What is Australia's succession plan for David Warner?

By David Shilovsky / Expert

When David Warner went down injured in the second ODI at the SCG earlier in the summer, cricket fans all over the country held their breath to see just how bad the prognosis would be.

Despite still being unpopular with some sections of the fan-base, and the fact he is 34 years of age, Warner is still one of the most important batsmen, if not the most important batsman, in Australia’s Test line-up.

He’s important to the Aussie sides in the shorter forms of the game too, but for this article, let’s just focus on the Test team.

He’s one of the first players picked, but that in itself is problematic. Before we even get to the question of how many good years Warner has left – realistically, I can’t see him going too far past next year’s Ashes series – the question needs to be asked: who will be his replacement when he retires?

Let’s take a look at some of the potential candidates.

Joe Burns
I’m writing this just a few hours after Joe Burns has had another horror show opening the batting for Australia – this time he was dismissed for a duck on the opening day of the Boxing Day Test. This underwhelming score from Warner’s incumbent opening partner follows his eight and 51* in the first Test.

Burns’ Test average of 38.86 isn’t exactly what I’d call mediocre. It’s not incredible – it’s somewhere in the middle. But I’ve never been convinced. At his age, even if Burns were to take a significant step, you’d almost need to immediately begin the next stage of succession planning.

(Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

There’s a fair bit hanging on his performance in the second innings at the MCG, and the third Test if he makes it that far. More low scores and it’s possible we see Joe Burns out of the team.

At best, Burns is a short-term solution with a decent amount of risk and most likely minimal reward. You can’t even call him a safe bet.

Marnus Labuschagne
Marnus Labuschagne has really come of age in recent times. While he’s not a fresh 18-year-old, he does have age on his side, and ideally, we’re looking for a long-term opening solution.

Of course, we need someone of his quality further down the line-up and he’s currently playing his role in the side just fine. There’s definitely an argument to be made about not rocking the boat.

It’s also possible he becomes Steve Smith’s successor at first drop, but with the former captain’s retirement a minimum of four to five years away, that’s a “we’ll cross that bridge when we’re a bit closer to it” kind of situation.

It might be a risk in more ways than one, but I’d love to see Labuschagne given a chance to face the new ball and see what he can do.

Marcus Harris
If Shield form on its own was enough for a player to be picked, Marcus Harris would have certainly been given a chance in either the first or second Test this summer.

Who knows, it’s possible he’ll still get a chance before this series is out, although it’s hard to ascertain exactly where he stands in the selectors’ pecking order.

(Photo by Michael Dodge/Getty Images)

The “little bastard” – as Justin Langer called him – will get a chance at some stage, surely. But given his age and mediocre showings in the baggy green up to this point, he’ll be on a short leash. If he really wants an opening spot, it’s there for the taking.

Unfortunately, I can see Harris as yet another player who’s mastered Shield level cricket, but just can’t seem to make the jump to the highest level.

Will Pucovski
Will Pucovski has been billed as a star of the future, but with one particular problem. Will he even get his chance to stake his claim for a spot at the top of Australia’s order?

Much has been made of the Victorian’s concussion issues – after all, that’s why he’s missed the first two Tests. Pucovski was ruled out of the first Test after yet again being concussed in a tour match playing for Australia A against India at Drummoyne Oval.

It seems it’s all going to come down to how team doctors are able to manage his existing issues, and if he does manage to make it to the middle in a baggy green, whether he’ll be able to avoid further blows to the helmet.

Pucovski has the temperament, he has youth on his side and he can’t really do much more at Shield level. I can only hope the concussion issue can be ironed out, he gets his chance and he takes it. But at this stage, it’s certainly a wait-and-see situation.

The Australian selectors are surely thinking about this issue – I’m not in the room and they’re paid to be planning for Warner’s replacement.

But from the outside, it doesn’t seem like there’s a solid plan. It almost seems as if the plan is hoping someone comes along and just plays themselves into the team, scoring triple centuries in the Shield and forcing the issue.

One way or the other, Warner’s last Test is visible on the horizon. Let’s just hope before that match, we find a solution.

The Crowd Says:

2020-12-30T01:33:52+00:00

matth

Roar Guru


I would love to see Renshaw back. He was dropped too early, like they didn’t expect a kid to have ups and downs.

2020-12-29T23:21:26+00:00

Rob

Guest


Renshaw may have moved down the order to change things up but also allow for Street. Street’s record breaking 345 opening for the Queensland 2nd XI got him a call up to the Bulls. This universally expected right/ left opening combination maybe to accommodate Burns and Street (left) to open? Club results would suggest Renshaw opens the bat and is better than Street by a fair margin. Small sample size but Renshaw is leading the Qld averages with 95 in the Marsh Shield this season with Marnus having 2 centuries averaging mid 50’s. Given the well worn selection criteria afforded to Warner’s record in Australian conditions with the baggy Green I think Renshaw’s return to form could put him into consideration ahead of Burns? Especially considering Burns was picked on the Warner theory and not current form? This left/ right requirement is a little over the top considering Langer/Hayden and even Renshaw/Warner record on Australian pitches opening. It was based around a 2nd string Sri Lanka and injury riddled NZ attack either.

2020-12-28T20:17:12+00:00

Waxhead

Roar Rookie


@David You've got to have available talent to have a succession plan. Pucovski is the only one with any opening potential now and he's got 2 big brain issues. He may never play for Australia. And Warner is only good in Australia..... and is 34. He's ordinary to poor anywhere else and I wouldn't even pick him for a tour OS. Best chance Aust have of finding new Test openers is to stop playing T20 cricket. It's poison for any player wanting to develop good technique and defence.

2020-12-28T07:51:46+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


One of the ONLY aussie batsmen in the past decade who seemed like a natural opener, but no one has a clue anymore!!! State coaches/selectors/captains shuffle the top six batters willy nilly now. Am absolutely convinced this is a major part of the problem we have with batmen now. Use to have your gritty tough openers/top 3's molds: Taylor, Slater, Marsh, Boon, Langer etc, and classic dashing middle order hitters from # 4 onwards: Jones, M Waugh, Martyn, Ponting (yes, I know he was #3, but seemed more naturally in the #4 dasher mold (Pucovski seems a natural #4 middle order dasher to me too) There needs to be Langer with the National Selectors/ "High Performance" clowns (if that position still exists) to mandate assessing where players belong best in the batting order, and what they need to do to thrive.there, rather than this seemingly bingo draw raffle they use now to decide the top six every six months.

2020-12-28T07:33:41+00:00

matth

Roar Guru


From memory his form had dropped to such an extent he was in danger of being dropped by QLD. Burns become an opener and Bryce Street had outperformed Renshaw while Burns was away, but he’s looking better again, thank goodness.

2020-12-28T06:27:30+00:00

Leebola

Roar Rookie


I see you've had two cracks at delivering a fresh, witty take on this particular topic. Give it a third go mate, you've got them rolling in the aisles...

2020-12-28T06:25:13+00:00

U

Roar Rookie


Finch isn’t an opener in first class cricket. He’s done well in the middle order but they made him open

2020-12-28T06:03:03+00:00

Rohan

Roar Rookie


He'd bend his knees to the bounce and get the length so early, then coming up with the ball, his hands matching his decision to play or avoid, hands up play, hands down avoid, always watching. The best.

2020-12-28T05:54:09+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


I'm not sure that's a viable plan A, given Pukovski's issues with the short ball. Still, we're so thin on alternatives, we need both these guys fit and ready asap.

2020-12-28T05:49:11+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


he had to be good at playing it, just to stay alive!

2020-12-28T04:41:05+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


Out of curiosity, why was Renshaw not considered for opening, and moved down the order? (Apart from just trying something different)

2020-12-28T04:28:36+00:00

Rohan

Roar Rookie


I think Renshaw is quality, the recent runs you mentioned have come in the middle order I think.

2020-12-28T04:15:27+00:00

Rohan

Roar Rookie


Border was the best at short bowling I've seen.

AUTHOR

2020-12-28T04:14:19+00:00

David Shilovsky

Expert


Fair enough, but regardless, I don't think he's got the quality you need in a Test opener.

2020-12-28T04:13:42+00:00

Rohan

Roar Rookie


The plan has obviously been for Warner to bring on Pucovski, but that's had a spanner in it. No plan b tho.

2020-12-28T04:05:32+00:00

Big Daddy

Guest


If we take Langer's word verbatum selection would be earned on form. The selection of Burns proves he's not true to his word .

2020-12-28T03:54:45+00:00

Rohan

Roar Rookie


The main problem facing Finch is that he doesn't have the support of the test coach. Look how well Finch and Maxwell do with MacDonald.

2020-12-28T03:50:14+00:00

Rohan

Roar Rookie


Paine came in again aged 34. Same age Finch is now.

2020-12-27T23:48:34+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


I put a lot of this issue around our batting down to short form cricket, especially T20. Guys seem to want/need to feel bat on ball, which is not a great approach if you're trying to build a long Test innings. Throw in all the weird & wonderful shots that seem to be at the expense of sound technique and it's no wonder Test batting world wide is in decline - the Poms are no better off than us, for example.

2020-12-27T22:17:34+00:00

matth

Roar Guru


Yes but he’s done it after moving down the order and we are looking for openers here.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar