Eight talking points from NRL Round 14

By Scott Pryde / Expert

There are just six weeks to go in the NRL season, and the top eight is looking more set in stone. Here are my talking points from a fascinating Round 14.

It’s amazing what happens when you play for the full 80 minutes
The consistency switch finally flicked for the Dragons on Friday.

Not from week-to-week. That has been there arguably since their first win of the season. The Red V haven’t had a bad loss since the twin defeats at the hands of the Warriors and Bulldogs when play first resumed.

But it’s the first time they have played for 80 minutes in a number of weeks. It follows three frustrating performances where they were the better team for chunks of the match but still found ways to lose. The Eels might have been a little bit flat, but the St George playing for the entire game without switching off was different.

It’s not a surprise the blue and gold were flat, given the five-day turnaround from a slugfest at Kogarah against Cronulla, and their clash with Melbourne next week will be pivotal, but the Dragons deserve plenty of credit for winning at Bankwest.

Whether it Cameron McInnes at lock, who ran more than 170 metres to go with 58 tackles, or the creativity and poise of Adam Clune, it was a solid performance.

Finals may be gone, but 2021 is worth building for now with Paul McGregor out the door. He was sent out a winner and the playing group clearly respected him, as evidenced post-game, but he wasn’t a good long-term fit for the club.

The upcoming period will be one of the most important in club history. Getting the right coach and sorting out player recruitment will determine whether they can rebound from a tumultuous seven years.

Paul McGregor. (Photo by Mark Kolbe/Getty Images)

Have the Broncos hit rock bottom?
Whether it was being beaten 59-0 by the Roosters, losing 30-12 to the Titans and 26-12 against the Warriors in back-to-back weeks, or being hammered 48-0 by the Tigers, it looked like things couldn’t possibly get worse for the Broncos.

But then on Saturday, they squandered an 8-6 lead at halftime to the Raiders, eventually losing 36-8.

It was embarrassing.

The attack was average, but defensively, it was a downright inept performance. When Corey Harawira-Naera simply ran past three defenders 60 metres from home without a finger being laid on him, it summed up the entire season for the Broncos. It was a level of defence which wouldn’t be accepted in junior footy.

They have now lost 11 of the last 12 games, and rock bottom may still be on its way. With a run home featuring the Roosters, Panthers and Eels, they could well wind up with the wooden spoon.

And just maybe, it’s what the club needs to kick back in the right direction, because little else is working.

(Photo by Mark Metcalfe/Getty Images)

Biting deserves a send-off, but the punishment needs to be used more
The send-off was wheeled out for only the second time this season on Saturday, with Kevin Proctor given his marching orders for biting.

As much as Proctor was remorseful afterwards, there is no place in the game for acts like that. Referee Henry Perenara and the rest of the officiating team made the correct decision.

The Titans second-rower is going to spend many, many weeks on the sideline for the incident, and it could be that the judiciary makes an example of him. Biting isn’t exactly a regular occurrence, but it must be stamped out immediately whenever it does bare its ugly teeth.

But – and it’s a big but – while the officials should be commended for their work on Saturday, even if it did end the Titans’ chances of staying competitive against the Sharks, the NRL need to get serious on other severe acts of foul play.

The stand-out is the eye gouge. The send-off hardly ever gets brought out on the rare occasions a player commits an eye gouge, and yet, you could say it’s the dumbest, most dangerous thing anyone could do on a footy field.

There are other instances – less so in the modern game – where the send-off should be used, and yet, it isn’t.

It’s been great to see officials using the sin bin with regularity, but for inexcusable acts, the send-off must be used more frequently.

Christian Welch proves himself another Melbourne success
Melbourne are a team full of unsung heroes. Players that at other clubs would barely be noticed, but under Craig Bellamy and his fine-tuned system are borderline stars.

One of those is Christian Welch.

The prop has had his share of injuries, but he has never had a star quality about his game. He isn’t a flashy forward, like Payne Haas for example.

He simply gets stuck in and does his job, which he has been doing better and better with each passing week as he re-establishes himself in the Melbourne 17.

His improvement has been picked up on by Bellamy, who promoted him from the bench to starting team, then left him there.

In Thursday’s game against the Roosters, he quietly racked up 190 metres from 19 runs to lead all Storm players, and chipped in with 86 post-contact metres and 32 tackles.

Jahrome Hughes and Ryan Papenhuyzen might have taken all the credit for the win, but without players like Welch, or Kenny Bromwich and Dale Finucane, it wouldn’t be possible for the Storm to be as good as they are.

There is also the small matter of a Queensland jersey at the back-end of the year. Welch may not be all that far away.

The Warriors can play finals footy in 2021 if travel restrictions ease
The script said the Warriors were supposed to fall in an absolute heap when they lost four players back home.

They weren’t supposed to win another game.

Well, they went and beat Manly last week, then turned around and hung in the battle against the red-hot Panthers on a soaking wet Central Coast this round.

While one might argue the Panthers were due for a let-down, and probably need a loss sooner rather than later, not many would have predicted the scare was going to come from the Warriors.

Consistency may still be avoiding the Warriors, but that’s hardly a surprise given their circumstances.

Under a coach with a record of putting the building blocks in place for a rebuild (he built the roster at Newcastle), they could well further even the wildest of expectations for next year and play finals footy.

With Roger Tuivasa-Sheck and Chanel Harris-Tavita in the side, plus some more signings likely (Euan Aitken has already joined), they have the creativity to put points on, so long as their forwards compete.

If they can get 12 home games, then the Auckland-based side could be the good news story the competition needs.

(Photo by Tony Feder/Getty Images)

Someone might want to sign Alex Johnston
There are some big signatures on the open market right now, but Alex Johnston’s name should be at the pointy end of the list.

For one reason or another, the Rabbitohs seemingly don’t see the value in the prolific try-scorer, but rival clubs circling certainly do, and Johnston will be a prized addition for another club.

While he does have a tendency to make silly errors or drift in and out of games – and the fact he wants to play fullback could be an issue – there are few wingers in the NRL like him.

Already this season, he has 12 tries in 14 games, to go with 95 in 136 for his career. It’s an incredible strike rate, and with his ball running – remember, he picked up over 300 metres just last week – it makes him stand out in a crowded market.

That comes with another double on the weekend, including a late clutch try to ensure the Rabbitohs stayed in the contest against North Queensland.

If South Sydney won’t sign him, it could well be a club like the Storm, who may need to replace two wingers, seeking his services.

This is a familiar sight for Alex Johnston.

Manly have one last roll of the dice
Every game carries more importance in a reduced season, and injuries suddenly rule key players out of a much higher percentage of the fixture.

That is the hole Manly find themselves in after three straight losses, including a couple of high-effort, low-polish performances against the Warriors and Knights in the last fortnight.

And while the injury toll has been enormous on Des Hasler’s men, it can’t be the excuse for slumping down the table. There are plenty of clubs battling with long casualty lists. They have proven they can match it with clubs they lose to, but have been struggling to string together 80-minute performances.

The casualty list is expected to start easing slightly next week with the return of Tom Trbojevic, but Manly, already out of the eight by four points, can’t afford any more losses. That is an issue because next on their draw are the Rabbitohs, followed by the Storm.

After leaving points on the field against teams like the Warriors, Dragons and Knights on two occasions, the finals have arrived early for the Sea Eagles.

Tom Trbojevic will be a very welcome addition for Manly. (Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

Chopping and changing hurts the Tigers defence
Michael Maguire must find a formula and stick to it.

Win or lose, the way the Tigers defended against the Bulldogs proves once and for all the team needs major improvements in that regard. But more changes aren’t the answer.

Canterbury have only scored more than 20 points twice this season – both against the Dragons – but 28 is a new high for the blue and white.

Good defence is a result of solid combinations, good work on the training paddock and putting it all to work in NRL games across the course of the season.

While the changes Maguire made this week may have been forced, their edges have been prone to leaking points all season. It doesn’t come as a surprise given the way he has ruthlessly discarded talent.

Benji Marshall has been dropped, Luke Brooks was put on the bench for three weeks, and their forwards have been a revolving door at different points throughout the year.

It’s one thing to drop players for being poor defensively, but when the changes are constant, almost making it look as if the coach has no idea who the best 17 is, it impacts the players and their combinations.

They may have escaped with a win on Sunday, but it wasn’t good enough if they have any hope of playing finals footy.

The Crowd Says:

2020-08-18T05:20:29+00:00

Nat

Roar Rookie


Oh no, now Hooper is trotting out a similar line to mine. I retract everything!!! :shocked:

2020-08-18T04:53:46+00:00

Nat

Roar Rookie


Maybe Johnson's tweet puts what I meant in better context. "In the heat of the moment I reacted the way I did and I can’t change that, no way did I think he would get sent from the field but I did think we’d get something for it." Thats' what I was trying to say, he played for a penalty but in doing so didn't fully appreciate the ramifications.

2020-08-18T01:44:36+00:00

edward

Guest


Thats why Perenara doesnt get the big games becausae he ruined the spectacle. BTW Hasler complained about the Newcastle game ref yet when he was behind on the scoreboard he received the small benefit of set restarts and penalties so it wasnt all one way but the fact that they led so early. I didnt hear him complaining about that.

2020-08-17T13:03:23+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


I’m not twisting any facts. Proctor bit him. You’ve admitted it. It’s against the rules and having someone’s arm in / on / near your mouth isn’t an excuse Biting wasn’t “made illegal” it always has been You’re telling me I’m twisting facts while you’re saying Johnson was trying to force his arm further into his mouth and twist his neck back to break his jaw? Johnson wasn’t doing any of those things, he wasn’t twisting or grappling Proctor, evidenced by the fact he hasn’t been charged with anything. His arm was across Proctors face, it ended up in his mouth and proctor bit him You’re making out this was some kind of intentional tactic from Johnson...he’s played 10 years of first grade, made literally thousands of tackles but has now suddenly come up with a deliberate tactic to pop opponents jaws out? It’s ridiculous and it’s not supported by the footage of what actually happened A far more reasonable explanation is that Johnson’s arm was accidentally across Proctors mouth who for whatever reason snapped and bit him. That’s exactly what the video shows

2020-08-17T12:42:00+00:00

Gray-Hand

Roar Rookie


You keep trying to twist the facts. His arm wasn’t across his face. It was in his mouth. That rarely happens and is meant to be penalised when it does because it is dirty play. He didn’t dislocate Proctor’s jaw because Proctor resisted. What else is Proctor meant to do? Let his jaw go slack and let Johnson force his arm further into his mouth? Let him use his top jaw as a lever to twist his neck back? Do you have any idea how easy it is to dislocate a slack jaw? A child can do it. I’ve watched someone do it by yawning. And there is plenty of force. Johnson is clearly leveraging his arm by gripping the shoulder. He maintained that hold despite feeling Proctor’s teeth on his arm. Biting wasn’t made illegal to stop people from legitimately defending themselves from having opponents illegally attack their mouths. It was outlawed to stop players deliberately disfiguring and maiming other players by biting delicate areas such as faces, ears and fingers.

2020-08-17T12:41:02+00:00

Kurt S

Roar Pro


I see Ben Ikin brought up my point RE: Proctor tonight on NRL 360.

2020-08-17T11:47:31+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


That’s an absolute load of garbage...Johnson wasn’t applying anywhere near enough force to dislocate Proctor’s jaw. His arm was across Proctors mouth, he wasn’t pulling his head back or applying any force As for it being an automatic reaction, that’s BS too. Players have hands and arms in their faces in every game and don’t feel the need to bite their opponents

2020-08-17T11:13:26+00:00

Gray-Hand

Roar Rookie


Of course he did - the other player was forcing his forearm into his mouth. Come on. If he doesn’t bite down he runs a very real risk of a dislocated jaw. The idea that anyone in that situation wouldn’t bite down is absurd. It’s the body’s automatic panic reaction to a dangerous act.

2020-08-17T10:17:02+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Of course Proctor couldn’t do anything about it, but he didn’t have to bite down I agree with everyone who says Johnson’s arm shouldn’t have been there and that he should have been penalised. But that doesn’t give Proctor the right to bite him Hands and arms in the face in tackles happens all the time...but players don’t get bitten

2020-08-17T09:01:51+00:00

Chris Love

Roar Guru


A fullback these days is more a winger and 5/8 combined. You can have a solid custodian that does the job at the back but unless he can also ballplay out the back and be that second 5/8 in attack they aren't going to be on the big coin. I also think Alex is a far better winger than he is a FB.

2020-08-17T08:39:06+00:00

Cadfael

Roar Guru


The converse is why wasn't Johnson penalised for a high tackle because that is what it was.

2020-08-17T08:14:20+00:00

Tony

Roar Guru


Classic

2020-08-17T08:08:33+00:00

Gray-Hand

Roar Rookie


Serious question - how is he expected to avoid his teeth coming into contact with Johnson’s arm after Johnson puts it in his mouth - and even holds it there by maintaining a hold on Proctor’s shoulder?

2020-08-17T06:56:41+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


Though I do also think Johnson should get a charge for the initial contact

2020-08-17T06:55:25+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


Well we disagree, I think he recovered his "cool head" pretty quick. As for understanding that - you said it was a bit rich that he's changed his view seconds later? Was that comment heat of the moment :silly:

2020-08-17T06:06:02+00:00

Nat

Roar Rookie


He's very aware as well. I mentioned it once during the game that running is the last thing on his mind when he's scanning as he's moving ready to do just enough to get to that space.

2020-08-17T05:58:53+00:00

Nat

Roar Rookie


CANCEL HIM!!! :silly: I understand that. My point is that the damage was done with Johnson's reaction. There's nothing Johnson can do after the fact, he won't even be required at the judiciary. Once he started showing his arm to the ref, he lost all control of the situation from that point on. It's fine to have a cool head after the fact but it's too late.

2020-08-17T05:11:16+00:00

farkurnell

Roar Rookie


Damn .Ive been sprung .Ive been sprung

2020-08-17T05:11:05+00:00

Bee bee

Guest


TPJ might consider it if it gets him out of his current contract. A nursing home with links to organised crime would be ideal.

2020-08-17T04:51:30+00:00

Rob

Guest


High and late should be the showers. T.Sims has done it 3 times and never been sent? Tripping or kicking a player you're off to the showers. J.Reynolds reckless boot to the fore head of a player picking up the ball. Twice before Reynolds has kicked players and never been sent? Swinging arms making contact with the head you go. JWH, TPJ never gets sent but on report frequently? On the subject of standard rulings and punishments why has Kyle Feldt been taken out twice in the air 2 weeks in a row with opponents not attempting to catch the ball and no penalty given? Maybe they keep calling it a 50/50 but 100% of the time goes against certain teams? It happened straight in front of a certain touch judge that called Hammer off side (replay showed he wasn't even close), Dunn offside (replayed showed he wasn't), Indicated Morgan was held up (relay confirms he wasn't), asked to check obstruction Morgan's 1st try (no problem), check Opacic try (No problem)? Called forward pass on Morgan that went backwards but let the final pass to Johnson try perfectly fine? Consistence is a pipe dream with officials from Sydney.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar