Messi survives miracle Dutch comeback to keep World Cup dream alive after shootout win

By Mike Meehall Wood / Editor

It is never over until it’s over. For 83 minutes, this was a dominant Argentina performance, with another Lionel Messi masterclass, who registered a goal and a superlative assist that wrote the next stage of the script that ends one of the greatest ever careers in triumph.

He didn’t, however, reckon with Wout Weghorst, all 1.97m of him. The striker inspired a late outbreak of long ball football that saw the Netherlands return from the dead and stage a stunning comeback, forcing extra time with two late goals.

Extra time followed, and Argentina did all they could to avert a shootout, hitting the post and forcing multiple last-ditch blocks from the Dutch defence. In the end, it didn’t matter: the Netherlands butchered their first two penalties and never recovered, with Lautaro Martinez able to win the game from the spot.

It was both a classic and a terrible match at the same time. There were long periods of inactivity – the first half hour and the first period of extra time showed very little indeed – and flamboyant Spanish referee Antonio Mateu Lahoz was forced into showing 16 yellow cards, including some to coaches, subs and even two during the shootout, with Denzel Dumfries ending up with a red after full time.

Both teams criticised the officiating afterwards and plenty of heated exchanges were seen between players and coaching staff, with Argentina angered by the Dutch kick and rush tactics and the amount of injury time added, while the Netherlands disagreed with the penalty that was given for a foul on Marcos Acuna.

“I didn’t like the referee, but we didn’t lose because of the referee,” said Netherlands boss Louis van Gaal. “We came back, but still screwed it up after penalties. And the players have been practicing (penalties) at their clubs all year long.

“I asked them to take penalties because as a coach I want to have everything under control. But, as I also once said during a press conference, you can’t simulate it.”

Argentina coach Lionel Scaloni said he was surprised by the Dutch tactics but that they could play in whatever way they thought would work.

“They played in a way I didn’t expect from them,” he said. “But each team, each coach, decides how to play. I won’t speak about their football philosophy but in truth in the second half it was an ugly game.

“We had no chances and it was frequently interrupted but they are allowed to play how they wish. The game was heated. But this was a quarter-final. And what happens on the pitch stays on the pitch. Of course we had 11 men. Leo was a very important player and he showed that he is the best of all times and we are happy that he is on our side.”

For all the bitty and spiteful play, there were also outbreaks of the highest quality: Messi’s assist for Nahuel Molina’s opener was as good a pass as seen at this tournament so far, while the Dutch equaliser was a supreme piece of confidence and composure with their continuance in the competition on the line.

Argentina go on to face Croatia, who surprised Brazil earlier in the day, but will enter with the feeling that they are destined to achieve something for their superstar. As long as Leo is playing, they have no need to fear anyone.

For the most part, he was again the best player on the field by far. The switch to 5-3-2, made by coach Lionel Scaloni to match the Dutch formation, brought the best out of his star and allowed him to find space. It also freed the wingbacks to fly up the sides, with Molina scoring the first and Acuna winning the penalty for the second.

There was few wilier foxes out there than van Gaal, however. In what will likely be the last game of a storied career, the veteran managed bought himself another half hour by changing tack late in the game and hitting paydirt with an aerial barrage.

The Netherlands are known for their Total Football, but have never been averse to lumping it to the big man, as everyone from Dick Nanninga to Pierre van Hooijdonk and Jan Venegoor of Hesselink could attest, and brought on Wout Weghorst up top, with the big man halving the deficit.

In the end, with Virgil van Dijk, Luuk de Jong, Nathan Ake and Weghorst all in the box, it was more like an English lower league clash than a World Cup quarter final, but the Dutch didn’t mind. Weghorst scored in the eleventh minute of injury time to keep his side in the tournament.

In the first half, there was no inkling that this was going to be any sort of a classic. The football was as drab as it gets. The Netherlands were more than happy to sit in and accept what Argentina could throw. That plan has worked so far, but it was yet to encounter Messi.

As Mexico learned, as Poland learned and Australia learned – given that this was his 1001st professional appearance, the lesson has been a long one – you simply cannot keep the maestro out of the game.

His involvement prior to the first goal had been limited to one shot over the bar, and the match highlight had been former hardman Walter Samuel, now a coach, picking up a booking.

When it came, it came in spectacular fashion. We’ve seen Messi the finisher and Messi the dribbler, but this was Messi the playmaker: he took the ball 40m from goal on the right, shimmied past Ake, who had no idea whether to press or not, and then slid a pass between Daley Blind and van Dijk.

Molina, rushing from right wingback, could not believe his luck as he poked the ball in.

The Netherlands were forced to change tack at half time. They did accumulate more of the ball, but struggled badly to make any inroads into the defence.

Indeed, the better chances continued to come at the other end, with Argentina able to break quickly: Alexis Mac Allister butchered a clear opportunity by sending a pass behind Rodrigo de Paul.

Messi, after reducing one of the best centre backs in the world, van Dijk, to simply pushing him over, hit a free kick onto the roof of the net.

The second breakthrough came from a similar route to the first. The wingbacks again were the key, with Acuna, on the left, getting high and wide, taking on Denzel Dumfries and winning the softest of penalties.

Messi has been more than fallible over the years from the spot, but Andries Noppert could only stand still has the penalty hit the back of the net.

Louis van Gaal had to abandon Plan A and introduced Weghorst for a more simplistic Plan B. It worked, with the towering striker thumping a header past Emi Martinez off a Steven Berghuis cross. Berghuis himself caused conniptions in the Argentinian ranks moments later, rippling the side-netting with a powerful shot.

The more agricultural tactics were worrying Argentina. The benches cleared after Leandro Paredes fouled Ake, then, leathered the ball into the Dutch subs. The time it took for the referee to regain control blew the added minutes out to ten.

With that elapsed, the Netherlands had a do-or-die moment, a free kick on the edge of the box. With everyone expecting the shot, Teun Koopmeiners passed low to Weghorst who turned home. It was a stunning moment to cap a stunning turnaround.

After the manic finish to regular time, and the further bout of pushing and shoving that followed, it was perhaps inevitable that the first half of extra time would be a dud, with Argentina innocuously passing and the Dutch sitting in.

The second period saw much of the same: with Lionel Scaloni forced to turn to the half-fit Angel di Maria with ten minutes until penalties. He nearly created something immediately, shimmying to the byline and picking out Lautaro Martinez, who cannoned a shot off van Dijk.

Enzo Fernandez then had a presentable chance deflected behind and, from the corner, German Pazzella headed over. Lautaro then stung the palms of Noppert from range.

The chances kept coming. Messi, of course, had a shot blocked, di Maria nearly sent the corner directly in and Fernandez hit the post from the edge of the box. It was not to be for Argentina, and the penalties came.

The Dutch had fought so hard to get to this point, but when it arrived, they fluffed their lines. van Dijk sent his wide, Messi rolled his in and Emi Martinez saved from Berghuis. A series of successful kicks followed and, while an Fernandez miss gave the Dutch hope, Lautaro iced it on the final kick.

The Crowd Says:

2022-12-15T05:47:11+00:00

Roberto Bettega

Roar Rookie


So? The first ever shoot out in a WC was in 1982 - that's 52 years after the very first WC (and in that very same year, they scheduled a date for a replay of the final in case of a draw).

2022-12-12T22:40:42+00:00

Anibal Pyro

Roar Rookie


There is history there. LVG always dismissed South América players. Like Di Maria, Riquelme, Brazilians, Uruguayans etc . Add talking before the match, add previous clashes, a QF game, fouls everywhere, a bad referee and you ve got a nuclear bomb.

2022-12-12T03:19:33+00:00

Censored Often

Roar Rookie


My comment comes from one pic only. I’m not a fan of the sport nor do I follow it, just curious about the behaviour. Nothing sinister…

2022-12-11T20:46:21+00:00

Anibal Pyro

Roar Rookie


You missing the point, why Dutch dark arts are not part of the discussion

2022-12-11T10:48:09+00:00

Brian

Guest


Actually Czechoslovakia beat Germany in a shoot out to win the euros in 1976

2022-12-11T05:03:39+00:00

Simoc

Roar Rookie


Thats a new one Doc. Extra time in AFL? Never seen it or heard of it. Did you just make that up? They have draws in AFL which leaves both teams and spectators flat. Can't celebrate or blame the ref. Only soccer likes draws and penalties is the way to sort it. Maybe have it at club level so players get better at it. Apparently Kanes second penalty attempt went into space and is still orbiting! That's pressure for you.

2022-12-11T04:55:00+00:00

Simoc

Roar Rookie


Yes but Kuol didn't score as in the script I was watching. I watched a dutch fans study of the Dutch tactics and success prior to the game. They had been poor the whole tournament but strong enough to get through regardless. I didn't get the ill feeling between the teams. It seemed to be there from the start. At the end an interviewer had to tell Messi to calm down after he cut loose on the Dutch striker standing nearby. The whole Argentinian team gave the Dutch team a poor send off after the penalty shootout wiping their eyes and laughing as they ran by.

2022-12-11T01:47:02+00:00

Loosey

Roar Rookie


What is a purist and why does anyone need to listen to them? In option 1. What if the score is 5-1 on penalties - what's the point of playing ET? In option 2. Games could go on longer than they do now with ET. What about copying hockey sudden death rules. Each player is given the ball, in turn, on the half way line and must dribble it toward the goal and attempt to score. One attempt then the ball goes dead whether GK saves it, ball hits post/bar or goes beyond the goal line.At least it introduces a greater level of skill and tactics on the part of both players.

2022-12-11T01:05:31+00:00

Cadfael

Roar Guru


After that after match outlandish whinge on the referee, Messi should cop a two match ban. The clown who kicked the ball into the Dutch bench should aslo cop a two match ban.

2022-12-10T23:41:28+00:00

Censored Often

Roar Rookie


Sure, but are the Argies completely innocent of similar crimes against soccer humanity or are they the victims they make themselves out to be?

2022-12-10T23:00:31+00:00

chris

Guest


And the other point is that playing until you drop, as some have suggested on here is going to be great for the winning team for their next game. Not. The thing is, drawn games is not an issue in points accumulation games like AFL. Hundreds of points accumulated. Never a need for a tie breaker. Yes penalty shoot outs are a game of luck for sure. But when all is taken into consideration, it's really the only way.

2022-12-10T17:23:55+00:00

Roberto Bettega

Roar Rookie


Loosey I'm disagreeing that it's a tradition of the game, that it's a relatively recent phenomenon. I also think it's entirely inappropriate that you would determine the best team in the world (or in a continent, or in a country) by way of pens because for me, it's a side activity occurring AFTER the completion of the game. By extension, when you start getting too many knock out finals determined by pens, then the same point applies. As for alternatives, yes, I agree, it's difficult (although with an extended bench, it does surprise me that possibilities haven't been explored whereby greater use is made of the bench in these circumstances). But I've come across two interesting ideas over the journey (dissatisfaction with pens is not new amongst purists and has been a topic of discussion for decades): 1. conduct the shoot out immediately after normal time - then play the extra time, such that the pens only break the deadlock if a draw remains (reason: an issue in the modern game is that often both teams play out the extra time in anticipation of pens, that would not be the case if one team already knows in advance of ET) 2. The great Johnny Warren put this idea forward years ago: subtracting players every 10 minutes until you get a result (if need be, open up the bench at the same time) In each instance - it is much better determining the winner of the game by actually playing THE game and not by a separate activity post-game.

2022-12-10T09:42:57+00:00

Redondo

Roar Rookie


But is there a practical alternative?

2022-12-10T09:34:14+00:00

Chris Lewis

Roar Guru


yes, my feeling too. Go England, May the force be with you.

2022-12-10T08:57:37+00:00

Anibal Pyro

Roar Rookie


30 blatant fouls from Dutch players, trashtalk before and during the game.

2022-12-10T08:07:14+00:00

Loosey

Roar Rookie


Roberto, are you only talking about the final because last night it was the quarters? Champions must win through on penalties from time to time, whether it is the final or not is moot. Ironically, you mention 1982, and in that year West Germany made the final defeating France on penalties. You’ve stated you hate them, you said penalties are an extraordinarily stupid way of determining the champion without providing any reasoning. OK it’s your opinion but you don’t provide an alternative. As for tradition, a greater number of WC tournaments have been played with penalty shootouts than not, starting with 1978. (As a means of determining a winner, not necessarily the winner of the final which became the norm in 1986, well before the staging of the WC in the US) The WC is not the only tournament or cup/competition that uses this method for resolving drawn matches. As I said earlier, Football Associations have been toying with penalty shoot outs since the late 50s, so yes, over 50 years. Next you’ll be telling us that you don’t agree with the back pass rule because that’s not tradition.

2022-12-10T07:17:11+00:00

Vamsi K

Roar Rookie


Players would then try to score corners than goals :silly:

2022-12-10T07:14:16+00:00

Vamsi K

Roar Rookie


While penalty shootouts don’t represent the overall skill of the sides, I don’t see any better alternative right now when teams are tied even after extra time. The other alternatives are to play on 15 mnt extra times till there is result but think how knackered players would be after 120+ mnts of play. Even playing next day would lead to injuries as 1 day isn’t probably enough time for players to recover.

2022-12-10T06:51:57+00:00

Rugbynutter

Roar Rookie


I feel the pain of oz loaf against Italy in World Cup all those years ago on questionable decision with Italy going onto to win the World Cup…hope Argentina don’t win the thing personally

2022-12-10T06:07:47+00:00

Knoxy

Roar Rookie


I think whoever wins tomorrow between France and England will win the world cup.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar