Test cricket needs free hit rule to cut down on no-balls and time wasting

By Paul Suttor / Expert

The time has come for the ICC to bring in the free hit to Test cricket.

It won’t go down well with the traditionalists/purists/nuffies who resist change but a free hit would help alleviate two of the biggest problems in the Test arena – slow over rates and no-balls.

As it stands, umpires on the field basically don’t even look at the front foot of a bowler and will only call a no-ball well after the delivery has been sent down after getting a tip-off from the third umpire.

That is when the technology is fully operational. We saw what happened in Brisbane during the First Ashes Test when that option is not available – Ben Stokes was not told he was overstepping the crease, he did so when he got David Warner out, the third umpire overturned the dismissal and the Australian opener added another 77 runs to his tally.

On day one of the Second Test in Adelaide, the tech was doing its job but it’s still a meh solution.

The on-field umpires were giving “posthumous” no-balls to the Australian side when the ball was well and truly dead.

Apart from the standard one extra run for the indiscretion, there was no benefit to the batting side.

The bowler rebowled the delivery and the game continued on. And of course that wasted more time when it happened at the end of the over and everyone had to get back into place for the seventh ball.

The ICC can go a long way towards fixing this blight on the game by making the next delivery after a no-ball an automatic free hit as has been the case in the white-ball arena since 2007.

That would discourage bowlers, the seamers in particular, to ensure they keep some part of their front foot behind the line as soon as they come into the attack. They could even get their teammate at mid-on or mid-off to station themselves right in line and let them know if they’re overstepping the mark as an extra safeguard.

The smart ones already measure their run-up to the centimetre before the start of play and have their precise starting point spray-painted at the top of their mark.

A free hit would also reward the batter because they no longer have the benefit of the umpire calling no-ball as soon as they notice an infraction.

Former Australian captain Ricky Ponting admitted in Seven commentary during the First Test commentary that during his illustrious career he didn’t think he ever changed a shot after hearing an umpire call a no-ball. Clearly, that system doesn’t work.

Bringing in a free hit to increase the penalty on bowlers will also help the ICC fight the scourge of slow over rates.

England were fined their entire match fees (some would say fittingly because they played like amateurs) and docked five World Test Championship points after their abysmal over rates in the First Test.

Apart from opener Haseeb Hameed, all the other players are on central contracts with the ECB with some also raking in cash from T20 contracts as well as county deals.

Making a minor dent in the hip pocket is no disincentive at all. If you need further proof, when they selected their team for the next game in Adelaide they went with a bowling attack of five seamers, leaving out their only spinner Jack Leach (although to be fair his overs probably took longer than the pacemen at the Gabba due to the time it took to retrieve his deliveries from the multi-coloured seats in the grandstands).

Shane Warne is on the MCC’s world cricket committee and solving the problem by banning the skipper from the next Test is on their agenda.

(Photo by Quinn Rooney/Getty Images)

“A lot of us on that committee have talked about not having a fine for over rates but the captain misses the next game because if you don’t bowl your overs in time, the financial penalties don’t seem to be working, they haven’t been working for a while,” he said on Fox Cricket.

“If the captain doesn’t play the next Test match after you don’t get through your overs in time, you watch them get through their overs.

“It’s such a big issue in the game. It’s every game, every single form of the game, especially Test cricket, so you’ve got to do something drastic to make your point and make a statement to every team player.

“If you do that every other captain will say I can’t miss the next game.”

England were again well below the required over rate in Adelaide – they needed the extra half hour at the end of the day and even then still finished one over short of the 90 they were supposed to bowl.

It’s not just the bowling side which stretches the rules – Ricky Ponting was joking on Seven commentary in the last over before the first session that batters always seem to have untied shoelaces as they try to ensure there are no more overs before the break. David Warner was checking his guard and wandering away from his crease a little more than usual between balls during this over – umpires should be stepping in and stopping this kind of gamesmanship.

Former ICC umpire of the year Simon Taufel believes the administrators, umpires and players all need to work together to speed up the game. He believes most of the time that’s wasted each day occurs between overs and reckons wicketkeepers should set the tone by running to their new position.

That sort of talk has been going on for decades but nothing has changed.

Warne again: “It’s not so much how long it takes to bowl the over, it’s the fluffing around between overs, they talk and have a meeting at the top with three or four players. There’s just a lot of meandering and wasted time of just waffling around.”

His Fox Cricket co-commentator Mike Hussey said batters like Steve Smith constantly changing his gloves should also be stopped from doing so at regular intervals.

Test cricket needs a circuit-breaker to fix the time-wasting issues. Change the venerable Laws of Cricket – bring in the free hit and you can be sure that all of a sudden, fast bowlers will make sure they do everything they can to ensure they don’t overstep the mark.

And if the free hit doesn’t get bowling teams to change their ways, dock them five penalty runs on the hour or at the end of each session when they’re behind on the over rates – that will speed the game up for sure and certain.

“Another suggestion was runs to the opposition so that for every over you’re down, 25 runs go to the opposition, straight away, just put them on the extras,” Warne added.

The time has come to stop wasting it.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

The Crowd Says:

2021-12-19T01:57:59+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


In the two Tests to date, Australia has bowled exactly one no-ball. England bowled double that number in the second innings run chase of 19 at the Gabba. One team has made a conscious effort to do something about this issue and the other is a work in progress. That doesn't mean a Law needs to be changed. It means one side needs to get it's cat together.

2021-12-17T23:09:38+00:00

Jacko

Roar Rookie


Yours was very weak soc. Proving the feebleness of your mind right there. And I certainly dont find you Cute.... Im attracted to a strong mind not a soggy weetbix mind....

2021-12-17T21:53:43+00:00

RT

Roar Rookie


Well said Akitas. When an author starts out like this, he would want to have a pretty convincing argument, but in case he failed badly.

2021-12-17T12:44:00+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


fair enough. just seems like there were were a few that led to free hits

2021-12-17T12:35:32+00:00

Son of Coco

Guest


Lol. When the feeble minded resort to that as a comeback... Cute

2021-12-17T12:34:02+00:00

Son of Coco

Guest


It's what the final word podcast said. I remember a few no balls being waste high, not front foot

2021-12-17T06:34:41+00:00

Big Daddy

Roar Rookie


The umpires themselves are part of the problem . Long winded decisions on reviews which tend to take all day and then explaining the decision to either side . For as long as I can remember has a batting side ever copped a fine .

2021-12-17T04:31:16+00:00

AndyS

Guest


Like I said...ask Robinson whether the free hit would hurt more and change things more than giving Labuschagne yet another reprieve.

2021-12-17T04:22:21+00:00

Atgm Shags

Roar Rookie


Sounds too complicated. What about a trip to the gulag

2021-12-17T03:52:45+00:00

Akitas

Roar Rookie


"It won’t go down well with the traditionalists/purists/nuffies who resist change" When you commence your argument with such a dismissive statement as this, I am inclined to read no further. Nevertheless, I did, and I think the free hit idea is nonsense in Test cricket, and for that matter also in the beach cricket and backyard cricket forms called limited overs and T20. The batsman already has the advantage of a run added to the team score and an additional ball from which he can score. That is, of course, if the umpires are actually doing their job. As for time wasting, it is a blight on the game, and the Poms have been masters at it for years. That's not to say every other team is innocent either, and then there is the "unintentional" time wasting carried out by batsmen like Smith with all that stupid fidgeting and gear adjustments after every ball.

2021-12-17T03:24:03+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


No, you are absolutely correct. The bowling side has an incentive to bowl 35 overs in the last session by taking the extra half hour.

2021-12-17T03:16:34+00:00

Jacko

Roar Rookie


Yes very few people like their superiors. Most are civil to them tho eh.

2021-12-17T03:09:11+00:00

Son of Coco

Guest


I don't like you and you're not worth my civility tbh.

2021-12-17T02:53:19+00:00

Tony

Roar Guru


I like it

2021-12-17T02:22:52+00:00

Nat

Roar Guru


I agree and that's already a (largely discarded) rule: be ready when the bowler is ready. Again, it's up to the umpire to ensure the batsman is ready. That's the premise, instead of fines and points penalties, just tell them both to go. They all know the rules.

2021-12-17T02:09:23+00:00

Brian

Guest


The problem with all the rules that penalise the bowling team is that the batsman waste time too. So many glove changes, drinks and batsman reviews. It really needs to be up to the umpires to move the game along. Essentially needs a shot clock, ball the bowl or we just give the batsman 6; be ready to face the ball or you get timed out. I believe there is a clock on the next batsman getting to the crease after a dismissal.

2021-12-17T02:05:43+00:00

Paul

Roar Rookie


Add runs per over for the innings x overs not bowled. Could always do a Duckworth Lewis like sliding scale according to wickets in hand.

2021-12-17T02:03:37+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


"England in ODI’s between mid 2015 and the conclusion of the 2019 world cup didn’t bowl a single no ball because of the consequences of a free hit" They were the only team to bowl a no ball in the World Cup final. They bowled 6 no balls in the 4 match series against the West Indies prior to the WC. They bowled no balls on their tour of Australia the summer before that. Their home summer in 2017 four months before the Australian tour, they bowled 5 no balls. ???

2021-12-17T02:01:32+00:00

AndyS

Guest


Don't see any particular need to change the no-ball rules. Important thing is that it gets reviewed if there is a wicket. Nothing hurts more than having the batsman called back. Do need to keep the pressure on over rate though. If batsmen are slowing things down the umpires need to step in, so that it is all on the bowling side. Sometimes conditions will conspire against them; tough luck, that's the game. More usually it is entirely within their control...I remember how Ponting had an issue with it, but couldn't see how a 30 second chat with the bowler every over had such an impact.

2021-12-17T01:39:29+00:00

Censored Often

Roar Rookie


If you don't bowl your overs in an day the batting team gets one batsman to bat again. Batting side's choice. That should hurry the slow kids up a bit.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar