The importance of rugby union’s scrum
Related coverage
There was a time in recent televised history when channels had a timer at the bottom of the screen to illustrate how much time of the game was being dedicated to scrums.
This counted how much time was being wasted while backs were just standing around and waiting until the big men upfront channelled the ball out into the backline.
There have been changes over the years, and referees now speed up the process by communicating with the front rows clearly, or penalising a prop for incorrect binding or dangerous engagement.
This has sped up the game a lot, but sometimes penalties are not the props’ fault, as their binding may slip off the ultra-tight jerseys or they touch the ground for an instant to get some stability.
There have been many scrums when both front rows engage with such force that they slip or buckle due to the immense pressure generated, but the referee would select a prop he feels was at fault and blows the whistle for a penalty. Yes, this has sped up the process of scrums and has given some easy points to teams, but it still has not changed the importance of scrums in the game of rugby.
The scrum is essentially a show of strength and power. The eight biggest men form a solid unit and push against an opposing unit. The team that dominates the scrum is usually the team that can win a game. The scrum becomes many things: a psychological weapon, a platform to attack, and a defensive tactic.
As a psychological tactic, the scrum that dominates can mentally take eight men out of the match. Each time a strong scrum draws a penalty or forces the other to retreat, the tight five feel fantastic about their effort and receive a pat on the back from their fellow players.
When a prop forces a tighthead scrum or causes his opposite number to buckle, they sometimes fist-pump the air, knowing that they have their rival on the ropes and that a few more big engagements will produce front football, allowing their team to attack harder and with more confidence.
The psychological damage done to a losing scrum can be seen on dejected faces of the front row, and it’s a difficult slump to come out of once you know that you are beaten at the job you train hard for.
The attacking platforms produced from scrums can be exploited by the backline. The scrum is a set piece, so the backline has a chance to set things up as they would on the training field and execute a play to get over the try line. If you doubt this, just watch The Rugby Club‘s Plays of the Week for round nine (you can find the highlight video on a variety of social websites).
Each of their chosen three tries were off the back of a scrum. Of course the backline had the skills to execute the plays and get tries, but they had the time and field position from a scrum. These are very recent examples of such set plays, but you are able to find evidence of this type of attack dating back to the first scrums of rugby.
It is more difficult to form a scrum as a defensive tactic as the front row has to be highly skilled, strong and a bit lucky to pull off a tighthead. If throughout the game the scrum has been solid, the team has a chance to push the attacking team off the ball and relieve pressure.
The hooker has to be aware of when the ball is being tossed in by the scrumhalf and can challenge the strike. Technically the ball should be thrown into the scrum down the centre of the tunnel, but that isn’t always the case, so the hooker has to be alert to be able to challenge for the ball.
Physics suggests that the team feeding the ball into the scrum will be slightly weaker, because the hooker needs to lift a foot off the ground to strike the ball, while the opposing hooker can gain leverage by planting both feet into a stronger position. If the defensive hooker is skilled and is in tune with his props, he can challenge the strike by lifting a foot and sacrificing a solid base.
This is a high-risk, high-reward tactic and skilled players are able to pull it off. If successful, the defensive scrum now becomes a weapon, and the attacking scrum is now under pressure to stabilise and win their own ball.
For the general spectator, the scrum may seem a boring and drawn out process, but there is no other game that has such a regulation where the pure force of power is exhibited.
The rugby league scrums are mere huddles and an excuse to keep the big men occupied for the moment. In the NFL, the scrummage is not a show of sustained strength, rather explosive power, which if unsuccessful in the first hit, leaves little chance for a player to be involved in the rest of the play.
The rugby scrum is a show of sustained strength and tactics allowing for many aspects of the game to be brought into play.
The scrum was, is and will always be the centrepiece of rugby, as a chance for the big men to get on the field, and as a pure simple test of their ability.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
![]()
Passionate about your union? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily union email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Where is Deans in the pecking order of rugby coaches? (404)
- Wallabies squad announced: Folau in, no Quade Cooper – yet (267)
- Deans: Should he stay or should he go? (245)
- SPIRO’s Lions Diary: Deans goes for experience, plus Folau (242)
- Australia, time to get behind the Wallabies (229)
- Wallabies 25-man Lions squad: analysis (214)
- Quade Cooper misses Wallaby squad selection (209)
- What happened to all the rugby enforcers? (15)
- With Quade, Deans faces a real dilemma (35)
- Wallabies coaching job poisoned chalice (3)
- Manu Samoa squad to tour South Africa for June Tests (2)
- Looking at the weekend’s Super Rugby games (2)
- Reds set to unleash veteran Samo
- IRB Law 12: The forward pass (4)
- What happened to all the rugby enforcers? (15)
- Manu Samoa squad to tour South Africa for June Tests (2)
- Looking at the weekend’s Super Rugby games (2)
- IRB Law 12: The forward pass (4)
- Australia, time to get behind the Wallabies (229)
- Who can still win the Super Rugby title? (45)
- ‘Lucky 29′ journey into despair (part one) (10)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Rugby Union


April 30th 2012 @ 7:38am
oikee said | April 30th 2012 @ 7:38am | Report comment
Rugby union should be played on AFL grounds.
By all means keep the scrum, but sharing fields with other codes has to be dropped. If you dont believe me, just have a look at the state of Suncorp, it is the worst i have even seen, a complete mess.
It will only take a few more injuries to elite players of other codes before its ugly head will be raised.
These players are ripping fields to pieces.
April 30th 2012 @ 10:16am
warrenj said | April 30th 2012 @ 10:16am | Report comment
Oikee.
I agree that there should be better maintained fields for rugby and sports that potentially damage the fields, but AFL fields are a last option.
AFL is an aerial game so stadium seats are built lower to the ground in a gentle terrace style. Rugby is mainly played at ground level, so seats are built higher off the ground with a dramatic terrace. I remember watching a rugby match at Subiaco Oval and spending more time watching the big screen than the action on the field, because we couldn’t really see what was happening on the field. Compared to the colosseum style stadiums, where you are able to look down into the action, the AFL fields allow you to look up. I can only speak for Subiaco, so I’m not sure about the other stadiums, but on TV, the seats seem to be set up in a flat structure.
There maybe nothing wrong with the field itself, rather the stadium seating structure.
April 30th 2012 @ 7:41am
Enrique TOPO Rodriguez said | April 30th 2012 @ 7:41am | Report comment
Dear Warren J, (yes an open letter to you and your followers)
Very occassionaly I enter a conversation in blogs like this because I run the risk of people recognising my name whilst I do not know who you people are on the other side of the screen, this is one occassion I do because I see an opportunity to redress the subject providing some education for those that know less than me and less than you too about scrummaging.
It really amazes me that you could write with such authority, backed by THE ROAR (reputable and opinionated site). However, I get the feeling you (with due respect) need to: a) watch more rugby; b) discuss it with more people that know about it; or c) read more about scrummaging, or the three options! On the “discussion option”, don’t need to search too far, the Zavos family (wogs like me) know a fair bit about the subject.
I’d like to start that if in a rugby match at times it appears that the FORWARDS are working for the BACKS or vice versa, it is only an ilusion and a wrong perception. Teamwork is what makes them interact towards common objectives. There is no written or verbal Law that dictates who will or won’t score the 1st or last try of the game, or How are you going to win (tactics & strategy)
“There have been changes over the years, and referees now speed up the process by communicating with the front rows clearly”!
Are we watching the same game Warren? How do you define speed-up? One (just one) of the problems with scrums is the interventionist and patronising attitude of referees that pretend to know more than the players about scrum. They just happen to be trained on THE LAW and should stick to ruling on that, nothing else (Judge-like)
In your extended article where you touch on many subjects about scrums even including a comment about NRL scrums, not once you refer, alude or imply SKILL or TECHNIQUE, yes just Strength and Power! (Are Skills and Techniques only reserved to backs’ actions?) If I was neofyte, I’d think that Forwards are part of a “Roman Circus” where the biggest and the strongest will prevail. Yet, not completely true! to survive any contest or life struggle apart from ably using your body you also need to use your head. This is what happens at International level and at a RWC, otherwise you would have 16 forwards cartered-off to a hospital even before the 80 minutes are over.
Well done on all other accurate information you have disseminated, it helps all and sundry with understanding the finer points of rugby.
All the best to you and all scrummites!
tOPO
April 30th 2012 @ 9:53am
warrenj said | April 30th 2012 @ 9:53am | Report comment
Topo.
All points taken into consideration, but I do elude to skill and technique when talking about the scrum. If I had to get into a discussion about correct technique and skill, I would be creating a whole new article. What we see on TV, is the brute strength that is generated by proper technique and skill. I can get into all the intricacies of proper scrumming and technique, but I’ll create another article, an article based in physics and the human skeletal positions and anatomic motions, which would be a boring read. (and I would need a number of visual aids).
As far as I have seen, the refs are communicating more openly with players. The refs call front rows for a quick meeting before a match and the good referees communicate on the field with the front rows, which can be heard via the ref’s mic. I didn’t not say anything about them knowing more about scrumming than the players – in fact I agree with you completely that they really don’t know a thing about scrums besides the application of the law. I state that refs often penalise a player when clearly there is no need to.
I watch a ton of rugby, close to 80% of the Super Rugby games and every Southern Hemisphere test match. I have grown up in the scrumming ranks and have played the game for over 25 years. I have gained coaching certification and IRB law administration at school level matches. I consider myself well versed in the game of rugby.
If you doubt the fact that refs have sped up the process of scrumming times, just look at the number of resets per game compared to a few years ago. I remember watching a 6 nations match (I cannot recall what teams were playing) and the broadcaster timed the phases of play dedicated to scrums. At the end of the match, the clock read 15 minutes and some odd seconds dedicated to scrumming and resets, which wasn’t that unusual for the time. If compared to now, the time dedicated to scrumming is nowhere near this as the refs either award penalties or free kicks (unjust or not) to keep the game moving.
To finish off, there are 15 men on the field and all 15 men work towards winning. In open play, it doesn’t matter if you are wearing number 1 or 15, if you are there in support, your teammate will look for you and use you, working together to score points.
April 30th 2012 @ 4:44pm
Sharminator said | April 30th 2012 @ 4:44pm | Report comment
Hi Topo,
this isnt really related to the topic, but seeing your name I remembered you used to coach me back at Sydney Uni in 2nd or 3rd grade in the late 1990´s.
Ive actually done the reverse to you, and moved to South America, where I`ve been playing rugby in Paraguay for the last 6 years, including for the national team here.
Anyway, cheers,
Alex
April 30th 2012 @ 8:49am
formeropenside said | April 30th 2012 @ 8:49am | Report comment
I’d prefer to see a counter for time wasted NOT scrummaging.
April 30th 2012 @ 10:55am
JIM said | April 30th 2012 @ 10:55am | Report comment
having watched and played rugby most of my life, i love a good scrum contest. I think that a big part of the problem is the way it is managed on TV. When you are at the ground, you sense the tension from the scrum a lot more than when you get commentators using the break in action to chat about other things.
When you are there and watching the players approaching the scrum and taking the bindings you learn a lot by their body language. Watching a good scrum getting ready to scrum is great to watch. Watching the backs get into positions and the little budges and winks between all of the players about what they are going to try. Unfortunately most of the TV commentators dont seem to get it. I think that some more commentators with experience in the tight 5 would go a long way to making scrums a more entertaining part of the game on TV. Better camera angles would also help.
April 30th 2012 @ 11:57am
warrenj said | April 30th 2012 @ 11:57am | Report comment
Jim.
Agreed completely. Recently Super Sport contracted Vic Matfield as a commentator and use him for his experience and knowledge and he can usually call a play accurately and explains well what is happening in the scrums and lineouts.
April 30th 2012 @ 5:21pm
Enrique TOPO Rodriguez said | April 30th 2012 @ 5:21pm | Report comment
Hello Mr Sharminator,
Do remember you well! Congratulations on your international representation of Paraguay and all the terrorising you must have done in Parque Caballero, Asuncion.
Are you still living there? If so did you get the hang of the “mate drink”?
Kind regards, tOPO
April 30th 2012 @ 6:40pm
jeznez said | April 30th 2012 @ 6:40pm | Report comment
Warren, always good to see an article promoting scrummaging. You should definitely write one from a technical perspective. I’ve written a couple and they are generally well received. Am always keen to get other perspectives on the skills and structure.
April 30th 2012 @ 9:13pm
warrenj said | April 30th 2012 @ 9:13pm | Report comment
Jeznez,
When I have the time and gather my resources, I’ll have a go at writing a technical aspect of the scrum. A project for another day and it’s something that I have been studying for years, so it’ll be interesting to see what I can personally bring to the table.
April 30th 2012 @ 8:17pm
mitchwally said | April 30th 2012 @ 8:17pm | Report comment
My views on scrums are probably skewed by my father being and old front rower- i.e. the scrum is the most important part of the game! I agree that it’s importance isn’t as valued as it could be- Dad always said that his objective was always to try and win a tight head, and whenever he did the lift it would give the team (as well as the ensuing tactical advantage) was immense.
Having never played in the Front Row myself I can’t vouch for how easy of difficult that might be (maybe topo can enlighten us!) but it does astound me that it doesn’t seem to happen too often at the top level. Is this because they are all so well skilled, or is their focus on other tasks?
April 30th 2012 @ 9:36pm
warrenj said | April 30th 2012 @ 9:36pm | Report comment
mitchwally
There are the rare occasions at international level when a tighthead scrum is forced, and this can be down to a number of things. I think that one of the reasons we don’t see tightheads that often is because the ball is generally fed screw into the scrum by the scrumhalf/half-back, which according to the law warrants a free kick but refs seem to let this slide more often than not unless the ball is fed into the locks channel and a blatant mis-feed is made.
Another more legitimate reason is because the attacking scrum knows when the ball is being fed into the scrum. When the attacking hooker is ready, he’ll signal his scrumhalf by either tapping his hand on the loosehead prop or another signal, and the scrummy feeds the ball as soon as the hooker lifts his foot to strike. The hooker cannot lift his foot before the ball is fed, so it comes down to timing. Since the defending hooker cannot see this signal, he is generally a half step behind the attacking scrum, so generally focuses on counter-scrumming.
If the front row has timed their engagement hit right and the 8-man unit pushes at the right time, it is possible to force the attacking scrum to back pedal allowing for the ball to bobble about in the tunnel and then the defensive hooker or props can strike it backwards, causing a tighthead. There is some skill, but normally on a defensive scrum, the tight five dig in and the loose forwards have their heads up watching for a sniping player or lining up a fly half or aiming for a channel to hinder an attacking play.
April 30th 2012 @ 8:56pm
spiro zavos said | April 30th 2012 @ 8:56pm | Report comment
I understand that Topo has finished a book on the scrum. I had the pleasure of reading an earlier treatise he wrote on the scrum. That was many years ago. I wrote at the time how impressive the information in the treatise was and suggested that if Aristotle were alive and writing about rugby matters that Topo’s treatise is what he would have written.
So Topo’s latest thoughts in a new book is something to look forward to.
In reading the book I’ll be interested in his thoughts on the long process culminating in the two-syllable word en-gage to get the scrumming underway.
The IRB are going to change the engage call to ‘scrum’ which will be better in that it is one sound.
The contested scrum is a distinctive aspect of rugby union. I once endured a game in NZ which had uncontested scrums very early on in the game. The game was boring. The scrum has the power of concentrating the forwards in one place. It also tires the forwards out a bit which allows a team with clever backs to make raids later on in the match.
And the sight of the heaving packs contesting for the ball gives us a suggestion of the origins of the game going back to the village contests with a ball being pushed from one village to the other in a shoving match that lasted days.
May 1st 2012 @ 2:05am
Rowdy said | May 1st 2012 @ 2:05am | Report comment
It’s great to see that SANZAR types are getting excited about the scrum being a contest – I recall a few years ago that the scrum was regarded as nothing more than a restart.
In the interests of keeping scrums competitive and not too drawn out, why not
1) Insist on the ball being fed in straight – a crooked feed is pinged at lineouts, why not for scrums?
2) Have props wear the old baggy shirts or, better, have tags on their shirts that the oppo prop must bind on.
3) Get rid of the Hit; there must be a way for the packs to engage then push when the ball comes in.
May 1st 2012 @ 8:05am
warrenj said | May 1st 2012 @ 8:05am | Report comment
Rowdy.
Agree with 2 of your points but the third point about the hit – that is part of the scrum at determines whether a prop can dominate or not. If you a prop gets a good hit, the opposition can be unstable allowing for the strength of the scrum to be determined. It comes down to technique, timing and correct body positioning.
The jerseys worn today by the players don’t allow for props to take a quick bind, so they land up grabbing a handful of skin. The jerseys worn by props should be a looser fit, but the “handles/tags” idea may hinder the player in open play. There is nothing wrong with wearing a looser jersey made of the same composition. Besides that, a prop doesn’t have the body for these ultra tight jersey. Imagine Salesi Ma’afu running around in skin tight compression-type gear. Not too pleasing to the eye. (No offence Salesi).
May 1st 2012 @ 1:17pm
Enrique TOPO Rodriguez said | May 1st 2012 @ 1:17pm | Report comment
Hello Spiro, Warren, Jeznez, Mitchwally, Rowdy, Sheek and many other bloggers. It’s good to see stimulating positive conversation flowing particularly about the forgotten SCRUM.
Jim Webster renowned and respected rugby and Olympics Sydney based journalist (for some people that didn’t know Jim) he coverd amongst several Wallaby tours and home tests, something like 6 olympics for The Sydney Morning Herald (not a bad feat for a journo). Jim recently wrote an article for the RUGBY NEWS magazine (Sydney Club Rugby program) of 21/04/12 on my book: “The ART of Scrummaging”, soon to be published (all good things take time, I have been at it for 15 years). So I thought be good idea to do a bit of cut and paste. There are a few important points that Jim briefly touched on. So here we go to stir the pot………
Topo Rodriguez going to print on scrums debacle. by Jim Webster
Enrique (Topo) Rodriguez Kobus Visagie, Jon White etc and their opinions alone are worth close scrutiny. For instance, Wilson Whineray says “the four step process seems a little too much”. Brian Lochore agrees that “it takes far too long to put the scrum down” and Dwyer believes that “this must be the stimulus for further discussion amongst experts, with the involvement of the law-makers.”
Rodriguez doesn’t pull punches in his problem assessment; nor should he. “From what I can gather the current crouchtouch- pause-engage law was driven by insurance assessors. It is a pity that more consultation with experienced scrummagers did not take place at the time, because they would have forecast the eventual outcome of the law creating more problems than it solved, including safety ones.“There may have been a small reduction in injuries since the c-t-p-e edict, but the risk of a catastrophic injury at the top level is lurking closely in the shadows.”
He maintains the present sequence is (a) too time demanding, (b) difficult to synchronise with the referee, (c) involves too much guessing, (d) is mentally and physically taxing on players, (e) more steps=more error gain, and (f) weakens the scrum structure.
Rodriguez proposes a two-step sequence, which would make it so much better for everybody. The forwards should arrive to the mark and get set. Take their positions and get ready. The whole pack steadies up (i.e. second and back rows have one knee on the ground).
When the referee deems both packs ready, he calls CROUCH, checks “both sides” and may even walk/jog around the scrum to check both sides of the scrum (and all knees are off the ground). When “scrum readiness” is in place and all is steady, a monosyllabic action call should follow.
The referee calls PACK, bringing both packs together from a stationary position. Rodriguez says that “sure, on engagement there will quick adjustments from both packs to achieve maximum balance. In this day and age of power scrums, I have no doubt the referee is in the best position to assess safety and scrum readiness and decide when the ball must go in. “Nonetheless, play must resume as quickly as possible and without delays. This last point is for the benefit of everyone involved.”
While the book hasn’t yet been launched, check its 16-page synopsis on http://www.toporodriguez.com
The manuscript also contains many action photos and copies of match-day programs from his great career
21st April 2012 – RUGBY NEWS.