The Wrap: Rugby Australia gaslights Rebels staff and why ‘I Can’t Go For That’

By Geoff Parkes / Expert

It was a difficult weekend for Hall and Oates fans, with news coming through of the duo’s official split. Never mind that their last top-ten single was way back in 1988, or that it feels a lot like discovering your grandparents no longer sleep together. For fans and hairdressers around the globe, it’s now ‘out of touch, out of time’.

With the Hurricanes coming off a loss and returning to Wellington, it always felt like the Waratahs were onto a hiding to nothing in the Friday’s opening match. Well, not quite nothing; the visitors posting two second-half tries to at least come away with some reward from the 41-12 result.

The Hurricanes were slick and powerful early, in what was a nice tune-up for their mouth-watering top-of-the-table clash next weekend in Auckland.

The Blues got plenty out of their match as well, under the pump in the first half in the face of a committed and tactically astute Rebels side, energetically led by the twin-Josh threat of Canham and Kemeny.

Power and class told in the end, the score blowing out late to 38-11 as the Blues took the short route, clinically converting the same red zone opportunities that the Rebels weren’t quite able to nail.

(Photo by Daniel Pockett/Getty Images)

A nod of appreciation is due referee Angus Gardner, who kindly allowed the crowd to enjoy a mid-match toilet and beer break, while he afforded Blues hooker Ricky Riccitelli an age to change his boots.

And how good was it to see Cameron Suafoa return to action, having spent a big chunk of this season undergoing radiation therapy for cancer?

Saturday delivered a sodden surface in Nuku’alofa, where the Highlanders brought the right game plan for the conditions, helping them to a solid 28-17 win against Moana Pasifika.

In what was their best display for several weeks, the only disappointment was that Rhys Patchell didn’t travel, depriving fans of the opportunity to see the Welshman perform the team’s special haka, before the match.

There are significant logistical and financial challenges around hosting matches in the Pacific Islands, but it was terrific to see such an animated crowd, despite the rain. Hopefully next time their side isn’t quite so overawed by the occasion.

The match of the round saw the Reds take their opportunities in the first-half, and muscle up in defence late, to score a rare, and very well-deserved win in Christchurch, 33-28 against the Crusaders.

Those early highlights included a wonderful team try to Tim Ryan who, after a stellar three-try debut last week against the Blues, slumped to a disappointing two-try tally this week.

The key play came when the Crusaders – who had the best of the middle two quarters – had clawed their way back to 21-21. David Havili was making a fair fist of flyhalf, but he got himself into an awkward position for a clearing kick, and Harry Wilson’s hustle to charge-down, regather and score, was typical of the Reds’ tenacity throughout.

Hampered by the early loss of Scott Barrett, the Crusaders are still lurking within striking distance of a finals spot, but they are making things tough for themselves. It goes without saying that they must overcome the Highlanders next weekend.

In Hamilton, the Force started poorly and thereafter were never in the contest; the Chiefs coasting to a 56-7 win. It wouldn’t be a Chiefs match without something for the Damian McKenzie showreel; this time making like a MLB outfielder, sliding to prevent a 50:22 and claiming a superb fair catch.

Keep an eye out too, for Chiefs replacement hooker Tyrone Thompson, whose final-quarter cameo was full of explosive power, pace and skill. Already a NZ Maori and New Zealand XV representative, at 23 years old, Thompson has the right physique and skillset to take his game further.

After a clean, swift 14-0 start, the Brumbies struggled to contain a Drua side that grew in confidence as they settled into the match, off the back of a powerful scrum.

(Photo by Mark Nolan/Getty Images)

Recovering to 21-17 a Drua win was a distinct possibility, but the injection of Luke Reimer proved decisive. Reimer – who most definitely doesn’t share the same hair stylist as John Oates – was in everything, snuffing out a couple of dangerous attacks then crashing over for the final try of the match.

The Drua sit in eighth place with what are some winnable matches in front of them, but next week’s match in Perth feels pivotal.

In off-field news, Friday saw a Deed of Company Arrangement (DOCA) proposed by the Melbourne Rebels directors, passed by a meeting of creditors. The saga now moves into a negotiation phase which covers two substantive matters: the extent to which the ATO might be prepared to forgive a debt or partial debt, and whether or not Rugby Australia is prepared to make available the Super Rugby licence for the Rebels, to the new consortium.

On the first point, an ATO representative explained to the meeting, legal reasons for their voting against the DOCA. That action does not prevent them from negotiating with the directors outside of the deed, just as it is normal practice for the ATO to make arrangements with businesses and individuals as it sees fit.

While many ‘at home’ observers have pronounced the Rebels’ directors guilty of insolvent trading, and insist that they know the ATO’s position, more prudent observers await with interest to see what will actually transpire.

With respect to Rugby Australia and the licence, multiple sources in New Zealand confirm that the two national unions have agreed to move to an 11-team Super Rugby competition for 2025.

Showing their hand on Friday, Rugby Australia voted against the DOCA. Every indicator suggests that Rugby Australia is intent on forcing the liquidation of the Rebels, via withholding the licence.

(Photo by Asanka Ratnayake/Getty Images)

Suggestions that Rugby Australia’s vote against the DOCA was forced by the certainty of legal action being mounted against them are a misread. Whether this matter goes to court or not hinges on two things happening: the continuation of the Rebels under a new consortium, and Rugby Australia acknowledging responsibility for a portion of the debt, with respect to undertakings that were made.

Should Rugby Australia return to the negotiating table over the next two to three weeks, there remains the possibility of these matters being resolved and the Rebels continuing without anyone going to court.

This is a very difficult issue for Rugby Australia to deal with; the pressure evident when the day before the creditor’s vote, a letter was sent to PwC Australia, alleging that the administrator’s report was biased in favour of the directors.

Note the language used since, to highlight how the administrator was appointed by the Rebels’ directors. Technically perhaps; in truth, the directors proposed a different firm but this was rejected by Rugby Australia, who insisted upon them appointing PwC.

As everyone in rugby knows, moaning about the referee’s decision is never a good look; more so when it’s a referee of your own choosing.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

If Rugby Australia are hellbent on downsizing Australia’s professional footprint and cutting the Rebels from Super Rugby, their position – and the understanding of every observer – would be enhanced by transparency around the net saving achieved by cutting the Rebels versus the net cost of cutting them.

In all of the talk about administration processes and potential litigation, what is too easily forgotten is the human element. Post-match on Friday night, Rebels coach Kevin Foote spoke about the severe stress placed on staff and players – many of whom have young families and whose livelihoods and careers are at stake – throughout this year.

Foote also referenced a Zoom meeting ten days ago, where Rugby Australia CEO Phil Waugh told staff he was happy for them that the DOCA as recommended by the administrator would allow them to receive 100 per cent of their entitlements.

Nice words, but what about actions? Those same staff now have to come to terms with Waugh voting against the DOCA; an action designed to prevent them from being paid those entitlements.

(Photo by Daniel Pockett/Getty Images for Rugby Australia)

To repeat, this is a difficult situation for Rugby Australia to navigate. But there can be no justification for gaslighting emotionally wrought staff, who are guilty of nothing but making a genuine contribution to Australian rugby in their respective roles.

It speaks volumes for the calibre and resilience of the staff and players that they have been able to function as well as they have, without the support of a CEO or a board, and a parent body who won’t level with them.

Out of fairness and respect for these people, it is past time for Rugby Australia to negotiate with the new consortium and keep the Rebels for 2025 and beyond, or else be done with it and confirm that the franchise will be cut, and face whatever consequences come with that decision.

Either way, everyone involved must be allowed to move on.

The Crowd Says:

2024-05-09T20:35:59+00:00

Rocky's Rules

Roar Rookie


@Dionysus In this case it means .... now within a whisker and most likely soon to be :laughing:

2024-05-09T05:55:25+00:00

Dionysus

Roar Rookie


I don't understand, what do you mean by almost ?

2024-05-09T01:16:10+00:00

ajhreds


They are a protected species like Queensland for good reason. They are the nurseries of all Rugby Talent in Australia pilfered by outside Super Rugby Franchises .

2024-05-08T22:33:21+00:00

Dionysus

Roar Rookie


"if Melbourne Storm’s NRL success over so many seasons does not allow any more support than all AFL sides in Melbourne what hope does Rugby ever have rstablishing a foothold" I guess that depends upon how you measure success and what establishing a foothold really means. The trap we keep slipping into is by thinking that success is measured by how many people go to matches when in reality so many other factors come into play. NRL and Rugby are arguably more enjoyable watched on TV as some of the more technical and subtle aspects of both games can be better appreciated. AFL and soccor seem to be games where enjoyment seems to come more from attending the match than by watching on tv. Maybe its more of a social thing, I don't know. An AFL friend of mine once said that he enjoys the whole game day experience with AFL starting with lunch with the family and ending in the pub with mates. You take the Storm, not the biggest home gates in the NRL but away gates are up there, 2nd highest memberships of any club and tv audiences amongst the highest every weekend. Now I admit that the Rebels have been very poorly run. The directors have taken a "heads in the sand" approach to their finances whilst rebels matches are one of Melbourne's best kept secrets outside of the ardent rugby fan community but what is their overall contribution to rugby in Australia ? Is it the Rebels that have failed in Melbourne or is it Rugby that has failed in Victoria ?

2024-05-08T12:54:26+00:00

Brendan NH Fan

Roar Rookie


The question is what is the income of 5 SRP teams and RA with a team in Melbourne and then what is the income of he 4 teams and RA if no team in Melbourne. How much is a broadcast deal with and without Melbourne. If with Melbourne its 30m and without its 25m then covering the 5m loss is a good investment as it costs nothing and you have 5 teams. IF SRP road is scrapped because Vic Government pull out as on Vic team and no one takes it on is the loss of the Rebels worth it for NZR. Melbourne has a 205 of SRP total population. If only 5% of Vic watch SRP that is 340k and if half stop watching then that is 170k views less watching SR. Add in that with 11 teams there will only be 5 games per round then alot of viewers from that team also don't view that weekend. Cost of a team is much bigger than many think.

2024-05-08T12:43:50+00:00

Brendan NH Fan

Roar Rookie


So who is taking the big loss last year and this year. When was the 700k up to. Like in 2017 RA chose to take the Rebel with no debt but never fixed the issue of how the debt came about. Have we heard the Tahs cutting player wages or how they are going to bring in more income. I know what their solution is, well the Lions and WC will just magically fix everything so that 5m loss will be gone because Tahs income will magically go up by 5m each year from 2027. It was the same with the Rebels because cutting the Force, Cheetahs, kings in 2017 and Sunwolves in 2020 was just going to make so much more money for everyone the Rebels would be fine.

2024-05-08T12:38:04+00:00

Brendan NH Fan

Roar Rookie


It depends on the business. If you have small income windows where 80-90% of the income is raised (SRP teams must be about that) is raised in a month then accounts are very good and moving things around where you are using tax payments, employee entitlements etc to get you an extra month until payday. We saw in the financial crash all over the world banks had weekend tech issues so they could not have any money go out until money came in on the Monday.

2024-05-08T12:34:42+00:00

Brendan NH Fan

Roar Rookie


Sadly so have I (an employee not the boss) and you get out of a whole by moving things around but the hole is just getting bigger and when you face up to it its to big to get out of. Tahs made a near 5m loss because of revenue dropping. We A. have nothing to say it is going back up, and B that expenses are coming down. We know that this new broadcast deal is make or break for if we can keep high earning SRP players in OZ so if it comes in under value (which is what I expect) then the hole got bigger and the expenses will be to far ahead to cut it back down to size.

2024-05-08T10:57:18+00:00

AgainAgain

Roar Rookie


Hard to believe anything coming out of RA either, which is what leads to so much conjecture.

2024-05-08T10:53:42+00:00

AgainAgain

Roar Rookie


Is SRAU jsut the same SR teams running out, which may get a bit boring and not hold much interest as it is just a repeat of what we have already seen in SR. Or are you suggesting SRAU is really just a rebadged NRC with more teams, in which case why not call it NRC?

2024-05-08T04:41:00+00:00

Jacko

Roar Rookie


Yeah its weird how Sueing RA is a possibility by so many isnt it Jez. Never RAs fault tho eh! You, and a couple of others inc hamish the drunken spender have spat the dummy and stated you will leave as your preferred option with contracts in place. Your partners have said they will plan for your childish governing body to actually do as it is saying. Great planning. What threats from NZ are your reactions to? Not one!!!

2024-05-08T00:26:50+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


All I’m proposing is some forward thinking. Ok, so NZ “making contingency plans” me sharing thoughts on an opinion site. All good for NZ, they are prudent and wise, me, I’m apparently spitting my dummy? Spare me. _ NZR to sue RA, Rebels to sue RA, anyone else we can get in to pick at the corpse of the code in this country?

2024-05-07T23:55:19+00:00

LuckyPhil

Roar Rookie


You seem to know all the answers, so please tell us who receives the most top ups. However, the way it works is the player still gets to choose where he plays, and not surprisingly most players that grew up in Sydney often prefer to stay there. BTW, I don't like the contracting process at all and believe if SR was run better the clubs could generate enough money to fund themselves.

2024-05-07T22:36:57+00:00

Jacko

Roar Rookie


Jez thats deliberately misinterpreting what was said. You deliberately left out the word "Contingency" before plans. NZ will always have a contingency plan should RA walk away. Its called forward thinking and RA should give it a go some time. Personally I hope NZR sue's the hell out of RA should RA no longer provide 5 teams. They have contracts thru to 2030 from what I gather.

2024-05-07T22:27:35+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


I agree with you, is why I’m open to the idea rather than actively advocating for it.

2024-05-07T22:25:56+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


Well yes, and let’s be clear, I’m just someone that comments on the Roar. To do it then RA need all that financial analysis, stakeholder engagement, etc. Meanwhile you and I are on an opinion site.

2024-05-07T22:11:24+00:00

Jacko

Roar Rookie


So where did the debt suddenly disappear to and why did the Tahs hand back their licence?

2024-05-07T20:30:02+00:00

Rocky's Rules

Roar Rookie


@Jez NZ have made continency plans to move on IF Aust spits it's dummy and doesn't want to be part of SRP. They're doing that cos they're much more intelligent than us. NZ rugby doesn't need Australia. Yes, I'm obviously not the full quid cos I don't put up thought bubbles as serious proposals. You'll need to have a valid economic viability assessment, a real Comp proposal with real entrants and real solid interest from potential broadcasters to be taken seriously. Until then you have no more than a thought bubble :happy:

2024-05-07T14:06:28+00:00

kingplaymaker

Roar Guru


They have two leagues in Europe. A domestic one they can win and an international one. Why on earth doesn't RA do that?

2024-05-07T13:14:30+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


I love it Rocky, NZR are making plans that don't include us and that's good management but I'm spitting the dummy if I consider plans that don't include them? You really aren't the full quid.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar