Here’s thing about all of the floggings this year: it is all of our fault.
Well, when I say all, I mean all of us who have been yelling for years for more players to be sin binned when they engage in professional fouls, repeated infringements and/or when players get hit high in tackles.
And I also mean the mass of us who wanted teams who were cynically slowing down the play punished so they weren’t able to do it anymore.
Well, we got our wish – and it hasn’t played out that well at all.
For years I couldn’t understand why the NRL would resist taking such actions.
I’ve now got a pretty good idea why: teams trying to slow down the play doesn’t just serve the good sides – as I naively assumed – it also often keeps the lesser sides in the contest.
The most bitter pill that I’ve got to swallow on this one is that I don’t know of anyone who has called longer and louder for both these sin binnings and speeding up of the play measures than myself…
I’ve been relentlessly banging on about both of these issues since 2013.
However, both of these things happening at the same time has not been good at all. Perhaps just one would have been fine, but both simultaneously isn’t.
Now – as brilliantly enunciated by AJ Mithen this week – we have the most top heavy, lopsided competition I’ve ever seen.
Mithen compared the current state of many games as being a colosseum mismatch akin to the Christians against the lions.
The issue is that, while so many of these games are forgone conclusions well before halftime (and many before kick off), there is no mercy rule.
The dead horse keeps getting flogged for the full 80 minutes.
It is the NRL equivalent of the 1980s movie Weekend at Bernie’s where a corpse is dragged around through multiple scenarios for an extended period of time. And just like that movie, it isn’t entertaining or funny in the slightest.
I usually watch at least six games a round, if not all eight. This season I’ve found myself watching four or less. My only real interest in many of them is to follow the progress of a same-game-multi I may have put on.
In short: I adore the NRL but I’m a bit bored.
I decided to have a look at the statistics to examine just how the combination of the rule changes to speed the game up, alongside the high tackle crackdown has effected the margins in matches on average.
Margins | 30+ | 20-29 | 13-19 | 1-12 |
---|---|---|---|---|
2020 | 25 | 21 | 30 | 84 |
2021 | 21 | 31 | 20 | 44 |
Percentage change (%) | +2.4% | +13.6% | -1.55% | -14.6% |
In 2020 there were almost four games a round that would result in 13+ margins. However, 40 per cent of those games were decided by no more than 19 points. While that’s a solid win, it isn’t a flogging.
There were 46 wins out of the home-and-away season’s 160 games that were by margins of 20 points or more. Seven of those were 40-49+ floggings and two of them were 50+ slaughters.
This season after just 116 games there has been 72 games that have resulted in 13+ margins. That is just four shy of what was achieved in 160 games in 2020. Already 52 games this season – that’s 45 per cent of them – have been decided by margins of 20 points or more.
So we’ve gone from an average of 3.8 games per round in 2020 that had a 13+ margin to five games per round in 2021.
As well, we’ve already exactly matched 2020 for 40-49+ floggings and 50+ slaughters in just 72.5 per cent of the matches.
So where have the changes occurred?
The big change is that there are 14.6 per cent fewer 1-12 results. Those games seem almost entirely to have turned into 20-29 point results. We can now only rely on three games in a round having margins within two converted tries.
The upshot of all of this is that 45 per cent of the time the matches are completely one sided slaughters.
Even the fans of the teams doing the slaughtering eventually won’t be interested in that sort of game for long.
And for those of us supporting the ten teams who aren’t even vaguely in the hunt this season, we certainly aren’t interested – even though our sides mostly are the ones in the close games.
Of the 44 matches that have been 1-12 results so far in 2021, 29 of them (66 per cent) have been played between the teams from seventh spot on the ladder down. So the close matches are mostly not being played by the contenders that will draw big crowds and high television ratings.
I will be stunned if this year’s premier isn’t either the Melbourne Storm or the Penrith Panthers. The only other sides that could possibly jag a result are the Eels, Sea Eagles, Rabbitohs and Roosters.
While there are always dominant sides, not to this level.
The combination of the sin bin crack down and the set restarts have introduced such fatigue into the games that once a side gets a roll on the rest of the match is literally just dragging Bernie’s corpse around the field.
So what can be done? Well, we have to protect the head of players so the sin binning – while I pray for consistency and ration in their application – needs to continue.
Further, I hated wrestling, offside play and other slowing tactics, so I want the set restarts to continue.
The changes I see that might help mitigate sides getting so fatigued that they get slaughtered hark back to Super League.
Firstly, the amount of interchanges has been steadily reduced since the days of unlimited changes in the 1990s. This has been done deliberately to introduce fatigue and through that facilitate scoring. Perhaps we need to increase the number of interchanges allowed per side right now.
Further, we have been seeing a pattern of sides scoring try after try, while their opponents are starved of possession. Perhaps reinstating the briefly trialled rule of the scorers kicking off could partially assuage this factor.
Another idea is the five minute sin bin coming back in so sides aren’t destroyed while a man down.
Something certainly needs to be done.
As much as it pains me to admit it, the NRL does need to be managed to ensure that it is an entertaining package that people want to watch and get excited by.
Because these constant Weekend at Bernie’s sequels are just dreadful.
Adam
Roar Guru
Who knows what they actually do...
James
Roar Rookie
The women's State of Origin was my favourite game this year. No six again, a close contest. No great amount of wrestling... though I don't seem to mind wrestling as much in the women's game!
Forty Twenty
Roar Rookie
If it's such an advantage then why aren't clubs using it more and putting a stop to the lopsided scores? I won't mind if teams want to do it to Manly and give away six agains. If they keep it up I'll expect them to get a spell in the bin . It will only be if the refs don't do their job that any sort of slowing tactic will be a good idea. I'd possibly prefer a system where the attacking team gets to chose six again or a penalty. Teams won't be choosing a penalty when they have the defence shot and a try is on the cards too often.
The Barry
Roar Guru
It’s still cynically and deliberately breaking the rules to gain an advantage, knowing they’ll get pinged maybe one in 20 if they’re unlucky. The delay caused by holding them down gives an advantage If they weren’t gaining an advantage why would they do it…?
Tom G
Roar Rookie
If the linesman actually did anything but stand behind the goal posts for kicks you wouldn’t need them. They could police the 10 as they’re wired up to the ref too aren’t they? It’s not like they’re busy, they don’t even make many calls on players going over the sideline now.
In brief
Guest
The point I’m making is more about how the genie was let out of the bottle. I think the best thing the NRL could do would be to align all rule changes to the other playing nations- this would at least force some compromises and middle ground.
Short Memory
Guest
Just read Phil Gould's advice to referee Gerrard Sutton stop SOO II turning into a blow out - "Let the maroons be off side and lay all over the ruck". Literally. So now he's advocating the kind of cynical rubbish he was blowing up about a couple seasons ago - all to stop the kind of blow out created by rule changes that resulted pretty directly from his criticism of the penalty crackdown that was applied to eliminate the cynical rubbish. So here we are.
Bugsy0705
Roar Rookie
Does no one own a calculator at the Roar? You might like to look again at your percentages in the statistics table. 84 down to 44 is not a 14.6% decrease, 30 down to 20 is not a 1.55% decrease, 25 down to 21 is not a 2.4% increase, and 21 up to 31 is not a 13.6% increase. Talk about an epic fail. How embarrassing. Equally as embarrassing as your graphic claiming that game 2 this year will be the first time no Broncos will be in the Queensland Origin team, despite the fact that no Broncos were in game 3 last year, or all the games between 1980 and 1987 before the Broncos started. I see you’ve removed that one, so if I were you I’d be removing or correcting the statistic table too.
Michael_1984
Roar Rookie
On the issue of fatigue: increase the number of players on the bench to seven (or perhaps even eight?) and bring back unlimited interchange. Reduce the number of players a team can have on the field at any given time from 13 to 12. In short, create attacking opportunities through creating more 'space' on the field (less players at any given time) rather than through fatigue. Note also that while there would be one less player for each team on the field at any given time, there would still be overall more players playing the game for each team so players wouldn't have to worry about a reduced chance of playing a game.
Rossi
Roar Rookie
The best current low tacklers would have to be Jake T, JdB, Murray and Josh Jackson. Those blokes would be worth their weight in gold if ever a good low tackle was rewarded as a 'dominant' tackle
Rossi
Roar Rookie
Off topic but as a fellow Dragon how do you feel about Ravalawa's suspension? I thought his tackle on Whitehead wasn't a penalty let alone a suspension, especially when you see the likes of Munster and Feldt get away with fines for worse.
Rossi
Roar Rookie
Injury from foul play? Funnily enough my older brother and I were much more likely to come to blows playing backyard cricket than footy :cricket: :boxing:
Greg
Roar Pro
*Elite players or *key players Not my fault you have removed the adjective to devalue my point
GregM
Roar Rookie
is there an equivalent to "Six & Out" in backyard footy?
GregM
Roar Rookie
they should find out the differences between RL in the 1980's and now, and go back to what they were doing in the 80's - 2 men in the tackle, quick play the ball, bl00dy good footy
GregM
Roar Rookie
the aim of the game is to score tries, so they should stay at 4 points. Remember years ago Vernon Pugh, then in charge of the RFU suggested making penalties worth 10 points (instead of 3) – the logic being – teams would rather prefer a try to be scored than to give away penalties especially 5 meters from their line. Didn’t happen of course but interesting logic. In RL – maybe the 6 again will change the physiques of the players, need to encourage the small skillful players who can dazzle the defense, instead of having them smashed into oblivion by the 120kg boofheads
Heyou
Roar Rookie
Most welcome.
Rabbitz
Roar Guru
The floggings shall continue until morale improves.
no one in particular
Roar Guru
- players stay for unders - examples of players not staying for unders are given - yeh...but..yeh..but..but those guys are fringe players - players are current origin players or captain of the club - those players don't count wonderful logic
Rossi
Roar Rookie
Does mum have to call out dinner time first?