Gallop exits but the challenges remain
By Luke Doherty, 6 Jun 2012 Luke Doherty is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- David Gallop, John Grant, NRL, Rugby League
Former chief executive of the Australian Rugby League Commission David Gallop. AAP Image/Dean Lewins
Related coverage
It was a little kick on the way to the exit door. Commission chairman John Grant, just hours after finalising a parting of ways with David Gallop, said rugby league was now in need of “a different style of leadership detached from the past for the next stage of its development.”
It was a fairly blunt assessment of why Gallop and the Commission could no longer work together.
It was meant to be a match made in heaven.
The two had looked longingly at each other for years from across the room.
The Australian Rugby League Commission on one side and Gallop on the other.
All of the games problems could be solved and the code could start to make ground on those uber professional people from down south.
You know the ones? The other mob who convinced Wagga Wagga City council to give them $100,000 a year for three years in return for playing pre-season games and development work.
Why? Because they asked.
But the idea of living together and the reality of actually sharing their lives differed greatly.
Gallop had been running the code his way for the past 10 years and now had a group of people overseeing his day to day decisions.
He admitted it was “always going to be difficult” to work like that.
Indeed, the marriage lasted just four months when they’d signed up for four years together.
Gallop has always been accused of being too reactionary instead of extremely proactive and he admitted that was an “easy criticism to make.” It is, but it’s a tag that has stuck.
It’s clear the new man at the helm will need to have thick skin.
For, as much as rugby league would like to be “detached from the past”, the issues that dogged Gallop’s reign won’t be unique to his time at the helm.
Headlines containing buzz words like “crisis”, “saga” and “outrage” featured prominently since he took over the top job in February, 2002.
None were of his making, but some of the responses left fans a little underwhelmed.
The new man will get a honeymoon period. It’s only right that whoever takes charge is allowed time to get accustomed to having their feet under the desk.
But sooner or later (preferably later) he’ll have to deal with the same headlines. Their response will be picked over in great detail. Measured, not only against his predecessor, but also against the expectations of supporters.
A new face won’t change what can be a rocky landscape, but after a decade that was challenging to say the least, it will be more than interesting to see where rugby league sits in another 10 years.
You can follow Luke Doherty on Twitter @Luke_Doherty and on Sky News Australia.
Sport, all day long. Does this sound too good to be true? We're searching for a Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. If you're a sales star who doesn't mind a hit, kick, throw, or cycle, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
- Explore:
- David Gallop, John Grant, NRL, Rugby League

June 6th 2012 @ 2:26am
Poor Boy Blues said | June 6th 2012 @ 2:26am | Report comment
You write a good article, Luke.
I think Gallop was unfairly treated by a big margin. That the commission felt they had to work with him, being that he was forced upon them, rather than wanted to, is a massive thing. The toxicity that makes for in a working relationship is no good if it bursts out. (remember this is a commission who knows little just yet about rugby league running, by their own admission)….
I honestly think it was purely – alone – the bad vibe between Gallop and Grant. Sure, thats no good for any organisation, BUT after just 4 months? I think Gallop was hard done by, but maybe Grant has other ideas about that – and about what he truly would want in a CEO.
Fine, be that as it may….but Gallop was a 10 year veteran, and it seems the commission has just stomped on him!
Interesting, and midly infuriating when considered in isolation; though I wonder how Gallop must feel, and/or would reveal when the dust has cleared.
Love to see a book about his time at NRL HQ. Please.
Thankfully it was only 4 months. For everyone sake. ____
So then today is the day the commission can begin appointing its own man, and they can unleash this new style they are talking about.
If Grant is a dragon, whatever. Lets just hope he gets it right; and I see no reason to suggest why he won’t. Obviously David will go onto brighter things for himself
He wasn’t pushed, so much as forced out, and agreed under the circumstances that “mutually” (by default to create that) it was time to go.
Does not every one consider that in a new job situation? “If its crap, I won’t be hanging around to cop it” people say to me. “So you should.” I reply.
I have faith in Grant. But I am not doing his job, so I can’t say why he would do what he did, but it seems like the right decision however you look at it. Gallop was reactionary to a large degree; I guess they need a guy in there – to their mind – who is more prodding, more flexible, more unwilling to accept no as an answer.
*****To have to make a harsh call, I would never have allowed David to enter this toxic environment….I knew it would be difficult, everyone did in fact; I do not know why they (news ltd) insisted he take the job; to that end, for RL, this is great; as for David, its a pity, but he is the one who can smile and hold his head high. *****
Its all ahead of Grant and his commission. Good luck to one and all. I think we can preserve the faith in all thats gone on. Its obviously for the best of all involved, and hopefully the dream will be realized soon. They need a guy who will climb up and shake down the fruit from the trees rather than waiting for it to drop.
The smh article about it being a war time/peace time thing is very apt; its just the nature of it being carried out I find wrong – and yet, it was all handled fairly professionally to watching eyes. The inner workings being none of our business; even so, its good to see the good of the game being seen to. Though I feel he could have used a full year before review.
David will be the first one to agree that Rugby League is forever, but the flesh is weak. And david has done so much in 10 years, the comp is firing so well, the envy of most other competitions the world over.
David did a lot underneath the bodywork of RL too, sorting out clubs, ect. Everyone has their failings and shortcomings, but David did good for rugby league, and he deserves a round of applause, and he has laid a good foundation. The fall is never as sweet as the climb.
The next guy better climb even higher, because david is proud, and rightly so; this admonishment has come from the game itself, not simply from Grant. Yet it is a sweet farewell, strangely, given the circumstances. His rule over league should be seen for what it is: a trimuph
June 6th 2012 @ 2:36am
Poor Boy Blues said | June 6th 2012 @ 2:36am | Report comment
triumph, correct spelling. That was a triumph in itself. Truly, now the commission can do what it feels it needs to do, and the admonishment from the great game itself (as interpreted by those on the commission) is telling, not of Davids quality, but of the timing for the game. Just remember, I think he was mainly thrown out due to his deteriorating relationship with Grant. Thats apparent to me, probably to everyone by the time the media finishes chewing on this.
So, it was stated at the press conference. Maybe in clear terms, given what I said about allowing david more time; david simply felt that he didn’t want more time. Maybe thats the entire mutuality there. I bet he thought “stick your job”, as one should when weighing up their financial future and happiness. I’d also be saying “the job used to be my own.”
All in all, though, these things aside, the game was seen right yesterday. And gallop should be rightly praised and remembered fondly as possible.
June 7th 2012 @ 11:10pm
Lazy Ted Failyou said | June 7th 2012 @ 11:10pm | Report comment
If I were the new CEO ….
1) Cut back clubs in Sydney to 4. One for the north, the southern, central and eastern and the western. The attendances with the current architecture are not working and crowds reflect that. Crowds should be 25k and up on average.
2) Get the laws of RL looked at, make scrums contested again.
3) shorten the season to reflect the interest from the public to around 18 weeks, same goes for the finals
4) no more salary caps, survival of the fitest
5) restore the Storms premierships
6) get NRL games across 2 or more FTA networks
7) play out of stadiums close to car parks, the population and public transport. Build in great locations.
June 6th 2012 @ 2:55am
Poor Boy Blues said | June 6th 2012 @ 2:55am | Report comment
oops, I left one thing out. Grants control issues. Well, to be short, I have written enough. Thats how the guy rolls. It sounds a lot more like AFL now – guard your secrets! Get onto that task by the close of business today! Have it solved! MAAAKE it happen!!
I don’t think thats how Gallop rolled after 10 years. No, a measured man, not him, if ever.
But maybe, being that neither of the above is necessarily bad, it just means that change is right for now; due to the change being chaotic for one arm of the new ARLC. A new direction being needed…. Having the commission assume control must have been a shock to the system. No wonder he only made it through 4 months.
But thats just the internals ticking over. I guess we all have our little problems with how things work. At the end of the day, Rugby League will end up winning. This commission seems determined to make it happen. The tides have turned for many these past 2 years. I think league is steering its course well; though Gallop had to fall on his sword, a shame, and maybe sad for those who worked under him, to see him go, because we all must look to the horizon and not back.
Turns out the international cricket council was after him. Gallop steers a good ship. I think if league were not so far behind where it should be, he’d be doing this for another 10 years in the form of his own leadership council, not under one himself. BUT that was not his fault.
June 7th 2012 @ 12:47pm
Meesta Cool said | June 7th 2012 @ 12:47pm | Report comment
poor boy, the fact that Rugby league is so far behind, says to me that Gallops methods were not working. The game has been screwed rotten by Ch9 for almost the whole of his CEOship, the contract was written, that they must show games at a reasonable time, — He never made them enforce that rule, in the end it was pressure from Storm fans and the fear of losing RL that made them use their digital channel to show the games and honour their contract. Sorry folks, but David allowed this to happen!..
Maybe because he didn’t care about the rest of Australia. another reason he had to go. running the game to his own agendas was preventing it from progressing, MANY roarers have made this observation over the years and now some of those same critics are saying he has done a good job.. No No No.
June 6th 2012 @ 7:58am
Bellringer said | June 6th 2012 @ 7:58am | Report comment
Don’t worry, the commission will fix everything.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
June 6th 2012 @ 9:53am
Gary Russell-Sharam said | June 6th 2012 @ 9:53am | Report comment
I have long admired David Gallop and his leadership. I wonder out loud if he could take a fairly extended holiday with his family and refresh himself so that he might be courted to take up the position that John O’Neil is vacating with the ARU. I know there will be screams of anguish at this proposal but a CEO is a CEO no matter what code of football eg JON with rugby then with soccer and now back with Rugby. I think he would be a great acquisition for the ARU. Lord knows the ARU need a fresh approach and IMO David Gallop might be just the person to offer that fresh approach.
June 6th 2012 @ 9:57am
A1 said | June 6th 2012 @ 9:57am | Report comment
For all his talk Gus Gould should step up and take the job.
June 7th 2012 @ 12:49pm
Meesta Cool said | June 7th 2012 @ 12:49pm | Report comment
No No No… let him do his job at Penrith, they need to be successful. it will be interesting to see what effect Gus has on that work.
June 6th 2012 @ 10:43am
Gr8trWeStr said | June 6th 2012 @ 10:43am | Report comment
I agree that decoding, “a different style of leadership detached from the past for the next stage of its development.” is the key.
I’m unsure whether it relates to:
– Gallop being too close to News Ltd by other media rights bidders – I think this is most likely.
– Gallop being too closely aligned to existing clubs and their CEO’s, limiting expansion thinking.
– Gallop being seen to be reactionary rather than pro-active.
– A need for new ideas and new vision. 10 years in any position is a long time and very difficult to not become somewhat myopic.
I thought the idea in keeping Gallop when the ARLC came in was for stability and continuity, clearly that is no longer considered necessary.
June 6th 2012 @ 10:56am
Curious said | June 6th 2012 @ 10:56am | Report comment
another aspect worthy of consideration relates to: perhaps it was felt that he had Channel9 in his back pocket or deemed to have as they seem to have been running the show (tv etc).
June 6th 2012 @ 4:59pm
cos789 said | June 6th 2012 @ 4:59pm | Report comment
Also, Gallop was tied to statements he had made in the past – even though the paradigm had changed, he is still tied to the old regime.
June 6th 2012 @ 4:10pm
mushi said | June 6th 2012 @ 4:10pm | Report comment
but the IC is as clsoely aligned to the current clubs as you can get. It is like the chinese poltical appointments
June 6th 2012 @ 6:02pm
Gr8rWeStnr said | June 6th 2012 @ 6:02pm | Report comment
The ‘I’ does stand for ‘Independent’ so it isn’t supposed to be aligned with the clubs even though they helped choose the commissioners.
The key issue is, would he have been willing to do the ‘hard sell’ to existing clubs on expansion?
June 6th 2012 @ 11:32am
turbodewd said | June 6th 2012 @ 11:32am | Report comment
Some challenges the NRL must address:
poor TV ratings in Syd when compared to Bris
poor NRL crowds across the board, theyve barely moved compared to 2005…and Australia’s pop has increased
expansion – is it a national sport or a Sydney comp with some add-ons? Does it want to be national?
June 6th 2012 @ 12:13pm
Jason Cave said | June 6th 2012 @ 12:13pm | Report comment
I reckon David Gallop has probably the hardest job of the 4 CEOs running the major football codes in Australia-AFL, rugby league, rugby union and soccer.
Trying to appease both the News Ltd people and the ARL traditionalists who are still dirty over the Super League war is not an easy thing to do. And remember, Gallop was part of the News Ltd legal team when it first took on the ARL in court during the Super League legal battle.
In regards to Gallop’s replacement, would the ARLC decide to go ‘back to the future’ and appoint John Quayle as the new CEO?
Or would they appoint someone from outside rugby league?
June 6th 2012 @ 5:09pm
The Bush said | June 6th 2012 @ 5:09pm | Report comment
I reckon Buckley and JON wouldn’t mind having the NRL’s “problems” (huge TV rates, thriving, 100 year old competitions with representative football that stops half the country…)
June 6th 2012 @ 5:11pm
turbodewd said | June 6th 2012 @ 5:11pm | Report comment
Outside of RL would be best. The DNA pool in RL circles is very shallow and full of groupthink and blinkered ideas. I mean the NRL should be bigger than the AFL in many ways…it has so much potential!!!
June 6th 2012 @ 12:32pm
p.Tah said | June 6th 2012 @ 12:32pm | Report comment
Grant discussing his role as CEO at Data#3
“John Grant admits that he is ‘absolutely tenacious’, a quality that may owe something to his career playing a game he describes as ‘pure confrontation’—John played rugby league for Queensland and Australia. With such a background, his sentiments about leadership are unsurprising, ‘if the CEO can’t lead the process of innovation’ John says, ‘then I don’t know who can.’
Perhaps he didn’t think Gallop was innovative enough.
http://www.innovation.gov.au/Industry/IndustryInnovationCouncils/Documents/InnovationProfiles/grant.html
June 6th 2012 @ 1:01pm
Poor Boy Blues said | June 6th 2012 @ 1:01pm | Report comment
gallop went from being in charge to taking orders. it was never going to work out well. it was the right call to move on.