MICHAEL HAGAN: Coaches have a point about bunker interference - it can make your blood boil

By Michael Hagan / Expert

It’s impossible to know the pressure an NRL coach is under unless you’ve been in that pressure-cooker environment.

That old saying, it can make your blood boil. It’s true. There were many times when I was coaching Newcastle and Parramatta when things were not going our way that I could feel the blood in my veins reaching that point.

Which is not to excuse coaches for having a spray at refs or the bunker or anyone else, it’s just the way it makes you feel. 

It’s hard to convey just how emotionally invested you are in a game. Let alone trying to understand the enormous frustration of the fans when several contentious calls seem to go against their team.

And it’s no coincidence that the coaches who are the ones venting their frustration at the refs in post-match media conferences are the ones who’ve just lost a game.

I have heard a few classic old sayings during my time as a player and coach like “winning isn’t everything, it’s the only thing” and “show me a good loser and I’ll show you an idiot” or “football isn’t a matter of life and death, it’s much more serious”.

(Photo by Ian Hitchcock/Getty Images)

This is the environment you are in. Everything’s at stake.

We’ve already seen a few examples of coaches reacting to decisions under pressure in the first two rounds of the NRL season.

They all had a point but it’s not always the best option to be complaining about every decision after a game, especially after a loss.

I got fined $5000 for a spray at a ref back in 2006 for a game we lost to Manly when Andrew Johns also blew up about a forward pass call.

Since I’ve stopped coaching I haven’t ever lost my temper anywhere like what I did when I was in that role – not with friends, family or driving in traffic. 

One of the things I see today’s coaches getting angry about is the influence of the bunker and they’ve got a point.

When the NRL first started using video review more than 20 years ago it was only for a few certain parts of whether a try was scored or not.

Nowadays the bunker is having its say on every aspect of whether a try was scored as well as many parts of the game in general play, plus we’ve also got independent doctors in the bunker with a direct line to the stadium to say whether players should come off the field.

Because we’ve gone back to one referee it has become so hard for that person to adjudicate everything they need to on the field and to have someone in their ear throughout a game. They have so much more to look after these days and the captains now have the option to challenge decisions via the bunker as well.

The bunker is a necessary evil – you can’t leave the referee on their own out there because they get crucified when they make mistakes but as is the case with most things in our sport, balance is the key.

We need to make sure the obvious decisions are correct as top priority. Some parts of the game are black and white, and as long as the officials get those ones right, then most coaches, players and fans won’t blow their top.

And then there are always going to be grey areas. Everyone is going to have an opinion on them and the parties on each side of a 50-50 call can make a case why they’re correct but ultimately, a decision needs to be made.

A perfect example of this is the Herbie Farnworth try by the Broncos against Canterbury on Sunday night at Accor Stadium.

Bulldogs coach Trent Barrett thought it shouldn’t have been a try because the Brisbane decoy runner went through on the outside shoulder of his defender but the bunker used discretion to say they didn’t think Braidon Burns was impeded to an extent that it mattered. 

The game has taken a strong stance on this issue and under the new interpretation of it (whether we like it or not) it should have been pulled back.

There was another one where a strip was ruled as a one-on-one because the other two Broncos players had dropped off a tackle and the Canterbury player relaxed thinking the tackle was complete.

One of the first things I was taught as a young Bulldog back in the early 1980s when Warren Ryan was the coach it was no matter what, you never let go of the ball and that was back in the day when you could get stripped of possession in a gang tackle when defenders would do all sorts of unsavoury things to you.

Teig Wilton tackles Mitch Moses mid-air. (Fox League)

The game has never had greater safety measures and concussion protocols in place to protect the players despite Parramatta complaining about a lack of protection for Mitchell Moses. However, we are still experiencing a few teething problems during some games but the Match Review Committee process catches nearly anyone who offends.

Teig Wilton should have been sin-binned for his late tackle on Eels half Mitch Moses on Saturday but the Sharks forward was still charged and has been suspended for one game so even if the officials get it wrong during a game like this when they only awarded a penalty, there are still things in place to ensure the player doesn’t get off scot free.

We’re still going to get some things wrong, irrespective of what the technology can bring to the game. 

But will fans, players and coaches accept that? When your blood is boiling and your job is on the line, it’s not so easy to let a bad decision slide.

var request = new XMLHttpRequest();

request.open('POST', '/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php', true); request.setRequestHeader('Content-Type', 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded;'); request.onload = function () { if (this.status >= 200 && this.status

The Crowd Says:

2022-03-24T05:33:49+00:00

Choppy Zezers

Roar Rookie


Imagine how long a set would take against the Storm. They would hold down for an hour every tackle, then claim that everyone does it

2022-03-24T03:23:57+00:00

mach4

Roar Rookie


That would be fun, with no refs and no limit captain's challenges. LOL

2022-03-23T11:11:41+00:00

Big Daddy

Roar Rookie


Most fan's can live with an incorrect decision now and again . With all the modern technology one of the biggest gripes is forward passed and has been for a number of years . The linesman these days can't even see if someone has put their foot into touch and it's right in front of them . They can see everything else but no-one going into touch or forward passes . Yet we hear from Annesley every Monday . I believe Vlandys now wants to change the scrums . Today's scrums have no impact whatsover on games yet they still want to tinker with things . Vlandys might have his head around the commercial side of things but why on earth does a chairman of the board need to stick his head into the rules . He should leave it up to people who have experience in it or are they too scared to say anything . He's starting to kill the basics . Why on earth to they have a rules committee as he's running roughshod over all of them .

2022-03-23T10:19:01+00:00

Nathan Absalom

Roar Guru


Nah, should be reserved for minor infringements like an incorrect play the ball, the lock of the attacking side failing to remain bound before the ball passes the second row or the tackled player not playing the ball on the specific blade of grass they were tackled on. We could call it the Barry Gomersall memorial bunker...

2022-03-23T08:56:49+00:00

Succhi

Roar Rookie


I have no problem with the decisions- it the number or replays, the commentary and scrutiny of it all.

2022-03-23T08:47:55+00:00

Adam

Roar Guru


The TMO is a different kettle of fish entirely. But the touchies are genuinely involved as officials, not just flag waving pedestrians

2022-03-23T07:48:18+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Agreed. How many times have you watched a footy game at the pub with mates and everyone has agreed on any call It’s crazy to think that with something as subjective as a loose / carry strip decision that a referee can ever get it ‘right’ even with multiple replays. There often is no right answer

2022-03-23T07:43:10+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Agreed. I don’t mind the initiative itself But the pantomime is absurd. The ref awards the try. The video ref looks at it. Then suddenly the ref blows time out and says somethings like “Shorty, need you to have a look at grounding” and then the video refs looks at it a few times so we can all catch up…

2022-03-23T06:34:21+00:00

Tony

Roar Guru


:laughing:

2022-03-23T06:28:16+00:00

Choppy Zezers

Roar Rookie


Quality rant Rob. I checked with the bunker and they confirmed my original decision after 25 minutes and viewing your comments from 19 different angles at various speeds See, the bunker works

2022-03-23T06:25:35+00:00

Choppy Zezers

Roar Rookie


1. Get rid of referees?

2022-03-23T06:24:52+00:00

Choppy Zezers

Roar Rookie


What about groundings and knock ons leading to tries? Sure it's like watching a caterpillar trying to wriggle out of bubble wrap but if it benefits my team at least 99.9% of the time I can live with it.

2022-03-23T06:05:03+00:00

Red Rob

Roar Rookie


LoL you're right, Tom. But to be fair, if I knew the bunker was going to make the ultimate ruling anyway, would I stick my neck out just to be proved wrong. Not sure I would.

2022-03-23T06:02:43+00:00

Red Rob

Roar Rookie


I wouldn't be offering up rugby as any sort of example for good refereeing systems atm, Adam. Every second comment on the super rugby game blogs has something unkind to say about them. It seems the rugby bunker (TMO) is becoming increasingly intrusive to the point of overstepping. Totally agree that the touchies could do more to help. Maybe they're becomig less assertive because they know the bunker is there?

2022-03-23T04:04:15+00:00

Rob

Guest


My blood boils watching the blatantly obvious ignored whilst they then take 16 replays from 10 angles to find some magical vision they sell to disprove the obvious. Use it for a quick check and if it’s an obvious mistake help the official on the park out. If not let the game move along. The Oats obstruction was the absolute definition of a decoy obstruction. Far out they let it go because they’re to busy looking at the scoreboard IMO. They then take an eternity to look at something 10 times then have a guess against the bloke in the middle. If you’re thinking maybe, just let go? If you’re seeing an obvious mistake then over rule. Support will argue 50/50 calls but which is alright it’s BS to not see the obvious. Sometimes I wonder if they over think it or completely miss the button they were trying to press?

2022-03-23T03:42:26+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


Serious foul play and try/no try. That should be the extent of it.

2022-03-23T03:16:00+00:00

Big Daddy

Roar Rookie


To be honest rugby league is a pretty simple game and each year we have the NRL constantly trying to change rules which really doesn't need it . Their perception is to fasten the game up to make it more attractive to the fans but it's rule changing to suit their own agenda . Make it attractive to watch and the fans will come back . At the moment players and coaches are scratching their heads trying to look at alternatives to combat some of these rule changes .

2022-03-23T02:40:40+00:00

Tom G

Roar Rookie


The scoring if a try should never ever be subjected to stop frame scrutiny. Sure look at all angles and slow it down a bit but looking at still frames for microscopic separation is a farce. The game is played in real time

2022-03-23T01:49:06+00:00

DP Schaefer

Roar Rookie


3. Get rid of Annesley or at least his woeful explanations. Doesn’t know what a forward pass or momentum implies.

2022-03-23T01:47:51+00:00

DP Schaefer

Roar Rookie


That's the NRL leader's fault for not sticking up for them. Remember the purge that started in 2018 that didn't last? Was the closest comp until the NRL blinked and let the coaches/clubs loose again.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar