Why reinstating Clarkson and Fagan is the right decision

By Matthew Younan / Roar Rookie

As Alastair Clarkson prepares to resume his tenure as North Melbourne coach on Wednesday, many might question why it’s happening.

Arguably never has someone started a new role under such intriguing circumstances.

The four-time Hawthorn premiership coach was announced as the new North Melbourne coach in mid-August.

After parting ways with David Noble, the Kangaroos embarked on ‘Operation Clarkson’. And they got their man for the next five years, with his contract tying him to the club until the end of 2027. It was a joyous occasion. A time of triumph for a club that has been struggling for so long.

The Roos, led by President Dr Sonja Hood, were hopping with glee, celebrating the successful coach’s commitment to the club. Even non-North Melbourne fans were happy for the boys from Arden St. After all, they’ve struggled lately and Clarkson is hailed by many as the best AFL coach of the modern era. His appointment was the glimmer of hope the wooden spooners desperately needed.

Alastair Clarkson and Chris Fagan at a Hawthorn training session in 2016. (Photo by Robert Cianflone/Getty Images)

Then about four weeks later it all went pear-shaped.

Australians woke up on Wednesday 21st September to breaking news by the ABC’s Russell Jackson. It was a damning piece regarding historical treatment of Indigenous players at the Hawthorn Football Club. The article referred to a report done by First Nations consultants claiming poor treatment of Indigenous players and their families.

Former Hawthorn Football Club staff including former coach Clarkson, former assistant Chris Fagan now the Brisbane Lions Coach and former Hawthorn player development manager Jason Burt were incriminated in the ABC report. Burt had left Hawthorn in 2019 and has been the Head of Coaching and Performance Sport at Caulfield Grammar.

Jackson’s report made for difficult reading. It was horrific. Distressing. The allegations levelled against Clarkson, Fagan and Burt are grave and troubling. AFL CEO Gillon McLachlan described them as “harrowing and disturbing.”

All three accused stood down from their respective roles, pending an investigation into the allegations of mistreatment of indigenous athletes, when the report came to light. Taking indefinite leave, they all vehemently denied and refuted any wrongdoing.

Eagerly seeking the opportunity to defend their reputations, they found themselves bound, unable to speak publicly so as to not prejudice the investigation. It’s an interesting case.

They also had to wait patiently for the AFL to set out the terms of reference for the investigation. The AFL finally did that last week.

The ecstasy many North supporters and others in the AFL community felt around the time of Clarkson’s signing turned into disappointment and shock. There was a sense of horror and disbelief.

McLachlan also lamented the situation and promised to ensure it did not occur again. The outgoing leader of the AFL emphasised that improvements needed to be made while stressing the importance of running a thorough investigation.

“We will do whatever we can to ensure the hurt you experienced is not experienced by others,” he told Indigenous players.

“We need to run a proper investigation to get to the bottom of it and this is important.”

Many believed Jackson’s article and were furious with Clarkson and co. Others were unsure what to believe and some questioned whether Jackson had done his due diligence before publishing the article.

They subsequently took to social media to express those thoughts.

Jackson refuted their claims.

The ABC quoted three unidentified Indigenous players in the article. Until this point, they remain unidentified, having been able to maintain their privacy.

These players have accused the Hawthorn trio of extremely cruel treatment. There were many other Indigenous players coached by Clarkson who seemingly had no issues with the master coach. They were not included in Jackson’s article.

A critical piece of investigative journalism is to allow the parties being investigated the right to reply.
For his part, Jackson says he contacted Clarkson, Fagan and Burt. However they have advised they were not contacted and were unaware of the report or that this article would come out.

None of them were interviewed as part of the report and claim they have not had the opportunity to share their side of the story.

Every story has three sides – in this case, the accused, the accusers and the truth which could be somewhere in the middle (or not).

And until they’ve had the opportunity to share their perspective of what took place, it is best judgment is reserved.

Following Brisbane’s approval of Fagan’s return on Tuesday night, North Melbourne’s board met on Wednesday to determine Clarkson’s fate. And they endorsed the four-time premiership coach’s start date.

There had been question marks whether Clarkson would commence his new role with the Kangaroos as planned in early November, following the independent Hawthorn report into its treatment of First Nations players during his time at the club from 2008 to 2016.

The 54-year-old recently returned from Scotland after spending some time with Celtic coach and fellow Aussie Ange Postecoglou. He is vowing to fight the allegations against him and defend his reputation.

The terms of reference for the investigation into allegations of racism were laid out by the AFL last Thursday.

Clarkson spoke about how the allegations have taken a toll on the accused. Determined to clear their names, they are looking forward to sharing their side of the story.

“Fages, myself and Jason have been through a tough time over the past four weeks and [we’re] just pleased that we have been able to identify a platform in which we can reveal some of the truths behind this and then get on with it,” Clarkson told Channel Nine’s sports reporter Ayrton Wooley upon his arrival at the airport on Tuesday.

It was the right decision to reinstate him as coach of North Melbourne and Fagan as the Brisbane Lions’ coach.

Notwithstanding the seriousness of the allegations, and the potential ramifications if found guilty, until proven guilty, they should be afforded the presumption of being innocent.

The seriousness of the allegations levelled against them means that if these things are found to have occurred, then their roles may be untenable. If there is truth to it, one could conclude that they would have failed in their duty of care towards the players.

Up until now, the Indigenous players are yet to confirm they will cooperate with the AFL’s investigation. However, Clarkson said he, Fagan and Burt are willing to do their part.

“Fages, Jason and myself always said right from the get-go we’ll cooperate fully with whatever the AFL put in place.”

An independent investigation into the allegations at Hawthorn will be completed by December 22.

The decision by the clubs to stand them down at the time this news broke was the appropriate action. It was the wise decision at the time, pending details about the investigation.

However, now that the AFL has laid out the terms of its investigation, the clubs cannot continue to hold them back from assuming their duties. There is just too much at stake for the clubs to not have a coach at the helm.

In the meantime, I wonder if Clarkson hasn’t already contacted his old mate Brett Ratten to see if he would like to work with him again. Ratten was an assistant at Hawthorn under Clarkson for six years. Part of the club’s 2013, 2014 and 2015 premiership coaching panel, Ratten left the Hawthorn Football Club at the end of the 2018 season.

Ratten was coaching St Kilda for the past three years. But he and the club parted ways in recent weeks, opening up an opportunity to reunite with his former boss.

The former St Kilda and Carlton coach has a wealth of knowledge and is known for his relationship building with players.

Having worked together in the past during a successful period at Hawthorn, they could replicate that winning formula. And if Clarkson does have to step down as a result of the investigation then the former Blues and Saints coach can comfortably step in.

Just as Brendon Bolton stepped in for five games during Hawthorn’s 2014 campaign when Clarkson was out being treated for Guillain-Barré syndrome. The Hawks won all five games with Bolton at the helm.

While Clarkson, Fagan and Burt are adamant they have done nothing wrong, this could be a smart back-up option.

But in the meantime, they deserve to be afforded the opportunity to defend themselves against these serious allegations.

The Crowd Says:

2022-12-17T20:27:48+00:00

Boner

Roar Rookie


So I go to my manager and say my supervisor has done and said these terrible things. My supervisor should be stood down…on just the allegation? Seriously?

2022-12-17T20:19:42+00:00

Boner

Roar Rookie


Allegations. Quite different to matters of fact. Political correctness and a touchy freely society being led by left wing media - walking on egg shells has done nothing for truth.

2022-11-03T00:46:14+00:00

Randy

Roar Rookie


dont tell me jeff kennet is head of the inquiry? LOL

2022-11-03T00:14:44+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


A lot of people seem to miss the point on this issue. Whether or not Clarkson and Fagan are actively working at their respective clubs while the investigation is underway (instead of being on paid leave) is purely a decision for each club, as their employer. It's got nothing to do with the presumption of innocence or any other criminal law principles, so long as the clubs aren't breaking any employment laws. Each club would have had to weigh up the benefit of having their respective head coaches present through the draft and early pre-season periods against other factors - e.g. wellbeing of persons (including them) at the club, potential for internal conflict, brand damage, fallout if they are eventually found guilty, that sort of thing. I don't claim to know if the board of each club has made the right call, and I don't envy them having to make a challenging decision like that. The other thing that bugs me is how people chastise the alleged victims for remaining anonymous or not cooperating. We need to remember: they didn't ask for this. Hawthorn and Jackson actively sought them out and encouraged them to participate in their reports. True, they could have just hung up the phone and not participated at all, but if they weren't sought out then we might never have heard boo from them. I'm also disappointed - but not surprised - that the AFL didn't make this a properly independent investigation. Once again, the boys' club wants to take the safer option of controlling the process, just like they tried (very unsuccessfully) to do with the Essendon saga. Just for once I would have liked to see them put an investigation entirely in the hands of people without a vested interest in the outcome.

2022-11-02T23:50:35+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


The employment question is whether or not they keep their jobs, and no one is deciding that yet. As far as I know they would still be paid even if they weren't on active duty.

2022-11-02T20:57:49+00:00

Bretto

Roar Rookie


This is the most nuanced and sensible comment on this matter. It is indeed entirely possible that what Clarkson, Fagan and Burt said and the actions they took would have been 100% accepted by non-indigenous players, and possibly by other indigenous players. However due to fundamental cultural differences, other indigenous players were significantly impacted by comments and actions of the coaches. It is very difficult to believe that racism was the basis for the coaches' behavior. White commentators with a position of "toughen up sunshine" is both ignorant and simplistic. The required outcomes are firstly a recognition of hurt caused to the indigenous players, secondly a recognition of no intentional harm or racist behavior from the coaches, and most importantly more awareness of cultural differences and sensitivities to prevent a repeat. Let's deal less in right/wrong positions, and more in empathy and a willingness to listen and learn.

2022-11-02T20:37:17+00:00

AdamDilligafThompson

Roar Rookie


Amateurs.lol. :silly:

2022-11-02T20:37:02+00:00

AdamDilligafThompson

Roar Rookie


Opps I saw it on there too, I meant that im guessing its on her social media, my bad.lol. Omfg I read somewhere now that her lawyer has complained she only had 2 days to answer the AFL in regards to the panel etc etc and thats just not long enough etc yet what they gave these guys 24hrs notice before the story was released by the abc. Talk about double standards. :laughing: :laughing:

2022-11-02T10:33:34+00:00

Ball Burster

Roar Rookie


It involves employment law therefore it is indeed a legal case that is subject to the rules of natural justice and procedural fairness.

2022-11-02T09:42:01+00:00

Mark

Guest


The right outcome. The case against the trio gets weaker by the day. The report accusing them was totally lacking in any independence or fair process. Their accusers refuse to put their name to their allegations, or talk with any organization that won’t accept their accusations unquestionably. Privacy? I don’t believe it. More likely minimizing risk of being sued for defamation. Time to move on.

2022-11-02T09:00:54+00:00

Brett Allen

Roar Rookie


Until proven otherwise, they are entitled to the presumption of innocence and to pursue their profession of choice.

2022-11-02T08:55:41+00:00

Doc Disnick

Roar Guru


Not really. Thrown out would mean there is nothing to answer, i.e. if the accusers don't want to play ball, then the case is 'thrown out'. However, if the accusers cooperative with the investigation, and the allegations do remain unproven, that does not mean the case was 'thrown out'. It just means that the result ended like virtually all other cases that involve hearsay.

2022-11-02T08:34:24+00:00

PeteB

Roar Rookie


Of course. For all we know these stories are total fabrications or very much exaggerated. To date evidence is very lacking and the alleged victims seem very reluctant to provide anything. This is not a criminal investigation. Get on with life until we know more, if we ever do find out more.

2022-11-02T08:09:27+00:00

PeterCtheThird

Guest


Matthew Younan seems to have done a splendid job of framing this the way the AFL wants, as essentially a criminal investigation with criminal-case standards of proof, using words like Incriminated, allegations, accused, wrongdoing, guilty, proven guilty, others seemingly had no issues. It would have been vastly better, although not for the AFL, McLachlan, Hawthorn or Kennett, to have a genuinely independent panel that actually sought to understand what happened, the cultural contexts of the club and of the players and their families, and what might be done differently. There is bugger-all chance of this. To provide an example of cultural context: If you are a white late-teens born-and-bred Melbournite, champion player at a GPS school, high draft pick, fawned over by schools, scouts, coaches, sponsors since you were 8, and your coach tells you “You can have a career or a family but not both”, what will your reaction be? “No worries, coach” and go back to shagging your way through the chorus line. If you are an Indigenous kid, lots of talent, been through the local non-urban school system, picked up in your late teens, pitchforked into a totally alien environment (simple example: trams? How do I know where it’s going? How do I pay for it? How can I ask without shame job?), family is absolutely central to your culture, and your coach says “You can have a career or a family but not both”, it’s not the same at all. Can Matthew Younan even understand that? Or all the commenters here busy singing out for libel? Is it any wonder that “Amy” doesn’t trust the system that is so heavily stacked against her?

2022-11-02T07:13:44+00:00

JudgeMental

Roar Rookie


If I could post a link, it would be this one https://www.marquelawyers.com.au/aflstatement

2022-11-02T06:56:27+00:00

.kraM

Roar Rookie


Sounds like you have firsthand knowledge

2022-11-02T06:50:27+00:00

JudgeMental

Roar Rookie


Apparently I don't know how to post a link

2022-11-02T06:50:01+00:00

JudgeMental

Roar Rookie


Actually I saw the artwork and story on ABC news site.

2022-11-02T06:34:49+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


I can't imagine what you think the issue is but you conversation seems to be about something that's not this.

2022-11-02T06:16:57+00:00

XI

Roar Guru


Cute isn’t the word I’d use for it. And that you don’t think it applies here means you really don’t understand the situation (shocking) That was me being cute

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar