Five key questions ahead of the World Test Championship Final

By David Schout / Expert

Almost 150 years since the first ever Test match, cricket is finally attempting a World Cup of sorts for the game’s longest format.

The first ever final couldn’t be more intriguing. The well-resourced, stylish cricketing behemoths that are India versus the plucky, patient, understated New Zealand.

There’s lots to unpack about the next five days, which will likely be extended to six, and we’ve picked apart five of the most pressing matters below.

1. Does Neil Wagner miss for the Black Caps?
Let’s jump straight into selection. Unsurprisingly the world’s two best sides — who are both boasting almost fully fit squads — will have a number of tough calls to make ahead of the toss at 7pm ()AEST tonight.

It’s absurd to think that New Zealand’s heartbeat, Neil Wagner, could miss, but it seems increasingly likely. Three seamers are already locked in ahead of the fiery left-armer: Trent Boult, Tim Southee and Kyle Jamieson. And if Colin de Grandhomme is picked to bat at No. 7 as expected, the final spot in the XI is essentially a battle between Wagner and spinner Ajaz Patel, who impressed in last week’s win over England at Edgbaston.

Spin could prove crucial in the back half of the WTC final, and the Black Caps may well opt for Patel. They could of course play both – and leave De Grandhomme out – but that would leave Jamieson batting at No. 7, which is too risky against a quality bowling outfit like India.

Neil Wagner (Photo by Jeremy Ng / AFP / Getty Images)

2. Shami or Siraj?
If leaving out Wagner would be hard for New Zealand, bypassing Mohammed Shami would seem equally difficult for India. But they may just do it. As Australian fans know well, Mohammed Siraj was excellent in his debut series on these shores last summer, showing excellent control with the Kookaburra ball. Siraj replaced Shami after the fellow quick broke his arm in the second-innings rout in Adelaide and has surpassed expectations since.

This third seamers spot – after Jasprit Bumrah and Ishant Sharma – appears as India’s remaining question provided they play the dual-spin of Ravichandran Ashwin and Ravindra Jadeja. And I think Siraj will get the nod.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

3. Will contrasting preparations impact the result?
From a preparation perspective New Zealand would appear to have the upper hand. They’ve just played (and won) a competitive Test series against the host nation, while India were resigned to a mere intrasquad hit-out in Southampton.

Ashwin said this was an “advantage” to the Black Caps and that he and his teammates would “have to adapt quicker”. But as outlined in the CricViz Cricket Podcast this week, India boasts far greater historical experience in the UK. Seven players have played five or more Tests in the UK, while New Zealand has played just two.

It’s impossible to compare and weigh immediate versus historical experience, but in this instance it would appear things (roughly) even out. Quite simply, the better side will win.

(Photo by Patrick Hamilton/AFP via Getty Images)

4. Will we even see a result?
Given there’s inclement weather forecast in Southampton over the next five days, it’s a good thing the ICC have scheduled a reserve day for Wednesday, which will almost certainly be utilised. The worst of the forecast is unfortunately for tonight (Australian time), but fingers crossed we can get away on time.

The Rose Bowl is also a generally batting-friendly surface too, and England have twice posted scores in excess of 550 in the last five Tests played at the venue. With those two factors combined, we may well be going deep into Day 6 for the inaugural WTC final.

5. Can this whet the appetite?
Opinions on the WTC are clearly mixed, as expressed on these pages over the last year. Even the ICC has been hesitant about the format — incoming chairman Greg Barclay declared it not “fit for purpose” in November.

But there’s clearly been a change of heart, and the WTC is here to stay. The game’s governing body earlier this month confirmed a final would be played every two years from 2025 to 2031.

Make no mistake, this week’s final will shape views about the format. Just as the compelling 2019 World Cup did wonders for the relevance of 50-over cricket, an engrossing first-ever final will be crucial to its ongoing acceptance, as shortsighted as that might seem.

Context is important in cricket, and a thriving Test table system, shortcomings notwithstanding, will enhance the game.

EDITOR’S NOTE: The World Test Championship will be broadcast into Australia on Foxtel, streaming on Kayo, and the ICC app.

The Crowd Says:

2021-06-20T09:06:53+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


Weather is a pain. But hardly surprising when scheduled in the UK in mid June. Just such a shame that all the build up is - literally - washed away because there is only one Test, rather than the back up of additional Teats plus the usual focus and refocus between Tests in a series of how the Test side should adjust in a series to ultimately come out on top.

2021-06-19T07:48:55+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


One would think that the ICC would grab the opportunity to make the final a showpiece event, which reflects how Test cricket is played; both broadly across the last 150 years and specifically in the WTC 2 year qualifying lead in period - I.e a series of Test matches that provides both teams with the opportunity to come out on top after factoring in the impacts of the toss and weather interference.

2021-06-19T07:18:36+00:00

Dwanye

Roar Rookie


Ha yeah true. Makes it more weird it one test. Tests treated poor

2021-06-19T07:01:49+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


Indeed Dwanye. In fact the WTC requires that the competing teams play at least two-Test series.

2021-06-19T07:00:34+00:00

Republican

Guest


English conditions are more akin to NZ so big advantage for Blackcaps I reckon. I'm hoping in hope that India prevail but don't believe they will v a very solid Kiwi outfit. Incredulous to think that NZ are now a far better Cricketing nation than Australia where Cricket is amongst some quarters considered the national sport? So the Kiwis can add this sport to the growing list of ascendancies v us that include but are not exclusive to Rugby League & Union of course & Netball. Sock it to them India!

2021-06-18T23:39:38+00:00

Dwanye

Roar Rookie


Hi Jeff. It also throws round the argument like olympics just go on in bad weather. Rain and difficult weather messes with the olympics, the event aren’t just slapped at some date for its two weeks and pray it don’t rain. It gets placed in the best driest time of the year as possible where it held so events don’t have hassle. Also how many times has two nations had one test? The standard is more then one

2021-06-18T14:12:43+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


These are familiar conditions for kiwis, so no worries there. Just the weather might stop them actually winning the match unfortunately.

2021-06-18T13:39:35+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


A single match, in a game always susceptible to weather impacts (so please, no more "oh but AFL, soccer WC, Olympics all do a one-off final") determinant for Test series cricket....both laughable and really sad. Leave aside the impact of the toss on a single match. There's a reason why why we determine the success (or not) of a Test side after 3, 4 or 5 Tests. India was considered to be successful on its last tour of Australia, not because it lost the First Test (which could have been the first and only if the series was based on a one-off Test), but because it was tested across variable conditions in multiple Tests where the outcomes of the toss and weather evened things out somewhat. Oh well, at least we can say we had "a final". And both sides get a participation ribbon, aka the title of World Test Champion.

2021-06-18T12:21:18+00:00

moaman

Roar Guru


Dunno mate-only if fit I hope. They still have the option of Blundell.

2021-06-18T11:29:52+00:00

Mountie

Roar Rookie


Go the Kiwis! Let’s hope they go better away from home than in Australia in 19/20 when they looked shocking!

2021-06-18T10:53:08+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


Seriously? That's a bummer. :crying: Ironic considering even in Britain, Manchester has a reputation as a very rainy place. Oh well...

2021-06-18T10:08:29+00:00

JD Kiwi

Roar Rookie


Re the weather - last year there were two biosecurity bubbles in English test grounds with hotels - Southampton and Old Trafford. Presumably Southampton was selected because the weather is usually better there. I've looked up the Manchester forecast for the next six days. Only a small amount of rain, unlike Southampton! Anyway, I think we are better equipped to cope with the wet so hopefully it will work out.

2021-06-18T09:36:13+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


He seems to be be rapidly improving.

2021-06-18T09:33:10+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


Oh him. Is he any good?

2021-06-18T09:29:21+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


Mitch Swepson! :thumbup:

2021-06-18T09:15:39+00:00

Sgt Pepperoni

Roar Rookie


Is Siraj that good? Not from what I've seen. I'd take ishants experience and inswing

2021-06-18T09:12:02+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


And I think if that QLD leggie (what's his name?) keeps going the way he is, then Lyon should be under more pressure to retain his spot.

2021-06-18T09:08:14+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


Yep, Pattinson, J. Richardson, Neser, Sayers, etc could've got more of a go, plus alternative left-armers like Paris, Behrendorff etc could've been looked at (assuming being left-armer is an issue in keeping Starc in the side).

2021-06-18T08:55:15+00:00

soapit

Roar Guru


tend not to have as many variables match to match tho

2021-06-18T08:24:19+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


They've already booked it in. But it does seem silly just to have the one reserve day, instead of two or three.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar