Caleb Clarke's performance to the Wallabies' defensive wobbles: Four talking points from Bledisloe 2

By Daniel Jeffrey / Editor

Another game at Eden Park, another All Blacks victory. New Zealand are on the verge of retaining the Bledisloe Cup after their 27-7 win in Game 2.

The result doesn’t come as a great surprise, but the scoreline was more dominant than the actual match. And that’s a decent place to start our Bledisloe 2 talking points.

Wallabies closer than the scoreline suggests
The Wallabies didn’t play like 20-point losers at Eden Park, with the painfully obvious exception of the 15 minutes after halftime. The All Blacks were at their ruthless best then, dominating that critical period after the break to end the contest with more than a quarter of the match still left to run.

Australia enjoyed more territory and possession early on for the second week in a row – both of those measures were dead even at full-time.

Also promising for Dave Rennie was that the lineout operated far better than in Wellington, with just one errant throw for the entire afternoon, and the scrum was also much improved even with a couple of dominant shunts from All Blacks debutant Alex Hodgman.

Ultimately when appraising the Australian performance, we must remember that New Zealand were a far, far better side than they were in Game 1 – and were always going to be.

Caleb Clarke was a revelation in his first start in the black jersey, Beauden Barrett added far more at fullback (albeit in friendlier conditions) than Damian McKenzie did, Jack Goodhue was one of a number of All Blacks to improve markedly from their showings last week, and the entire team’s defence was outstanding.

When Aaron Smith crossed shortly after a penalty goal, the All Blacks were on the verge of closing the game out before halftime. That the Wallabies were able to respond with a try of their own, and didn’t concede again before the break, was pleasing for Australian fans familiar with morale-crushing opposition scores late in halves.

Even between New Zealand’s third and fourth tries, the visitors went deep into attacking territory and only the TMO (rightly) stopped Brandon Paenga-Amosa from pulling a five-pointer back.

Even though Sam Cane went onto score shortly after, there was enough to suggest the Wallabies have more ticker and are more likely to stay in contests longer than what their supporters have become accustomed to in previous years.

Ned Hanigan. (Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

But…
Enjoy those positives? Great, because the negatives were far more plentiful.

While the Wallabies did have better field position early on, even in the frenetic opening passages of the game it was clear they had failed to address their weakness at the attacking breakdown. Too often gold jerseys were hopelessly isolated after a tackle, with Ardie Savea and Sam Cane seemingly always able to get their hands on the ball.

As a result, by my count there were at least five or six turnovers conceded in the first 25 minutes – although two were immediately pinched straight back.

That on its own made compiling strings of phases together difficult enough, but when paired with the slew of handling errors the Wallabies coughed up it became nigh-on impossible.

Australia made some 19 offloads in the game, their most since 2016, but too often they forced the extra pass when it wasn’t on. The attack was disjointed and not at all composed, and it provided New Zealand ample opportunities to counter-attack in broken play – a scenario in which they are lethal.

After dominating the kicking battle in Wellington and using the conditions there far better than the All Blacks, the Wallabies were completely outplayed in that area of the game today. While the side’s kicks in the series opener almost always led to even contests between receiver and chasers, the opposite was true in Auckland.

Barrett and Clarke were rarely challenged under the high ball and were constantly gifted too much space on kick returns by absent chasers.

That contributed to a number of missed tackles, but the Australian defence struggled all afternoon to stop opposition runners regardless of the scenario. After being miserly without the ball in Game 1, the men in gold missed more than a quarter of their tackles, falling off 22 in the first half then 18 in the second.

At the start of the series, Rennie identified keeping the All Blacks to 15 or 16 points as a key factor in beating them. That’s never going to happen when you finish a Test with a successful tackle rate of 73 per cent.

Matt Philip. (Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

Wanted: Someone who knows how to tackle Caleb Clarke
Caleb Clarke showed enough in his short stint off the bench in Game 1 that he may have been handed a start today regardless of George Bridge’s fitness. At any rate, Bridge’s unfortunate torn pectoral muscle made the decision for New Zealand’s selectors easy, and after his Eden Park performance, Ian Foster will be keeping the youngster in the XV for many, many more Tests.

Australia’s aforementioned aimless kicking made Clarke’s role easier than it should have been, but even in phase play he was never easy to bring down.

According to Opta, he finished the match having beaten 12 defenders, but it seemed like he’d left twice as many in his wake in the 65 minutes he was on the field.

While the 21-year-old didn’t get on the scoresheet, Ardie Savea’s try was all down to Clarke’s incredible bruising run when he received a James O’Connor kick on his own 40-metre line, burst through the first line of defenders, bounced up off the ground after Tom Banks and Marika Koroibete couldn’t complete a tackle, before finally being brought down 15 metres out by Nic White. Savea strolled over the very next phase.

It’s going to become one of those ‘where were you when…?’ events fans will discuss many years into the future, a short moment when a new star announced himself to Test rugby.

The Jonah Lomu comparisons are inevitable and not particularly fair on a young man who looks set for superstardom on his own merits. But on top of being a charismatic, likeable character off the field, Clarke has all the tools necessary to live up to the legacy of the famous no.11 jersey he wore with such aplomb at Eden Park.

Caleb Clarke. (Photo by Michael Bradley/AFP via Getty Images)

What will change in two weeks?
Rennie showed on Thursday he’s not afraid to make changes after sub-par performances, and hinted in his post-match press conference that he could look to address the Wallabies’ appalling tackle numbers at the selection table.

It looks as if he’ll be forced into at least one change following Matt To’omua’s injury. Australia missed their inside centre dearly after he tweaked his groin late in the first half, their defence and attack both looking less organised with the veteran off the ground.

The injury’s seriousness isn’t yet known, but given he left the field in the Rebels’ Super Rugby AU semi-final with the same issue, returning for Bledisloe 3 in 13 days is unlikely.

Hunter Paisami shifted to 12 when To’omua off and is one possibility to take his place in Sydney, although the fact Rennie mentioned Irae Simone as a possible replacement indicates the Brumbies midfielder may have the inside lane for a Test debut in two weeks’ time.

Jordan Petaia was lively after coming on for To’omua and will surely start at outside centre in Game 3 providing he pulls up well. He’ll offer a more reliable option in defence than Paisami, who is still a work in progress on that side of the ball.

It’s hard to find an obvious change in the forward pack. Ned Hanigan was one of the Wallabies’ best in his return to Test rugby, Harry Wilson was far more physical than a man who recently spent 36 hours in hospital should be capable of, and Brandon Paenga-Amosa provided a notable improvement at the set-piece.

James Slipper and Taniela Tupou have performed well as the starting props – although the latter will have his kicking license torn up after a shocker in the lead-up to the All Blacks’ opening points – and so too have Lukhan Salakaia-Loto and Matt Philip in the second row.

An extra week of preparation may facilitate more of an improvement than any tinkering with the line-up. It’s easy to forget given this is a better-looking Wallabies side than last year’s iteration, but they’ve only spent a grand total of four weeks in camp with a brand new coach this season.

Eden Park may have been one step back after two forward in Wellington, but the team is still headed in the right direction. Today’s loss doesn’t change the Bledisloe equation: the Wallabies need to win two games to regain the long-lost cup. Now they just have to get both those victories at home.

The Crowd Says:

2020-10-20T21:42:09+00:00

Short Arm

Roar Rookie


Peter Mc,I wasn’t talking about Gardner’s talk in general play, it was his same old speech come scrum time, players do tune out with that repeated stuff.

2020-10-20T03:12:51+00:00

Stu

Roar Rookie


Stitch up.. Lol. With a new coach and untested players (to him) thrown together with average preparation time, we were always going to lose in Auckland. No one would care if we lost in Auckland, if we'd then go on to win in Sydney and Brisbane, and win the cup. He'd have had a much stronger idea of that now if he'd used that match to see what the other players had. Anyway, whatevz.. good luck to both teams and coaches.

2020-10-19T22:49:51+00:00

elvis

Roar Rookie


Well actually it is clear. He had a hand on him and he was on the ground. It obviously wasn't clear to the ref in the moment, but that is an understandable error.

2020-10-19T22:44:12+00:00

elvis

Roar Rookie


They should have taken the points at 15 - 7.

2020-10-19T20:20:31+00:00

In brief

Guest


Is Garters French? The way he refs the scrum you’d think so. The rugby scrum is no longer adjudicated in accordance with the laws of the game so it’s become a farce.

2020-10-19T19:53:24+00:00

Paulo

Roar Rookie


“Smashing a kicker is a legitimate tactic.” See, I disagree with this. If your committed to the tackle - fine. But if you deliberately commit to the tackle knowing your going to be late, then say “l was committed” - not fine. Edits the cries partisanship and hypocrisy, I’m aware most teams do it; I don’t like any team doing it. And certainly not as a legit tactic. With all the evidence going around about long term effects of contact sport, concussions, and repetitive high impact collisions, this ‘smash the kicker’ cowardice has to stop. It’s about the most cowardly and dangerous things you can do on the field.

2020-10-19T18:27:57+00:00

Phantom

Roar Rookie


Take your eye patch off. If the ball has gone the tackle is late.

2020-10-19T13:14:45+00:00

Paulo

Roar Rookie


Indeed, if he goes the full Aus-B team, it says 1) he had no faith his A team could do it. 2) his B team are expendable. 3) he gives away test caps as if he doesn’t value a Wallabies jumper (typical smug Kiwi). 4) everyone would still be saying the Aus-A team are the goods and would have won if only the kiwi coach had had faith. Must be a stitch up.

2020-10-19T11:32:54+00:00

Double Agent

Guest


Smashing a kicker is a legitimate tactic. Last week I think at least one was late but this week no problem.

2020-10-19T10:15:09+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


The turnovers conceded were at the pre-ruck breakdown.

2020-10-19T09:03:11+00:00


Just to add, us Bok fans know all too well what impact the wrong coach can have.. Just go through our record :crying:

2020-10-19T09:01:38+00:00


P2R2 I find it curious that Foster is criticized so openly or should I say his appointment in public by Graham Henry in particular. I think it is a bit unfair on Foster. As you say, he has two years, which in itself suggests the NZRU wasn’t totally committed to his appointment until the next RWC, unless their policy changed in the sense that they won’t entertain four years coaching gigs anymore.

2020-10-19T07:43:21+00:00

Faith

Roar Rookie


Test Rugby Stu does not take place in the isolated strategy possibilties of the coach's mind. They take place in the real world. WBs stunned ABs and the world in Wellington - the demand was that they could finally break the Eden Park hoodoo and you suggest he goes full mental with WBs B team. 20-20 hindsight is truly a thing to marvel at ...

2020-10-19T07:07:58+00:00

Colin Fenwick

Guest


Being held means that a tackler must continue holding the ball-carrier until the ball-carrier is on the ground. Hmmm, very doubful the tackler is doing any of that and certainly not clearly. He slipped off before Clarke got to his feet. Play on.

2020-10-19T05:36:59+00:00

Malotru

Roar Rookie


Surprised about Caleb Clarke? Some of us thought he should have been in the ABs mix two years ago. No Jonah Lomu though, mainly because he has speed, power and a deceptive step and swerve. Don’t think I ever saw Jonah step or swerve, just ask Mike Catt. Paisami is an honest toiler, but lacks one attribute every test back needs, speed.

2020-10-19T05:19:49+00:00

pm

Roar Rookie


You are just talking better players, Bhoosho. It is fine to say drop him cause he's not a star, but then let's see you replace him with someone who is.

2020-10-19T05:03:53+00:00

David

Guest


If Foster didn't give Caleb Clarke the starting spot on Sunday, would the whole rugby world know he is a player of the future? If he sat on the bench again, and for the remaining tests and then the tri-series because they wanted to stick with known entities (if I had Dan Carter or George Gregan/Smith in my team I would stick with them, they are far more than known entities, they were genuine best in the world in position players) would he be the same player in 2021? I doubt it, and i'd expect france would come calling and he would be lost to the international game. I guess that means I agree 99% with your statement. I'd swap out some, but keep the combinations you might want going forward. For example White, Lolesio, Simone all have a run together. White I believe is the best half by some distance, the 10 and 12 I believe there is no real front runner. So give the 10 and 12 every opportunity to shine.

2020-10-19T04:46:00+00:00

David

Guest


I completely disagree with your statement. How do we know if Tom Wright or any other winger won't bring more to the party if we don't give them a run? We know what Koroibete brings, he runs hard and straight at a defender, butchering a certain try. He only needed to step inside a defender (didn't need to get past the defender, just needed to make it an arms tackle) and fall over the line. Even some of the best have been dropped for untried players. Gregan was dropped for Giteau. Smith for Pocock. Was Koroibete the best winger in Super Rugby? Henry Speight and Andrew Kellaway pre covid (Rugby.com.au). Post covid was Filipo Daugunu and Tom Wright (Rugbypass.com and the roar)?

2020-10-19T04:45:27+00:00

Hoy

Roar Guru


I think we make a lot of problems ourselves. Again, for example, continuously turning down penalty kicks. At worst, it gives your players time to reset... get settled, ready to go again. At best, you get three points, which yesterday would have made the game what? 15/10? Not a bad result, keeping in touch. Instead, yet we went for the lineout... again, and botched it... again... That is just stupid if you think about it. Putting unnecessary pressure on ourselves. We would make a break, and then throw the ball away... or have no support... We do these things to ourselves in truth. 40 missed tackles? The same players missed a lot less the week before. I think we have the cattle to be higher than top 5... but we need to put the parts together better.

2020-10-19T04:41:31+00:00

jameswm

Roar Guru


a draw

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar