I knew Australia's bunch of 'no-hopers' couldn't win the World Cup, right up until I knew they would

By Ben Pobjie / Expert

Personally, I never doubted them for a second. Although in the interests of strict transparency I suppose I should make clear that that first sentence is technically only true if you don’t count any of the seconds that took place in the six months or so before the World Cup final.

Yes. I am on record as saying that Australia had no hope. I thought they had no hope long before the tournament. I thought they had no hope as they stumbled through the pre-tournament games. I thought they had no hope when they lost their first two games. I thought they had no hope when they won their next eight. I was utterly convinced that of all the no-hopers who ever had no hope, no no-hoper had ever had less hope than these ones.

I will also say this though: my belief that Australia simply could not win the World Cup was not due to a particularly low opinion of the team. Unlike many, I had no great problem with the squad that was selected, nor with the teams that were picked throughout the Cup. Aside from the unfortunate but unavoidable absence of Ashton Agar, I thought this was pretty close to the best side Australia was capable of putting out – and that it was, all in all, a decent team.

But just a decent one. Not a great one. Not one capable of matching it with the current Indian side. For that matter, I didn’t think them likely to be able to match it with South Africa either. England and New Zealand, too, I thought were probably a level above Australia at this time – and in Indian conditions I thought Pakistan and Afghanistan would probably be a big test too.

The first couple of games confirmed my suspicions. Knocked off by India, demolished by South Africa. Like all Australians my heart sang as England turned out to be far less than I’d expected, but it still seemed that our lads would be very lucky to sneak into a semi-final.

The tournament went on. New Zealand, after a turbo-charged start, fell away. Australia began to win. A semi-final loomed as more likely than not. That was gratiifying. But winning the World Cup seemed as unlikely as ever. India were laying waste to oppositions like Genghis Khan sweeping across the plains. Australia edged out tough foes: India nuked them.

There were grand moments of triumph. Victory against the Kiwis was sweet, a neat kicking of the English even sweeter. The Maxwell Miracle against Afghanistan was glorious, and it gave me a lovely warm feeling to know that the 2023 World Cup would give us one truly magnificent memory to take away, in the absence of the trophy that Australia continued to have utterly no hope of acquiring.

Glenn Maxwell celebrates the greatest one-day innings of all time. (Photo by Robert Cianflone/Getty Images)

The semi-finals came. I thought South Africa was too good, but that it didn’t matter anyway, as they were playing for second. Unexpectedly, Australia won. Ah, good. Second it is, I thought. Very creditable, really – given the talent available, and the late stage of many of the players’ careers, coming second to an all-time Indian lineup would be far from disgraceful. We could only pray that a decent fight would be put up in the final, and the poor tired Aussies would not be detonated the way several others had been throughout the Cup.

What I’m trying to say is, Australia had no hope. None. To be honest, since before the World Cup began I was sure that nobody had any hope but India. They were so damn good in every department, and they were playing at home, and they were all in such dazzling form, and they had a nation of over a billion behind them, and everything was arranged, and, well, the story of their victory seemed to practically have been written already.

Australia? Well they were just a cricket team. A pretty good one, but no match for a juggernaut. Maybe in Australia they could’ve challenged. Maybe five years ago these same players would’ve had it in them. But here and now, it was India’s World Cup, and second was the best we could possibly hope for.

So why was it that, when the final started, I felt a sudden and irrational surge of optimism? Why was it that as the players took the field, I was filled, against all expectation, with the odd sensation that…well…maybe…?

Funnily enough, I think the initial bullishness came from the fact that Pat Cummins had decided to bowl. This seemed to be a decision made against all common sense – I myself had thought before the game that if there were even the tiniest sliver of hope to be had for victory, Australia simply had to bat first – and yet it soothed me strangely.

(Photo by Gareth Copley/Getty Images)

On reflection, the decision to bowl first fortified me precisely because of its apparent madness. I do not see Cummins as a reckless or experimental soul, nor is the Australian dressing room filled with flamboyant mavericks of irrepressible artistic temperaments. If they made a surprise decision at the toss, I half-consciously reasoned, it cannot be because they’ve had a psychedelic flight of fancy. It must be because what they’ve seen – in the pitch, in the air, in the forecast – gave them reason to think it was a good decision.

That’s no guarantee of anything, of course, and as Rohit Sharma began his usual pyrotechnics, there was cause to believe that one of two things was true: either the decision to bowl was the wrong one; or India was so superior that it didn’t even matter.

But then…then…

Then Rohit got out. And then Shreyas Iyer got out. And then Kohli and Rahul…didn’t get out, but didn’t exactly seem to be all that happy to be in, either. The gigantic crowd was poised, ready to let out volcanic roars every time the batters found the boundary…but they didn’t. They couldn’t. Every time it looked like they would, Marnus Labuschagne would leap like a salmon, or David Warner would swoop out of thin air to cut it off. Over and over passed without release.

And I was believing. I knew it couldn’t last. I knew India could not be beaten. I knew that they’d still pass 300, and that Australia’s batting lineup would not be able to top 300 against these bowlers. But against all my good sense, I was believing. Because what the Australians were doing – bowling with uncanny precision, fielding with relentless ferocity – was extraordinary.

So extraordinary, in fact, that the busting of the dam never came. Kohli passed fifty and Cummins cut through him. Rahul never found his extra gear. Jadeja lost his Australia-destroying kit. The legendary SKY swung and swatted and found no way through an impenetrable jungle of hurtling yellow-clad fielders and agonisingly slow bouncers.

And all of a sudden the innings was over and the irresistible force had been resisted. All out for 240! What nonsense! But I didn’t just believe they could – I believed they WOULD.

And then they came out and lost three wickets in the blink of an eye and Australian fans everywhere sighed and said, “Fun while it lasted”.

Except that somehow, I still felt fine. I should’ve felt awful. To have hope dangled before my eyes and to see it snatched away by a depressingly familiar top-order collapse? Sickening.

But I didn’t feel sick. I felt like we were going to win. And by “We”, of course I mean “they”. They were going to win. They had never had any hope of winning, and yet I felt that they were, quite definitely, going to. Nearly 200 runs still to get? Three top batters already in the shed? Bowlers with tails up, ball swinging round corners and 100,000 Indians shaking the earth with their passionate calls for the killing blow to be applied?

(Photo by Gareth Copley/Getty Images)

Nah. It was going to be fine.

And so, indeed, it was. The third wicket was India’s last shot. Australia didn’t just sneak home, they cruised. They brought India to their knees and then hammered them deep into the Ahmedabad turf. And somehow, despite spending the last six weeks completely at peace with my knowledge that it was impossible, on the day itself it had seemed quite feasible from the get-go, and almost certain for much of the time.

Why? Why did this confidence come upon me?

It began with that call at the toss: bizarrely reassuring by means of its very counterintuitiveness. It wavered a little early, but it rebounded with Head’s catch of Rohit, surged with Cummins’s dismissal of Shreyas, and positively overflowed when the same man rattled Kohli’s stumps. By the time the Indian innings whimpered to a close, it was unstoppable, and not even the wild slashes of Warner and Marsh or Smith’s unprecedented respect for the opinions of others could hold it back.

This is the magic of this Australian team. You might call it the Power of Pat, and in fact I urge you to do so. There are many measures of a great cricket captain, but one of the most fundamental is that they mould a team in their own image.

That is why this is a team that smiles, and laughs, and throws itself about like a bunch of teenagers. That is why this is a team that plays through pain, shrugs off doubt, charges again and again at walls that have repelled it, marches through fire and ice to follow its leader, and has the most fun anyone ever could doing so.

This is a team that makes miracles happen, because when the players in this team look at their captain, they see what everyone else sees: a man who approaches both possible and impossible with the same attitude: well, let’s come up with a plan, give it a go, see what happens, eh?

It was inevitable, in the end: I could hold onto my certain knowledge that Australia could not win the World Cup all I wanted to, but this is Pat Cummins’s team, and sooner or later they were going to make even me believe.

The Crowd Says:

2023-11-23T07:37:44+00:00

The Knightwatchmen who say Nii

Roar Rookie


Langer a genius? Turn it up!

2023-11-23T07:32:28+00:00

The Knightwatchmen who say Nii

Roar Rookie


You wouldn't have seen Hayden advance towards too many test bowlers in the 1990s ...

2023-11-22T16:55:51+00:00

Dusty10

Roar Rookie


Now I'm aggressive too?? Is it the extra question marks that have hurt your feelings?? I must be the worst kind of bully, just like that horrible Matt Hayden...

2023-11-22T13:22:41+00:00

carnivean

Roar Rookie


You clearly don't want your world view updated and you are getting quite aggressive in your defence of it. So good luck to you and I'm sure Hayden loves you back.

2023-11-22T08:31:22+00:00

Derek Murray

Roar Rookie


He’s a brilliant player. The only area where he was remotely at risk was the short ball. And it did for him a few times when other shots did not. It’s also easier to average those numbers if your role is to go at run a ball on roads and let the goers ramp up the strike rate at the other end. When nobody was going, any flaws were highlighted

2023-11-22T08:26:29+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


Ben, Great article, & great banner headline. I too didn't expect much from these Aussies, & the early games confirmed my ordinary opinion of them. But as the cup progressed, I sensed the team was gelling & building. Not yet 1999 again, but possibly? And SA should have won the semi, as they should have won in 99, but the Aussies hung tougher. Again. By final time I though Oz could win. Not because they were an exceptional team, not like 1999 but India looked like a team who had already clocked off. The final would merely be a coronation ceremony for Indian cricket, Indian nation, Indian greatness, Indian supremacy. But like the Brisbane Broncos in the recent NRL grand final, they forget to keep playing until the final whistle. Worse still, they began like it was somehow all written in the heavens. Why, they even batted first despite losing the toss. The heavenly script said India would bat first. And Rohit Sharma & Virat Kohli both batted like the heavenly script had decreed they would score 94 & 108 respectively, pushing India well on their way to victory. Indeed, Sharma & Kohli both batted with air of arrogance like they had already seen the heavenly script & Sharma would get a quick-fire 94 & Kohli a glorious century. But then something strange happened, did the Gods get bored or angry with the arrogant Indians, or did the Aussies just play smarter? Believing in dieties is one thing, but here on earth folk are mostly rewarded for their own endeavour. Someone halved the predicted heavenly output for both Sharma & Kohli. It may well have been the Aussies themselves. Over on Facebook, a guy with an Indian sounding name made some astute observations of Cummins' captaincy. Sharma was charging the bowling a lot, so he brought on Maxwell. Cummins believed Sharma would take the bait of charging Maxwell & he did, fatally. Then when Kohli & KL Rahu slowed the batting rate to consolidate, Cummins took off the fast men & replaced them with part-timers, saving the fast men for the end. The Indians didn't score any quicker. Finally, Cummins noticed that Kohli wasn't timing the short stuff as confidently as he usually did. So he peppered him, with Kohli consequently playing onto his stumps. It seems, Cummins has well & truly improved as a thinking, tactical captain. I didn't rate him in the recent Ashes series. He didn't seem to have any clue how to combat Bazball, even after 5 tests. But I was being unkind. Who seriously can combat Bazball when it's going well? Sure, you can bat crazily in ODIs & T20s, but you just don't that in test cricket, my dear fellow! They say life is a journey & not a destination, & as long as you improve incrementally as a human being, that's personal progress. Cummins & his team have been on one helluva journey this year. And they have all evolved as better cricketers & better human beings. A shot time ago it wasn't great being an Aussie when the Wallabies crashed in the pool stages of the RWC. But with the Baggy Greens, sorry, Gold Caps winning the ICC world cup, we can think better of ourselves again.

2023-11-22T06:33:41+00:00

Dusty10

Roar Rookie


What?? How is Hayden a bully?? I think I'll defer to players who were in the same test side, who played with him over long periods of time, and only seem to praise the man. I've seen Hayden stand up for himself and team mates, I've seen him advance towards bowlers and never back down, and I've seen him enjoy decimating bowling attacks on many occasions, all of which are GOOD things in a test cricketer. They sure as hell don't make him a bully. If he's a bully for sledging, then so are 90% of top level test cricketers over the past 25 years or longer.

2023-11-22T06:28:18+00:00

Dusty10

Roar Rookie


A 145 pages report that had nothing to do with Matt Hayden nor Justin Langer, Barb. They were not cheats, nor where they any 'worse' with sledging than any other test side (England, SA among them).

2023-11-22T06:25:02+00:00

Dusty10

Roar Rookie


Well they weren't made by me, I've loved ODIs from the beginning. A good test of each team over one full day, what's not to like? 20-20 cricket just can not compare.

2023-11-22T04:24:07+00:00

Barb Dwyer

Roar Rookie


I don’t see any evidence that Langer is a cricketing genius. They offered him a contract and he chose not to take it. Cummins asserting himself in this area shows great leadership. Ignoring poor behaviour is not good leadership.

2023-11-22T01:17:24+00:00

carnivean

Roar Rookie


I will always respect players of great standing for their ability in their sport. On the flip side they don't get respect outside that niche just for being good at it. Hayden talking about batting gets the respect and deference due a player of his record. Hayden talking about how to behave as a person or any topic unrelated to batting gets exactly the same respect and deference as any other person, i.e. what they've earned through their words and actions on that topic. Hayden has shown repeatedly that he's a bully. As such his words on how Cummins should behave are disregarded and given no respect.

2023-11-22T01:12:09+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


Wasn’t an especially short ball, just bounced a bit more. Kohli did well to disguise that weakness, averaging 96 across the tournament.

2023-11-22T01:11:29+00:00

carnivean

Roar Rookie


Any coach that resorts to bullying the players under them is missing a fundamental aspect of the skillset and therefore isn't a genius at it. Any leader in a group of people that are suffering and doesn't speak up for those people isn't doing their job right either. Talking openly (in the right forums) and honestly about the situation and how it is affecting people is the only way to get a real resolution. There's elements to how it all resolved that the public can never know. However taking the things that are known publicly about the whole situation then there's no way that you can count standing up for his players as a black mark on Cummins.

2023-11-22T00:34:07+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


I took that as being about Cummins the man (i.e. a progressive), not his captaincy tactics

2023-11-21T23:54:50+00:00

Barb Dwyer

Roar Rookie


I would never question their abilities at cricket. Both players were angry bullies. What about the carry on and verballing during the match? Australia were undeniably the worst bullies with daylight between them and second, (can you name who was was worse?) culminating in a 145 page report damning Australia due to our teams focus on winning without counting the cost. I don't think solely being good at cricket makes someone a legend.

2023-11-21T23:24:33+00:00

Gilberto

Roar Rookie


All the arguments made against T20 are exactly the same as lovers of Test Cricket made against ODI when they started.

2023-11-21T22:44:34+00:00

Sage

Roar Rookie


Very good Ben, as usual. Thoroughly enjoyed your observations and how you've put this together.

2023-11-21T22:31:17+00:00

Sage

Roar Rookie


That’s the thing, I don’t think the POMS do hate all that much. I’ve never read so much support and admiration – albeit grudging in some instances – (BBC Cricket) for an Aussie cricket captain in a very very long time. Well done Pat. You’re doing us proud

2023-11-21T20:57:20+00:00

Dwanye

Roar Rookie


‘Fremantle fruitcake’ lol. That could take off. A summer season snack during the cricket made from west coast stuff.

2023-11-21T20:52:56+00:00

Dusty10

Roar Rookie


Wow. Why all this hatred directed at former greats of the game?? Langer and Hayden are our most successful opening pair, their test records are incredible, and Hayden's ODI efforts pretty bloody amazing as well. Both men came through in a time when cricket was bloody tough, and ALL teams sledged, not just Australia. They played their cricket hard but FAIR. No arguing with umpires, no carry-on or verballing the other side after the match, and no whingeing about the sledges or behaviours of the other side (unless they reverted to racism or something equally unacceptable, like Mr Singh pulled out one fateful day). Both men served 'apprenticeships', coming into the test team as young stars before being dropped and banished to shield cricket for significant periods. They fought their way back in, doing the hard yards, and made their places their own. They were loyal to their captains and team mates and they deserved to retire on their terms, playing well right up to the end. Hayden isn't the best commentator, that's true, but I love his enthusiasm and still respect the man. He's an Australian legend. A little respect is deserved, I think.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar