Coulter-Nile's batting will spare him the axe

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

Had paceman Nathan Coulter-Nile not batted so brilliantly against the West Indies on Thursday he very likely would have been dropped for the crunch match against India this Sunday.

That’s an odd statement to make about a specialist bowler. Yet even he himself told media yesterday he’s facing the axe after going wicketless across Australia’s first two World Cup matches.

Coulter-Nile’s worrying form with the ball extends to Australia’s final warm-up game against England, when he was clattered by the home batsmen, conceding 61 runs from six overs. That means that across his last three ODIs, the 31-year-old has combined figures of 1-167 at an awful economy rate of 6.96 runs per over.

Even against Afghanistan, who have an extremely weak batting line-up, Coulter-Nile did not look threatening. He no longer boasts the hurrying 140-145kmh pace that was such an asset to him earlier in his international career. Instead he is having to trade on guile and deception, and I’m yet to be convinced that this version of him is good enough to be consistently effective, particularly against strong batting line-ups.

Of late he has been a rocks or diamonds kind of bowler. One game he finds a nice rhythm and a hint of swing and heads home with tidy figures. The next match he seems to be in the slot every other delivery and gets punished. Given the potency of their star opening bowlers Mitchell Starc and Pat Cummins, Australia’s quandary now is whether to back the West Australian’s natural wicket taking ability or pick a more reliable and economical bowler.

The alternatives are left arm swing bowler Jason Behrendorff, right arm seamer Kane Richardson and off spinner Nathan Lyon. Richardson, to me, offers nothing that Coulter-Nile does not. Behrendorff, meanwhile, is essentially a specialist new ball bowler and Australia should be reticent to break up their in-form opening pair.

Lyon has immense value when Australia play the most aggressive batting line-ups like England and the West Indies. Those teams tend to bat in an aggressive T20 style, which brings spinners into play. But it is crucial in this tournament that Australia assemble their attack based on the batting style of their opponent.

Australia don’t need to field two spinners against India, who play slow bowlers perhaps better than any other ODI team.

South Africa took that punt against India on Wednesday and their two spinners, Imran Tahir and Tabraiz Shamsi, combined to take 0-112 at nearly six runs per over. By comparison, South Africa’s three quicks were far more effective. Kagiso Rabada, Chris Morris and Andile Phehlukwayo together took 4-115 and conceded a miserly four runs per over.

That, to me, narrows the field down to just two men – Coulter-Nile and Behrendorff – to fill the fourth bowler slot against India. The latter is a fine 50-over bowler but is clearly at his best when given the new ball and is untested at this level as a first change bowler. There are several other factors that work in favour of the incumbent.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

The first is that he has much more experience than his fellow Sandgroper against the Indian batsmen, having played a lot of IPL and also faced them in eight ODIs. The second is that his skill with the blade offers Australia crucial batting depth.

While it would be folly to expect Coulter-Nile to suddenly become an all-rounder on the back of his phenomenal 92, that innings may give him the confidence to make the most of his batting talent in this tournament.

He has far more ability with the bat than his career numbers indicate across all formats. A tail of Coulter-Nile, Cummins and Starc has a nice balance between the poise and solid technique of Cummins and the hitting power of the other two. Some Roarers will be livid at the idea that a bowler’s batting ability could be a significant factor in selection.

But the reality is that against the commanding batting line-ups of India and England, the two favourites to win this World Cup, Australia could badly need such batting depth. That’s not to suggest Coulter-Nile should be carried through the tournament if he continues to labour with the ball.

Rather, I think it is worth giving him another game or two to see if he can regain some bowling form. Because if Coulter-Nile can build some momentum with the ball then his batting ability will give Australia vital balance to their line-up.

The Crowd Says:

2019-06-10T22:54:15+00:00

Chris Kettlewell

Roar Guru


Definitely. I feel that NCN only has his spot in the team because he offers something with the bat and the selectors don't want to weaken the batting lineup by replacing a number 8 with a number 11. At this point, I think they need to do that though. Likely we've seen the one good innings from NCN, and if playing Behrendorff instead of NCN can mean chasing 20 runs less, then that's better than having NCN coming in at 8.

2019-06-09T10:26:17+00:00

Bunney

Roar Rookie


Doesn't matter Chris...Kane Richo and the Dorff are still better than NCN. NCN always had pace... he's struggling to get higher than 133kph so far in the CWC. Without pace, he's got very little. Kane has change-ups, the Dorff has accuracy, Lyon has guile...all more than what NCN is offering

2019-06-09T01:24:11+00:00

Insult_2_Injury

Roar Rookie


It doesn't matter how well you're going if you keep winning. Pretty is for spectators, getting the job done is for fans.

2019-06-08T22:22:23+00:00

JD St George

Roar Pro


Just because we're winning doesn't mean we're going well. 8th ranked West Indies had us 4/38 and nearly pulled off the upset.

2019-06-08T21:49:12+00:00

qwetzen

Roar Rookie


Oh? So form for the last year/10 odis and whether the side has won counts for some, but not for others. lol!

2019-06-08T16:06:20+00:00

Geralt

Guest


Do you expect anything other than clickbait from Ronan? Reactionary sensationalism, his opinion changes every second game lol. Throw in his cherry picking stats and youve got a recipe for high comment count and article views, nothing overly insightful.

AUTHOR

2019-06-08T07:29:05+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Stanlake in form would have been a monster on that last pitch. Really hope his body holds together he is such an incredible prospect.

2019-06-08T07:25:13+00:00

Rellum

Roar Guru


In hindsight, with actual bounce in these pitches, Stanlake should have toured over Richardson. Nesser would have been a better option.

2019-06-08T07:18:48+00:00

Neel

Roar Guru


He needs to fire with the ball soon. That performance in the last game with the ball was really disappointing.

2019-06-08T07:13:49+00:00

VivGilchrist

Roar Rookie


I’m glad badmanners got the gist of my comment

2019-06-08T05:39:02+00:00

Simon

Guest


I actually think Richo could do a decent job in the middle and latter overs, got a bit of guile about him. For me it's between him and Lyon

AUTHOR

2019-06-08T05:35:30+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Kane Richardson struggled in the 4 warm-up matches he played, taking 3 wickets at 61. He needed to do a lot more than that to force his way into this Aussie lineup for me.

AUTHOR

2019-06-08T05:31:32+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


India's attack really is fantastic - the best white ball quick in the world, plus the best spin combo in the world, and a very handy second seamer in Bhuvi. It's going to be very tough work for the Aussie batting lineup.

AUTHOR

2019-06-08T05:29:24+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


"Any chance of our top order scoring runs?" They have done all year, that's a key reason Australia have won their last 10 ODIs as well as 5 of their 6 warm up matches.

2019-06-08T05:27:58+00:00

Tigerbill44

Roar Guru


He certainly looked a weakling in the bowling attack. This situation reminds me of the case of Ijaj Faqih of Pakistan back in 1987. An off spinner cum useful lower order bat, he was flown in from Karachi as replacement for injured Tausif Ahmed for the 4th test against India. Ijaj scored a cracking hundred; but failed to impress with the ball;so with Tausif fit for the 5th test; he was dropped. I think, he played only one more test for Pakistan; against WI in 1988.

2019-06-08T04:52:47+00:00

badmanners

Roar Rookie


Yep VivGilchrist, amazing that a bowler can go for a few and his head is on the block, yet there are 4 batsmen above him with a combined tally of 19 but they're safe for the next match.

2019-06-08T03:55:22+00:00

VivGilchrist

Roar Rookie


Totally agree. Once again a bowler has to lift. Any chance of our top order scoring runs?

2019-06-08T03:16:34+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


You're right on the money with two of your comments, Ronan. "it is crucial in this tournament that Australia assemble their attack based on the batting style of their opponent". If we can get this right, it will take a lot of pressure off the entire attack. There will be games where Lyon and/or Behrendorff could play and Langer with Finch has to get those decisions right. "it is worth giving him another game or two to see if he can regain some bowling form". Again, I see him as a possible Chris Woakes type player in this tournament, able to get a wicket or two without going for a lot of runs AND being a lower order threat with the bat. It's hardly likely NCN will take a swag of wickets in any game but if he can go for under 5 an over and maybe get a wicket as well, we're still a solid chance in this tournament

2019-06-08T02:21:30+00:00

Insult_2_Injury

Roar Rookie


Sound option, Bunney. He'd fit in well for Stoinis or Maxwell, neither of whom have done anything yet.

2019-06-08T02:19:32+00:00

Insult_2_Injury

Roar Rookie


Keep it simple? What, like retaining a winning team and at all costs retain your form players with the bat?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar