys are so big!

2021-08-30T06:17:43+00:00

Pumping Dougie

Roar Guru


Yep, he'll dominate Young but not English. English played significant time in the ruck on the weekend against Draper and did very well.

2021-08-30T05:35:09+00:00

DingoGray

Roar Guru


Lane was the mid season recruit haven't really seen much of him to be honest. By all accounts Henry Smith been going really well this year and surprised a few people with his development. But can't see him being brought in. I expect coach Chris to go stop gap- I wouldn't be surprised to see Lester & Payne to come in and then use Adams / Andrews as pinch hitters when Big O needs a rest.

2021-08-30T05:07:34+00:00

Thom Roker

Roar Guru


I'm a little surprised the Lions have persisted with Fullarton over Archie Smith for this long. They also have two young rucks they drafted named Henry Smith and Kalin Lane. Both Brisbane and Bulldogs missing Stef Martin.

2021-08-30T05:02:09+00:00

Thom Roker

Roar Guru


The Suns had Burgess and Graham in the ruck because they are good with 2nd efforts, but when the Big O cut loose he smashed out 12 clearances. He wasn't just dominant in the tapout, he was playing like a man possessed. Much as I like Young's effort, there's a match up issue.

2021-08-30T04:42:32+00:00

Naughty's Headband

Roar Rookie


Gleeson pushed Weightman. Doesn't matter if it's incidental, he still whacked him over the back of the head.

2021-08-30T04:41:50+00:00

Naughty's Headband

Roar Rookie


Draper didn't get run into.

2021-08-30T04:19:56+00:00

Charlie Keegan

Roar Guru


22-8

2021-08-30T04:19:38+00:00

Charlie Keegan

Roar Guru


Yeah difference is that’s the swans their game style lends themselves to conceding large amounts of free kicks

2021-08-30T04:14:16+00:00

nics

Roar Rookie


Ahh that's where I went wrong. Here i was thinking swallowing bleach and horse paste would do the job. This is what I get for listening to rotund men from Queensland and Florida who know more than medical experts.

2021-08-30T04:07:19+00:00

Thatsashame

Roar Rookie


Mix the jab with 5G. All your problems will be gone forever

2021-08-30T04:04:45+00:00

Thatsashame

Roar Rookie


It's not the amount...its where and how they get them. Don't forget it wasn't just the 5 direct goals, they missed another 2 or 3 shots on goal from direct free kicks. They could have had 8 goals just from free kicks. That's going to hurt any opposition team.

2021-08-30T04:02:55+00:00

Thatsashame

Roar Rookie


Great stat's by Dasher Parkin....every final they've played in the last 6 years they've smashes the free kick count. It's something like 150 for and 94 against. 2016 GF was 20 for and 8 to Swans. The bias is obvious

2021-08-30T04:01:37+00:00

Thatsashame

Roar Rookie


Yeah so Draper gets run into and he gets penalised. Joke. You didnt watch the game

2021-08-30T04:00:24+00:00

Thatsashame

Roar Rookie


You clearly didn't watch the game. None of them were there. And this article is wrong too as was Montagna. It's easy to say "well he still had to nail them" but that doesn't change the fact the Bulldogs were given this game by the umpires. When 5 of your 7 goals are all free kicks...youve had substantial help. Yes the Bombers should have kicked some if their easy shots but when momentum us everything in footy, and the Bombers had plenty if it, for the umpires to continually stop that momentum by giving the Dovgies free goals rips the heart out of a team. And if they're going to pay those pathetic free kicks, then give them to the other team. But as it always is with the Bulldogs...they have to win the free kicks every game they play, especially finals.

2021-08-30T03:40:07+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


Merrett clearly bumped so I assume then that you're talking about Gleeson? His hands were in the side and there was no weight to the contact. Cody went to ground because of the impact from Merrett, which was perfectly legitimate. 9 times out of 10 - at an absolute minimum - that's play on. And Draper was reaching for the footy when Weightman came up under his armpit. What the hell was he supposed to do? It was incidental contact. Weightman wasn't even expecting a free kick for that. Stop conflating the issue of the free kicks with the result of the game. It's entirely possible to acknowledge that the Dogs were the better team and deserved the win, while simultaneously being annoyed about poor umpiring in a do-or-die final in wet conditions. There was just nothing in those decisions. Any fan would be disappointed with calls like those going against their side, regardless of the result.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar