World Cup semis: Australia's two key weaknesses - and England's major strength

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

Australia have had a fantastic World Cup to date but they will have to overcome a number of issues if they are to beat tournament hosts England in Thursday’s semi-final.

Here are three problems for Australia heading into this match.

The brute force of Roy and Bairstow
When Australia comfortably defeated England two weeks ago the home side were hampered by the absence of intimidating opening batsman Jason Roy.

Instead the Aussie quicks were lucky to bowl at his replacement James Vince, a flawed batsman who has failed in both ODIs and Tests to date.

The 28-year-old Roy has been in barnstorming touch in ODIs this year, cracking 743 runs at 74, with a sprinting strike rate of 118.

He also seems to bring out the best in his opening partner Jonny Bairstow. That is no surprise. When a player scores as quickly as Roy, and bullies bowlers and opposition captains like he so often does, it relieves a lot of pressure on their batting partner.

England’s Jason Roy (David Davies/PA via AP)

It means that, if Bairstow is not quite in sync at the start of his innings, he can take his time to find rhythm, safe in the knowledge the run rate is healthy regardless. And if he is seeing them well then it’s party time, with both batsmen getting after the bowlers, leaving the opposition under siege.

The latter scenario is just what played out in England’s last two matches. Against New Zealand, Roy and Bairstow cantered to a 123 run stand in just 18.3 overs. In the previous match, versus India, they put on 160 from 22.1 overs.

These fast starts are valuable for a variety of reasons, many of them obvious. One of their more subtle upsides relates to pitch conditions in this tournament. The English surfaces have got progressively slower, lower and more difficult for batting across most games.

Roy and Bairstow help England cash in while batting conditions are at their best, reducing the responsibility on the middle order to score at a scorching pace.

So good is this pair that they have the highest average partnership (68) of any opening combination in ODI history (minimum 1,000 runs).

Alex Carey’s keeping is letting him down
The South Australian has been one of the breakout stars of this tournament, with 329 runs at 66, at a strike rate of 113. But his classical strokeplay and impeccable timing have concealed, to an extent, his shoddy glovework.

Carey’s mistakes behind the stumps have been at the heart of both of Australia’s losses in this series.

Against South Africa, in-form batsman Rassie van der Dussen was on just four when he came down the pitch, was beaten in the flight by off spinner Glenn Maxwell and left stranded out of his crease. But Carey missed this fairly straightforward stumping chance.

Had he taken it SA would have been 3-133 and their weak middle order would have been exposed.

Instead van der Dussen cracked 95 and constructed a match-winning 151-run stand with skipper Faf du Plessis (100). While Carey later starred with the bat, making 85, his error allowed van der Dussen to push the Proteas to a total that was beyond Australia.

It was a similar story in Australia’s loss to India. From the first ball he faced, India’s most dangerous hitter Hardik Pandya nicked a delivery from Nathan Coulter-Nile and offered Carey a regulation catch.

Somehow, Carey turfed it. Pandya then proceeded to go ballistic, hammering 48 from 27 balls. It was a pivotal moment and only looked more significant when Australia finished just 36 runs short of victory.

These two instances are not Carey’s only keeping mistakes in the tournament, they are just the most crucial ones. Ironically, Carey was picked to play ODIs largely on the strength of his glovework, with his batting widely seen as a weakness. To date, the reverse has been true.

Maxwell’s short ball weakness
Glenn Maxwell has a problem, a bouncer problem. The cavalier all-rounder has been out cheaply to short balls in his last three innings as teams have begun targeting him with bouncers.

Maxwell was also out playing the pull shot against the West Indies, in Australia’s first match of this World Cup. That means four of his seven dismissals have come from short balls.

Against the Windies a Sheldon Cottrell delivery got big on him and he skied an easy catch. Versus England he tried to run a Mark Wood short ball through the slip area and edged behind. Next up he was through his pull shot far too early and succeeded only in toe-ending it straight back to New Zealand’s Jimmy Neesham.

Glenn Maxwell. (AP Photo/Jon Super)

Then against South Africa, the Proteas made a point of targeting him with short balls until he nicked a Kagiso Rabada bouncer. England are perfectly positioned to exploit Maxwell’s weakness.

In Jofra Archer and Mark Wood they have two of the fastest bowlers in the tournament, both of whom have very good short balls.

Maxwell seems to have only one plan to counter this strategy – thrash for the fences. Expect Wood or Archer to come into the attack when he arrives at the crease.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

The Crowd Says:

2019-07-10T12:25:42+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


Of course! I should never have doubted myself :)

2019-07-10T10:24:07+00:00

Cadfael

Roar Guru


I think the word is that Hanscomb will come in for Uzzi.

2019-07-10T03:26:46+00:00

IAP

Guest


Roy and Bairstow are average batsmen who are totally reliant on big bats and postage stamp grounds. Against NZ Bairstow twice mishit balls that would have gone straight to cover for 100 years but flew over the top for 4. You're spot on, we just have to not allow them to free their arms and then just wait until they mishit trying to force the ball.

2019-07-10T03:06:20+00:00

El Loco

Roar Rookie


No it wasn't, vocal 'cords' is correct.

2019-07-10T02:42:16+00:00

DTM

Guest


I'll have Thursday nights if it's ok.

2019-07-09T22:17:20+00:00

Neil Back

Roar Rookie


That tail may become less relevant. With a good chance of showers forecast, Mssrs Duckworth, Lewis & Stern may be at the game.

2019-07-09T13:12:44+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


And we are potentially seeing it play out right now with NZ/India...

2019-07-09T12:07:46+00:00

Gonzo99

Roar Rookie


Looking at the NZ - India match, you may have jinxed it with this.

AUTHOR

2019-07-09T11:05:46+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


No doubt that England have an amazing tail.

2019-07-09T10:19:45+00:00

Perthstayer

Roar Rookie


Ronan, good corrections. Not only was I thinking of Moeen's 4 centuries, whose not playing, but I also thought Woakes had one to his name, but HS is 95. But with Woakes 4x 50's and Plunkett's average is 21, I stand by my point that the 5 to 9, along with either the 3 or 4 could make a big total if Roy and Bairstow are skittled.

2019-07-09T08:34:30+00:00

David Holden

Roar Guru


For Australia to be a chance on Thursday night, they need to get early wickets. If they can pick up Roy and Bairstow cheaply, uncertainty will start to creep in. It’s up to our new ball bowlers

2019-07-09T08:33:35+00:00

Andrew Cowley

Roar Rookie


Good article again ronan,agree on Carey fully.too late for keeper change but looking forward,moving Carey up the order and bringing in wade or even Paine as keeper maybe a good option.as you say if Carey costs is runs by missing chances then having Paine in for keeping can save us runs.put it this way if Paine was keeping in those games we would have won by taking those chances and therefore not conceding extra runs.i think having the best keeper in your side is a must but maybe I’m old fashioned.hopefully 2 close games to come and an epic final.

2019-07-09T07:53:28+00:00

Diamond Jackie

Roar Rookie


Goodness that’s detailed GG. Nice work.

2019-07-09T07:47:51+00:00

Simoc

Guest


I doubt this. They will have a team in mind and only deviate from it through injuries. They seem to be fixated on Stoinus where no-one else is. He is the weak link. So Marsh isn't eligible to play at present I would still leave Stoinus out and play Wade and Handscomb. But I think they will go with Handscomb and Stoinus. But anyway if we win the toss, bat and score over 300, I think we will win.

2019-07-09T07:46:24+00:00

Republican

Guest


.......the 1st semi i.e. NZ v India, is a far more enticing contest because it's difficult to pick a winner. England v Australia is unfortunately a foregone conclusion, with England in the box seat to secure a place in the final. Australia is unstable and vulnerable, due to changes in the line up courtesy of injury to key players. They will pay dearly for this v England. I hope in hope that it will be an India v Albion final but I have a gut feeling the Kiwis are going to roll India P.M. and if they do, they will give England a power of consternation in the final, to be sure.....

2019-07-09T06:49:33+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


Yep. It "could" be a real conundrum James. Very interesting though.

AUTHOR

2019-07-09T06:46:39+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


There you go... https://www.theroar.com.au/2019/07/02/bat-first-to-win-this-world-cup/

2019-07-09T06:19:46+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


Adding to that, was reminded that Carey has missed a couple of other balls off Lyon that beat the batsmen and went over or close to the stumps. Not chances, but perhaps more evidence of a weakness keeping to spin than I conceded above.

2019-07-09T06:11:46+00:00

Cricket fan

Guest


Yes, there is no confusion because if stoinis get fit than Marsh will not be choosen than its simple only Khawaja needs to be replaced by Handscomb but than I opt for Wade because I don't want to play stoinis that's why I said both should play and "on Marsh if stoinis somehow yes somehow doesn't fit on time which is very bleak secenerio than it must be Marsh instead of Wade "

2019-07-09T06:09:46+00:00

Brainstrust

Roar Rookie


This is a bizzare analysis. Carey has missed some chances, but he hasn't missed that many.Is it a major weakness I would say no. The rest of the team have been more reliable but have missed the odd chance. Pakistan on the other hand they seemed to stuff a few per innings. Pakistan their catching and fielding is a major weakness. They cant do anything about Carey anyway. Maxwell his new major weakness they can cover for easily by sending Carey ahead of him. Stoinis he has about 5 major weaknesses, his strike rate, getting out to part timers, his running between the wickets, his expensive bowling. They can ditch him. I would say the fast bowling the first spell with the new ball has generally been poor. Because the wickets were helping them that covered up for their bad bowling. England made their highest total without Roy, Root opened against the West Indies and they won that easy, he would be a better choice than Vince if Roy was still injured. Roy is obviously a lot better than Vince but I dont see Roy helping the other batsman England failed against Pakistan with Roy chasing the only big total England had to chase. They were chasing a modest total against Sri Lanka. Englands major weakness is they are a batting team for flat wickets, which is not an issue if the wicket is indeed flat.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar