Every Aussie rated from first Test vs West Indies: Call the cops, Josh Hazlewood - you've been stone cold robbed

By Tim Miller / Editor

It wasn’t quite as emphatic as many thought, but Australia seldom looked likely to be upset by the West Indies, with nine wickets from Josh Hazlewood and a century from a back-in-form Travis Head enough to secure a comfortable 10-wicket win.

Despite wrapping up victory in just two days and a session, there are still questions for the hosts to consider.

Head’s counterattacking ton papered over some cracks as the Australian top order misfired again, with Steve Smith’s return to open and Cameron Green’s recall at number four both producing slim returns at the first time of asking.

Usman Khawaja also finished the Test in hospital after copping a nasty blow to the jaw from Shamar Joseph, throwing his spot in the XI for the second Test into jeopardy – and as we learned from the decision to replace David Warner, choosing a new opener is bound to be controversial no matter who is picked.

With Marnus Labuschagne also failing, a score of 283 against an only reasonable Windies bowling attack, save for the exceptional performance of debutant Joseph, will have both the team and its selectors hoping for more runs in next week’s day-night Test at the Gabba, ahead of tougher assignments against New Zealand across the Tasman and India at home for the remainder of 2024.

Here are The Roar’s player ratings for the first Test.

Usman Khawaja – 6.5

A scratchy if composed first-innings 45 was made to look a better innings by the failure of the rest of the batting order, Head excepted; but as the senior opener, Khawaja never felt likely to take the game away from the Windies.

Nevertheless, should that blow to the jaw rule him out of the second Test, his promises to be a tough void to fill, both as an opener and at first slip, where he has moved to fill Warner’s shoes.

Steve Smith – 3.5

Backing away due to movement near the sightscreen before a ball had been bowled was a vintage way for Smith to start his time as an opening batter; unfortunately, he couldn’t match it with some vintage Smith batting.

Copped a good ball to edge Shamar Joseph’s first delivery in Tests to slip – though it’s worth nothing both that openers are paid to be circumspect outside off stump and that Warner was rarely given that excuse when he fell cheaply later in his career – and while he looked more comfortable in the second innings with two boundaries in the chase of 26, he’ll certainly be hoping for more time at the crease in Brisbane.

Marnus Labuschagne – 3.5

Destroyed the Windies last summer with two centuries and a double in just four innings, but there was no such flood of runs this time around for Labuschagne, loosely pulling a Joseph short ball to backward square for just 10.

Having looked to be back in form with three 60s in four hits against Pakistan in Melbourne and Sydney, he’d have been filthy to miss out, while he came in in the second innings with just one to win.

Gets a bonus half point for his insistence to review an LBW shout off Nathan Lyon on the last ball of Day 2, which, for perhaps the first time, proved a good DRS decision from the highly-strung Queenslander.

Cameron Green – 4

Green sceptics are unlikely to be silenced by a scratchy performance from Australia’s new number four in his only innings on his Test return.

Desperate to get through to stumps on Day 1, he regularly played and missed prodding nervously outside off stump, and very nearly torched Khawaja with a suicidal single to get himself off strike.

When he edged Joseph behind off the fifth ball of the second morning, it felt inevitable – despite a pair of boundaries earlier in the over showing the undoubted talent that made the selectors so eager to get him back into the team.

Bowled just seven overs for the Test, but showed his partnership-breaking knack by enticing Kirk McKenzie, the visitors’ best bat, into a checked drive to cover.

Travis Head – 9

By his own admission, the South Australian’s popular century at his home ground was far from his fluent best; but with the team in a sticky situation at 6/168 and still 20 runs in arrears, this was a priceless knock to end a lean run this summer.

Made off just 134 balls and featuring 12 fours and three sixes, Head’s counterattacking was in stark contrast to the more sedate scoring of the top order, and on a pitch offering plenty to the bowlers where good balls were never far away, his approach led to a match-turning innings that once again proved his immense value to the team.

A sharp catch under the helmet at short leg early in the Windies’ second innings capped off a memorable second day for the hometown hero; however, being adjudged Player of the Match might have been a step too far given the match one of his teammates had. More on that later.

Mitchell Marsh – 2

Having plundered runs for fun in the middle order all summer, Marsh finally failed to have an impact when he edged Justin Greaves to a close-in gully for just 5 – one ball after a near identical nick had fallen just short of the same fielder.

This was a tough match for the beloved Western Australian; bowling just two overs as the main quartet did the lion’s share of the work, he wasn’t given the chance to impact the game in his secondary skill.

Add to that a dropped chance at third slip that he made look more difficult than it was by going with one hand just completed a shocker of a Test – good thing he has six months’ worth of credits in the bank.

Alex Carey (wk) – 4

Typically sound as a keeper, though with little to do short of snaffling the simple chances that came his way, Carey’s reliability behind the stumps is more integral to Australia’s fortunes than is properly given credit.

From a batting perspective, though, doubts remain; his 15 before edging Greaves behind was in stark contrast to fellow South Australian Head’s dynamic performance, and is unlikely to do anything to silence the calls for Josh Inglis’ more aggressive batsmanship to be given the nod instead.

Mitchell Starc – 5

Day-night Tests in Adelaide are Starc’s domain, but with the match played during daylight hours only for the first time in three years, the left-armer couldn’t have his usual impact in the city of churches.

Of his three wickets, two were tailenders, with keeper Joshua Da Silva’s uncontrolled hook shot on the third morning the other; he bowled better than that, with a number of plays and misses, but was still clearly the worst of the three quicks.

Pat Cummins (c) – 8.5

For the first time all summer, the captain had to play second fiddle with ball in hand; but when the match was still up for grabs on the first day, Cummins was as crucial as anyone.

A first-day four-wicket haul after winning the toss and boldly choosing to bowl first saw him back up his decision with another brilliant spell; his ball to clean bowl opposite captain Kraigg Brathwaite adding to the long list of pearlers he has sent down this summer alone.

Managed his bowlers perfectly throughout, with the only criticism of his captaincy a continued desire to have the quicks bowl short at the tail, which allowed the Windies’ last pair to add 55 and 26 – more than for any other wicket across both innings.

Nathan Lyon – 6

Treated with more respect than Pakistan afforded him, the off-spinner played an unassuming role in Adelaide.

Picked up three wickets – though removing No.11 Shamar Joseph twice isn’t quite a typical cleaning up of the tail given he proved the Windies’ second-best bat – but with the visitors batting for less than 100 overs across both innings, was scarcely needed.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

Josh Hazlewood – 9.5

So often the George Harrison in Australia’s ‘Fab Four’ bowling quartet, every so often Hazlewood proves that in just about any other attack, or any other era, he’d be the leading man.

That was the case in Adelaide; in both innings, the veteran quick’s metronomic accuracy and relentless quality bowling made mincemeat of the West Indies’ batting order, with eight of his nine wickets for the match coming in the top six – most caught behind the wicket poking nervously at an immaculate line with the perfect amount of seam movement.

Really, the only visitor who took the fight to him was Shamar Joseph – had the No.11 not twice whacked him around Adelaide Oval for some late runs, Hazlewood’s match figures of 9/76 would have been even better.

Call the cops, Josh – you were stone cold robbed of that Player of the Match award.

The Crowd Says:

2024-01-20T04:44:39+00:00

Tony

Roar Guru


:laughing:

2024-01-20T03:45:55+00:00

Choppy Zezers

Roar Rookie


And get their name in the paper

2024-01-20T01:44:04+00:00

matth

Roar Guru


Yeah sorry about that :happy:

2024-01-20T00:35:57+00:00

The Bush

Roar Guru


If Hazlewood didn't take 'em, the other bowlers would have. It's not like no one else was looking threatening on some flat track or whatever. It was a tough call on Hazlewood, but it was the right call.

2024-01-20T00:25:28+00:00

Targa

Roar Rookie


Also Glenn Phillips on an absolute bunsen, a terrible pitch in Bangladesh. He came in at 46/5 and got NZ to 180 by scoring 87 off 72. Also got 40* in the 3 wicket win and took a handy 3-fer.

2024-01-19T18:53:30+00:00

Tony

Roar Guru


We could always give them all McDonald's happy meal participation vouchers just to be consistent with junior cricket

2024-01-19T18:51:06+00:00

Tony

Roar Guru


They were in a winning position from the time they arrived at the ground

2024-01-19T13:50:48+00:00

Ben Pobjie

Expert


I think if Hazlewood got no wickets they still win.

2024-01-19T07:54:03+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


Well, someone needs to be awarded the goblets. Not sure they can be split as they come as a set?

2024-01-19T06:54:09+00:00

DTM

Roar Rookie


I'm not sure I like this MOM award. Why do we have it? The concept of an award for a single test match appears to have started around 1980. Why don't we just get rid of it? It is after all, a team game yet much of the discussion after a test match (by the media and fans) can be about who should have won the best player award. I'm sure the players care little for these awards - they all have too many trophies and medallions to count. It doesn't send a good message to kids about being part of a team if the media glorifies one player's performance whilst ignoring the fact that he/she could not win a game without 10 team mates. Personally, I don't care whether Travis or Josh were the best - in two weeks time, I'll remember the match but will have forgotten the MOM.

2024-01-19T06:49:17+00:00

Tufanooo

Roar Rookie


yes

2024-01-19T06:35:02+00:00

Tufanooo

Roar Rookie


The 10 wicket loss is a misleading result. They did ok, and although they were never ever in a winnign position, they were not a 10 wicket loss team. It was just that 3rd session on day 2 that blew it up.

2024-01-19T06:33:04+00:00

Tufanooo

Roar Rookie


If Head got a duck would Australia still win the game? I think the answer is yes, we would have got enough runs in the second innings to win the match. Indeed, but perhaps Joseph gets a second 5-for and gets more wickets than Hazlewood. We just don't know. You can't award the MOTM based on speculation. Hazlewood had a great game, but Head made - on a bowling deck - an effort no one else got near. Just 3 players passed 30.

2024-01-19T06:24:42+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


There are always what ifs. What if it hails on a 43C day and power infrastructure is taken out for days? Oh wait, that actually happened during the week..

2024-01-19T06:22:14+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


:laughing:

2024-01-19T06:09:22+00:00

liquorbox_

Roar Rookie


If Head got a duck would Australia still win the game? I think the answer is yes, we would have got enough runs in the second innings to win the match. If Hazlewood got no wickets or had an average performance we may not have been in a position to win. Hazlewood should get the man of the match award.

2024-01-19T06:08:50+00:00

Ace

Roar Rookie


My thought was that if WI have another quick K Roach could go. Medium pacers won't stand him in good stead in the next match. Oh for a decent no 3 as well but the experience may help them with a better effort next game

2024-01-19T06:05:22+00:00

Ace

Roar Rookie


I think he may have meant an inning's five for

2024-01-19T05:57:23+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


Repeating a discussion I heard on ABC radio: the left handers in the match were the ones that mostly scored decent totals. The right handers mostly struggled (was 24 the highest score by a right handed batsman?). I don't have an issue with Head getting MoM - though I would have also had no issue with Haze getting the nod. Aus fielding was a clear winner, though Marsh was a bit average catching-wise. It's a tough gig playing Australia at home and even though the Windies were clearly outclassed, as a pretty young side, I thought they gave it their best shot. Kemar Roach was probably the main disappointment for me on their side - as the experienced performer, I felt his effort was below par when others around him were stepping up.

2024-01-19T05:52:40+00:00

Choppy Zezers

Roar Rookie


I give Green an additional point for his height and another for his IPL earning potential. He's already up to 7 for this match, then add another 1 for forcing one of our best ever batsman to open so he can slot in at 4. He's nearly MOTM now after adjustments.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar