The AFL fails the game - again

By Les Zig / Roar Guru

It’s never a surprise when the AFL is pissweak and selective about on-field indiscretions.

There is no consistency, although it seems there should be.

In today’s landscape, the head’s sacrosanct. It must be protected at all costs. That’s why bumps are effectively outlawed. That’s why the sling tackle’s considered so dangerous. But a strike to the back of the head? Hmm, well, that’s not quite as bad.

Towards the end of the third quarter in Saturday’s Richmond-Collingwood clash, Tiger defender Rhyan Mansell fell into the back of Magpie forward Jack Ginnivan. Mansell drove a forearm into the back of Ginnivan’s head – that first blow might’ve been accidental, a result of momentum.

But then Mansell did it again intentionally.

And the response to it?

Richmond coach Damien Hardwick didn’t think anything of it. “End of the day, I didn‘t notice it compared to any other player,” he said in his post-game press conference. “But we want our small backs to be physical and like most other backs in the AFL, they’d be doing exactly the same.”

Well, he’s trying to prejudice the context to make sure that we all know that, hey, it’s tough out there, and sometimes things happen. Um, okay.

“He’ll cop a fine or a week for that – probably a fine because it was low impact,” commentator Jason Dunstall said during the game.

Low impact?

This seems to be the media’s response. Certainly, nobody’s highlighted it and talked about it with the gravity that it deserves.

(Photo by Michael Willson/AFL Photos via Getty Images)

Let’s take a step back here: what would my punishment be if I walked into a bar, had a heated verbal exchange with somebody, and when they weren’t looking decided to strike them in the back of the head? Could I go to court and argue, “Hey, it’s low impact”?

Years ago, this type of attack was branded a “king hit”. Then there was a rightly a push to de-glamorise it. “King hit” sounded noble. It had a majesty about it. Nope – it had to be branded for what it was. It then became the “coward’s punch”, which was much more fitting. Tragically, there are a litany of examples of people who’ve been struck this way, and then suffered serious injuries or died later.

Nobody should be finding this defensible.

I’m unsure why the AFL doesn’t categorise these incidents as the worst of the worst.

The way I break it down is there are three types of indiscretions in Australian Rules.

1. Acts the AFL are trying to police out of the game, such as the bump (to the head) and the sling tackle
2. Acts that are a result of incidental contact, e.g. a late spoil that collects an opponent in the face
3. Acts off the ball, or acts of pure thuggery, e.g. a strike.

The last should always be considered worse. They’re not football choices that are mistimed (e.g. a late spoil) or that have gone wrong (a bump that’s collected the face of an opponent).

It’s a conscious choice that a player makes in that moment to hurt an opponent. There’s no rationale or excuse for it. They’re the one act that you can parallel with wilful and violent behaviour anywhere. These decisions have no place in life, let alone football.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

Some will counter that Jack Ginnivan got under Mansell’s skin, or that Ginnivan’s so annoying it’s unsurprising he got some sort of comeuppance. Defences such as this are victim blaming. If Hardwick can argue it’s the job of his defenders to be physical, then surely Ginnivan can be annoying and try put them off the game.

If the AFL truly is intent on cleaning up the game, acts like this should not only be punished, they should be punished so heavily that it becomes an immediate deterrent. No player in any league should ever think for an instant that this is okay.

Rhyan Mansell might be a young player still finding his way in the game, but that’s all the more reason this is where the line should be drawn.

The AFL should not only be taking a tough stance, they should be sending a message to footballers everywhere that this behaviour is unacceptable.

Uh-uh. One week. That’s the penalty.

I guess the AFL will just wait until somebody does seriously get hurt before they take real action.

The Crowd Says:

2022-05-12T05:24:20+00:00

RT

Roar Rookie


Interesting admission. Les had only one thought in a two year period. At least that's what 80 consecutive Collingwood articles saying the same thing would suggest.

2022-05-11T09:52:55+00:00

pablocruz

Roar Rookie


Easy there, Tiger.

2022-05-10T07:47:59+00:00

Peter the Scribe

Roar Guru


Yeah a "king hit" is more what Matthews did to Bruns or what Barry Hall did. Andrew Gaff too has to be included in that group sadly.

2022-05-10T05:49:59+00:00

Jimmy Woods

Roar Rookie


Love it Les Zig, that Richmond turd should get life! What a dog act, it’s worse than a sling tackle or accidental hit to the head, like poor old Paddy Ryder getting done for nothing, so your point is well made I reckon.

2022-05-10T03:01:31+00:00

Spanner

Roar Rookie


Well said :thumbup:

2022-05-10T02:42:46+00:00

Brendon the 1st

Roar Rookie


Talk s#@t, get hit. Bring back the biff I say, one week is fine, move on. I played all my footy in the nineties, had no problem with a bit of biffo, still happily played every week, not saying we should allow UFC on the field, but I do miss blokes belting people from time to time, eg- Scarlo punching that little flea Ballantyne, good stuff. This whole article is alarmist and the usual sook from Les.

2022-05-09T23:57:07+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Roar Rookie


The AFL is nothing if not consistently inconsistent. Zak Jones tunnelled a Melbourne player in a manner not dissimilar to Nick Larkey the week before. Larkey got a week. I don't think Jones even got cited.

2022-05-09T21:51:52+00:00

George Apps

Roar Rookie


Worst rule I've ever seen - umpire dissent my arse!

2022-05-09T21:47:35+00:00

George Apps

Roar Rookie


Right on Les, I agree, especially about the AFL being arseholes! As far as Ginnivan being annoying, that's part of the game and the way he plays. It's a good thing he has a hard head or that would go straight to the tribunal!

2022-05-09T21:38:12+00:00

.kraM

Roar Rookie


Shades of golden boy Rance introducing his forearm to Watts’ noggin. The Richmond Special.

2022-05-09T12:55:13+00:00

Dusty does Danger

Roar Rookie


Amazing how we condone disrespectful behaviour and trash talk by the little ?!$@. The thing is because he is on thé field he thinks he can get away with disrespectful toilet waste coming out of his mouth, when in fact, if he was in public his head would be taken off. Mansell knew he was in the seconds next week, hoping to give him a fat lip to keep his mouth closed :thumbup:

2022-05-09T12:44:10+00:00

Dusty does Danger

Roar Rookie


Tuddy, your getting soft in your old age. In your day you would of whacked the little t..d in the chops for disrespecting!

2022-05-09T12:42:11+00:00

Dusty does Danger

Roar Rookie


As Reg Reagan would say - Bring back the Biff!

2022-05-09T12:40:15+00:00

Dusty does Danger

Roar Rookie


Nothing comes soft out of Port Adelaide!

2022-05-09T11:51:20+00:00

1dawg

Roar Rookie


No need for Expression of violence. All we need is Love.

2022-05-09T09:21:05+00:00

Tuddy

Guest


Les always says what I’m thinking

2022-05-09T09:02:20+00:00

Mr Right

Roar Rookie


Nice article Les. I would much prefer the AFL clamp down on foul play rather than awarding 50 metres for players spreading their arms out in disappointment when they are penalised in a line ball decision.

2022-05-09T07:15:26+00:00

pablocruz

Roar Rookie


Likening this to a 'king hit'? Bwahahahaha. That's enough to make me wet myself, Les. Get real. He copped a week, fair call, move on.

2022-05-09T06:44:33+00:00

Dusty does Danger

Roar Rookie


Don’t know what your on about Les! freedom of expression - young love. I believe he told Ginnivan to pull his head or else he would love to put it in the turf of the MCG.

2022-05-09T06:24:11+00:00

1dawg

Roar Rookie


Should be 2 week’s minimum

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar