First Test Talking Points: Defiant Stokes declares he was right, Aussie duo stand tall, big-talking Poms pair left red faced

By Paul Suttor / Expert

England’s Bazball tactics pushed Australia all the way but the lingering doubts about whether they’ll stand up to the world Test champions remain after the tourists claimed a dramatic two-wicket win at Edgbaston in the Ashes series opener.

Ultimately it was the class of Usman Khawaja and Pat Cummins which proved the difference for Australia with England left thinking what might have been.

The hosts had the huge advantage of batting first on the benign batting wicket but let the Aussies back into the contest with some poor shots by their batters, a controversial day-one declaration and Jonny Bairstow’s bumbling effort with the keeping gloves. 

Australia now head to Lord’s with the upper hand and will likely bring Mitchell Starc back into their line-up while England will need to decide whether their quickest bowler, Mark Wood, should be brought into the attack, whether Moeen Ali’s finger injury will be right for Test workloads and if Bairstow should be given another chance as the specialist keeper.

Jonny Bairstow. (Photo by Visionhaus/Getty Images)

England’s declaration, keeper gambles backfire

Bazball’s philosophy is bold and it shouldn’t have been too much of a surprise that England captain Ben Stokes declared late on day one to get a crack at the Australian openers in a tricky little session before stumps. 

But it backfired. Joe Root was motoring on at 118 at the time and after Moeen, Stuart Broad and Ollie Robinson had been able to swing freely on the batting featherbed, they could have added at least another 50 runs to the total of 8-393 if they continued on into day two. 

The state of the pitch should have been the over-riding factor when Stokes and Brendon McCullum were weighing up whether to declare.

“I’m a captain who saw it as an opportunity to pounce on Australia,” Stokes said. “I don’t think any batter likes to go out 20 minutes before the close of play. The way in which we played, and took Australia on, actually allowed us to be able to do that. 

England’s Ben Stokes reacts during day five of the first Ashes Test at Edgbaston. (Photo by Martin Rickett/PA Images via Getty Images)

“I could also turn around and say, ‘If we didn’t declare, would we have got that excitement like we did at the end of day five?’ I’m not 100 per cent sure but I’m not going to be looking back at this game as ‘what-ifs’. The reality is, we just didn’t manage to get over the line this week.”

Even David Warner with his troubles against Broad was unbothered as the Aussies made it to stumps without losing a wicket. 

And after getting the tourists in a spot of bother at 4-148, a Bairstow blunder to miss a Cameron Green stumping before he’d scored let the Aussies get back to parity on the first innings. 

He missed a few other chances in both innings which proved extremely costly for the England side. The extra runs he delivers as a batter at No.7 compared to Ben Foakes will not outweigh the inferior glovework if Bairstow cannot get back to his best as a keeper as soon as possible.

Pat Cummins celebrates after hitting the winning runs. (Photo by Stu Forster/Getty Images)

Cummins, Khawaja stand tall

Cummins was roundly criticised for negative tactics on day one with his defensive field settings but what was he supposed to do?

The pitch was so flat that batters with modest Test records like Zak Crawley were walking down the wicket to the Australian pace attack and hitting through the line like they were playing a social T20 game. 

Cummins went wicketless in the first innings but added a valuable 38 with the bat while combining with Khawaja to ensure the Aussie total finished just shy of England’s tally. 

He then produced the ball of the match with a Waqar Younis-like in-swinger to uproot Ollie Pope’s off stump and kept bringing himself back into the attack to bag 4-63 as England were dismissed for 273.

And then he finished the match with the not insignificant matter of an unbeaten 44 to lead his side to what will be a famous Ashes victory in the ever-expanding pantheon of thrillers between cricket’s oldest traditional rivals.

Khawaja came into this Test with all sorts of questions about his record in England, which only grew louder after his twin failures in the World Test Championship final against India at The Oval. 

But in response to the Bazball onslaught, the 36-year-old left-hander dropped anchor to last 321 deliveries, two minutes short of eight hours at the crease, in compiling his player of the match innings of 141. 

And it wasn’t like he didn’t attack – he hit 14 boundaries and three sixes but when his team needed someone to hold up an end to prevent England from sparking a collapse, Khawaja was a rock.

He did likewise in the second innings with 65 from 197 deliveries in more than five hours of resistance before inside-edging an innocuous Stokes delivery onto his stumps.

Usman Khawaja of Australia celebrates his century during Day 2 of the LV= Insurance Ashes 1st Test match between England and Australia at Edgbaston on June 17, 2023 in Birmingham, England. (Photo by Stu Forster/Getty Images)

Ollie, Harry put their foot in it

There was considerable confidence cursing through the veins of the English players on the back of their 11 wins from 13 Tests in the Bazball era. 

Harry Brook, before the first Test, embodied that by saying he wouldn’t back down to the Australian bowlers and singled out their spinner, Nathan Lyon, as someone he wanted to blast into the stands.

“If he bowls a good ball then I’m going to respect it but other than that, I’m going to try to take him on,” he said. 

Well, Lyon got his wicket in both innings. Firstly, when the cricketing gods dished out a dose of karma when Brook’s forward defensive shot ballooned up and trickled onto the stumps when he was on 32.

And in the second dig, Brook didn’t follow his pre-game mantra of respecting Lyon’s good deliveries by trying to force a pull shot that went no further than Marnus Labuschagne at mid-wicket, throwing his wicket away on 46 at a crucial time to leave England on 5-150.

Robinson shot his mouth off a couple of times – he dropped the F-bomb in a foul-mouthed send-off for Usman Khawaja after the veteran opener’s superb knock of 141 and he also claimed the Australian tail was filled with three No.11s in Lyon, Scott Boland and Josh Hazlewood. 

The English tail of Robinson, Stuart Broad and James Anderson is hardly a batting juggernaut. 

Robinson was unable to dismiss Boland during his frustrating 53-minute nightwatchman vigil or Lyon as he peeled off an unbeaten 16 as he and Pat Cummins guided Australia to victory with a 55-run ninth-wicket stand.

Talking the talk only works when you walk the walk afterwards.

Selection changes on the horizon

For the Aussies, it looks pretty straightforward for the Lord’s Test, which starts next Wednesday.

Starc will come in for Boland, who has played the past two Tests, and Hazlewood, after a successful return from his side issue will have no issue staying in the side. 

David Warner hasn’t done enough in his four Test innings in the UK to prove he’s still up to the task but in the eye of the national selectors, he doesn’t yet deserve the tap on the shoulder.

They only selected this squad until the end of the second Test but even so, they will likely not change much, if anything, when they announce who will be remaining for the final three matches of the tour.

England have several dilemmas. With their bowling attack, they lacked raw pace so Wood will surely get a run at the St John’s Wood venue. 

Broad was the most threatening bowler so Anderson or Robinson will likely make way for him. 

Or they could go all-out pace with Moeen’s finger injury looking like it will be an ongoing problem. 

Teenage leg-spinner Rehan Ahmed, who made a roaring Test debut in Pakistan, Liam Dawson, Will Jacks and Liam Livingstone are their other spin options but none of these would keep the Aussie batters awake at night.

Stokes, particularly with his inability to get off the ground as he grassed a difficult late catch off Lyon, is operating at well below capacity with his bowling due to his knee problem so England probably need to have a spinner who can soak up plenty of work to give the frontline quicks a breather. 

The Crowd Says:

2023-06-29T02:56:27+00:00

Insult_2_Injury

Roar Rookie


All good, mate, I finally got it - you're right, I'm wrong and you know what I meant, better than I did. Happy to move on.

2023-06-25T09:58:47+00:00

Derek Murray

Roar Rookie


You still need help. My comment didn’t suggest he was wrong to make the call, only not to review it. In response to somebody who said he shouldn’t. Let’s hope that clarifies it for you

2023-06-25T02:32:43+00:00

Insult_2_Injury

Roar Rookie


Thanks for the clarification, I certainly needed direction on who thinks a captain is stupid or arrogant for backing his team to win from a position where the opposition hadn’t bowled them out in a day when they had scored at 5 an over! I think I have a clearer view who I’m talking with now, cheers!

2023-06-24T00:07:20+00:00

Wikipetia

Roar Rookie


Yes they were attacking. They aimed for 4. England aim for 5. It’s off the charts

2023-06-24T00:06:09+00:00

Wikipetia

Roar Rookie


Such roads that we couldn’t get over 380 against a disjointed attack, despite having most of the best batters in the world in our team

2023-06-23T21:53:40+00:00

Panthers

Roar Rookie


Yet they were a couple of wickets from victory.

2023-06-23T19:14:07+00:00

Johnno

Roar Rookie


Looking at individual stats, it was probably late 90’s, early 2000’s. Where do you find those team stats? Interested for looking at.

2023-06-23T09:55:01+00:00

Derek Murray

Roar Rookie


Yes, I do. My comment reflects the former in case you need direction

2023-06-23T09:12:33+00:00

Doctor Rotcod

Roar Rookie


Waratahs, Proteas don't fit...

2023-06-23T05:09:49+00:00

ThugbyFan

Roar Guru


Bazball looks pretty good when they are playing on roads (aka ODI and T20-like wickets). It wouldn't surprise me if the Poms demand field restrictions in test matches so their sloggers have less chance of getting out. :laughing:

2023-06-23T05:05:55+00:00

ThugbyFan

Roar Guru


Nice article Paul, it wouldn't surprise me to see Boland keep his place in the side, and the contest between Starc's swing and extra pace and Hazelwood's metronomic accuracy. I thought Hazelwood looked still unfit and struggled in the Pom's 2nd innings. Am loving the blushes of the England mouths who (a) said the Ashes of 20-21 was not the fair dinkum stuff (S.Broad), (b) told all and sundry how he was going to rip N.Lyon apart (H.Brook) and the loud mouth tVrd called Robinson, who has previous form in abuse. I got an extra giggle listening to the "drunks on the hill" (and Robinson, surprise surprise!) singing the Aussies were cheats. This is from the supporters of the "Murray Mints XI"?? :laughing:

2023-06-23T03:11:23+00:00

Ted Dwyer

Roar Rookie


Lords is a very happy Ashes hunting ground for Australia. Sure - stats are stats - but they do confirm Australian dominance at Lords. As I undertand it, the Australians have played 38 Ashes tests at Lords and won 16 (42%) vs. England's 7 (18%) (15 draws). The Australian top order averages at Lords are also impressive (Labuschagne 59, Smith 54, Head 49) with Warner (32) and interestingly Khawaja (26) having averages below 40 (Green and Carey havent played a Lords test match yet). Australian bowling is also good in particular the quicks. The available data for the Headingley attack - Cummins average at Lords is just 16 vs overall average of 21.9, Hazlewood average at Lords is 23.63 vs overall average of 25.97. Boland and Green have yet to play a Test at Lords.

2023-06-23T00:00:36+00:00

Opeo

Roar Rookie


The list I am looking at is massively, and disproportionately, dominated by tests in the last 20 years or so. Only seven of the fastest 50 innings of all time occurred prior to 2000, for example, even though I am guessing that more than half of all test cricket was played before 2000. Australia in the 1990s probably were aggressive for the time.

2023-06-22T23:57:24+00:00

Opeo

Roar Rookie


That 540 was scored in six overs less than a day’s play too.

2023-06-22T23:28:00+00:00

Insult_2_Injury

Roar Rookie


You know there's a difference between reviews and second guessing don't you? A review analyses the whole circumstances and determines if the same or a different outcome is likely or achievable if another decision had been made if they let the 40yo bunny bat. Second guessing is a negative reaction where, in hindsight, you wish you'd done something else because you weren't confident with your original decision. The question is, was Stokes not confident at the time that declaration was the right decision?

2023-06-22T23:25:28+00:00

Johnno

Roar Rookie


Well that blows me away. I have no stats to back me up, just that that team was very attacking, and was reported so at the time. I think it was the 90’s.

2023-06-22T22:38:54+00:00

Opeo

Roar Rookie


It was probably the flattest pitch Australia has played on in England since 1948.

2023-06-22T22:11:37+00:00

Opeo

Roar Rookie


I am not sure what you are looking at. England scored 540 in less than a day’s play like two weeks ago. They made 598 in a day’s play in Pakistan last year. Three of the top five, and eight of the top 15, fastest innings or all time have been recorded by England in the last 18 months.

2023-06-22T22:10:21+00:00

Opeo

Roar Rookie


You are completely making this up. Eight of the 14 fastest innings of all time have been recorded by England in the last 18 months. Even the first innings of the most recent test was the 30th fatest innings ever but just the 10th fastest by England since the start of last year. Australia in the entirety of the 1990s never recorded a single innings in the fastest 200.

2023-06-22T15:10:40+00:00

Derek Murray

Roar Rookie


If he’s arrogant/stupid enough not to revisit the decision then he’s not the leader I thought he was. It felt wrong to many at the time given the featherbed nature of that day 1 track. It’s OK for him to stand by the call but if big decisions simply aren’t teviewed, he’s likely to not make the right call at similar junctions again in the future

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar