AFL out of touch with regional Australia
By Vince Rugari, 6 Mar 2012 Vince Rugari is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- AFL, Essendon Bombers, NAB Cup, St Kilda Saints
AFL CEO Andrew Demetriou speaks to the media. AAP Iamge/Julian Smith
Related coverage
If I was from Wangaratta, I’d be filthy at the AFL right now. The whole saga that surrounded the cancellation of Saturday’s NAB Cup match between Essendon and St Kilda stank of half-heartedness.
The city itself was keen – more than keen, actually. The game was sold out.
11,000 people had tickets. It was years in the making. Everyone was ready to go.
The town was all set up to embrace some top-flight footy. They rolled out the welcome mats for the big wigs. Excitement was in the air. One local club spent $40,000 on catering.
But then arrogant Bombers, who wanted to fly to Wangaratta when it would have been easier to take a bus, ruined everything with their big city brashness.
Wild weather meant their two chartered planes couldn’t land. The Saints were there, but Essendon didn’t show.
The AFL cared so little that they were making it all up as they went along. They were clearly underprepared – nobody was ready for this situation. An abandoned match. What do we do now?
First, they decided the match would be declared a draw, even though everybody knows that in junior footy the team that doesn’t rock up forfeits the game.
Then a coin toss was on the cards.
Which genius thought that would actually be a good idea? Thankfully someone came to their senses and St Kilda were rightly handed the four points, even if it’s only the pre-season stuff and nobody really cares anyway.
Still, it’s the principle of it, as Dennis Denuto would say. The fact that the AFL weren’t involved in the Dons’ travel plans just does to show how devil-may-care they are about the NAB Cup.
They shouldn’t have allowed them to fly on matchday – they don’t when it comes to the season proper.
But Wangaratta cared. They cared a lot – it’s not often that regional Australia gets to host professional sport.
What’s most disappointing about all of this is that it came at a time when the other codes are strengthening their ties to country areas.
Even the A-League, which seems to be cementing its reputation as a controversy magnet, has made inroads.
The concept of a regional round has merit, even if it wasn’t managed as well as it could have been this season.
Instead of waiting for the fans to come to the A-League, football instead went to the people. They held matches in Dunedin, Campbelltown, Bathurst, the Latrobe Valley and Launceston.
While the attendance figures didn’t set the world on fire, the fact that those cities were even considered did wonders for their PR.
If the round ball code can pull 3000 in Morwell to watch the burgeoning Melbourne Heart and a bunch of Kiwis, then it’s not that much of a stretch to suggest that the AFL could draw perhaps a five-figure crowd anywhere in regional Victoria.
Imagine what it would do for a town to hold a real match in their own backyard. Even those from the city could drive and make the day of it. And yet the AFL’s relationship with country fans just took a massive hit.
Rugby league leads the way with the annual City versus Country Origin match. The fans love it.
If the AFL ever opens its eyes to the world of representative matches, wouldn’t it be great to see a metropolitan versus country showpiece? It’s already a small part of the AFL system – Victoria has two state teams at junior level, after all, split along those lines.
But no. Aussie Rules is being half-hearted in their attempts to engage with folk outside of the main population areas.
It’s a shame, because there’s plenty of love for footy out there. The success of country leagues is proof – some of the best football outside the AFL is played out in the bush, where there’s plenty of coin on offer.
The people are dying for a taste. But the league won’t even help out when it comes to staging a NAB Cup game.
Surely the best way to remedy this would be resolving to rebuild the bridges that they burned. To do that, AFL House should seriously consider taking games for real points outside of the big markets.
And next time, get the teams in a week beforehand so they can spend time getting around the community.
Vince Rugari is an Adelaide-born journalist who cut his teeth on the sporting graveyard that is the Gold Coast. He fancies the round ball and the Sherrin, and used to be a handy leg-spin bowler before injury curtailed a baggy green push. He is a Port Adelaide fan by birth, as painful as that has been recently. He's now sports editor of The Area News in Griffith, NSW.
- Explore:
- AFL, Essendon Bombers, NAB Cup, St Kilda Saints

March 6th 2012 @ 4:48am
AndyMack said | March 6th 2012 @ 4:48am | Report comment
Vince, I think your last sentence was the most pertinent. Was a great opportunity to get the players from both teams down to the town, do a day or two of activities for the locals. Maybe not a week, but at least a day or two beforehand. Good PR for the AFL and for the teams involved.
Agree that the AFL dropped the ball on this one. Really feel for those who had tickets, those who travelled, those who put an effort in to get to a game, only to be denied. Amateur!!!!
March 6th 2012 @ 6:18am
squidz66 said | March 6th 2012 @ 6:18am | Report comment
Well aren’t I silly!
Here I was expecting a rant about how people in regional areas won’t even be able to see the team that they’ve loved since VFL was a lad, unless they enter a contract to pay for a service that they didn’t want!
I was under the assumption that, that’s why we had to endure the constant bombardment of advertising.
I suppose one way or another..we not of Melbourne have to either
If it seems as though I don’t think that the AFL and Dimetriou are concerned with rural footy fans, I don’t think my point has come across.
March 6th 2012 @ 7:04am
The_Wookie said | March 6th 2012 @ 7:04am | Report comment
um two things.
Theres no less FTA AFL before the current deal – except now its all live and Fox are presently advertising no contract deals for its hd sport channels…….
March 6th 2012 @ 9:13am
Michael DiFabrizio said | March 6th 2012 @ 9:13am | Report comment
Wookie, I think the gripe here isn’t with the contract, it’s more having to pay for all those other channels that people like squidz are not interested in. It is a bit ridiculous that to get Foxtel or Austar, you have to pay for 40-odd channels before you even get access to the sport ones. A lot of people do not need these channels yet want to watch their team play on the weekend. It’s a legitimate point to raise.
Also, while it is true there are no less FTA games, the percentage of games on FTA has once again reduced. At the end of the day how many people watch all four FTA games? Some do, but people are far more concerned with seeing their team play each week, and having a greater percentage of games on pay TV (and two more teams) that’s going to happen less often.
March 6th 2012 @ 9:28am
Redb said | March 6th 2012 @ 9:28am | Report comment
MD,
A chicken and egg argument somewhat. Without the extra revenue coming from Foxtel there wouldn’t be an extra game in the first place.
It remains true that the key games are largely still on free to air and remain at 4 games a week, not bad for free.
If you want choice you have to pay for it and really $100 a month is nothing compared to the sport and entertainment available on Foxtel.
March 6th 2012 @ 9:37am
Michael DiFabrizio said | March 6th 2012 @ 9:37am | Report comment
Redb, not saying we shouldn’t have Foxtel, but I can understand where people like squidz are coming from.
March 6th 2012 @ 9:40am
Redb said | March 6th 2012 @ 9:40am | Report comment
MD,
It remains to be seen whether regional viewers get better coverage. The new deal has been lauded for covering previous black spots.
March 6th 2012 @ 9:41am
Clayts said | March 6th 2012 @ 9:41am | Report comment
Exactly this. I have been saying this ever since I got Fox. And it isn’t even $100 per month. You can get the sport channels from $49 a month these days, under various deals. That is not a lot of money, really. One less slab of beer per MONTH, which you would spend at the pub watching one game anyway, and you get every game in HD. That is another reason to pay for it – HD. Having gotten used to watching sport (not just footy) in HD, I couldn’t go back, it is a markedly better experience. The no ads siren to siren is awesome too. No cutting to the 6oclock news with stories of cats up trees as soon as the ball has cut the vertical plane of the goal line in the final seconds to win the game.
March 6th 2012 @ 10:02am
Redb said | March 6th 2012 @ 10:02am | Report comment
HD & IQ a must, so it’s a bit more plus movies for the family.
March 6th 2012 @ 7:04am
mds1970 said | March 6th 2012 @ 7:04am | Report comment
Not really. I’ve been on this site for two years, and I only just realised that the f-word got straight through. Normally that word would have triggered moderation.
March 6th 2012 @ 7:09am
The_Wookie said | March 6th 2012 @ 7:09am | Report comment
i never realised it either lol
March 6th 2012 @ 8:17am
Tristan Rayner said | March 6th 2012 @ 8:17am | Report comment
It doesn’t, it won’t, and don’t try
Cheers guys. Tristan.
March 6th 2012 @ 4:00pm
Nathan of Perth said | March 6th 2012 @ 4:00pm | Report comment
The F-word? What, “Finals”? Bit early for that, isn’t it?
March 6th 2012 @ 6:40am
The_Wookie said | March 6th 2012 @ 6:40am | Report comment
Oh FFS. The rain was so bad they cancelled the Wangaratta Cup. A week beforehand? During the preason tournament and three weeks out from season start? You arent grounded in reality. Clubs have done their community camps well before now (ie. Carlton in Kyabram) Yes it could have been handled better, but the right decision was reached, and they are guaranteed a NAB Cup fixture next year.
Heres what you didnt mention. The same weekend games were also played in Mandurah, Launceston and Alice Springs. Next week games will go to Maroochydoore, Victor Harbor, Albury and Ballarat. Even more matches will be played in the final week in parts unknown.
The AFL will play PREMIERSHIP matches in Cairns, Darwin, Launceston and Canberra. 3 of those are locations rarely touched by most codes. Thats 11 matches in regional areas alone during the regular season, on top of 7 during the preseason. Can throw in another 7 if you count Geelong.
The AFL didnt just start doing this either. The NAB Cup/Challenge has been sending teams out into the far reaches of the country for years. AFL games are played in Carins, Darwin and Launceston every year. Not to mention Geelong. Clubs have been going out into their communities for years. The Aboriginal All star game is generally held in the Territory.
Half hearted my foot.
Finally, the AFL have already announced they are taking travel arrangements out of the hands of Clubs in future.
March 6th 2012 @ 7:11am
Lucan said | March 6th 2012 @ 7:11am | Report comment
Considering this was the grand opening of the Wangaratta Showgrounds, next year’s NAB Cup would be little compensation.
They’d managed to pre-sell 10k tickets, St Kilda managed to get there a day earlier. Essendon’s fly-in/fly-out arrogance is appalling.
March 6th 2012 @ 7:31am
The_Wookie said | March 6th 2012 @ 7:31am | Report comment
Oh absolutely it is. And its my understand that the AFL gave them permission to fly, and thats about it. The AFL didnt know they were going to leave at 2pm.
Apparently Wangaratta were offered another match in the final round of the NAB Cup but have asked for next year instead due to cricket commitments
March 6th 2012 @ 8:08am
The Cattery said | March 6th 2012 @ 8:08am | Report comment
Good points raised by Wookie.
Also, the AFL will compensate the caterers who lost a lot money on planning for a big event.
All in all, it was a pretty poor effort and the AFL just needs to learn from it and be better prepared next time.
March 6th 2012 @ 8:12am
Australian Rules said | March 6th 2012 @ 8:12am | Report comment
Yes valid points by Wookie.
But ultimately, I think Essendon was to blame…not the AFL. They’re the ones that made the unnecessary decision to fly.
And perhaps most importantly…all of this took place on a weekend that had record breaking downpours and floods…it was natural disaster sort of weather. I don’t think that automatically renders the AFL out of touch with the bush. The AFL does more in remote communities (esp in the NT) than any other code.
March 6th 2012 @ 8:23am
The Cattery said | March 6th 2012 @ 8:23am | Report comment
I saw pictures of the St Kilda boys playing on the Wang oval that evening and they were basically splashing around in six inches of water, so one way or the other, it wasn’t meant to be.
March 6th 2012 @ 8:43am
Redb said | March 6th 2012 @ 8:43am | Report comment
The blame lies with the weather, which would have ruined the game anyway and Essendon’s reliance on the travel option. They had buses standing by, but were told by the pilots they would be able to land.
March 6th 2012 @ 10:01am
samwise said | March 6th 2012 @ 10:01am | Report comment
A bit of wet weather footy shouldn’t have been an issue. Good practice for the ‘indoor’ Saints.
It would’ve copped the blame for an injury though. An AFL coach (might’ve been Laidley) tried to blame a perfectly maintained country oval for a pre-season knee injury to a player, and that no doubt would’ve been the case again.
Not just disappointing for Wangaratta, but North East Victoria more generally. I think there’s a GWS match at Lavington (pretty much Albury) this weekend. Might get extra numbers now.
March 6th 2012 @ 10:05am
The Cattery said | March 6th 2012 @ 10:05am | Report comment
Good point about the game at Lavington, GWS vs Suns, first time that Izzy meets Hunt, and given that it’s NSW, there will be plenty in the region that know about them. If the weather fines up, they’ll be there with bells on.
March 6th 2012 @ 11:47am
Jaceman said | March 6th 2012 @ 11:47am | Report comment
Not the AFL’s fault maybe Essendons but as was said the match unlikely to go ahead – it was teeming. You get people who criticise those in charge just for the sake of it who dont consider the alternatives if they were in positions of authority (there will be record rainfall recorded in these regions for this month) – and tragically these forums give them more credence than their posts deserve – remember the charming lad “Its called Football”.
March 6th 2012 @ 8:21am
Redb said | March 6th 2012 @ 8:21am | Report comment
Good points Wookie, I cant beleive the author is trying to smear the game like this. Agenda much, check the twitter profile.
March 6th 2012 @ 6:11pm
Jack Russell said | March 6th 2012 @ 6:11pm | Report comment
Cancellation of the Wangaratta cup shows how out of touch horse racing is with regional Australia.
March 6th 2012 @ 7:00am
mds1970 said | March 6th 2012 @ 7:00am | Report comment
The A-League’s regional round didn’t go off completely without a hitch. The Sydney FC v Perth Glory game had to be rescheduled after the Glory couldn’t fly out of Perth. But a key difference was that was the night before, so everyone knew the game was off on game day – so no-one had the nasty surprise of going to the game and only finding out when they got there that the game was off.
But Saturday was a bad look for the AFL. When teams have to fly across the country, sometimes things like what happened with the A-League is unavoidable. But with Wangaratta being only a few hours drive away, there was plenty of time for Essendon to make alternative arrangements to get there.
March 6th 2012 @ 7:44am
ac said | March 6th 2012 @ 7:44am | Report comment
I am not sure if you can blame the AFL itself for this particular situation. I do feel sorry for the fans though.
March 6th 2012 @ 8:15am
Redb said | March 6th 2012 @ 8:15am | Report comment
There isnt’ a club in the AFL who has done more for communtity football right around Australia over the years, travelling the length and breadth of the land. Essendon have made a mistake, move on.
This was caused by Essendon not the AFL as a whole.
March 6th 2012 @ 5:54pm
Xman said | March 6th 2012 @ 5:54pm | Report comment
Here here!
A once in 50 year weather event was the problem, and even then they followed the advice of the pilots. Essendon have promised to make it up to the people of Wangaratta. Essendon were accused of wasting money by flying but they have revealed that it was cheaper for them to fly up and back on the same day than bus up and stay over night.
March 6th 2012 @ 8:25am
The Cattery said | March 6th 2012 @ 8:25am | Report comment
At least Wang didn’t get flooded out completely, unlike their regional cousins in Wagga two hours to their north-west, a strong aussie rules region in NSW, we should be more worried about helping people that have been flooded out and assisting amateur sporting clubs getting back on their feet.
March 6th 2012 @ 8:26am
BigAl said | March 6th 2012 @ 8:26am | Report comment
Well Vince, I’m sure the people of Wangaratta have more to worry about right now than an eagerly awaited game of footy being cancelled.
Perhaps AFL should have just cancelled the game and got the players (well St.Kilda at least) filling sandbags.
March 6th 2012 @ 8:30am
The_Wookie said | March 6th 2012 @ 8:30am | Report comment
AFL and NRL clubs were involved in flood relief efforts in QLD and VIctoria last year, there are worse ways for clubs to occupy players.
March 6th 2012 @ 8:44am
camtherose said | March 6th 2012 @ 8:44am | Report comment
Very disappointing article from a credibility perspective, but if Vince wanted to write a sensationalist piece mentioning all codes to ensure that debate ensued, then he has achieved his goal, and the comments will come thick and fast.
It’s almost hard to believe the many ways that this article is erroneous, but following Vince as I do on Twitter, he has sent over 100 tweets in the last three days, with almost every single one of them about the A-League, while the few remaining were about soccer in general. There was one mention of Karmichel Hunt re-siging at the Gold Coast.
This being the case, it is not surprising that he found little time to research this article properly, and it’s clear where the large base of his sporting knowledge resides. That’s fine in and of itself, of course it is, but to then write an AFL article as a voice of authority is where I have to draw the line.
“The fact that the AFL weren’t involved in the Dons’ travel plans” – The AFL signed off on the travel plans.
“Instead of waiting for the fans to come to the A-League, football instead went to the people. They held matches in Dunedin, Campbelltown, Bathurst, the Latrobe Valley and Launceston.” – Firstly, the AFL actually schedules several regular season games in Launceston each year, and Hawthorn has made it their second home, so the A-League is hardly breaking new ground there. The AFL has scheduled matches in eight provincial settings over two weeks in the Nab Cup. If that’s ‘half-hearted’ then so be it.
Vince seems to spend the first quarter of this article pumping up how huge the game was going to be in Wangaratta (most of which was driven by the AFL caring enough to take an interest in the area), and then spends the rest tearing down the AFL for not caring?
Why is it so difficult to understand that sometimes innocent mistakes are made?
For those interested, here is my more measured take on the Wangaratta incident, as well as other thoughts on the previous round of AFL, from someone who watched all five televised matches on Foxtel this weekend, and blogged for The Roar for two of them:
http://www.theroar.com.au/2012/03/06/five-things-learned-from-round-two-of-the-nab-cup/
March 6th 2012 @ 9:25am
TomC said | March 6th 2012 @ 9:25am | Report comment
I didn’t like the article, but this ‘I’m a bigger footy fan than Vince!’ nonsense is embarassing.
March 6th 2012 @ 9:32am
Redb said | March 6th 2012 @ 9:32am | Report comment
That’s your take. I think Cam’s point are spot on.
This is a very strange attack on the AFL.
March 6th 2012 @ 9:35am
TomC said | March 6th 2012 @ 9:35am | Report comment
Maybe, but why should I care if Vince was tweeting about the A-league or that Cam watched a lot of footy on the weekend?
If you’re confident in your point, let it stand on it’s own.
March 6th 2012 @ 9:41am
camtherose said | March 6th 2012 @ 9:41am | Report comment
Personally, I think that it’s a matter of credibility so if i’m going to question Vince’s then I believe I have to provide the grounds of mine? But, I see your point as well, and that’s the beauty of debate.
March 6th 2012 @ 9:56am
Vince Rugari said | March 6th 2012 @ 9:56am | Report comment
First off, you pretty much summarized the brief given to the writers in your first paragraph and that’s something everyone keeps in the back of their mind when they’re penning their stuff. Myself included. Job done, to an extent.
And AFL runs through my veins, despite my twitter account. I grew up on the members wing of AAMI Stadium, it’s just currently soccer season for me and there’s a bit going on where I live, the Gold Coast, in that regard so I do apologize if I’m not footy enough for you.
I’ve probably played the man a bit too much and not the ball, and haven’t gotten my points across as well as I could. For that I apologize. I know that there’s games played in Cairns and Lonnie and Darwin, and I know the AFL signed off on their travel plans (could have worded that sentence better). But they shouldn’t have.
I guess my overarching point is that at the end of the day, the fact that the AFL allowed them to fly on gameday, opening up a situation where the risk of being unable to land in such weather is greatly increased… it just seems to me as if this game was not the AFL’s priority, if they allowed the Dons to do that. That’s where the half-heartedness is. And that’s a shame because Wangaratta’s priority is football, and they deserved better. Even if the weather was going to mean the game wasn’t going to be played – but let that be the reason, not Essendon’s no-show. Then there’d be no controversy, because people understand that the weather is an unpredictable beast.
March 6th 2012 @ 10:10am
Redb said | March 6th 2012 @ 10:10am | Report comment
From my recollection a no show by an AFL team is a very rare occurrence. To suggest its half hearted by the AFL is churlish.
March 6th 2012 @ 10:15am
Vince Rugari said | March 6th 2012 @ 10:15am | Report comment
Yes, it is rare. But AFL should be prepared. Why allow Essendon to fly on matchday when they don’t at any other time? Why is it OK to do that and take that risk in the NAB Cup, but it’s not OK in the season proper?
There’s an obvious answer – it’s because the AFL doesn’t care as much about the NAB Cup. Fair enough, nobody else does. But unfortunately the byproduct of that was the headlines about Wangaratta missing out.
March 6th 2012 @ 11:00am
Redb said | March 6th 2012 @ 11:00am | Report comment
It’s a one off, not an excuse to go off half cocked with an article suggesting the AFL has no care factor for regional areas. All evidence to the contrary.
Laughable suggestion the A League is doing a better job, given the FFA’s lack of stewardship over GCU and community links.
March 6th 2012 @ 10:15am
camtherose said | March 6th 2012 @ 10:15am | Report comment
Agree on first paragraph, and you’ve certainly achieved that here.
I’ll have to remember not to call you ‘Vinnie’ like Clive Palmer did on Twitter! As you point out, there’s plenty happening up your end in the A-League, so I think your article came across as a little rushed, and as you admit, that’s probably because it was!
The AFL did open the door a little to this situation by allowing them to break their usual game-day protocol of not flying on the day, but it’s always hard to predict catastrophic weather conditions, and we’ve all been in planes that have landed in inclement weather.
My contention is that it has been a string of innocent mistakes that has spiralled out of control.
As ever, there is nothing like genuine footy debate, and argument from all sides.
March 6th 2012 @ 10:22am
Vince Rugari said | March 6th 2012 @ 10:22am | Report comment
Now now, I never admitted it was rushed – and I think you’re framing me and my knowledge of AFL based on the fact that I tweet about soccer a lot, which is unfair.
Personally, had the two teams arrived in Wang perhaps two days earlier – and via the road, not the air – you’d not only have avoided that situation, but if the weather had meant the match couldn’t have gone ahead, you’d at least have 44 fit blokes in the town ready to at least tell everyone how sorry they were about everything.
Instead, we got only one team there, a half-baked rushed scratch match, and the AFL fumbling over themselves trying to figure out who gets the points.
I get that you want to defend the AFL but they’re not blameless. They were underprepared, under-committed and this was the result. The fact that this wouldn’t happen in the real season is proof.
March 6th 2012 @ 10:35am
camtherose said | March 6th 2012 @ 10:35am | Report comment
Without wanting to be pedantic Vince, you admitted that you “haven’t gotten my points across as well as I could”, which to me suggests that you didn’t do your due diligence and review your piece properly before you submitted it.
The combination of that, the fact that “it’s soccer season and there’s a bit going on”, plus your twitter feed are clear signs that your mind is elswhere. Don’t get me wrong, that’s fine, you have your priorities, but I find that this has been reflected in your article.
Yes, mistakes were made, and I’m not suggesting the AFL are completely blameless, but to me, without wanting to denigrate the community of Wangaratta, the issue is ultimately a trivial one, so we don’t need to hang, draw and quarter everyone involved.
March 6th 2012 @ 9:32am
TomC said | March 6th 2012 @ 9:32am | Report comment
Seems like a very long bow to draw to me, on the basis of one game where I really don’t see what more the AFL could have done. It’d have to be very exceptional circumstances indeed where the AFL would veto a club’s travel plans to a pre-season game.
I think it goes without saying that the A-league is hardly the model for the AFL when it comes to servicing regional areas. Scheduling mid-week games involving lower drawing games isn’t particularly useful. Stubbornly ignoring bids from Wollongong and Canberra in favour of a hypothetical Western Sydney team probably doesn’t generate much goodwill either.
Don’t really know much about the NRL, but it seems a bit mad that neither the Central Coast nor the Illawarra has their own unique team, so I doubt they’re a paragon of regionalism either.
It seems like every major football code has their pluses and minuses on this issue. Seems silly to pump up a couple and criticise the other.
March 6th 2012 @ 10:24am
Australian Rules said | March 6th 2012 @ 10:24am | Report comment
In the aftermath of the SuperLeague War, Central Coast got dumped from the NRL in 1999 because they were insolvent (they’re mounting a push to be re-instated…optimistic one would think).
A struggling Illawarra Steelers merged with St George in 1999…they still play some games there.
But heralding the NRL as “leading the way” purely because of the country vs city match is also misguided. First, it only relates to NSW…nowhere else. Second, it’s relevance has been waning for years and is now considered just a trial match for the NSW Origin team.
The NRL should be commended for playing games in the bush…but to use this one-off game as the example as to why it is “leading the way” is a bit rich.
March 6th 2012 @ 10:36am
Vince Rugari said | March 6th 2012 @ 10:36am | Report comment
Its relevance is certainly waning, but I really love the concept of it. A country team is great. I know a lot of lads from the country who are proud of where they come from. In a world where all professional sport is concentrated in the big cities, you have to move if you want to make it into the big time… the idea that you can get back to your roots but representing Country Origin – and then play that match anywhere from Albury to Port Mac… The concept itself is leading, though perhaps it’s not longer what it was.
March 6th 2012 @ 12:53pm
Australian Rules said | March 6th 2012 @ 12:53pm | Report comment
But Vince, this isn’t about the virtues of a Country rep side, it’s about your contention that the AFL is “out of touch” with regional Australia.
You use the Country v City game as the sole reason that NRL is leading the way…and then suggest the AFL should copy the idea.
A one-off game is great but it isn’t proof of committment to the bush. I read that there are about 1400 Auskick programs in regional areas. Clubs are constantly going to remote Aboriginal communities to promote the game. The attitude to regional and rural areas by the AFL has been overwhelmingly a cohesive effort. It a major area of advantage that the AFL had over NRL pre-ARLC.
Your argument seems to be that the AFL is “out of touch” with regional Australia because Essendon couldn’t land their plane during a once in a century torrential downpour.