Mitchell Johnson has blasted chief selector George Bailey for questioning whether he was OK in the wake of his explosive newspaper column questioning the ongoing selection of David Warner in the Test team.
He also revealed he has fallen out with Warner over his clash on social media with his wife Candice in April with the batter sending an inflammatory text message in response.
“Some of the things that he mentioned in that message,” Johnson said on his podcast, The Mitch Johnson Show with cricket journalist Bharat Sundaresan.
“I won’t say it because that’s up to Dave to say if he wants to talk about it. There was some stuff in there, which was extremely disappointing what he said and pretty bad, to be honest. That sort of was a bit of a driver (for last Sunday’s column).”
The former fast bowler was furious with Bailey’s response of “I hope he’s OK” when he was asked in a media conference about Johnson’s column in The West Australian newspaper which has reignited the debate over whether Warner deserves his three-match farewell series against Pakistan based on his Test form.
“To ask if I’m OK because I’ve had mental health issues is pretty much downplaying my article and putting it on mental health, which is quite disgusting I think,’’ Johnson said.
“I’m fine. I’m not angry. I’m not jealous. I’m just writing a piece that for me I felt like I needed to write.
“It’s basically having a dig at someone’s mental health and saying that I must have something going on, a mental health issue, has made me say what I’ve said. That’s not the truth.
“That’s completely the opposite. I’m actually clear-minded. It sort of tries to downplay the questions that I’ve asked in that article. It seems very childish from George and condescending.’’
Johnson said Bailey had chided him recently over an article criticising the decision to rest emerging fast bowler Lance Morris from a Sheffield Shield game.
“It was just a bit condescending. Typical George sort of stuff. When you receive at odd hours in the morning, it was disappointing.”
Johnson said he was not a fan of Warner declaring nearly six months ago prior to the Ashes that he wanted to retire after the SCG Test.
“I’ve heard, like everyone else has, that Dave wanted to retire from cricket at this point at the SCG. He told everyone before the Ashes series. That didn’t sit with me well again as I say, it’s my personal opinion.
“I do have a ghost writer but I also write most of it.”
In his column, Johnson said Warner had not taken full responsibility for his role in the Sandpaper-gate affair in South Africa in 2018 that earned him a 12-month ban.
He questioned “why a player at the centre of one of the biggest scandals in Australian cricket history warrants a hero’s send-off”.
Johnson conceded he regretted the reference to Bunnings and sandpaper – “What will fans bring for Warner? Bunnings would sell out of sandpaper”.
He backtracked by saying it was “probably distasteful” and “that was probably something that didn’t need to be said”.
“The reason that came up is that I just don’t look at statistics. I look at the whole picture. And I’m not trying to bring up those old things. But someone to get a farewell and to be in that position that he was and what they did back then, that didn’t quite sit right with me, that’s why I brought it up.’’
Warner is yet to respond to the explosive remarks but his manager James Erskine has called Johnson “ignorant”.
“This reminds me of backseat drivers, they’re bloody annoying, and quite frankly, we don’t need it,” Erskine told SEN. “(Johnson) is basically making comments that I think are incendiary.
“Come up with an alternative solution, pal. If he thinks basically three people did Sandpaper-gate, then he should go to the moon for holiday. I mean, it’s just a joke.”
Warner’s opening partner Usman Khawaja said his fellow left-hander had paid his dues for the Sandpaper-gate scandal.
Khawaja said he “strongly disagreed” with Johnson’s column, adding Warner and former skipper Steve Smith, who was also banned for a year, had paid for their mistakes.
“Davey Warner and Steve Smith are heroes in my mind,” Khawaja said.
“They missed a year of cricket through dark times in Australian cricket but they have paid their dues.
“No one is perfect. Mitchell Johnson isn’t perfect. I am not perfect. Steve Smith is not perfect. David Warner isn’t perfect.
“What they have done for the game and to grow the game far outweighs anything else they have done.
“So for (Johnson) to imply that Dave Warner or anyone else involved in Sandpaper-(gate) is not a hero I strongly disagree with because I believe they have paid their dues.”
Khawaja said he also did not agree with Johnson’s comments that chairman of selectors George Bailey was too close to Warner and the other players.
He said Bailey had brought a “breath of fresh air” to the role.
Under Bailey’s chairmanship, Australia have won the 2021-22 Ashes and retained them in 2023, and have been victorious in the 2021 T20 World Cup, this year’s World Test Championship and ODI World Cup.
“‘I’m not sure you can argue with that. (The criticism) is harsh,” Khawaja said.
with AAP
aerial lizard
Roar Rookie
This one has them cranked, isolationist parochialism VS Big Brother Blue.
Tony H
Roar Pro
Umm? OK. I'm a Qlder.
Gappy
Roar Rookie
Mitch is a professional sports journo now. Sports journos rise to the top of their pile by being both outrageous and outraged. Mitch is doing his job for his employer and for his employment prospects
aerial lizard
Roar Rookie
Nor is he a Sandgroper, so the parochialism might be misplaced.
DaveJ
Roar Rookie
“ The handling of Warner in recent years, who played with Bailey in all three forms, raises the question of whether Bailey was simply too quickly out of playing and into the job and too close to some of the players," Johnson wrote. Seems not even Mitch’s ghost writer can write decent English.
Curmudgeon1961
Roar Rookie
Never gets old https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7l2doxjnn3Y
Brett Allen
Roar Rookie
Why though ? The dictionary defines a hero as “Someone who is admired for their courage, outstanding achievements or noble qualities”. Can you deny that people, and especially kids, might view Warner or Smith in that light ? If you want to differentiate them from say soldiers, then you can call soldiers as “war heroes”.
Tim Carter
Roar Pro
I'm suggesting that different words should be used to describe those you refer to as heroes and that 'hero' would then have a definite and more powerful definition. It's not to deny the reverence you or others give to the people in question.
qwetzen
Roar Rookie
If there was any modification with sandpaper I would have known. It *is* possible that the bowlers didn't know. Bancroft could have been using the wrong side of the sandpaper...
jameswm
Roar Guru
Maybe. I had a look at his quote a few days ago, and I reckon you'd be naive to take him solely on the literal words on that. Anyway, the selectors have to do what they think is right for the team now and in the future - without favour.
Barb Dwyer
Roar Rookie
I agree, there is an undercurrent but that has been generated by those who don't support Warner, not Warner himself. I'm not a fan of Warner's but I don't think this is an issue to catch him out on.
jameswm
Roar Guru
I read Warner’s quote. He didn’t exactly say that but there was an undercurrent.
Rowdy
Roar Rookie
Don't yu yu yu ... yiu yu yiu you wor, don't you yiu yu worry about that
Khun Phil
Roar Rookie
Is that you,Sir Joh?
Khun Phil
Roar Rookie
How did Brett Lee get into this argument?He hasn't come out bagging people because they came from a different state. To me,Johnson and Lee were both excellent fast bowlers who had some special moments.Neither of them will go down as legends like Lillee,Thomson or McGrath. Johnson has chosen to use his profile to make provocative comments, so he must expect to receive some flak in return.
Pumping Dougie
Roar Guru
Yeah fair point ... both are flogs
Barb Dwyer
Roar Rookie
It's a fair comment except that Warner has never made this comment so his accusation is inaccurate.
jameswm
Roar Guru
How did he attack Bailey personally? Do you mean to the level of querying his mental health?
jameswm
Roar Guru
Totally agree. And if a selection is close, taking into account other factors, like the future of the team, becomes relevant.
jameswm
Roar Guru
Yes, well my comment was tongue in cheek...