'That talent is huge': Southgate booed by England fans as Man City's creative star snubbed in bore draw

By Mike Meehall Wood / Editor

England manager Gareth Southgate was booed by his own fans and slammed by pundits after ignoring superstar talent Phil Foden as England limped to a stodgy 0-0 draw with the USA.

Three Lions fans have long been critical of a perceived cautious approach from Southgate, with some expressing their disappointment vocally as the final whistle blew.

He left Manchester City star Foden on the bench for the entirety of the game and England looked a lot better once Jack Grealish entered with 20 minutes to play, but it was too little too late in a second half that Southgate had allowed to drift. Trent Alexander-Arnold, too, remained unused.

England are now all-but through – they would have to lose by four goals to Wales to miss the knockouts – though their performance was underwhelming and left the door ajar for another side to top the group, which would force them into a potential Round of 16 clash with the Netherlands.

“I was disappointed not to see Foden,” said England legend Gary Neville on the UK coverage. “For me that talent is huge. I have not seen anything like that. For Foden to not be in that and to not come off the bench is interesting.

“It was poor, we’re all disappointed. We wanted a lot more from England. Sometimes our midfield didn’t click, we looked tired at times. I didn’t feel as though we connected in combinations in midfield.”

His fellow pundit Roy Keane agreed that Foden should have entered the game.

“We were surprised watching it and, obviously, Gareth doesn’t agree,” he said. “Of course he’s the manager and knows the players better than anybody. But we expected Foden to come on and the subs who did come on didn’t really have an impact. They did well the other day but they lacked pace and looked short of ideas.”

It was a highly tactical game, with both sides ebbing and flowing, but ultimately a draw was fair. England’s defence never looked overly troubled, but at the other end, they also failed to make much of an impact.

“It was exactly the sort of game I thought it would be,” said Southgate. “Some of the quality in the final third could have been a little bit better, but we’ve shown great resilience to defend against opponents who kept asking questions. 

“This is tournament football, we’re not going to roll through a tournament, and sweep through everybody without having nights like that, when you’ve got to show different qualities to get the result.

“It will be a totally different game against Wales. Silver medal today was a point. It puts us in a really strong position in terms of qualification. If we can win our last game, we win the group.”

England have a poor record against the USA in World Cups – a famous loss in 1950 and a poor draw in 2010 – and for long periods, this looked like would sit alongside those two results. In the context of the group, this is far from a disaster

They struggled badly against an American side that was far more coherent for long periods. The criticism of Southgate’s men has been that they focus too much on defensive solidity at the expense of attacking flair, despite having the talent to play more progressively.

That looked moot after a crushing 6-2 win over Iran in their opener, but returned with a vengeance here. For the most part, they look uninspired. Granted, they withstood plenty of American advances with relative ease too – Harry Maguire was England’s best – but the inability to threaten remains the biggest worry.

The United States now go into their final game with Iran knowing that a win will be enough to see them through. They will take plenty of hope, though the Iranians performance in defeating Wales suggests that they will also have confidence.

England began the brighter, with an early chance for Kane deflected wide, but the greater levels of organisation from the Americans began to come to the fore.

Once they managed to halt England’s progress along the right through Bukayo Saka and Kieran Trippier, the USA emerged as the dominant force and would have been unhappy not to have scored in the first half.

Weston McKennie blasted over from six yards out, Christian Pulisic hit the bar from range and then sent a header wide. They were nearly made to pay, too, with Mason Mount forcing Matt Turner into a low save from distance.

(Photo by KIRILL KUDRYAVTSEV/AFP via Getty Images)

Whatever Southgate said at half-time went unheeded. America kept coming and were able to force a series of corners, though England’s defensive resolve is well-established and their set piece work, as ever, excellent.

Southgate finally made his move. Jordan Henderson and Jack Grealish entered for Jude Bellingham and Raheem Sterling. The momentum immediately shifted, with England dominating the ball and running everything through the Manchester City midfielder.

Nothing transpired, however. Both sides played between the boxes and, as time ticked away, seemed more than happy to share the spoils. Kane missed a header in stoppage time from a free kick, but it flew wide. When the USA got a similar opportunity, they took the ball to the corner and ran time out.

The Crowd Says:

2022-11-26T06:21:43+00:00

Stevo

Roar Rookie


USA would have been far more satisfied with their performance than England.

2022-11-26T03:30:36+00:00

Kangas

Roar Rookie


Phil Foden is a freakish talent. Maybe Southgate is playing the long game, saving him for the knockout

2022-11-26T03:16:04+00:00

Waz

Roar Rookie


I would agree with that. There’s occasional exceptions but generally speaking at international level play form players.

2022-11-26T02:51:19+00:00

jamesb

Roar Guru


Another thing Southgate should learn is to pick players who are in form. An example, Sterling and Mount have been average for Chelsea and against the USA, both were MIA.

2022-11-26T00:18:17+00:00

chris

Guest


How bad is Harry Kane? He is just too slow and cumbersome now. Surely someone younger, quicker and more mobile is required.

2022-11-26T00:01:21+00:00

Chris Lewis

Roar Guru


enjoyed the match, the US again played hard ball in a World Cup

2022-11-25T23:39:44+00:00

Simoc

Roar Rookie


It looked to me that USA were up to it from the start, showing more intensity and desire throughout the first half. I was surprised how good the USA were. They'll have to improve greatly to be a threat in the knockout stage.

2022-11-25T22:33:14+00:00

Waz

Roar Rookie


I wondered if England were expected USA to tire late in the game, which didn’t really happen.

2022-11-25T22:32:04+00:00

Garry

Roar Rookie


my USA as a smokey lookinmg good :stoked:

2022-11-25T22:16:07+00:00

Brainstrust

Roar Rookie


England were both mentally and physically a mile off what they did against Iran. Iran did sit back and give England confidence . England need to rotate players looking at this game, particularly Kane I think there is too much deference to Kane. In the Iran match the speed of the other players and their workrate was great. They were very aggressive in the press and aggressive in taking players on. This time they hesitated they dont have ability to play at tempo it has to be all out.

2022-11-25T22:10:52+00:00

Redondo

Roar Rookie


The Iran win caused this borefest, which is ironic because Iran-Wales was a joy to behold.

2022-11-25T21:24:15+00:00

Waz

Roar Rookie


Good example of a team not responding to how the others are playing - England kept doing the same thing expecting a different outcome. The one weapon they had - pace going forward - they nullified with ponderous and slow counter attacks that allowed the USA to get back behind the ball. My coaching tip to Gareth Southgate (yes, I know you’re an A Pro Licence Coach and I’m not … but I see things :silly: ) …. Every time Saka has a good 90 minute game, drop him to the bench for the next one. He’s incapable of putting two good games together (you’re welcome Gareth :thumbup: ). Quick note on the Refs: they have been really slow to give yellow cards this WC and the games have been better for it. Hopefully AL Refs heed the lesson.

Read more at The Roar