The Liebke Report Card: 'Shamar Joseph might be the best thing that ever happened to Cameron Bancroft'

By Dan Liebke / Expert

With David Warner retired from both Test cricket and the attendance of his siblings’ weddings, Australian cricket had spent the intervening period abuzz with chatter about how his absence would impact the side.

Now, at the Adelaide Oval, it was time to find out.

Here’s the report card for the first Test between Australia and the West Indies.

Stretchy Puppies

Grade: B

When Pat Cummins won the toss, he called upon all his marketing nous and gave the salivating fans a chance to immediately witness Warner’s replacement in action.

Yes, it was time to once again see Cameron Green, history’s greatest gully fielder, back at work, covering everywhere from fourth slip to point with his absurd, outsized reach and goofy, joyous grin. 

It didn’t take long for Green to do his ‘I’m also the frontrunner to play Reed Richards in the Fantastic Four MCU reboot’ thing, stretching to improbably pluck a Tagenarine Chanderpaul chance from the very edge of the sky.

So excited was Green that I’m almost certain he technically threw away the ball in delight before he regained his full balance.

A pedantic third umpire – i.e., virtually all of them – might even have ruled the catch invalid on this basis.

After all, if Green had been close to the boundary’s edge and thrown the ball away while off-balance, a case could surely have been made that he did so because he was afeared he might otherwise have toppled over the rope.

And, in a way, isn’t Cameron Green always just a couple of paces away from the boundary edge?

(Explanation of joke: Because he’s so tall.)

Scorecard Graffiti

Grade: D+

Nevertheless, the third umpire didn’t overturn the catch. Perhaps he was dozing off, or stuck in an elevator. Or perhaps he just saw the writing on the wall regarding the West Indies innings.

That scorecard graffiti was all about Josh Hazlewood and Cummins tearing through the visitors’ inexperienced lineup.

‘Please Hammins, don’t hurt ’em,’ it read (no, this metaphorical graffiti did not refer to the duo as ‘Cumwood’), as the pair took the first seven wickets to fall, with combined figures of 7/54, as the West Indies staggered their way to 7/132.

Hazlewood, in particular, was described by Brad Haddin on the Fox Cricket commentary as the kind of bowler who ‘asks questions all day’.

I now desperately hope Haddin’s claim is a literal truth, and Josh is continually wandering around, bugging teammates by asking ‘why is the sky blue?’, ‘how do magnets work?’, ‘can animals talk to each other?’, etc.

Tenth Wicket Counter-attacks

Grade: A-

One question Hazlewood wasn’t asking teammates was how to get a number eleven out. To be fair, few of his teammates seemed interested in asking that question either. 

Because, just as in the Pakistan series, the fall of the penultimate wicket triggered a brazen counterattack from the visiting side. This time around, it was newcomer Shamar Joseph who did the damage, smacking 36 (41) in a tenth wicket partnership of 55 that eventually saw the West Indies reach 188 all out shortly after a belated tea.

Should teams touring Australia contrive to bat every player at eleven, somehow? Look, it’s worth trying.

Learning Nothing From Nathan Lyon

Grade: F

In a display of Joseph pluck not seen since the dude who was cuckolded by God, the West Indies quick was given the ball first change, and dismissed Steve Smith first up.

Stupidly, however, Joseph didn’t immediately retire, thereby blowing an opportunity to leave Test cricket with an unbeatable average and strike rate.

A shame for the kid. Learned nothing from Nathan Lyon.

Joseph also sent Green packing, in the process dismantling the entire Warner replacement shuffle. Shamar Joseph may well be the best thing that ever happened to Cameron Bancroft.

Joseph and the rest of the attack continued plugging away at the Australian batters. At one stage, when they were 5/129, in reply to the West Indies’ 188, it appeared that Australia might not even get ahead. Then, of course, they realised they already had a Head.

Travis Head, to be precise. He scored 119 (134), and helped Australia eventually take a first innings lead of 95.

Listening To Marnus

Grade: F

This lead would prove more than enough, as the West Indies fell to 3/7 in the sixth over, with Josh Hazlewood bowling three consecutive wicket maidens before shamefully failing to take a wicket in the fourth and conceding two runs (and yes, yes, taking another wicket) in his fifth.

Good tactics from the West Indies to race as quickly as possible to Australia’s main weakness – bowling to the last wicket partnership.

They couldn’t quite get there before the end of the second day, though, ending instead six wickets down and still 22 runs shy of making Australia bat again.

The last wicket of the day to Nathan Lyon was won on review after a half-enthusiastic shout for LBW was turned down, only for Cummins to be foolishly tempted into sending it upstairs by the shrill voice of Marnus Labuschagne piping in, claiming ‘I reckon it pitched in line’. 

As it turned out, Marnus was correct in this instance, and Justin Greaves was out.

But that’s not the point, is it?

This Australian side, like so many modern sporting teams, talk a lot about ‘processes’ and the importance of not focusing on the outcome, but on instead executing the skills within your control.

And you know what’s in your control, Pat? Ignoring Marnus, that’s what. Something you very much failed to do.

In fact, rather than celebrate Lyon’s wicket, the entire team should have hung their head in shame that they’d gone so far astray from their methods.

Why should Head bear the brunt of this disappointing breakdown in the team’s mindset, I hear some of you ask. To which I can only say, touché!

Forget Jonny Bairstow in the Ashes. If Cummins was ever going to call an opposition batter back to the crease, this was the time to do it.

Yes, on the third morning, Australia went on to dismiss the West Indies for 120 and comfortably chase down the target of 26, with Steve Smith unluckily stranded a mere 389 runs short of Michael Clarke’s very normal prediction that he (Smith that is, not Clarke himself) would break Brian Lara’s individual Test innings record of 400. 

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

Victory by ten wickets and the retention of the Frank Worrell Trophy. But at what cost, Patrick? At what cost?

The Crowd Says:

2024-01-19T23:19:48+00:00

The Knightwatchmen who say Nii

Roar Rookie


You're probably right about 2010. But the only significance the year 1973 has in the whole discussion is that was the year our family world book encyclopedias growing up were printed/published. It said, incidentally under the topic "Capital punishment is still provided for in three states, Victoria, South Australia and Western Australia".

2024-01-19T19:58:23+00:00

3 R M

Roar Rookie


Federal law only overrides an inconsistent state law, isn't that one of the core principles of federation?

2024-01-19T19:12:52+00:00

Tony

Roar Guru


Love the bit about Hoff asking questions all day :laughing:

2024-01-19T19:11:46+00:00

Tony

Roar Guru


Most men don't

2024-01-19T19:08:36+00:00

Tony

Roar Guru


Nanny state rubbish

2024-01-19T13:53:02+00:00

carnivean

Roar Rookie


Is this a cut and paste from ChatGPT? You posted your opinion on a public forum. Me calling it out as ridiculous isn't cancel culture. It's called consequences. You want more respect? Stop posting gibberish.

2024-01-19T13:09:44+00:00

The Knightwatchmen who say Nii

Roar Rookie


Fair enough DT.

2024-01-19T13:02:03+00:00

Good Grief

Roar Rookie


Ball tampering?

2024-01-19T12:23:49+00:00

Gamechanger

Roar Rookie


“They should be disregarded at all times.”With that one statement you have attempted to cancel me and my views. That is called intolerance. Secondly the attempt to influence roarers to adopt your position I’m calling out as inappropriate. You have a right to disagree with me, but not attempt to demean me and cancel me. That is one of the ills of this society . Cancel Culture. You stepped right into it. It would be appreciated if you withdrew those ill informed comments.

2024-01-19T11:55:14+00:00

Redcap

Roar Guru


Nah, just a federalist, Bernie. Though if somebody proposed reintroducing capital punishment specifically targeted to people who say 'very unique', 'a myriad of' and/or 'utilise', I'd be tempted. :happy:

2024-01-19T11:38:13+00:00

Tufanooo

Roar Rookie


Never said you weren't. I was saying you are both right, and that you're also wrong that the DP being purely a state thing. The federal government also would have had the power to force the states to abolish the death penalty anyway if they wished. Had that 2010 law been passed in say, 1950, all states still enforcing the death penalty at the time would have been obliged to scrap the law under s109 of the constitution.

2024-01-19T11:25:09+00:00

The Late News

Roar Rookie


Brilliant Dan. The batting order is now 11A, 11B, 11C, etc. Take the names and numbers off their shirts and simplify! Obviously it could be XIA, XIB, XIC...and so on.

2024-01-19T10:44:19+00:00

carnivean

Roar Rookie


This is the kind of rigour that we need. I eagerly await your satire recap of the Brisbane test.

2024-01-19T09:09:02+00:00

The Knightwatchmen who say Nii

Roar Rookie


Does that mean you support the DP DT? If you were a young man in USA around 1860 would you have been born and raised in one of the 11/15 secessionist states? :)

2024-01-19T09:07:41+00:00

The Knightwatchmen who say Nii

Roar Rookie


You are right about 2010 but I am totally right about state by state abolition.

2024-01-19T08:03:47+00:00

Redcap

Roar Guru


"They then passed another law in 2010 that ensured no state could reinstate the death penalty" Typical bloody Federal overreach. :happy:

2024-01-19T08:02:30+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


Covering eyes? Doesn't that defeat the intent?

2024-01-19T07:53:58+00:00

Tufanooo

Roar Rookie


Actually, you're both right re: Australia and the death penalty. And you are wrong that criminal law is a state jurisdiction in our set up. It is state and federal and the federal government exercises commonwealth criminal law for federal crimes and in external territories to which responsible government still has not been granted (such as Christmas Island, Cocos Island etc) And they did abolish the death penalty in 1973. They then passed another law in 2010 that ensured no state could reinstate the death penalty.

2024-01-19T06:54:28+00:00

Tim Carter

Roar Pro


Did you cover your eyes?

2024-01-19T06:27:28+00:00

carnivean

Roar Rookie


Another GC post that seems like it read the same article as everyone else, but so wildly misses the point of it that you really have to wonder. Marnus's calls for reviews are about as sensible as Shane Watson reviewing all of his LBWs. Or your posts. They should be disregarded at all times.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar