Why News Corp and Foxtel are set to go after rugby broadcast rights despite Wallabies' World Cup flop

By Christy Doran / Editor

As the Wallabies prepare to bow out of the World Cup at the pool stage for the first time, the big end of town in Australia is preparing to pack their bags and head to France for the knockout stages.

And it’s not just Nine Entertainment and Stan Sport officials heading to Paris, but News Corporation ones too.

It will see network executives like Nine Network’s Mike Sneesby, who as Stan CEO helped secure the current broadcast deal with Rugby Australia in 2020, as well as News Corp executive chairman Michael Miller – a former NSW Waratahs board member – descend on France.

Not even the Wallabies’ flop at the World Cup, where their stay of execution in France could be extended another week should they put away Portugal with ease, has turned rugby’s sometimes detractors away.  

Although both major networks have twisted the knife into the Wallabies over the past fortnight particularly, with head coach Eddie Jones and Rugby Australia chairman Hamish McLennan especially coming under fire, the rival broadcasters have their eyes on the game not just in the short-term but the long.

Jordan Petaia, Mark Nawaqanitawase and Andrew Kellaway. (Photo by Chris Hyde/Getty Images)

Rugby Australia’s decision to walk away from Fox Sports as their broadcasters of 25 years might have infuriated News Corp and Foxtel executives no end, but the only thing that riles News Corp – part owners of Foxtel – up more is looking at a competitor thrive – or threaten to, at least.

Rupert Murdoch might have stepped down as chairman of Fox Corp and News Corp last week, but the media giant’s understanding of competition runs deep.

It’s, in part, why industry insiders believe News Corp and Foxtel will come back to the party in 12 months’ time because with Stan Sport wrestling to win the rights of other sports, losing their key product, rugby, would be a blow.

While Nine Entertainment and Stan Sport won the broadcast rights in 2020, it’s understood RA is not wedded to the network despite having another two years on the deal.

Given RA agreed on a significantly reduced broadcast deal worth just $29 million per year, down from $US45m under the previous cycle signed by former CEO Bill Pulver, the governing body will want a significant uplift on their next deal, particularly off the back of the Lions series in 2025 and with home men’s (2027) and women’s (2029) World Cups on the horizon.

The current deal came after then-CEO Raelene Castle chose to take the broadcast package to market. But her plans somewhat backfired when Covid-19 brought the game to a halt.

Without a deal in place, and Australia’s sides flagging, RA was boxed into a corner and accepted a deal heavily in favour of Nine/Stan to keep the game afloat.

Rugby Australia chairman Hamish McLennan with Wallabies coach Eddie Jones. (Photo by Matt King/Getty Images)

McLennan’s relationships with the rival networks are something that could prove crucial over the next six to 18 months as the governing body works towards their next deal. It could well be one of the reasons the states, who have an axe to grind are being led to the point of financial collapse, fall into line behind McLennan’s leadership.

With the Super Rugby unions desperately in need of a financial uplift, RA won’t be sentimental about their next deal.

As the incumbent broadcast rights holders, Nine/Stan has exclusive rights to deal with RA first.

But should they attempt to low-ball RA, it’s understood the governing body won’t hesitate to take the broadcast rights to market to get a minimum of $50 million per year for their next deal.

While Stan Sport and Foxtel are the two major broadcast players, Paramount Plus and Amazon Prime loom as options.

The arrival of suits in France comes amid a wave of backlash towards Jones and the administration that fired Dave Rennie to parachute Eddie Jones into the role.

The Wallabies will take to the field at the Stade Geoffroy-Guichard knowing they need to beat Portugal with a bonus point to keep their faint quarter-final hopes alive.

Even if they smash the world No.16 Portuguese, Fiji, who beat the Wallabies and Georgia on Saturday, would need just a losing bonus against Portugal in a week’s time to ensure their place in the final eight.

Naturally, the heat has turned on Jones and McLennan for their part in the Wallabies’ disastrous 2023 campaign, which has netted just one win from eight Tests.

The struggles on the field come as McLennan attempts to usher through structural reform, with RA intent on moving towards a centralised system.

The Crowd Says:

2023-10-09T04:12:38+00:00

EastsFootyFan

Roar Guru


There’s no chance in hell that RA are getting a “minimum of $50m per year”. They’ll be lucky to get $20m at this stage.

2023-10-04T21:35:54+00:00

Kent Dorfman

Roar Rookie


Channel 9 in SA has shown 3/5ths of bugger all. considering the large number of Kiwis and Safa's in Oz now you'd think these media twerps in AFL states would televise games involving at least these 3 countries - but no!

2023-10-02T03:39:28+00:00

Perthstayer

Roar Rookie


DaveJ Appreciate the correction (sadly!). I made the grave mistake of "assuming". Seems World Rugby keeps the lucre. But RA do make money from BIL. I still think a new TV deal needs to be near $75m. There will be positive flow over from RWC for the domestic broadcaster. Increased interest in the game will mean more viewers for SR matches (or whatever the format is by then).

2023-10-02T01:42:05+00:00

Brett Allen

Roar Rookie


It’s money is as good as anybody else’s.

2023-10-02T01:18:26+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


Aren’t those rights sold separately to broadcasters around the world, not through Foxtel or Stan?

2023-10-02T01:00:33+00:00

piru

Roar Rookie


I'd be quite happy if rugby went back to Fox, it would mean I get my MotoGP, NFL and NHL back.

2023-10-02T00:53:07+00:00

fiwiboy7042

Roar Rookie


It's after 2025 where life gets interesting. NZR's deal expires next year with the RA rights due to be negotiated in 2025 (?) for beyond the 2027 RWC after Stan extended its deal two years. SRP will continue to run to 2030 but the broadcaster has not been decided yet.

2023-10-02T00:48:59+00:00

fiwiboy7042

Roar Rookie


Mind you, News Corp was also prepared to destroy rugby union with Super League back then as well. Some friend of rugby!! :shocked:

2023-10-01T21:15:29+00:00

high horse

Roar Rookie


sure the coverage might be better on stan but no one watches stan apart from rugby die hards

2023-10-01T21:14:57+00:00

high horse

Roar Rookie


we are being fed lies, FOx isnt interested in paying much for rugby

2023-10-01T21:11:55+00:00

high horse

Roar Rookie


FTA is not interested in rugby

2023-10-01T18:00:16+00:00

Tom G

Roar Rookie


He can’t get a better deal.. that’s not what they’re after.

2023-10-01T17:02:21+00:00

ScouseinOz

Roar Rookie


What I never understood was how he couldn't get Fox to take part in the bidding for the 2021-2025 tv deal considering his "close links" with the Murdoch clan. He was still a Murdoch man as Chairman of RA when he signed the reduced deal with 9 and Stan. How come he couldn't get them involved in the last round of broadcast negotiations?? As far as I remember, Fox offered around 40 million last time, but pulled it (hissy fit) when Raelene Castle said RA were only doing sealed bids for the rights. She was gone before he became chairman, but still no bid came from Fox, so 9 offered peanuts. If he couldn't do it before, why should he be able to get a bigger TV deal now?

2023-10-01T15:03:19+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


"News will not want to share live content with a FTA provider". Except when it's: *AFL *NRL *BBL *Test Cricket *Supercars etc ...which all have Fox/Kayo deals along with FTA deals.

2023-10-01T14:45:41+00:00

Perthstayer

Roar Rookie


For HM to add value he should target a $100-150m tv deal. Anything less and we're being ripped off. The deal is all about BIL and RWC. These bring guaranteed UK, Ireland and global viewers in the many many millions. How the WBs perform is important but it's only one part of the negotiation puzzle.

2023-10-01T14:44:34+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


NZR screwed themselves over. The same issue wasn't a sticking point when bidding to host the 2011 rwc.

2023-10-01T12:50:25+00:00

Brett Allen

Roar Rookie


I was gonna say, wasn’t it News Corp that face rugby it’s first big broadcast deal back when it turned professional ?

2023-10-01T12:31:47+00:00

ScouseinOz

Roar Rookie


On a world scale - league, VFL and rugby don't rate. Cricket is massive in asia where over a quarter of the population live. They aren't all wealthy but the richest have the money love the game. Football is global. Either way in Australia, super rugby on FTA gets lower ratings than repeats of Hey Duggee and Big Bang Theory. They will do well to get over 30 million. People don't have to naively believe Hairdye Hamish anymore.

AUTHOR

2023-10-01T12:18:20+00:00

Christy Doran

Editor


But they want it packaged up as a result ... so it will be unusual to split hosting rights, which has occurred in the past.

2023-10-01T11:47:31+00:00

Tony H

Roar Pro


Don't use logic Brett People in here froth at the mouth if you mention News Corp, even tho it was Rugby's only friend for 20 years

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar