Starc on track to be greatest ODI bowler of all time but Aussies need to sort out batting before World Cup

By PSha / Roar Rookie

With the 2023 ODI World Cup taking place in India in October, the recent ODI series held in the same conditions has been a good litmus test to see how the Aussies stand in the subcontinent.

After beating India 2-1, the Australian think tank will be pleased but this team still needs work if it is to add to Australia’s World Cup collection.

Marsh-Head opening duo here to stay

Promoting Mitch Marsh to open the batting with Travis Head has been a revelation. It has given Australia a dynamic combination that has put up closer to T20 numbers in the powerplay.

Australia pose with the series trophy after winning 2-1 in Chennai. (Photo by Pankaj Nangia/Getty Images)

In the first two ODI games, Head and Marsh had an opening stand of 68 off of 10.5 overs and also chased down India’s meagre target of 116 in brutal fashion in 11 overs with 239 balls to spare. Marsh has been the chief destroyer as the top run-getter for the three contests with 194 runs at an average of 97.00 and a strike rate of 131.08 to earn player-of-the-series honours.

Head scored the third-most runs notching up 89 at a strike rate of 125.35. The next step for Marsh will be to balance his aggression and capitalise on the starts by posting tons and ensuring wickets are in hand for Australia to get out of the middle overs and start all-out attacking from the 35-40 over mark or earlier.

For now, Australia will be chuffed to have uncovered an opening pair that has been able to attack from ball one and get the team off to a flyer.

Middle order must do better

While the Aussie openers have stamped their authority in the India series, the same can not be said for the rest of the batters.

In the first ODI, Australia went from 3-129 after 19.4 overs to 188 all-out.

In the third ODI, Australia had posted 68 after 10.4 overs before their first wicket fell before subsequently collapsing to 5/138 after 28.1 overs.

Admittedly, both sides found it tough going after their opening partnership, but Australia’s stabilisers will need to do better and the finishers have to be more accountable by looking to build partnerships rather than trying to post mammoth scores on pitches that are tougher to bat on once the ball gets softer.

Australia is in danger of over-relying on its openers to put up necessary totals, which could come back to haunt them in the World Cup as it has for India in past editions who were reliant on their top three of Rohit Sharma, Shikhar Dhawan, and Virat Kohli and were sent packing in multiple knockouts when those three faltered.

What does Warner switch mean for Marnus and Marcus?

With Mitch Marsh now opening the batting and excelling, David Warner was placed at No.4 in the third ODI after he was declared fit. Warner at 4 with Labuschagne at 5 likely indicates that the veteran left-hander will be the preferred option to bat behind Steve Smith. This would mean Labuschagne, Marcus Stoinis, Glenn Maxwell, and Cameron Green would likely be competing for two spots alongside wicket-keeper Alex Carey.

Maxwell and Green have better track records than Labuschagne and Stoinis and should be the preferred options in the middle order. The world’s top-ranked Test batter, Labuschagne, had an average of 21.50 and a strike rate of 64.17, while his career ODI average stands at 31.37 with a strike rate of 83.20. He has neither been able to provide stability in the middle overs nor score at a decent clip in his ODI career.

While Stoinis helped contribute to posting a winning score in the third ODI batting in the lower order, his resume remains unconvincing. Since April 2019, Stoinis has a batting average of 16.5 in 27 matches and has not scored a single 50. With limited opportunities left before the World Cup, it will likely be Labuschagne and Stoinis who need to lift in order to gain a spot in the XI for the World Cup.

Starc making serious case to be crowned GOAT bowler for ODIs

Mitchell Starc has had a phenomenal career as an ODI bowler and Mr World Cup (bowling average of 14.81 in ODI World Cups) looks prime to dominate on the biggest stage once again.

In the absence of Josh Hazlewood and Pat Cummins, he stood up to be the leading wicket-taker for the series.

Mitchell Starc of Australia celebrates the wicket of Suryakumar Yadav of India. (Photo by Pankaj Nangia/Getty Images)

He bagged eight wickets at an average of 21.12. With his 5/53 in the second ODI, Starc became level with Brett Lee and Shahid Afridi for equal third for five-wicket hauls in ODI history.

Only Waqar Younis with 13 and Muttiah Muralitharan’s 10 five-wicket hauls are ahead of Starc. Everyone equal to or ahead of Starc has played at least twice as many matches.

Of every bowler that has 100 ODI wickets or more, Starc has the highest wickets per match average at 1.99. The three highest ODI wicket-takers, Muralitharan, Akram, and Waqar Younis average 1.52, 1.41, and 1.58 respectively. While Starc will be unable to match the numbers of the highest wicket-takers due to fewer ODIs being played nowadays, these stats do show that Starc is having an all-time great ODI career.

Pace depth looks potent

The unfortunate absences of Hazlewood and Cummins allowed Australia to test out their bowling bench strength and see how their depth stacks up halfway across the world.

Sean Abbott and Nathan Ellis proved themselves in Indian conditions. The pair were great accompaniments to the brilliant Starc. In his sole outing, Ellis took 2/13 in 5 overs while Starc undertook his demolition of India in the second ODI. Abbott was the preferred backup pacer having played all 3 matches and taking 4 wickets at a bowling average of 26.00, while importantly providing tight bowling to have an economy rate of 4.16.

Australia can rest assured that if anything were to happen to their frontline pacers then they have the necessary depth to cover for it.

The Crowd Says:

2023-03-25T05:58:51+00:00

TheCunningLinguistic

Roar Rookie


If you're looking for a white ball leader, look no further than Mitch Marsh. He has shown himself as a very capable leader in WA, and he'll be a staple of the white ball teams for years to come.

2023-03-24T10:47:44+00:00

Soyaib Zihad

Roar Rookie


I wonder how quickly people change their view and thoughts. It's rediculas. Obviously, Marsh did a very good job as opener for the first time in ODI but that does not mean he is sloted to the top as ever, not at least when Warner is there. Warner at middle is a joke! He is still a very good opener in ODI and it's about WC. So, experience counts.

2023-03-24T09:27:09+00:00

Sgt Pepperoni

Roar Rookie


Get him in now! If anyone says he's not a short form player then they can go sit with the pundits who said he couldn't play spin. Just get the best, in form players into the team

2023-03-24T07:12:07+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


Or here. https://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=2;filter=advanced;opposition=1;opposition=2;opposition=3;opposition=4;opposition=5;opposition=6;opposition=7;opposition=8;orderby=bowling_average;qualmin1=30;qualval1=innings_bowled;team=1;team=2;team=3;team=4;team=5;team=6;team=7;team=8;template=results;type=bowling

2023-03-24T07:09:42+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


Here’s the page from CricInfo showing the stats below.

2023-03-24T06:57:27+00:00

Nobody likes a smarta*s

Roar Rookie


Starc should only be WB from now on. The same goes for MM, Agar, Carey, Warner and Zampa. Labuschagne, Green machine, Cummins, Hazelwood should only be RB for a while.

2023-03-24T06:46:56+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


Definitely agree that Marnus probably doesn’t make the cut. Remains an open question whether it’s better to keep Warner at opening and put Head or Marsh back to the middle order. He may be out of form in Test cricket but he has one of the best records among ODI openers over the last decade and averages 52 in India at a strike rate of 97. Whereas middle order might not be ideal for him. How to measure the greatest ODI players is difficult, but aggregate wickets or runs is never the way to do it. Why should a 14-year career be better than a ten-year one? But averages are hard to compare because scoring rates were much slower in the 1980s and 90s because they didn’t have the big bats and smaller boundaries (and T20 experience) as today. Runs per innings in the last decade are about 20% higher than in 1980-2000. Also there are a lot more matches involving minnow batting lineups in World Cups and elsewhere (Zim, Afghanistan, Namibia etc). Starc looks very good when you compare only matches among the top 8 teams: he is in the top 12 all time on averages at 23.4, which seems on par with the best (Garner 19, Lillee 20.5, Hadlee 21.5) if you take different scoring rates into account. He is way behind their economy rates (5.2 vs 3.1, 3.6 & 3.3) but way ahead of those three on strike rate (27 vs 37, 34 & 39). He has the best strike rate of anyone on the top 40 averages on this list, and Brett Lee and Trent Boult are the only others with strike rates under 30.

2023-03-24T06:09:02+00:00

matth

Roar Guru


That’s why I said “oddly”. He didn’t top even QLD’s series runs in either season

2023-03-24T06:09:02+00:00

Choppy Zezers

Roar Rookie


Yep Id like to see Hardie get a start. Definitely needs to get some time at the international level and so we have a ready made replacement for Greeny

2023-03-24T06:02:33+00:00

The Bush

Roar Guru


Geez he must be a really inconsistent player in the format then matth, cause I see that in 2019/20 he had a truly great seasons; averaged 60 at 100 over 6 games, but I'm not sure how he got the gong in 2016/17, because his batting was 271 runs at 45, striking at 90; good but not amazing (see Cam White's performance that season or even Henriques). It also means there must have been lots of dross in between these seasons for him to only average 33 in the format. I think he's a real talent and I'm sure he can be useful in the format, but I doubt he'll ever be as good as Smith has been in ODI cricket (he's been unfairly maligned in white ball cricket in my opinion).

AUTHOR

2023-03-24T05:33:36+00:00

PSha

Roar Rookie


Perhaps. I’d like to see Ben McDermott or Sam Heazlett being tried after Smith retires. McDermott has an ODI century against Pakistan batting at 3, although he can be criticised for being slow in 50 overs cricket with a List A strike rate of 80.29. Heazlett has an average of 42.58 and a strike rate of 97.37 while mostly opening. I think he can do well batting at 3. There might also be a young generational batter ready to replace him depending on how long Smith has left.

AUTHOR

2023-03-24T05:25:00+00:00

PSha

Roar Rookie


Having watched Head captain in the Shield, I'm not too keen on him skippering Australia. He came across as very defensive, although to be fair to him he was mostly leading when the redbacks squad was starting to rebuild. South Australia looked better under the captaincies of Jake Lehmann and Henry Hunt who have been more proactive. I'd be interested to see how he goes with a better squad.

2023-03-24T05:24:25+00:00

matth

Roar Guru


Oddly, Labuschagne is one of the few players to be named player of the series twice in our domestic one day comp (2016/17 and 2019/20)

2023-03-24T05:20:07+00:00

matth

Roar Guru


You could go with Inglis or Turner

2023-03-24T03:35:35+00:00

Dougs

Roar Rookie


I like his calmness under pressure. He is is an excellent all round cricketer. When he filled in as captain for the Strikers he showed that he has a good cricket brain, and leads by example. He has been great in all forms of the game over the summer and is a significant part of why the Vics are in the Shield final. I think he would be a useful addition to any of the Australian squads.

2023-03-24T02:41:18+00:00

The Late News

Roar Rookie


Gracias amigo!

2023-03-24T02:26:38+00:00

jammel

Roar Rookie


Matt Short is a pretty good shout for the ODI squad - I hadn't really considered him until the past 2-3 days.

2023-03-24T02:14:18+00:00

boes

Roar Pro


I've updated the definition....

2023-03-24T02:02:58+00:00

The Late News

Roar Rookie


Yeah but you gotta have THE hat on!

2023-03-24T01:59:47+00:00

Tempo

Roar Rookie


Fair enough, I guess when I look at how Warner has performed in ODI cricket I see a player who is still performing in this format (forgetting test cricket where I'd agree he has been poor over a very extended period now). He played some really good innings last year and was consistent too. Not sure I would have given him ODI player of the year at the Australian Cricket Awards but he deserved to be in contention. I'd see moving him out of the opening slot as more Mitch Marsh (and Travis Head) taking up the opportunity presented by his injury than by Warner not performing. He did score a century in his most recent ODI prior to this series and an 86 two matches prior to that, averaging 50 in his last 10 matches with a couple of 90s and another 50 to add to those scores.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar