The Liebke Ratings: Australia vs India, second ODI

By Dan Liebke / Expert

Trailing 0-1 in the series going into the second match, India were confident that their raw batting power could chase down virtually any total that Australia could muster, just as long as it wasn’t, y’know, ridiculously large.

(Gulp.)
Here are the ratings for the second ODI between Australia and India.

Heat
Grade: D
Aaron Finch won the toss and elected to bat. Partially to put a score on the board batting first, but mostly because it was a forty degree day and he had precisely zero interest in running around in the field in such sweltering conditions. He’d much rather do his fielding in the cool evening once the Sydney equivalent of the Fremantle doctor came in. (The Sydney Fremantle doctor is a 36-year-old plastic surgeon who charges $750/hr for an initial consultation and then spends the entire time boasting about his heavily negatively geared property portfolio.)

The only downside to Finch’s cunning ‘not field in the heat’ plan was that he did have to bat in the heat. Which also meant that during the drinks breaks he had to forego the Gatorade and instead answer questions filtered through a flying drone.

Imagine taking a drinks break on a stinking hot day and having to spend the entire time talking to a robot*. How demeaning. (* Note: this is not a cheap shot at Steve Smith.)

Nor did the heat help India’s over rate, already under the microscope after being fined for their sluggishness in the first ODI. In fact, the first half of the Australian innings took a full one hour and 51 minutes to be bowled.
Which I think meant, according to the new Big Bash rules, that Friday night’s India side earned a bonus point.

(Photo by Harry Trump-ICC/ICC via Getty Images)

David Warner and Aaron Finch
Grade: A-
Speaking of suffering from scorching yellow objects on fire, David Warner and Aaron Finch again caused the Indian bowlers despair, smashing them all around the SCG.
With their current belligerence and moustaches, Finch and Warner are reminiscent of a couple of 1970s cops, unafraid to cut corners and rough up a few lowlifes if it means they can slam sweet justice into the face of the perps.

The pair reached 142 before Finch was dismissed, the third ODI in a row in which they’d scored a century partnership opening together. However, the prospect of the duo repeating the feat in the third ODI on Wednesday took a turn for the worse in the field when Warner injured his groin and was taken to hospital.

Perhaps mistaking the groin injury for an attack by the supervillain Bane, Fox Sports helicoptered a reporter to the scene for live, up-to-the-minute updates of the crisis as it unfolded. Viewers were breathlessly informed that we’d know more about the injury once the scan was completed. Gripping coverage.

Nevertheless, there must be grave doubts about Warner’s ability to play in the First Test, only a little over a fortnight away. This gives Will Pucovski an opportunity to open with Joe Burns. Of course, ‘Pucovski-Burns’ doesn’t merely roll off the tongue as a Test opening partnership. It’s also street slang for a very specific kind of venereal disease. So hopefully the Australian squad keeps the Dettol handy.

Repeats
Grade: F
After the first wicket fell, Steve Smith then scored a player-of-the-match-worthy century in a mere 62 balls. Same as in the first match. Yawn. Go read my ratings for that game if you need to know more.

Unorthodoxy
Grade: B+
After Smith reached his century, he immediately decided to make the contest a little fairer by playing every shot from then on while rolling around on the ground. (This is not an exaggeration for comedic effect. He literally did this.) I fully expect him to score a century in this fashion in the next match.

Glenn Maxwell, the next man in, seemed to view these kind of antics as encroaching on his hard-won batting territory. Stung by Smith’s forays, Maxwell proceeded to score a half-century off just 25 balls, pulling out all his various tricks along the way to help Australia reach 4/389 at the end of their fifty overs.
Maxwell has taken his unorthodoxy to new levels in this series. He even bats at seven in unconventional fashion, wandering out to the middle as he does at the fall of the third wicket.
Not many other players can offer such brazen innumeracy down the order. Australia remain lucky to have him.

Virat Kohli
Grade: A-

In pursuit of 390 for victory, everything pretty swiftly fell on the shoulders of Virat Kohli. Rightly so, too. Kohli looked completely at ease at the crease, with the only Australian capable of threatening him seemingly umpire Paul Reiffel, who shot him out LBW at one point.
But even Reiffel’s relentless probing was easily countered by the brilliant Kohli, who swiftly overturned his wicket via DRS. Ultimately, the only thing that could stop the Indian captain from snatching an improbable victory was a spectacular leaping catch by Moises Henriques. A shame, really, as the brilliant snare not only snuffed out the match as a contest, it also highlighted yet again how difficult it is for any randomly chosen set of commentators to agree on how to pronounce the all-rounder’s surname.
Come on Moises. Just tell everybody to pronounce it ‘Hen-reek-us-shane’, and be done with it.

The Crowd Says:

2020-12-01T03:13:01+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


There’s no excuses, only the suggestions that the teams were not perhaps as evenly matched on paper as it may have appeared and also that at least two Australian batsmen were breathtakingly brilliant. I don’t disagree that overall there is an unhealthy imbalance between bat and ball in proper one day cricket.

2020-12-01T03:09:20+00:00

Mooty

Roar Rookie


Too many if’s and but excuses from Bernie and Paul, you can only deal with the facts of what happened on the day. History will only record the result, not the excuses for losing.

2020-11-30T16:59:20+00:00

Derek Murray

Roar Rookie


Smith was amazingly good but India's bowling was poor. His run rate reflected some of both IMHO

2020-11-30T12:26:38+00:00

dungerBob

Roar Rookie


I think my favourite line in all this is the one about how India's over rate would have earned a bonus point in the BBL.

2020-11-30T08:57:57+00:00

Tony

Roar Guru


Starc should be bowling first change

2020-11-30T08:54:51+00:00

Tony

Roar Guru


Absolutely brilliant writing Dan.

2020-11-30T08:31:34+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


Ian Chappell says he shpuld play in the pink ball first test but thereafter his spot will be in jeopardy if his form doesn't improve.

2020-11-30T07:09:50+00:00

Ash

Guest


FYI, he's one of seven to do that rather than one of five: AB De Villiers (4), Jos Buttler (4), Sanath Jayasuriya (3), Shahid Afridi (3), Virat Kohli (2), Jonny Bairstow (2), Steve Smith (2). (Source: https://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/records/211608.html)

2020-11-30T07:09:14+00:00

Al

Guest


Not against true Scotsman, that's for sure.

2020-11-30T06:58:37+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


Smith is one of only 14 players to have scored more than 4000 ODI runs at his own average or better, his own strike rate or better as well as with his number of centuries or more.

2020-11-30T06:47:28+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


Hayden benefited from big bats as much as anyone as hos great years were all post 2000 – all bar 11 of his tests, 29 out of 30 of his test tons and all of his dozen or so one day tons. While batsmen have these bats, this is counter balanced by much higher fielding standards. A promising innings being terminated by a freakish catch is far more likely these days than 30, 40 or more years ago and contemporary batsmen are also deprived of far more runs through sensational ground fielding inside the circle – shots that once would have been 4s get stopped by scarcely believable diving.

2020-11-30T06:34:48+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


Well he is well behind Warner and Maxwell, as well as Gilly. 8 runs is a substantial difference. Just behind Marnus and Travis Head and about equal with Mike Hussey. So I don’t think people who perceived him as being a strong innings builder and accumulator rather than a big hitter or super fast scorer were off the mark at all. Smith has only hit 42 6’s in 124 games, while Ponting hit 159 in 374 and Hayden hit 87 in 160, in an era of mostly smaller bats. These bats of the last 10-15 years are a big reason why you can’t readily compare players of today with those of earlier eras. Viv Richards strike rate of 90 (when also the boundaries weren’t brought in 10-20 metered) would equate to about 105-110 today, with the likes of Roy, Buttler, Hetmyer. Smith still doesn’t make the fastest 100 career S/Rs of all time - but maybe he will if he continues to play innings like these last two.

2020-11-30T06:09:39+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


Got it, tks. Labuschagne’s is only tortured because the original name was subjected to even weirder, ear-grating Dutch pronunciation when it became an Afrikaans name.

2020-11-30T05:49:08+00:00

badmanners

Roar Rookie


9 wickets from 2 games at 28 is poor is it? Scored a useful 86* with the bat as well.

2020-11-30T05:45:01+00:00

dungerBob

Roar Rookie


I think not.

2020-11-30T05:42:33+00:00

badmanners

Roar Rookie


And strangely just after Diego "Hand of God" Maradona passed away. Coincidence????

2020-11-30T05:30:46+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


He was always excellent at it. There will never be an era where a strike rate of 86-87 will be too slow for ODIs.

2020-11-30T05:30:15+00:00

Ruairidh MacDonald

Roar Rookie


Pretty sure it's referring to Labuschagne and our usual tortured pronunciation of his name

2020-11-30T04:54:15+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


Smith scoring 100 off 60 odd balls instead of 70 (off 60) and maxwell's 200 SR for 50 or 60 runs means 315-330 totals are getting turned into 375-390. Plus India are without Rohit Sharma and Dhoni is not there at all anymore. This makes it far more difficult for Kohli chasing.

2020-11-30T04:33:11+00:00

Chris Kettlewell

Roar Guru


No way Abbott should even be in the conversation to replace Stoinis. Stoinis may have got a first ball duck, but he's in the team basically as a batting allrounder. Batting in the top 6. Abbott is not that sort of player. He's basically a bowler who can bat a bit. Green has been great in first class cricket, but his domestic white ball returns suggest he shouldn't have even been there in the first place. Henriques has done pretty well in recent years in domestic white ball cricket. Add to that the fact that Green is quite a bit quicker than Henriques, and they were playing on a pitch where it seemed the faster you bowled the easier it was for the batsmen, Henriques bowling was much more suited to the conditions than Green's also.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar