So long Ed Cowan and thanks for the memories
By Junior, 30 Apr 2012 Junior is a Roar Guru & Live Blogger
- Tagged:
- Australian Cricket, David Warner, Ed Cowan, michael holding, Test cricket, The Ashes, West Indies cricket
Ed Cowan plays a shot during the first innings of the first cricket Test between Australia and India at the MCG in Melbourne, Monday, Dec 26, 2011. (AAP Image/Julian Smith).
Related coverage
We have all heard of batsmen who can bowl or bowlers who can bat. Allow me introduce you to a new phenomenon in world cricket: the batsman who cannot bat.
More popularly known as Ed Cowan, he is the rarest of breeds.
What did we expect? The Australian Test selectors pick a near-30-year-old journeyman to debut for Australia and expect that he’ll solve the team’s top order woes?
Wrong.
We have now tolerated Ed Cowan through two full Test series and seven Test matches, and his performances with the bat would barely have impressed his mother. Everybody else is still trying to figure out the difference between him and a nightwatchman.
Cowan’s fighting qualities are not in question. His ability against Test attacks is. When he strides to the crease, adopts his upright stance and wobbles the toe of his bat near two o’clock, people around Australia take up their preferred viewing position. Huddled behind the sofa.
Against bowling that can best be described as impotent, he has failed miserably. In four Tests versus India, Cowan was confronted with a raw Yadav, an aching Zaheer, a wayward Sharma, an ineffective Ashwin and flat pitches.
The result? 206 tooth-pulling runs at an average of 34.
Soon after, in three Tests against an even more pedestrian and inexperienced bowling line-up in the Caribbean, our soporific opener managed to peel off 152 runs at a wholly unspectacular average of 25.
When an opener places a high value on his wicket and digs in when wickets are falling around him, they earn respect. When an opener makes a start and gets to 20 or 30 off 100 balls, he is expected to go on with it more often than not.
Cowan has reached 20 seven times in his Test career and has never gone on with it. Not once.
Players who reach Test level often need to tweak their game to survive. Cowan, in contrast, has stuck with the same awkward technique that he has used against Shield fodder during the sunniest 18 months of his career.
This approach has simply not been up to Test standard. He clearly has neither the range of shots nor the resources to adapt his game to prosper at the higher level.
What is disturbing is that in getting to 20 or 30, Cowan often looks scratchy. His catalogue of near misses has to be seen to be believed, whether it is dropped catches or clumsy run-out attempts.
His slow reaction times and propensity to edge to the cordon will not have gone unnoticed.
Of greater concern however is his judgment outside off-stump. In just seven Test appearances, the Australian cricket public has already lost count of the number of times he has shouldered arms only to see the ball clatter into his pads. He has been dismissed LBW a staggering 50 percent of the time.
His refusal to play a shot to a Ravi Rampaul inswinger in the second over of last week’s Dominica Test is just the latest example. Is this the pedigree of a Test class opener?
It is little wonder the English have fallen in love with Cowan. With a Test average of below 30, England would be delighted to see him walking out on a Lord’s green top for the opening Test of the 2013 Ashes series. Who wouldn’t?
Cowan has won plaudits for writing books and articles on cricket. For his efforts, one wag on Twitter has labelled him our very own Pulitzer Prize winner.
It seems writing self-congratulatory material for Cricinfo may help get you into the Test team, but it is your cricket ability that keeps you there.
If you are still wavering on Cowan, here is what Michael Holding had to say: “I don’t think the Australian openers are that hot, I think they have a lot of work to do, a lot of learning to do.”
He went on to add, “I do not think these two [Cowan and Warner] will be good enough to do a good job in England for the Ashes.”
Warner has shown he can adapt and has time to improve further. Cowan has reached his potential and it is well below Test level. His time has come.
Congratulations Ed Cowan on a very mediocre Test career. Thanks for the memories.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Cricket articles
- Australian cricket rotting under Clarke’s off-field leadership (144)
- Does Australian cricket need a clean out? (127)
- This fast-tracking of Ahmed is a concern (117)
- David Warner stood down after attacking England player (114)
- Doesn’t Warner want to play cricket for Australia anymore? (108)
- Botham is wrong on Aussies: de Villiers (90)
- Is Steyn Test cricket’s best ever fast bowler? (86)
- Australia A squad for Tour of Africa announced (2)
- Where have all the good guys of Aussie sport gone? (11)
- Trophy exit hits Ashes confidence
- Inverarity says Aussies are decent men
- Aussies knocked out of Champions Trophy (12)
- Inverarity drops Ahmed Ashes hint (8)
- Australian cricket rotting under Clarke’s off-field leadership (151)
- Where have all the good guys of Aussie sport gone? (11)
- Get ready for the 2013 Champions Trophy semi-finals (4)
- Cricket’s All Time K Team (27)
- Australia vs Sri Lanka: 2013 ICC Champions Trophy live scores (3)
- Ask yourself: what would Davey do? (13)
- Ravichandran Ashwin: The silent workhorse for India (8)
- Why the Champions Trophy still rocks (7)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Australian Cricket, David Warner, Ed Cowan, michael holding, Test cricket, The Ashes, West Indies cricket

April 30th 2012 @ 6:08am
Kris said | April 30th 2012 @ 6:08am | Report comment
What a nasty, spiteful piece.
April 30th 2012 @ 6:50am
Uncle Eric said | April 30th 2012 @ 6:50am | Report comment
Totally agree Kris, obviously Junior forgot to take his medication.
April 30th 2012 @ 9:13pm
NSW's players get in no matter said | April 30th 2012 @ 9:13pm | Report comment
Funny how NSW comes last in the Shield but their guys keep getting the inside running into the test team. Any wonder Australia underperforms, starting with the captain.
May 1st 2012 @ 8:28am
AndyMack said | May 1st 2012 @ 8:28am | Report comment
You still having a crack at Clarke?? After how well he has done?? Methinks that is your bias coming to the fore, not the selectors…..
May 1st 2012 @ 12:09pm
Charles said | May 1st 2012 @ 12:09pm | Report comment
NSW did not come last in the Shield last season and a finalist the year before! Sorry but that fallacy is long gone if you check out who’s from where nowadays. Do the names Bollinger, Copeland, Khawaja and Hughes ring any bells in regard to any favours or inside running from the selectors? I don’t think so, move on, old argument.
April 30th 2012 @ 6:14am
Scott minto said | April 30th 2012 @ 6:14am | Report comment
Ease up Junior (unless you’re actually Mark Waugh)
Cowan has been fairly solid and needs some more time before we can judge him.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
April 30th 2012 @ 6:17am
ManInBlack said | April 30th 2012 @ 6:17am | Report comment
While I agree with the notion that Cowan is thus far not living up to – I don’t want to say ‘hype’ – but, not up to the grade,
however, when noting that not one single recognised batter for Australia averaged over 50 for the series, Not even over 40. Those rarified heights were left to Harris and Lyon.
Best ‘batter’ comes in with Wade at 39.5 (and his position is considered on the line for a returning over the hill never was that good keeper batsman in Haddin).
so, Cowan’s output – not good enough, but, who’s was (amongst the specialist batsmen) in the Windies?
April 30th 2012 @ 6:58am
AndyMack said | April 30th 2012 @ 6:58am | Report comment
He has a mediocre record in 10 years of first class cricket. No surprises to me he has struggled.
Seems a good guy, a good guy to have in the dressingroom, but if he is not scoring big runs at the top of the order he isn’t doing his job. At least give the role to a younger guy who might improve over time.
April 30th 2012 @ 7:44am
TomC said | April 30th 2012 @ 7:44am | Report comment
Awful. Just awful.
Yet another piece of evidence for the case that the Roar need to scrutinise articles more closely before putting them up.
April 30th 2012 @ 8:53am
Geoff Lemon said | April 30th 2012 @ 8:53am | Report comment
Tom, The Roar scrutinises and publishes Crowd articles based on writing quality and ability to express an argument. There’s nothing inherently wrong with this one, as much as you might disagree with it.
I disagree with it too (see my comment below), but that doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be run.
April 30th 2012 @ 8:06am
jamesb said | April 30th 2012 @ 8:06am | Report comment
Whats dissapointing is that the article doesn’t have an alternative for Ed Cowan.
As for Holding, he does work with the likes of Botham, Athurton and Hussain in every English summer, so he will praise those who pay him.
Yet Holding forgot to mention how ordinary the pitches were in the West Indies.
April 30th 2012 @ 8:36am
sledgeross said | April 30th 2012 @ 8:36am | Report comment
Yeah, I dont think Cowan is the answer, but there aint a dearth of talent banging down the door is there. It has been a tough series on tough decks where a Cowanesque type player, Shiv Chanderpaul, was the most dominant batsman. The only difference is Shiv has more talent and experience.
April 30th 2012 @ 8:47am
Geoff Lemon said | April 30th 2012 @ 8:47am | Report comment
Can’t say how completely wrongheaded this article is in isolating Cowan’s work in the West Indies. Every Australian batsman struggled on what were low-scoring pitches, and what was actually a surprisingly strong Windies bowling effort with pace and spin. Shiv Chanderpaul had four of the eight highest scores for the series.
Remember a West Indies bowler hadn’t taken ten wickets against Australia in nearly 20 years, but it happened in consecutive matches this series.
Watson was the only top seven Aussie to cross 50 more than once in the series, and then only barely (56 and 52). Not all series are statistically equal. In most innings Cowan at least did his opener’s job by seeing off the first 25 overs.
If seven Tests is considered enough time for a new player, God help us.
April 30th 2012 @ 9:06am
Disco said | April 30th 2012 @ 9:06am | Report comment
Cowan’s done just about enough to be persevered with.
That said, the younger Khawaja’s a far better player, one who NSW successfully chose ahead of Cowan, Forrest and Warner three years ago.
It’s the past-it Test No.4′s position that needs to be looked at.
April 30th 2012 @ 9:08am
Bob said | April 30th 2012 @ 9:08am | Report comment
3 tests and a winning series in Sri Lanka, and reasonable ones at that on very flat pitches, was enough for Copeland to get shafted completely off the face of the earth, so your last comment doesn’t hold much water with these current selectors. If they set that sort of standard, then don’t be surprised when others comment/criticise about “enough chances” for others.
On Cowan, he a mature player who should know his cricket well enough to adjust, he makes it worse by defending his 20′s as good as a 50, etc. yes, it was difficult but it’s supposed to be when he’not playing at home! I think he should have been able to offer much more, too many starts and if you are going to take time at the crease, then at least make it productive in the end. Seeing off the new ball is only part of his job as an opener.
April 30th 2012 @ 11:59am
Disco said | April 30th 2012 @ 11:59am | Report comment
Quite true re: Copeland and Cowan seems favoured by Clarke, Arthur et al. It seems to me a real weakness that they form attachments to certain players and crap on about mateship etc. at the expense of fair, responsible selection policy.
May 2nd 2012 @ 6:39am
ManInBlack said | May 2nd 2012 @ 6:39am | Report comment
so what your saying is the selectors and team had a seriously close look at Copeland over a 3 test international tour and have decided others are ahead of him at the minute.
What’s wrong with that??
May 2nd 2012 @ 9:12am
Bob said | May 2nd 2012 @ 9:12am | Report comment
Another comment on here re Ed Cowan says: 10 innings do not define a career. But in Copeland’s case, it was far less although he did nothing wrong. Copeland got his chance on the back of 2 awesome shield seasons, he earned his place through bloody hard work and yet isn’t extended the same opportunities as others. He was good enough to be given the chance in the first place, then suddenly he can’t play good cricket anymore, sorry but I don’t get it.
Mickey has double standards for who he likes affording them more opportunities, look what they did to Khawaja and people wonder why he went missing on return to the Shield comp.
April 30th 2012 @ 6:51pm
AndyMack said | April 30th 2012 @ 6:51pm | Report comment
So everyone was bad, therefore we persist with all of them again….??
Seven tests is not enough to judge how good a player is, but 10 years of 1st class cricket certainly is. Lets not forget he had one good patch of about 6 weeks where he scored a few hundreds, and got himself in the limelight. Prior to that, he had done next to nothing.
April 30th 2012 @ 8:21pm
Kris said | April 30th 2012 @ 8:21pm | Report comment
On a tough deck for openers since he moved to Tasmania, Cowan has averaged 60 in 2011/12; 34 in 2010/11 (including a gusty first innings hundred that set up Tasmania’s victory in the final); and 53 in 2009/10. This contrasts with 22, 18 and 30 in his preceding NSW Shield seasons.
I’m not sure about you, but that is a little more than a “six week” purple patch amongst ten years of “next to nothing”. By all means people can question his quality at Test level, but too many are just making stuff up or rewriting history to suit their own arguments.
April 30th 2012 @ 10:43pm
AndyMack said | April 30th 2012 @ 10:43pm | Report comment
Hey Kris
If you look at his 11/12 season, the bulk of his runs for the season came in that 6 week period. Prior to that period, he was never in the frame for Aust selection. All of a sudden he scores a few centuries (granted he was in a hot hot run of form) and he is given a baggy green.
Thats not a slight on Cowan, more a state of the depth (or lack thereof) in Australian batting stocks at the time.
I stand by my “next to nothing” comment, and I dont think it is rewriting history.
April 30th 2012 @ 9:40am
Sam said | April 30th 2012 @ 9:40am | Report comment
Great article. A very accurate summation.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
April 30th 2012 @ 9:51am
Winston said | April 30th 2012 @ 9:51am | Report comment
Don’t entirely disagree with your opinion, but I think for now he is not a bad option. If (and it’s a big if) Hughes, Marsh and Khawaja are our hopes for the future, it’s not a bad thing that Cowan is in there in the interim while they go back to sort out their issues. If they are not the answer, then the question is whether there is any other young new player better than Cowan at the moment and I think the answer is also no. So whether Cowan is our long term future or not, he’s the right man for the job now. Then of course, add the opinions already expressed by others to the mix, and it means we ought to give him more time anyway to prove himself.
The only alternative would be to move Watson back to opener, and already enough has been said about that.