Groundhog day for the Wallabies: Four talking points from Bledisloe 3

By Daniel Jeffrey / Editor

Another Bledisloe Cup, another series victory to New Zealand, courtesy of a dominant 43-5 victory over the Wallabies in Game 3 at ANZ Stadium last night.

Just about everything that could have gone wrong for Australia did, and the young side can now hope for nothing more than a consolation win next week in Brisbane.

Here are four talking points from Bledisloe 3.

Groundhog day for Wallabies and their fans
It might have been a record margin, but it was nonetheless an all-too-familiar scenario for Australian rugby: a comprehensive trouncing against the All Blacks in a must-win match. Last year it was 36-0, the year before 40-12, and the years before that contained a collection of similar scorelines.

ANZ Stadium is also a dire hunting ground for the Wallabies in the Bledisloe Cup. 2015 was the last time they beat the All Blacks at the venue, and 2008 was the time before that.

Neither of those makes last night any less painful, particularly considering the promise the young Australian side showed in Game 1 and, to a far lesser extent, Game 2.

The team, both coaches and players alike, had talked so frequently about improving their accuracy after the Eden Park defeat, but the same problems remained: 17 turnovers coughed up, forcing ill-advised offloads time and time again, five times as many line breaks conceded as the All Blacks, and too much ineffective kicking.

Dave Rennie has rightly espoused the merits of a good game with the boot – you need only re-watch the All Blacks’ play last night to see the effect it can have – but Australia seemed intent on kicking only at the worst possible time, and were unable to get any kind of momentum with ball in hand as a result.

Make no mistake, New Zealand were excellent in the first half before cruising in the second. But while the Wallabies didn’t allow their opponents to be at their best in Game 1, the opposite was true in Sydney: they made it far too easy for New Zealand to dominate, and were lucky the scoreline didn’t blow out further.

(Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

Richie Mo’unga’s perfect ten silences the doubters
Remember when there were questions over whether Richie Mo’unga was the right man to play flyhalf for the All Blacks?

They’ve been thoroughly dispelled now. The little number ten was good at Eden Park but downright brilliant in Sydney. There were no issues with his kicking game, whether he was pinning the Wallabies in miserable field position or sending the ball wide with low, flat, perfectly accurate kick-passes.

He controlled the play superbly, and his two tries (which would have been three but for losing his footing on the stroke of halftime) and match haul of 23 points were just reward for a commanding performance.

With Beauden Barrett also playing well from fullback, it’s clear this dual playmaker system which has been so thoroughly discussed is lethal, and something Ian Foster won’t be shying away from anytime soon.

Foster can also have a smile to himself knowing his critics are out of ammunition for now. Not everyone was a fan of his appointment, but the All Blacks were a clinical, well-drilled side who executed perfectly when the game was alive last night.

Both Mo’unga and Foster will be tested again when New Zealand next play the likes of South Africa or England, but with no one knowing exactly when those fixtures will arise, they can both be content with what they’ve achieved so far this season.

(Photo by Matt King/Getty Images)

Loss exposes the lack of depth in Australian rugby
When fully fit, the Wallabies have shown themselves entirely capable of matching it with the All Blacks this year. With their two key playmakers, Matt To’omua and James O’Connor, out injured, they suddenly looked out of their depth.

Replacing O’Connor at flyhalf, Noah Lolesio struggled. His try was the only bright spot in a brutal debut, where his kicking game was inaccurate and his defence ruthlessly exposed by New Zealand. He had a penalty which went dead instead of into touch, and threw a few poor passes, including one behind and above Harry Wilson when the number eight was running a powerful line with the Wallabies enjoying some good, clean ball.

It’s rough on the youngster, who had excelled when stepping up to a new stage every time this year, but on last night’s evidence he’s got a way to go yet before becoming a Test-level flyhalf.

That said, he seems to have the right attitude, so will hopefully be capable of bouncing back from his first foray into international rugby.

Irae Simone was far more assured in defence than his Brumbies partner, but didn’t offer a hell of a lot more in attack.

Plenty of fault lies with the beaten forward pack, but the result was still a directionless, rushed Wallabies attack which functioned nowhere near as well as it had with O’Connor and To’omua on the park.

With those two unavailable, there weren’t many other options for Dave Rennie to turn to for his 10-12 combination. Reece Hodge or Hunter Paisami could have been tried at inside centre, but neither had made a compelling selection case either in their limited Wallabies gametime there, or in Super Rugby.

Will Harrison is the only other recognised flyhalf in the squad, and while he’s showed himself capable of attacking well behind a beaten pack for the Wallabies, he has just the same defensive concerns as Lolesio.

Contrast that to the All Blacks, who were able to shift Hoskins Sotutu into the starting side to cover Ardie Savea’s absence, bring Ngani Laumape onto the bench, and dump Damian McKenzie in favour of Reiko Ioane as the utility back, and the difference is considerable.

Australia’s depth will improve as the next generation develop, but right now it’s still a way off where it needs to be.

What will the Wallaby response be?
Nothing will erase the disappointment of last night’s loss, but a good response in Brisbane next week will at least indicate to Wallabies fans that it was an aberration, and that this team is actually on the improve.

It is worth keeping a bit of perspective amidst all the doomsaying that has inevitably accompanied the defeat. This side is still a young, inexperienced outfit who’ve spent little more than a month with their new coach, and were missing their two most important backline players. The All Blacks are far more settled, and their ‘new’ boss was part of the previous coaching panel.

That doesn’t excuse the frequency with which the Wallabies have needlessly spat out offloads when they’re not on and gifted ball straight back to New Zealand in their last two matches. That, perhaps more than any other area, must be addressed before Game 4 because, in their rush to keep the ball alive, Australia have made it impossible to build phases and attacking pressure. The defence and kicking game both require improvement too, and kinks remain in the lineout.

Rennie said after Game 2 that he’d look to address weaknesses through selection – referring then to the side’s missed tackle count – but you have to wonder how much can be fixed on the teamsheet and how much falls back on individuals lifting their performance to the level they’re capable of.

(Photo by Chris Hyde/Getty Images)

Matt Philip, for example, had his weakest game of the series so far, and the same could be said for pretty much every other Wallabies forward. But making wholesale changes on the back of one bad outing – atrocious as the ensuing scoreline may have been – doesn’t appear to be the most constructive of approaches.

Caveats out of the way, there will no doubt be some changes made by Rennie. Talk about retaining Lolesio even if O’Connor is healthy is absurd: if the Reds playmaker is fit, he’ll surely be an automatic inclusion.

Lukhan Salakaia-Loto’s ankle injury could also force a change in the second row. Rob Simmons was better in Sydney than he had been in New Zealand, so could come into the starting side and equally provide Trevor Hosea an opportunity to make his debut off the bench.

In terms of unforced changes, the starting front row was decent and Michael Hooper and Harry Wilson won’t be going anywhere, even if the skipper was below his best for the second game ina row, but Ned Hanigan may be nervous about his place in the side after a poor outing, as would Jordan Uelese.

In the backs, Filipo Daugunu had a stinker with an early yellow card and lots of lost ball, and Dane Haylett-Petty was surprisingly far less secure under the high ball than Tom Banks had been in the opening two games of the series.

Whatever changes are made, it’s critical that the Wallabies fix, or at least begin to improve, the issues that have marred their last two Tests in the final Bledisloe game of the year next week.

The Crowd Says:

2020-11-03T11:34:46+00:00

Derek Murray

Roar Rookie


I know the Brumbies use Banks in this role. With him out, you're right, it seems strange he doesn't get the job. Or DHP, who also has a good boot - both have more distance that Lolesio

2020-11-03T10:23:01+00:00

Matt

Guest


In his first stint with the Brumbies he also had an incredible ability to kick the ball an absolute mile down field when penalties were awarded. Seems somewhat strange now that neither the wallabies or brumbies used this feature of his game. Might have been handy a couple of times on the weekend when we were lucky to chew off more than 20 metres

2020-11-03T09:08:15+00:00

Gun Dog

Roar Rookie


Sad but true...

2020-11-03T05:41:14+00:00

moaman

Roar Guru


I haven't seen enough of Umaga-Jensen to comment but rate ALB immensely highly.

2020-11-03T03:27:40+00:00

BrewsterBandit

Roar Rookie


Goodhue been on the short end defensively since last year. ALB is the best NZ centre, but they always have Goodhue in first. I would love to see ALB (12) and PUJ (13). That would be a much better centre combo.

2020-11-03T00:13:45+00:00

Tom G

Roar Rookie


Spot on.. I’ve been saying this for years

2020-11-03T00:10:42+00:00

Tom G

Roar Rookie


Lack of depth is almost a self fulfilling problem with Australian rugby. Our structure narrows its focus on supposed elite players rather than a robust national club competition that runs for a season. Sure the NPC is an attempt at that but that model is hampered by the brevity of season and the lack of profile afforded it. Basically we aren’t producing enough quality to fill run on selections let alone back ups and because the sport is broke this isn’t going to change anytime soon

2020-11-02T10:02:07+00:00

Mike

Roar Rookie


Yes, I think Hodge would have been a far better choice than an uncapped 12. If Rennie is happy for Hodge to take over No 10 from the bench (as happened on Saturday night), then its hard to see how he could have a problem with Hodge playing at 12.

2020-11-02T09:15:29+00:00

John


Not sure re Harry Wilson, might need another season or two. Could be wrong though.

2020-11-02T08:56:27+00:00

John


Are we the only country that restricts top players playing overseas from national selection?

2020-11-02T08:55:01+00:00

Derek Murray

Roar Rookie


You know I never noticed. I accept your view and will keep an eye out for it when the new season kicks off in a few weeks

2020-11-02T08:42:07+00:00

John


Moaman would you consider Matt Phillip as captain?

2020-11-02T08:06:31+00:00

Republican

Guest


.......true. I also believe it's hard to watch the code because the vast majority of Australians do not engage with Union as a spectator sport. Despite the games dynamic and quirky strategies; it's diversity around positional function of players, it no longer translates as an attractive spectator 'product' akin to Test Cricket, which has been given commercial O2 courtesy of the truncated versions of the game. This cultural trait has only evolved or devolved depending on where you sit, greater over time and certainly moreso with Australia's changing immigration diasporas, rendering Union here virtually irrelevant. I believe the code will suffer this inevitable fate in NZ as well.

2020-11-02T07:54:01+00:00

Republican

Guest


......I believe Unions growth here has been very much a top down approach with the advent of Super Rugby which in fairness, provided the code initial exposure that it previously lacked. Unfortunately this approach has not trickled down, (akin to the philosophy i.e. trickle down economics), to the grass roots. Domestically strong codes result in internationally competitive rep sides in the main. In re to our Indigenous code, since the codes strength is in its domestic status as with American codes and Irish ones, I don't believe comparing it with Union here is at all helpful. Conversely League is a pseudo international code and growing by all accounts, while Australia competes well on the international stage in that footy brand on the back of a world class domestic league (despite affording NZ domestic status), which has assisted the game in NZ no end. If you analogise with say Basketball, Soccer, Netball, Hockey, Cricket to name a few, all boast reasonably solid domestic leagues here, with respective codes/sports competing very well at the international tier as a result, certainly compared to Union. Building depth in Union where the code is already on the back foot given its status in Australia has long been mediocre to say the least, without any structured domestic footprint, is surely sentencing the game to extinction. That said the footy market is extremely competitive here, in capturing the publics imagination, from the grass roots and beyond to the commercial realities of sport today and I really can't see Union gaining traction to realise a status i.e. NZ, where the domestic market remains far more friendly to the codes vitality there, for now at least.

2020-11-02T07:21:14+00:00

Republican

Guest


.......rhetorical spin that Australian Union has been appeased with for donkeys. Nothing will change, no matter who the coach, while Kiwis coaches are possibly the least invested in how we improve in the code they covet, truth be told.

2020-11-02T04:04:12+00:00

Tree Son

Roar Rookie


Understandable. Of the available players, maybe Kurindrani fixes the 13 issue, but that pushes the young 13 out to wing (maybe a good thing). 10-12 is still super young then. Who could add starch and experience at 12? Hodge?

2020-11-02T03:13:59+00:00

Rhys

Roar Rookie


Oh dear, at least we can share that pain....friends in Auckland remind me constantly :laughing:

2020-11-02T02:56:03+00:00

qingdao16 .

Roar Rookie


Yes there certainly was a Cane bump but it was not enough in my view to push the winger into the tackle. Plus he wrapped his arms around the flyer. A smarter player would have slowed a little to time his approach to the tackle as the NZer landed. Maybe we ought to have an IQ assessment of prospective future Wallabies as well as quite a few of them don't seem to have too many brains, especially those in the forwards who seem to think they can match it for pace with the likes of Mo'unga.

2020-11-02T02:49:19+00:00

potsie

Guest


Rep, It is entirely feasible for rugby to move beyond its current niche status, but for that to happen it needs a domestic competition. What do the popular Australian sports have in common? They are domestic only, which means an Australian team always wins. If League or Ozzie rules were played internationally and the Australian team and the Australian club teams hardly ever won, their support base would wither too. So what is the answer? Build a competition where the matches are well contested and an Australian team always wins. In time that will build support and depth and wider success.

2020-11-02T01:54:42+00:00

potsie

Guest


Brilliant attacker but still probably the worst tackler in professional rugby.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar