Weather they like it or not, England only have themselves to blame for Australia being raining Ashes champs

By Paul Suttor / Expert

There’s no doubt England were the better team in the fourth Test and if not for Manchester’s wet weather saving Australia’s skin, they’d be heading to The Oval with a chance to regain the Ashes. 

They were clearly the superior side in the third Test too when they scored a well-deserved three-wicket victory. 

When they tempered their ultra-aggressive approach and run rate by parking their Bazball egos at the door in Leeds and Manchester, they played better Test cricket while still living up to their oft-stated mission to entertain the fans.  

But it was in the first two matches of the series where they let their chance of regaining the urn slip from their grasp.

On both occasions they could have and possibly should have emerged victorious instead of going down by two wickets and 43 runs in nail-biting contests. 

England captain Ben Stokes after day five of the Test at Old Trafford. (Photo by Stu Forster/Getty Images)

Bazball is a high-risk, mostly successful strategy. It has propelled an inferior, on paper, English team to the level of the machine-like world champions. 

But to be the champion you need to beat the champion and they failed to knock the Aussies to the canvas when they had chances at Edgbaston and Lord’s. 

Which is also part of the Bazball mystique. Playing up-tempo cricket on fast forward heightens your chances of dominating a methodical team like Australia. 

But it also means you can throw away a position of advantage with an overly attacking shot or a gamble like selecting a batter who keeps ahead of an expert gloveman. 

England have improved in leaps and bounds from the rabble that left Australia with their tails between their legs at the start of last year – it feels longer but that was only 18 months ago. 

But that pathetic effort is also the reason why they no longer have a chance of regaining the old piece of woodwork which is such famous sporting silverware. 

Even in Stuart Broad’s fantasy world where that 4-0 result is a “void series”, the Aussies are still the champs because they drew 2-2 in 2019 on the back of a 5-0 whitewash in 2016-17. 

It would have been a clean sweep in Australia the last time around as well if not for rain saving England from certain defeat in Sydney when Broad and James Anderson held firm to deny the home side the final wicket required. 

Cricket is a sport that can be ruined by rain like no other. 

In a five-match series in the UK you’d be lucky to go 25 days without rain or bad light interfering which means if you don’t have the urn, you can’t afford two losses, particularly the opening matches of the series. 

It’s not the first time wet weather has saved either side in an Ashes Test at Old Trafford. 

Ten years ago, Australia had England in strife at 3-37 on the final day of the third Test at Manchester, chasing a target of 332 when rain ended play early after 20 overs, allowing the home side to retain the urn in what turned out to be a 3-0 series triumph.

Way back in 1953, Lindsay Hassett’s side was on its knees at 8-35 in the second innings with a slender lead of 77 when rain prevented England’s victory march. 

Don Bradman’s masterful 304 propelled Australia to a 384-run first-innings lead in 1934 and England were 6-229 at Headingley when the heavens opened.  

England have claimed the moral high ground this series on the back of the Jonny Bairstow stumping incident at Lord’s, grasping at the spirit of cricket in their defence. 

Tell me which team is upholding the ICC’s code which involves respect for:

Your opponents
Your own captain and team
The role of the umpires
The game and its traditional values.

The team that had a player churlishly claim their previous series defeat didn’t count while also continuing his “celebrappeal” theatrics to boorishly put pressure on umpires,
requested the wickets be tailor-made to suit their playing style, aka pitch doctoring,
had a bowler deliver an unprovoked foul-mouthed spray at a batter he’d dismissed after a gallant hundred,
the side that didn’t respect the umpire’s decision when Bairstow was given out due to his own carelessness
and the team that claimed a catch at slip in this Test that was clearly caught on the half-volley?

(That team’s own privileged members at the supposed home of cricket abused the opposition players as well but you can’t really blame the side for that.)

England’s Ollie Robinson sledges Usman Khawaja after taking his wicket in the first Test. (Photo by David Davies/PA Images via Getty Images)

Or the team that had a wicketkeeper clever enough to execute a legitimate form of dismissal?

It should also be noted that Bairstow, when batting with Anderson at Manchester, didn’t seem to think the ball was dead the moment the ball hit the keeper’s gloves when they decided to run through for a bye with Alex Carey standing back. 

Broad wrote in a column before the final day of the fourth Test was washed out that it would be “unjust” if rain saved the Aussies.

Blame it on the rain, if you want. It didn’t work for Milli Vanilli and that rationale will hold just as much water this time around as well.

If England want to truly show that they deserve to have the Ashes back in their keeping for the first time since 2016, they need to thump the Aussies at The Oval in the final Test starting on Thursday.

It’s been a ripping series with the first three matches decided by less than three wickets or 50 runs – the only time that has happened in Test history.

Australia’s retention of the urn and escape from near-certain defeat in Manchester gives them a bittersweet result unless they win the series finale.

Stuart Broad and Ben Stokes. (Photo by Nick Potts/PA Images via Getty Images)

Their mission in England was to win the World Test Championship and be the first Aussie side to be triumphant in an Ashes series on tour since 2001.

“There’s been a lot of work gone into putting us into a position where a draw does make us retain the Ashes,” captain Pat Cummins said on Sunday night. “But there’s a Test match starting in three days, so that’s going to be our full focus.

“In some regards, whatever happened today wouldn’t really change how we look at next week. We want to win it to make sure we win it outright.”

Both teams still have plenty to play for in the final match – England can show they’re back on equal footing if they win while Australia can only call themselves the undisputed champions of the world if they bounce back to take out the series, otherwise an invisible asterisk will forever hover over this result.

The Ashes rivalry is alive again thanks to England’s revival under Brendon McCullum’s high-octane coaching methods and Ben Stokes’ fearless captaincy. 

But their chances of getting the Ashes back are dead, not because of England’s fickle weather but their own lack of attention to detail during the big moments early in the series. 

The Crowd Says:

2023-07-27T09:50:14+00:00

All day Roseville all day

Roar Guru


Agreed, more's the shame.

2023-07-26T06:34:37+00:00

Doctor Rotcod

Roar Rookie


Stokes used Stokes well,mostly. Cummins used Cummins poorly, mostly. And yet, with 70 to get, in the Second Test,Stokes lost. In the First Test, with 70 to get,Cummins won

2023-07-26T06:14:17+00:00

Doctor Rotcod

Roar Rookie


Acknowledgement of inadequacy is a step on the path to wisdom. Keep it up. We're here to help. If I don't have an opinion on the value or otherwise of the English batting on , but merely observe the result, don't think poorly of me.. Situational ethics have suited the English commentariat so far, but the team, you know,where real-world events play out have come up short in actualization,. No shame there against the world no.1

2023-07-26T05:19:55+00:00

Pierro

Roar Rookie


I wanted more bowlers at Manchester I wanted neser in for warner and it turns out that would have been wise of course. I just don’t like spinners on these pitches as much especially where rain about for a. few days they hardly get used that said Lyon is different at times because he offers more bounce and cna whip them through for a stumping but he’s gone

2023-07-25T21:35:29+00:00

ExtraSundries

Roar Rookie


Hey, ignore me. I’m just a loudmouth on the internet hiding beneath a fake name, thinking my opinion means something. Apologies for being rude. You’re right, I’m not as clever as I think I am, and trying to be smart is no excuse for acting like an idiot. Sorry.

2023-07-25T16:12:46+00:00

ExtraSundries

Roar Rookie


I wasn’t the one playing the “you don’t understand it” card. You were the one playing the “I don’t understand it” card. Almost sounds as though you don’t want me to help you understand.

2023-07-25T09:15:56+00:00

Doctordbx

Roar Rookie


You know you look like a fair dinkum Walnut when you come into a sports forum and play the "you don't understand it" card. The evidence is here that perhaps Stokes and yourself aren't half as clever as you think you are.

2023-07-25T08:08:08+00:00

ExtraSundries

Roar Rookie


Oh dear. It’s funny when you explain to them, and their brows furrow. “What, so they get two innings each – does that mean they bat for 40 overs?” And then their eyes light up. “Oh wait, so if one side passes the other side’s runs, then the other side has to go in again and pass the first side’s runs. But only if there is enough time. Gosh, it’s complicated. I think I’d better stick to proper T20 cricket.” It’s quite sweet, really. But I can’t spend all day explaining to them how Test cricket works.

2023-07-25T08:00:47+00:00

ExtraSundries

Roar Rookie


Aaaand there’s another one.

2023-07-25T04:25:41+00:00

Christo the Daddyo

Roar Rookie


There’s zero chance of this happening.

2023-07-25T03:26:55+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


Rellum, Like you I don’t have a problem with Stokes’ decision. It wasn’t time that beat England, but weather. And since when does anyone take weathermen seriously???

2023-07-25T02:02:25+00:00

Peter

Roar Rookie


Not losing the 4th test was a huge win!

2023-07-25T01:02:24+00:00

AndyS

Roar Rookie


You may be right, but at the start of the third day the equation was clear...take ten wickets and score the runs. How to do that was entirely a choice however, not the single fated path as Stokes is suggesting. The first and foremost requirement was that ten Australian wickets had to be taken; there was no path to victory without that. But England chose the approach allowing the minimum time to achieve that non-negotiable outcome, which was strategically the weakest of the options available. If Stokes genuinely believes he had only that one option, or even that it was the best available option, his team should be concerned.

2023-07-24T23:58:58+00:00

Rellum

Roar Guru


They planned for 3 hours at least on the last two days for mine , to take those last 6 wickets. They just weren't good enough

2023-07-24T23:51:52+00:00

AndyS

Roar Rookie


Of course, but if they couldn't get the extra tail end wickets with twenty more overs on the third day, then all the extra runs they scored were worthless. Whereas if they did and then had a modest chase, the game was there to be won with aggressive batting on a docile track. Which approach would have been more Bazball, or even just the more positive game plan with England controlling the pace?

2023-07-24T23:28:03+00:00

Rellum

Roar Guru


You are making the assumption they would have taken the wickets on day 3

2023-07-24T23:24:54+00:00

AndyS

Roar Rookie


And I think the observation is they should have tried to take them on day 3. Perhaps it would have made no difference and there simply wasn't time, but the team holding the bat control how the game is being played. Australia spent day four defending...how many runs might a chasing England have made in the same time?

2023-07-24T21:33:40+00:00

Opeo

Roar Rookie


For Manchester people were telling me that we only needed three bowlers because the bowlers could rest during rain delays on the first two or three days.

2023-07-24T21:06:03+00:00

Doctordbx

Roar Rookie


Well clearly Stokes was wrong because look what happened.

2023-07-24T21:04:19+00:00

Doctordbx

Roar Rookie


Don't even watch T20. I've watched test cricket for about 40 years though. It was a Stokes non-declaration and it was costly. Your comment is just as dufus as Stokes.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar