How to improve the greatest game of all
The NRL video referees are back under scrutiny (AAP Image/Chris Hyde)
Related coverage
Rugby League is a passion of mine and has been for as long as I can remember. I had the pleasure of playing the game from the age of five up to 17 and my on-field feats have stood the test of time, at least in my own mind.
Nowadays, as I am approaching a mid-life crisis, I marvel at the way the game has developed into one of the globe’s most respected and physically demanding contests.
The game will always have its critics. Fans of other codes will always want to knock rugby league, but many don’t take the chance to understand the game before they knock it.
I love rugby league, the collisions, the pace and the skill demonstrated in the modern game is breathtaking. There are so many attributes and good things the game has going for it. However, there are also areas that I’m sure many other lovers of the game have a reason to gripe about.
Even though I love rugby league, I do think there are areas where it could be improved. Some of these are:
1) Mid-season transfers
The game is a profession nowadays and players have the right to take care of themselves as best they can. Loyalty is not a term of endearment in any profession. The career span of a player is short. Notwithstanding that, it is difficult to accept a player can be committed to his team mates and jersey when he is focused on where he may be playing next season, next month or next week. Perhaps a transfer window deadline could be considered.
2) Scheduling of games
The Brisbane Broncos played a good portion of their early 2012 games consecutively on Friday nights. This allowed them consistency in their preparation for each week, a considerable advantage. Whereas other teams had to back up from Monday night games and play on Saturday, etc.
In addition and more importantly, the scheduling during the representative season is a dog’s breakfast. Teams who provide the bulk of rep players are often disadvantaged with byes during this period. It’s been mentioned constantly, however I firmly believe that representative matches should be standalone fixtures. If you disagree, have a look at the NRL crowd numbers the weekend after an Origin game.
3) Refereeing decisions
This gripe harps way back to when that Pommy bloke picked up the soccer ball in England and started to run and palm his chasers in the face. The video referee is in my opinion necessary for the game. The use of the video referee, though, needs to be refined. No penalties for head shots which should be the responsibility of the on field referees.
This will discourage players from lying down when there has been contact with the head. The on-field referees need to also be accountable for making decisions in the first instance rather than rely on the bloke upstairs. More often than not, the on field ref is in the best position and close enough to make a call on a try, however lacks the conviction to do so.
4) Scrums
Are they worth persisting with? They are no longer a genuine contest. The benefits are an opportunity for the attacking team; however it is hard to adjust seeing fullbacks packing in the second row, front rowers feeding the ball in the scrum and so on. They seem to be a debacle and a bit of a blight on the game.
5) Expansion
The wounds are still raw for many Bears and Jets fans and I can’t recall speaking to too many excited Steelers, Magpies, Saints and Tigers fans for clubs who have merged. There is a certain purity I believe when traditional clubs oppose each other, in front of their parochial followers.
While the game has broadened its horizons in places like Queensland and Melbourne, we need to consider at what cost. A lot of life long supporters have given the game away in recent years due to mergers or altogether axing’s of their teams
There are a multitude of changes and enhancements possible for the game; they are debated regularly on footy shows and in print. For instance there is the current Origin eligibility and among others interchange rules, 40/20′s etc.
On balance, the game itself has never been more exciting and breathtaking to watch. It is a great way to spend a Saturday night snuggled up next to a meat pie and a cold tinny.
But, Roarers, over to you. What would you like to see improved in the NRL?
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby League articles
- How to increase crowd numbers in the NRL (180)
- How rugby league should expand (132)
- All I am saying is give Pearce a chance (123)
- Why do NRL fans love empty seats? (115)
- Let me tell you why people don’t like Manly (103)
- Ease up on ASADA: NRL boss (90)
- It’s time for Channel Nine to get serious about the NRL (88)
- Newcastle Knights vs Canterbury Bulldogs: NRL Live scores, blog (89)
- Cronulla Sharks vs Canberra Raiders: NRL live scores, blog (100)
- Give Dugan time before elevating his star again (11)
- Farah calls for unity at Wests Tigers (5)
- Dragons hail superstar Dugan (9)
- Roosters hold off Cowboys 12-8
- Sorry Warriors cop record NRL thrashing (19)
- Newcastle Knights vs Canterbury Bulldogs: NRL Live scores, blog (89)
- Cronulla Sharks vs Canberra Raiders: NRL live scores, blog (100)
- North Queensland Cowboys vs Sydney Roosters: NRL live scores, blog (91)
- Penrith Panthers vs New Zealand Warriors: NRL live scores (10)
- St George Illawarra Dragons vs Parramatta Eels: NRL Live scores, Blog (85)
- Albert Kelly should be the Blues’ number six (29)
- Cowboys discover the NRL is no country for old men (32)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- NRL, Rugby League, State Of Origin

June 21st 2012 @ 1:52am
Rabbi said | June 21st 2012 @ 1:52am | Report comment
Top article. The current scrum is ridiculous. Having said that I’m not sure where to go with it. I don’t think the RU model is right for league, and I don’t think we can go back to the old league scrum last seen in the 80s, but I would love to see an opposed scrum with a contest for the ball. With two refs on the field, surely they can oversee a scrum? Expansion is another interesting topic. We must preserve our heritage. I can’t see too many dyed in the wool supporters wanting to see a plastic construct such as the Brisbane bombers come in at the expense of a traditional club. Expansion must be balanced against defending the heartlands of the game. We should never see what happened to the bears ever again.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
June 21st 2012 @ 5:22pm
Fat Man said | June 21st 2012 @ 5:22pm | Report comment
Don’t call it a scrum it’s a group hug. With all the heavy hitting and aggression it is nice to have a group hug after someone drops the ball.
June 21st 2012 @ 11:07pm
Recalcitrant said | June 21st 2012 @ 11:07pm | Report comment
Change the laws to become in line with the IRB.
June 21st 2012 @ 3:15am
Knight Vision said | June 21st 2012 @ 3:15am | Report comment
Couldnt disagree with this statement more ” Loyalty is not a term of endearment in any profession ” . Loyalty is a term of endearment in any walk of life. It is in fact one of the very foundations of character that is worth more than money. Sure it is certainly not common but this only increases its value. In life its one of the few things that you take with you to the grave. Call me old school but if you have no loyalty you have nothing.
June 21st 2012 @ 10:25am
JazzyJase said | June 21st 2012 @ 10:25am | Report comment
Hi Knight Vision,
Thanks for your response and mate i could not agree with you more.
I have been with my current employer 24 years….maybe you and i both are dinosaurs in that regard.
Perhaps i didn’t convey as well what i was trying to achieve regardign loyalty. Simply, the days of one club players are becoming less common which i feel is a great shame. When i see players being forced out of clubs through business decisions or chasing more money i think that is a shame for the fans of that club.
For this reason, i applaud players such as Luke Burt, Hindy, Gallen, Minichello and co who stick through thick and thin
Jazzy
June 21st 2012 @ 11:01pm
Knight Vision said | June 21st 2012 @ 11:01pm | Report comment
absolutely , clubs should through way of salary cap concessions be rewarded for nurturing young junior talent and keeping them. Players sourced outside the clubs junior pool should count higher in the cap. I personally don’t want a lot of outside talent in my team , I want to go and watch the local boys serving it up and cheer them on. I understand they need to make hay while the sun shines and go for the dollar but we really do need to be able to offer them the incentive to stay loyal and give the clubs the ability to stay loyal to them.
June 21st 2012 @ 3:16am
mark melville said | June 21st 2012 @ 3:16am | Report comment
what happened to the bears will happen again. its just simple economics. in 100 years i bet the make up of the NRl will be completely different
June 21st 2012 @ 8:25am
Crosscoder said | June 21st 2012 @ 8:25am | Report comment
There is one change I want to see,and I have harped on it before.It revolves around the 6th tackle and the predictabilty of the kick.
I call it the bonus running option play:the BRO
The game retains the 6 tackle format with a variance ,if the attacking teams so chooses .
It works this way,the attackers are given a bonus two tackle running option only(no kicking).In effect they have 8 tackles in attack to ,work planned moves ,or tire the defence giving them better scoring opportunities..
The ref signals on the 5th tackle as per usual,and the team can either kick on the 6th tackle to gain valuable ground,or opt to try the running option,meaning they are running it only, on the 6th 7th and 8th tackle.
If they are tackled on the 8th ,it’s a handover.They cannot kick on the 7th and 8th.
IMO it reduces dramatically the routine bomb on the 6th tackle especailly within the defence’s quarter.It gives the attack the chance to work moves within that tackle spectrum,it tires the defence,it reduces the number of injuries incurred when players are tackled taking the bomb.It creates uncertainty both for the defence and the spectators,excitement,reduces the number of handovers and or scrums.
It brings back the opportunity for creative players to exhibit their skills more often.Andrew Johns would have had a ball.it brings back the little guys as a force.More backline plays.
Now we just have to train refs to count to 8.
June 21st 2012 @ 10:28am
JazzyJase said | June 21st 2012 @ 10:28am | Report comment
great points. The number of tries being scored from bombs is becoming predictable. nowadays the emphasis seems to be on getting in a position after 5 tackles for an ‘attacking kick’. the BRO thought would encourage more flair and creativity
June 21st 2012 @ 3:02pm
Luke M said | June 21st 2012 @ 3:02pm | Report comment
Mate they should ban tapbacks on bombs. If you don’t catch a ball and ground it, NO TRY!!! If you dont strip it from the opposition catcher and score without dropping it, NO TRY!!!!
They also need to get rid of the Inglis Origin rule that DCE scored from on the weekend. The defending team should be allowed to play at the ball, but as sson as control is lost and the ball comes lose it is play stopped, 10m scrum for the attacking team. If Farah played at the ball, Inglis should get no reward for being too stupid to ground a football from a metre off the ground.
June 21st 2012 @ 9:06pm
Mantis said | June 21st 2012 @ 9:06pm | Report comment
On the point of kicking, I am sick of teams thumping it long over the dead ball line to nullify attacking fullbacks such as slater, hayne, bowen etc… If the ball is kick from inside the 20 and goes dead (i.e a grubber or attacking kick), fair enough, 20m tap. but from anywhere outside the 20 (or a determined distance out, maybe 20 is too close), then a different result should occur. whether it is as simple as a tap from the 30m line, or as extreme as the rule they use in Union, being the team gets the ball from where it was kicked. It would encourage more exciting play by getting rid of the long pointless kicks.
June 21st 2012 @ 8:51am
Zippa said | June 21st 2012 @ 8:51am | Report comment
Great article. What I would like to see is more time and effort spent developing the international game. We already have the best club competition and state of origin. Now we should focus on the international game.
There are so many countries that have now taken up RL however whenever international RL is mentioned it seems to bring out nothing but negativity.
June 21st 2012 @ 10:29am
JazzyJase said | June 21st 2012 @ 10:29am | Report comment
i’m on your side. Wouldn’t it be great to see the Polynesian countries develop into powerhouses. PNG obviously love the game and Lebanon are big contributors also.
June 21st 2012 @ 2:19pm
Millz said | June 21st 2012 @ 2:19pm | Report comment
Jazzy, do Lebanon have their own comp?
Fair enough, there is a large majority of league players with Lebanese ancestry but as to having a comp in Lebanon soil?
June 21st 2012 @ 2:50pm
League fan said | June 21st 2012 @ 2:50pm | Report comment
Millz yes they do have a domestic RL competition in Lebanon. It is also played in a few high schools and universities. Lebanon only just missed on qualifing for the next RL world cup. They beat Serbia, Russia and drew with Italy but missed out as Italy had a better points for and against. Very unlucky.
June 21st 2012 @ 3:49pm
JazzyJase said | June 21st 2012 @ 3:49pm | Report comment
A link below re Lebanon Rugby League
The comp is apparently of a reasonable quality and as League fan above says, unlucky not to have the Cedars represented in next World Cup
http://www.lebrl.com/
June 21st 2012 @ 3:54pm
bjt said | June 21st 2012 @ 3:54pm | Report comment
How can the NRL possibly justify focusing attention on the International version of the game when they haven’t secured the national version yet?
If they want that “N” to be taken seriously, that has to be the first goal.
International is the ultimate goal of course, but it’s got to be the last phase. You’ve got to build the foundations first. The NRL’s got to have Australia conquered first, before it can take on the world.
I would rather they spent millions on a Tasmanian team, before trying to arrange promotional matches in the US or other such folly.
They talk that NZ is ripe for a second team, but what is NZ doing for rugby league? They don’t even have a serious domestic/national comp (6 or so rounds is not serious).
WA does, and they don’t have a team in the NRL. The NRL has got to stop reading the Sydney press for their ideas and start rewarding where its due and where it isn’t implement the plan to develop!
June 21st 2012 @ 8:54am
Lachlan said | June 21st 2012 @ 8:54am | Report comment
I love the argument that says that the top teams are disadvantaged by having too many good players that they lose to rep teams but I still can’t bring myself to feel sorry for them. Still, if you are going to have a whip round to raise some money to buy the Storm and Broncos some flowers or a card, I’ll throw a couple of dollars in.
June 21st 2012 @ 9:26am
kovana said | June 21st 2012 @ 9:26am | Report comment
“I had the pleasure of playing the game from the age of five up to 17 and my on-field feats have stood the test of time, at least in my own mind.”
I loved this comment!
June 21st 2012 @ 9:36am
roarr said | June 21st 2012 @ 9:36am | Report comment
Fixed Schedule needs to come in next year. Its ridiculous that Ch 9 and Foxtel get to choose what night of the weekend we play.
And I agree with the origin series destroying the comp for about 6-8 weeks. It’s now a bit of a strategy to get through the 3 phases of the season and kudos to those who come out the other side well… but with the hard salary cap, you aren’t allowed to have quality depth. So the two NRL policies are kind of butting each other in the heads unitl one budges.
Scrums are fine, not worth the hassle to change them.
Expansionists can settle down a little bit. Maybe Perth… but theres no real rush is there? Nothing wrong with the teams we have now!
June 21st 2012 @ 10:35am
Will Sinclair said | June 21st 2012 @ 10:35am | Report comment
I’d be looking to change the interchange rules, which are a blight on the game.
If you’re in doubt – look at State of Origin. The fastest and most physical contest the game can offer, and yet some blokes are playing 5 or 10 or 15 minutes alone.
The top players don’t need a rest.
Reduce the interchange and watch the game open up.
June 21st 2012 @ 10:37am
Will Sinclair said | June 21st 2012 @ 10:37am | Report comment
“I marvel at the way the game has developed into one of the globe’s most respected and physically demanding contests.”
Hate to be a Negative Nellie but… seriously, 95% of the World’s population (and I think I’m being conservative there) would never have even heard of rugby league.
June 21st 2012 @ 10:50am
Zippa said | June 21st 2012 @ 10:50am | Report comment
Will 95% of the world not know what rugby union is so what is your point. The people that do know RL will know RL is the toughest most physically demanding team sport on earth. If you want proof watch state of origin game 3.
June 21st 2012 @ 11:43am
Titus said | June 21st 2012 @ 11:43am | Report comment
Why would it be any more respected than Rugby or NFL as the toughest sport on earth? Or UFC for that matter.
June 21st 2012 @ 11:58am
League fan said | June 21st 2012 @ 11:58am | Report comment
Titus as Zippa said just watch state of origin game 3. Rugby and NFL are tough sports as well but they are much slower and more stop start. State of origin is played at a speed and intensity that is second to none.
June 21st 2012 @ 9:11pm
Mantis said | June 21st 2012 @ 9:11pm | Report comment
Union is more stop start then league? In league, the ball literally is dead at the end of every tackle, then gets restarted once the ball is played. Union may have more penalties and stoppages, but when the ball is in play it is always alive.
June 21st 2012 @ 9:55pm
Col Quinn said | June 21st 2012 @ 9:55pm | Report comment
Alive? I have never seen a ball with a pulse in RU. The latest figures I saw foe Super Rugby was that the ball was “alive” for only 35 mins in 80 mins. CPR needed her Mantis. In RL the ball is breathing with a pulse for 60 mins out of 80 mins. League needs more competition for the balls, competition brings variety. Not so much competitive scrums but bring back the defensive teams right to strike for the ball in the play the ball.
June 21st 2012 @ 10:56pm
Queensland's Game Is Rugby League said | June 21st 2012 @ 10:56pm | Report comment
A rugby union ball spends most of its time at the bottom of a ruck, in the scrumhalves’s hands while a scrum is being set, and in the hands of the hooker before a line out. It spends a fair bit of time on the scrumhalves’ boot and on a kicking tee.
Rarely does the ball get in the hands of a runner charging at the line. Even rarer for it to be in a centre’s hands during a genuine attacking play. Seeing it passed along the backline in a genuine attack raid is like searching for a near extinct species in the bush. The crowd members in the front rows along the sideline probably get to handle the ball more often than the centres.
June 21st 2012 @ 9:11pm
Mantis said | June 21st 2012 @ 9:11pm | Report comment
Who ever mentioned union?