What would Australia XI vs Australia A look like?

By The Crowd / Roar Guru

An international cricket selector must look at both statistics as the foundation of form and non-statistical information to understand those stats in context.

The stats that really define how well a batsman is performing over the short and long term are:

  1. total runs;
  2. total average;
  3. total balls faced; and
  4. hundreds and fifties.

Similarly, a bowler is measured on:

  1. wickets;
  2. total average; and
  3. strike rate (balls per wicket)

Non-statistical information is also important as it allows a selector to make a comparison between ‘easy’ and ‘difficult’ runs and wickets. This includes information like:

  1. match history and circumstances
  2. pitch
  3. weather
  4. pressure
  5. opposition
  6. long-term prospects
  7. recent short-term form vs long-term form
  8. leadership

So what would an Australian XI v Australia A look like in 2019?

Australia XI
Marcus Harris, Aaron Finch, Usman Khawaja, Shaun Marsh, Travis Head, Mitch Marsh, Tim Paine (captain), Pat Cummins, Mitch Starc, Natan Lyon and Josh Hazlewood.

Australia A
Matt Renshaw, Joe Burns, Daniel Hughes, Kurtis Patterson, Cameron White, Glenn Maxwell, Matt Wade, James Pattinson, Jackson Bird, Chris Tremain and Fawad Ahmed.

Batting

It’s hard to comprehend how this side is Australia’s best side using any statistics-based analysis. Only two players in the top six have a first-class average over 40, those being Usman Khawaja (43.71) and Shaun Marsh (40.94). While runs are the currency of the day, no centuries have been scored in the current Test series and with only Travis Head averaging over 30 (36.16).

Notable is that players most under pressure are Mitch Marsh and Aaron Finch. Marsh only had one Sheffield Shield score of note to start the season, being a 151 against a toothless Queensland attack with ordinary fielding, while Aaron Finch struggled in his only Shield game and didn’t score any ODI or T20 runs yet has been rewarded with at least four Test matches against India.

For Australia A, four players average over 40 in first-class cricket, with Daniel Hughes (39.76) and Matt Renshaw (37.82) maintaining higher averages in first-class cricket than the four incumbent Australian batsmen.

In addition to the case for Matt Renshaw is that he scored 184 against Pakistan in Sydney, performed well in India in a low-scoring series and was top-scorer for Queensland in their 2017-18 Shield-winning season.

(AP Photo/Kamran Jebreili)

Bowling

Many commentators have labelled this bowling unit as the best in the world, yet statistically they are not even the best in the country. When Test records are excluded to allow all the bowlers to be fairly measured against each other an interesting picture appears for standalone first-class statistics.

Given the development of Pat Cummins and Nathan Lyon in the last 18 months, statistics do not tell the entire story. These two players are in the top tier of their professions at the moment, with consistent success for the past two years. As a result I have used their superior Test records to tell a more accurate picture.

That said, our opening bowlers, Josh Hazlewood (avg 22.84, SR 48.09) and Mitchell Starc (24.67 avg, 45.18 SR), have inferior records to two other opening bowlers in the country, those being Chris Tremain (23.68 avg, 45.7 SR) and James Pattinson (20.82 avg, 39.47 SR). Notably, Tremain and Pattinson have higher first-class batting averages than Hazlewood and Starc, with Tremain even having a first-class century to his name.

Result

Statistically Australia A would win this contest.

Australia A Australia XI
Overall combined batting average 343.69 325.29
Total first-class centuries 78 87
Combined bowling statistics 25.11 avg, 46.72 SR 25.68 Avg, 51.37 SR

Best Australian Test team

1. Matt Renshaw
Picked on overall 2018 Form and long-term prospects:

Granted he’s averaged 20 to start the current Sheffield Shield season, but he’s also scored 648 at 162, including a 345, in Queensland first-grade cricket. And at 22 years old he represents a long-term prospect for the Test team and leadership potential. Plus he already has a Test century.

2. Marcus Harris
His form over the previous three years is not reflected in overall career statistics. He’s been averaging in the mid-40s since 2015.

3. Usman Khawaja
He’s the best available batsman in Australia

4. Joe Burns
Burns is consistently near the top of the Shield run-scoring charts, with a career first-class average of 41. He’s taken over Shaun Marsh at No.4 because Marsh’s Test form for the past 12 months has been ordinary and it may be the end of his road in the Test arena.

(AP Photo/Themba Hadebe)

5. Cameron White
White is a veteran who averages 41 and has 21 first-class centuries. He’s an exemplary tactician and first slip fielder. He’s shown the ability to ride out tough batting situations and has a wealth of experience.

6. Glenn Maxwell
He has a first-class average of 41 and a Test hundred in very difficult batting conditions in India, and he’s the best fielder in the country and can accelerate an innings when required.

7. Tim Paine
He’s retained over Matt Wade because of his leadership and glove work, though Wade has been knocking on the door in the last 12 months with amazing batting form. Tim Paine also has the second-best Test batting average of any wicketkeeper to play for Australia and does value his wicket with long innings.

8. James Pattinson
He’s statistically the best fast bowler in the country. He swings the new ball and is very fast and aggressive. He also has a better batting average than Mitch Starc.

9. Pat Cummins
Cummins is the world No.3 Test bowler. He hits great lengths and has many tools. He’s able to get top-tier batsmen out in all conditions.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

10. Chris Tremain
Tremain is statistically the best line and length bowler in the country by a small margin, but he’s been getting top-order players out. He also has a first-class century to his name.

11. Nathan Lyon
He’s arguably the best spin bowler in the world at the moment.

The Crowd Says:

2019-03-31T23:55:34+00:00

Harvey Wilson

Roar Rookie


I must have missed what Mitchell Marsh has done to be awarded a theoretical selection in the Australian XI.

2019-01-06T23:19:33+00:00

Pedro The Fisherman

Roar Rookie


Yeh - better to pick a guy with a test average of 26!

2019-01-05T23:49:54+00:00

Extra Short Leg

Roar Rookie


Personally, I want Travis Head to succeed but even his most ardent fan would have to admit his shot selection has been strange to say the least. When the team has really needed him, he has thrown his wicket away after batting nicely, when set.

2019-01-04T16:16:08+00:00

The Anti-Don

Roar Rookie


Sheek, I have no clue why you choose to attack people who choose to post their opinion on an opinion site…. but I notice it’s only when someone attacks the Australian cricket selectors…. why is that?… how long can you defend the current Australian cricket selectors in good faith?… if the selectors are so great why do they continually choose insanely unqualified players and pick them in positions they are not known to play.. like Finch to open.. Marnus at #3 … Mitchell Marsh anywhere near the team… etc etc…? My point is that if anyone in the sporting world currently deserves negative opinions regarding their performances it is the Australian cricket selectors… why do you so vehemently attack people who question their worth…on a sporting opinions site?

2019-01-04T03:23:46+00:00

Battler

Roar Rookie


"natural style" that sounds like one of the excuses West Australians/ fanboys frequently roll out for MMarsh.

2019-01-04T03:21:58+00:00

Battler

Roar Rookie


Aus A would comfortably win that h2h, although I'd have SOK in over Ahmed.

2019-01-03T23:55:53+00:00

Karshy

Roar Rookie


That would be fine if any of them averaged over 40...

2019-01-03T13:49:43+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


JamesT's comment is an opinion?

2019-01-03T09:32:56+00:00

Maxwell Charlesworth

Roar Rookie


If Smith and Warner were in the side then not only would he be Australias 3rd highest run scorer (which is still good), but he would be able to play his natural style of cricket, and not have to resurrect the innings from the failings of Finch, Harris, Handscomb, S Marsh and M Marsh.

2019-01-03T09:29:40+00:00

Maxwell Charlesworth

Roar Rookie


Im simply criticising your obvious double standards when it comes to sub-par victorian openers compared to decent SA middle order batsmen. You say that your reason for selecting Harris in the combined team is he has had a good few years recently, and his stats arent reflective of his entire career. The exact same can be said for Travis Head, the only difference being Head's career statistics and recent form statistics are better than Harris'. You say Heads FC average is only 36, then dont pick a player whos average is 35.

2019-01-03T06:46:05+00:00

pakistanstar

Roar Rookie


I'd have White over S Marsh at the minute. How many chances should 1 bloke get?

2019-01-03T05:03:08+00:00

VivGilchrist

Roar Rookie


sheek, this is an opinion site.

2019-01-03T04:17:29+00:00

Swiggy

Guest


Ferguson that is all

2019-01-03T04:16:53+00:00

Swiggy

Guest


Ferguson

2019-01-03T04:15:24+00:00

Michael

Roar Rookie


Hazlewood is better than Tremain. Cummins is better than Pattinson. Having a left hander helps the balance of the attack and gets footmarks into the right spot for Lyon, therefor Starc stays. Swapping out 2 proven test match bowlers with ones that are not clearly better is no better than what the selectors currently do with the batting! So no. No changes to the bowling attack- that’s not our problem!! It shouldn’t really be a surprise that when the top 2 batsmen in a team are taken out, the remaining side looks shaky. Take Kohli and Pujara our of this Indian team and they look pretty weak too. Warner and Smith will (hopefully) come straight back in to fill the number 1 and 4 spots. Then the team looks alright to me. Warner Harris Khawaja Smith Marsh Head Paine Cummins Starc Lyon Hazelwood That’s a pretty good team imo. Marsh to eventually leave once a Harris and Head settle in. I’d give Finch a go at 5. In the mean time select an operner for Warner...Burns. Put Finch at 5 with Marsh at 4. White? LOL.

2019-01-03T04:12:32+00:00

Ben

Roar Rookie


That’s is his luck. If he was in the team with smith and Warner he would be long gone.

2019-01-03T04:11:42+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


James T, What an appalling generalisation. And you're a genius because your comments appear on The Roar? The selectors DO have an idea. They no doubt pour over the stats of each player like we do, but arriving at different conclusions. They are also closer to the action. Their deliberations, right or wrong, just happens to be different from most of the rest of us.

2019-01-03T02:30:59+00:00

Hamish

Roar Rookie


I'd suggest career stats shouldn't be used but with so few shield matches it nearly impossible to get a legitimate sample size from one season.

2019-01-03T02:29:45+00:00

Hamish

Roar Rookie


Basketball uses a lot of net rating - it factors in off court / on court statistics, per possession stats etc. You could develop similar models to weight statistics based on other performances in the game to take out the variables of pitch/opposition. If you score 80 in a total of 250 it's a much stronger performance than scoring 100 when your team declares at 3/440.

2019-01-03T00:06:53+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


You're comparing apples with watermelons, when you compare the first class record of these players. The Test guys play little other cricket and when they do, it's rare they're being extended. Guys like Starc and co will only get a Shield game or two and coming back from injury, they're not going to be extended. That said, the only conclusions I can draw from this article is the lack of quality batsmen in Australia and some highly questionable selections but I didn't need a bunch of stats to know that.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar