The Wrap: Two different ways to skin a cat as Wallabies and Springboks draw first blood

By Geoff Parkes / Expert

You would have thought the rugby pitches used in Mendoza and Mbombela on the weekend were a different size. On one, players were able to kick, run and pass into space; on the other, it was as if every blade of grass was spoken for.

More on how the Springboks denied the All Blacks space and time on their way to a dominant 26-10 win, later.

The Wallabies’ 41-26 bonus-point victory over Argentina signalled an emerging maturity, which bodes well for the continuing development of Dave Rennie’s side.

Argentina brought it early, Pablo Matera scoring off an inside ball after a late-arriving Alan Ala’alatoa was left with too much space to fill, one man off the ruck.

But despite the early concession, and a half-time deficit of 19-10, there was never a sense of panic or disorganisation, and the Wallabies – helped by impetus from a superior bench, and reversing the penalty count – finished the match off impressively.

Rebuilding from the 2019 World Cup disappointment, there can be no doubt about the strength of character Rennie has welded into this side. Test matches have been won with 14 men, and despite Australian rugby not having the depth of talent of some other leading nations, a steady stream of injuries to important players has been met with squad men stepping up and doing a job.

Only those in the inner sanctum will truly know the impact that Michael Hooper’s late withdrawl had on the psyche of the team. The easy thing to say is that it had a galvanising and inspirational effect, with players rolling their sleeves up an extra inch to get it done for their wounded leader.

But these were not the same circumstances as Hooper tweaking a hammy and limping off the training track. Teammates would quite reasonably have been reflecting and processing and the reasons behind Hooper’s withdrawl, to the point of questioning the team environment and their own feelings and perspective on life as a rugby professional.

Throw in the loss of the team’s playmaker Quade Cooper – who looked to be in fine fettle – and a lesser side would have been entitled to lose focus. Instead, it was Argentina who foundered.

In a frustrating first half, many of the familiar Wallabies trademarks were in evidence; soft penalties for offside, tackling while on the ground and a pass to an unmarked man finding the touchline instead going to hand.

What was different this time however, was the Wallabies not doubling down on their shortcomings. Their second-half set-piece execution was sharper, and most of the lazy discipline issues were dealt with.

Quade Cooper  (Photo by Daniel Jayo/Getty Images)

Best of all, the Wallabies played smart. Nic White often directed play down a loaded blind-side, enabling the Wallabies to find a rhythm that suited them, and which eventually drew penalties from referee Mike Adamson; a man not averse to handing them out.

Even though there were 30 penalties blown in total, there was a sense of Adamson enjoying himself and, unlike the players who were exhausted at full-time, still having a few more left in him!

Coming out of the half-time reset, good decisions were made by the Wallabies. Goals were kicked when it was right to do so and, in a Brumbies-like way, the try-line was found three times from attacking lineouts.

That clarity in decision-making extended beyond the 80 minutes. With the option available to end the game at any point, the Wallabies – admittedly with the security of an 8-point lead – put it on themselves to extract a bonus point from the match.

With both teams having run themselves to a standstill, it was Len Ikitau whose name went on the scoresheet, although the real value wasn’t the extra ladder point. The combination of fatigued starters and cold bench players trying too hard to impress often leads to messy outcomes, but the self-belief and confidence the Wallabies will take from executing under these conditions cannot be overstated.

Of the starters, Rob Valetini found himself engaged earlier and more often than he was able to achieve against England, and while Hunter Paisami isn’t Samu Kerevi, he showed nuances to his game that nicely complemented his usual fizz.

Both late replacements, Folau Fainga’a and Fraser McReight, grew nicely into the match, and Reece Hodge did exactly what was required of a bench player covering six positions. There is a lot to like too, about how Tom Wright is gaining in confidence at the back and how he is starting to demonstrate some deft distribution skills.

At halfback, White was the archetypical Jekyll and Hyde; gaining massive chunks of territory with some impressive kicking, before giving away successive penalties for nothing more than losing his composure.

Nic White (Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

While the Pumas’ bench couldn’t foot it with the visitors, theirs was by no means a poor performance. The 9-point half-time lead was well deserved, and the flowing counter-attack try scored by Juan Martin Gonzales, sparked by winger Santiago Cordero, was an absolute beauty.

Flyhalf Santiago Carreras impressed in the opening forty, only to prove the age-old adage in the second half, that a flyhalf can only influence proceedings as much as his forward pack provides him with the platform to do so.

Argentina will be disappointed by the flow of penalties against them in the second half, which is about the only area where the two Test matches aligned. It is clearer than ever that in modern rugby, no side can afford to allow penalties to accumulate on top of each other.

Whether those penalties are a result of pressure forcing mistakes and desperate reactions, or the other way around, is really of little consequence. What matters – as the All Blacks found out to their detriment – is that if you’re on the wrong side of the first five penalties, you have no hope of achieving anything like the positive start that they would have spoken about all week.

With the Springboks so ruthlessly efficient, the opening turned on the tiniest of detail. In his haste to rush up and cause havoc, Faf de Klerk knocked himself out and the All Blacks, in possession, were forced to go to a scrum re-start after de Klerk was attended to. A free kick for an early engagement later, they were pinned in their defensive half, where they were to spend most of the next forty minutes.

What was particularly fascinating about this battle was that there were no surprises. It was clear before the match what both sides would bring, and so it proved. It was thus down to who could best impose their style on the other.

In reality, this was always going to be the Springboks, because their game plan has the fewest moving parts, and it is second nature for the same group of players who have been delivering it for the last three years.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

When the motivation levels are set right – which they invariably are against the All Blacks – an uncompromising set piece, contestable high kicking, high-pressure defence, and accumulation of points on offer all add up to a bullet-proof strategy.

Near their best, the Springboks acted like a vacuum packing machine, sucking all of the space from the pitch. That the All Blacks knew exactly what was coming at them made little difference, because so much of their physical and mental energy needed to be devoted to countering the Springboks.

In that respect, the All Blacks were manful; both their scrum and lineout more than functional, and their first-up tackling much improved from what they showed against Ireland.

The Springboks were far better equipped to deal with what they knew was coming to them. Forced to live off scraps and half-chances, at no stage in the match were the All Blacks able to mount any concerted pressure in the attacking zone.

Call this the deadly triumvirate; ill-discipline, skill errors at vital moments, and not enough heads up play to direct runners away from wherever Malcolm Marx was stationed.

Marx, quite deservedly took all of the plaudits in his 50th test match. But it was the set-up of the defensive line – subtly forcing ball carriers into seams where their support runners can become disconnected, and the quality of the first-up tackling – that laid all of the groundwork.

In truth, South Africa’s compressed defence has troubled New Zealand for years. It can be worked around if the initial ball transfers are slick and secure, and there are runners coming into the space at pace and on the right angle.

But the All Blacks’ passing execution and handling is not what it was. And shown ‘fools’ gold’ on the outside, the way around it is never to lob high, loopy passes; the kind which made a career for Bryan Habana on the intercept, or which simply allow defenders to slide across and force runners over the touchline.

To their credit, the All Blacks on a few occasions did look for inside runners, but it’s one thing to bend the wall of steel and another thing to be able to break it.

Other concerns? Beauden Barrett pop-gunning hard won penalty kicks no more than 20m down the touchline, simply doesn’t cut it any more. With Codie Taylor and Dane Coles’ error rate off the chart, Samisoni Taukei’aho must be invested in fully and a demand made of Asafo Aumua that he realise his early potential.

That same urgent reassessment must be made at tight head; nobody believes that new assistant coach Jason Ryan is turning Angus Ta’avao and Tyrell Lomax into World Cup winning props.

(Photo by Getty Images)

But that’s getting beyond the here and now. What the All Blacks can work on before next week is a counter to the contestable Springboks kicking game; safe in the knowledge that there will be more of the same thrown at them at Ellis Park.

Fifteen times the Springboks lobbed the ball up high as an offensive tactic. Seven balls were contested and won – including the try to Kurt-Lee Arendse – four were contested and won by the All Blacks, and four were too deep to be properly contested.

That ratio really tells the story of the Test match; the Boks recovering half of their kicks with the All Blacks’ defence out of formation or, in the case of the other half, giving up possession only where they had the All Blacks were corralled into parts of the field where they offered no threat.

As if to hammer home the clinical nature of this aerial assault, it was no coincidence that not a single kick was sent in the direction of Will Jordan; identified as New Zealand’s most potent attacking weapon, and frozen right out of the match.

By contrast, New Zealand kicked only three times in similar situations, none of which were able to be contested, let alone recovered. In fact, the only kick contested and recovered was from a kick-off, by Caleb Clarke. Slim pickings indeed.

If the All Blacks are to do anything next week, they simply must find a way to keep the Springboks guessing, or turn some of that same pressure back on them.

Nearing the end of the match, one of the nine contestable kicks from halfback Jaden Hendrikse led to an ugly incident; Arendse charging into Beauden Barrett as he leapt to catch the ball, flipping Barrett and causing him to land on his head, from a height.

(Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

Players at all levels of the game have done well in recent years to remove what was a blight on the game; attacking players running recklessly into contests like this at pace, claiming no intent to injure, while doing just that.

Arendse was a fine contributor to this match, but this was an awful action which has no part in the game. His suspension should be lengthy, and will be well deserved, but if it makes other players at all levels think more carefully about how and when to enter the catching zone, perhaps some good will come of it.

This incident also makes a mockery of the 20-minute red card pushed for so hard by Australia and New Zealand. Rugby must always retain the ability to send players off for the whole time remaining in the match, and punish sides numerically, when there are fouls as serious as this one.

As for the future of New Zealand rugby, beyond all of the noise and exhortations from fans and media for the coach’s head to be delivered on a platter, the immediate prognosis actually looks quite straightforward.

Another loss in Johannesburg will mark the end of Foster’s run with the All Blacks; a win will potentially rank as one of the All Blacks’ greatest comebacks, and will buy him at least the rest of the Rugby Championships.

In the meantime, there is a sense that impossibly high expectations are being set for Scott Robertson. But that’s a story for another day.

The Crowd Says:

2022-08-10T00:04:52+00:00

Suzy Poison

Guest


Way off James. Have you seen the draw. Pools A and Pool B will destroy each other. They contain France, AB's in Pool A and Ireland and Boks in Pool B. But the semifinals two of these four teams will be gone. Correct Mzilikazi. Bookies have Boks at tie 3rd place with England for WC. France clear favourites. I think England will win personally and I am Bok fan, purely because of the draw.

2022-08-09T13:34:38+00:00

James584

Roar Rookie


Not boring at all. Beautiful to watch.

2022-08-09T11:44:31+00:00

savant

Roar Rookie


Actually I love almost everything about rugby. But when I sit down to coach the under 10s by showing them a game, they get bored by the length of time stoppages take for set pieces. When I go to the rugby with my daughter and her friends and I look around at other women it’s pretty clear they are bored by the same thing. You see I love the game. And I want both genders and kids to love it to. Not just us big tough old sexist blokes. I played it in the 60s and 70s when we ran to scrums and packed immediately, when line out calls were made in the line out ( to the winger throwing in!) and quickly, when fatigue was a big factor because ball was in play for long periods and there weren’t 8 replacements on the bench. I don’t see any of the changes that have happened since then have made for a more entertaining game to watch, coach or share with family. Now if the strengths of my national game were huge sides of beef from the high veldt, or massive guys with high bone density from the pacific islands, I would want to minimize ball in play time, reset scrums, discuss line out calls in a group 5 metres from the line out and then saunter over when we were good and ready, have long water breaks every 20 minutes, and need treatment for injuries to big forwards that miraculously heal themselves after a couple of minutes of sitting down and sucking in some big breaths, I would want all this because winning ( not the great game of rugby) is my only objective.

2022-08-09T08:56:07+00:00

Ken Catchpole's Other Leg

Roar Guru


Good thoughts Lr

2022-08-09T07:35:52+00:00

Good Game

Guest


Apologies- got my threads mixed up, Tim. You were asking Geoff.

2022-08-09T06:59:26+00:00

Locke

Roar Rookie


The Umaga-Jensen twins would have been a better option. Firstly, they've been plying their trade in the lower levels of rugby for several years, while RTS is a late come Charlie. There has to be some reward for committing to rugby long-term and doing the hard yards up through the grades. Secondly the twins have the better physiques suited to the midfield, RTS is a smaller, quicker player better utilised at wing. Quite frankly RTS's performances didn't warrant an AB callup and it reeks of star athlete infatuation.

2022-08-09T06:21:25+00:00

WEST

Roar Guru


Looks like they’re kicking it because they’re out of ideas. Still can’t work out or developed a way through the rush defence.. So they gamble on 50/50 kicks. But, direct is the only option at rush defence, can’t go sideways, can’t kick away what little possession they have. Just have to be more creative! Look at league teams, that’s all they deal with. I’m surprised NZ rugby haven’t approached the top league teams on advice. That’s all league is, constant rush defence.

2022-08-09T05:34:55+00:00

Good Game

Guest


Fair call mate. Out of the current options? Tupaea probably, but I don't mind the thought of JB's boot at second reciever. He is physical enough. Just unsure on whether he is up to international standard whereas Tupaea has shown enough (and hopefully learned enough) in his short career to be considered. I see the merit in Havili but it seems we need a line bender more than a hybrid 10/12.

AUTHOR

2022-08-09T05:30:42+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


I guess that's the luxury of having bigger guys in place where you need them, isn't it SP? Big men in the front row, PSDT at 6, and two, not huge, but solid centres, means you can complement them with a couple of short, speedy guys who can feed off the pressure created elsewhere. It's a great combination to have. I guess there was something similar with Habana as well - although he's not as small, his speed was such a contrast to the grunt guys.

2022-08-09T05:22:09+00:00

Good Game

Guest


Thanks Tim

2022-08-09T05:21:03+00:00

Kaptein_Kakhuis

Guest


South Africa were pretty ruthless in the tackles and rucks. Kicked less than usual which added some unpredictability and executed their plan well. Slight concern that they were only able to put together 2 tries, 1 off a loose pass, and that's something theyll need to work on because you can't dominate everything like that and only score 26 points. It was a definite step forward for SA in attack but more needs to be done wrt putting backs into space. NZ weren't as bad as they looked, I think they were just blown away by the sheer intensity that the boks brought and its sad that the coach and captain could take a fall after this weekend, because given until the end of the RC they are likely to still walk away with 4 of 6 wins.

2022-08-09T04:33:09+00:00

LuckyPhil

Roar Rookie


I think you are reading too much into it numpty. I don't think anyone is suggesting just throwing Tom Wright in there. Agree though that they need to get their systems in place. At the moment I don't think they really know what style of game they want and therefore what systems to use.

2022-08-09T04:14:54+00:00

mzilikazi

Roar Pro


That's a very perceptive post, Max. Especially "All the talk of not having the cattle and coaches are misguided." In my view it's more a matter of the coaching team making the best use, getting the best out of, the "cattle in the paddocks".

2022-08-09T03:51:35+00:00

Colin Fenwick

Roar Rookie


What you say about being unsettled is an understatement, but I can remember there being the usual wringing of hands when there has been a lack of depth, albeit, temporary. This dysfunction probably starts way up the top of the food chain and has finally made it's way into the team and it's performances.

2022-08-09T03:34:22+00:00

MaxP

Roar Rookie


It’s hard not to enjoy it, having been mercilessly ribbed by Kiwis for two decades

2022-08-09T01:43:31+00:00

Suzy Poison

Guest


Hi Geoff. I found this match up most interesting. In short (no pun intended) there seems to to be a trend with the Bok coaching group of picking smaller, more skilled backline players. Even forwards like Kwagga Smith. Rewind a couple of years, and Jake White or Heyneke would never have picked such lightweights. There is no better example of a highly coached bunch of lightweights beating much bigger players than the Commonwealth 2022 Sevens final. Where the Blitzboks beat the much larger Fijian team, with a clever kicking and defence strategy. To Jake White's credit, he started former 7's player Kurt Lee Arendse at the Bulls, so he has come around.

2022-08-09T00:07:21+00:00


I think of Quade like the Highlander movie - ‘there can be only one’. So much in the same vein as Kerevi missing then the Wallabies could perhaps structure their game plan a bit differently. Foley is definitely not Quade Cooper but might bring some value as you have alluded to from the bench or in the environment as a experienced figure. He has a decent boot and is a good distributor. It’s a shame all our fly halves are either early 20s or early to mid 30s. A former Rebels player Jack Debreczeni has been linked to the Brumbies with Larkham for this season so I’d be interested to see how he turns out. Same kind of stature as Hodge but is a specialist 10 that can play 15. He was close to Wallabies selection a few years back but fell out of form. I’m worried that the current crop of Donaldson, Edmed and Lolesio don’t have enough time at Super Rugby level to be able to handle the tests unless it’s a real ‘sink or swim’ situation. Only Marcus Smith and Ntamack come to mind as young international fly halves, and Ntamack has the fewest questions overall. The other nations have Russell, Biggar, Pollard and Sexton who are all close to or above 30 leading the team to the World Cup. Dan Carter was 33 at the 2015 RWC. Something to be said for an experienced 10 unless they are exceptional. I just don’t see Lolesio filling the Cooper void in the short term.

2022-08-08T23:40:05+00:00

Big A

Roar Rookie


hey Charlie compared to what Noah offers i'm happy to go with Hodge at 10

2022-08-08T22:42:36+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


And he is not prepared to be away from home and let his wife cope with this on her own. I have known about this for some time but have not commented because I felt it was a very private matter but if it is now publicly known the same strictures don't apply.

2022-08-08T22:32:03+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


There is no answer from Jacko. He will be consulting JK on what to say.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar