New Orleans Hornets end turbulent NBA era (part two)
By Nick Jungfer, 2 Jul 2012 Nick Jungfer is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- Anthony Davis, Chris paul, NBA, New Orleans Hornets
We continue with our look at the New Orleans Hornets’ recent turbulent past, from part one last week.
During the lockout, the Hornets undertook a highly ambitious campaign called “I’m In.” Due to not being able to market the players because of the lockout, the Hornets instead marketed the city. They reminded people that New Orleans is a special city and that the Hornets are a big part of its identity and rebuilding process. The idea was that if you’re in for the team, you’re in for the city.
The campaign was unique, ambitious and aggressive. It included a program called “100 events in 100 days”. These events were hosted around the city and at people’s houses. They involved top members of the Hornets’ front office, led by team president Hugh Weber, who got out into the community and connected with thousands of people.
The campaign as a whole was a staggering success. As well the enormous amount of good will achieved, the Hornets sold 4000 season tickets despite the lockout. Hardly anyone else was selling any tickets at all. Not to mention all the uncertainly surrounding whether Chris Paul and the team as a whole would stay. It was an astounding effort with an astounding result.
Hugh Weber, who was recently relieved of his duties so that Tom Benson could implement his own people, was a big part of what made, and makes, the Hornets so special off the court.
He was aware that he would be out of a job when new ownership came in. He knew this for over a year. He could have coasted his way through his final year as the Hornets struggled on court, done the bare minimum and knocked off early each day. Instead, he went above and beyond to ensure the franchise he knew would soon cut him loose would be in the best possible position in the future.
To give you an idea of what Weber is like, he would receive voicemail from concerned and sometimes almost crazed fans about things like trades, and he’d return their calls. The rest of the staff are equally personable and hard working. It’s symbolic of what the Hornets are about, accessibility, connecting with their fans.
The Hornets had a predicably rough season on the court in 2011/12. Not only were they without Chris Paul and David West, but injuries tore the team apart.
The following is the number of games some of the Hornets’ best players missed in this 66-game season.
Eric Gordon – 57
Emeka Okafor – 39
Jason Smith – 26
Trevor Ariza – 25
Carl Landry – 25
Jarrett Jack – 21
Greivis Vasquez – 20
Chris Kaman – 19
This resulted in the Hornets having a total of 22 players suit up for them, in a league where the roster maximum for any one time is 15, including three emergencies who aren’t in uniform on game night.
This included nine temporary players on 10-day or other short-term contracts. Jeff Foote, Solomon Jones, Donald Sloan, DaJuan Summers, Darryl Watkins, Jerome Dyson and a trio of Johnsons – Carldell, Chris and Trey – all suited up and played significant minutes. Most people would never have heard of any of these nine gentlemen.
Not only did the Hornets play 22 players throughout the season, they played 28 different starting line-ups. The Hornets finished last in the west with a record of 21-45, tied with Cleveland for the third-worst record in the league behind Charlotte and Washington.
The Hornets became one of the favourite whipping boys along with the Bobcats for ignorant national media outlets and fans. People looked at the standings and nothing more, forgetting if it wasn’t for injuries the Hornets would have a starting line-up of Jack, Gordon, Ariza, Landry and Okafor with players like Vasquez and Kaman coming off the bench. Instead, they were forced to trot out starting line-ups which almost entirely consisted of young players and D-Leaguers.
Seemingly every week another injury occurred, and whenever someone returned, another bowed out shortly after. I usually hate playing the injury card, but this was just ridiculous. Never before have I seen a team as injury ravaged as the 2011/12 Hornets.
Despite the grim results on court, a multitude of great things started happening off it, resulting in an extremely bright future for the organisation. At the end of the regular season, in April, the Hornets finally got an owner. New Orleans businessman Tom Benson purchased the team for $338 million. Benson beat out a consortium headed by Raj Bhathal, a swimwear manufacturer from LA.
Benson won Stern and the NBA over when he told them he was the only one they could trust to keep the team in New Orleans long-term. Benson is from New Orleans and owns the city’s NFL team, the New Orleans Saints (which, as a matter of fact, he turned from a perennial loser into a Superbowl-winning powerhouse).
There was little to no chance LA-based Raj Bhathal was going to keep the Hornets in New Orleans long term. Benson knew this, and let it be known to Stern.
Benson buying the team also activated a lease agreement which was constructed prior to the sale. The lease included many fantastic elements for the Hornets. There was a deal to keep the team in New Orleans through to 2024, with no escape clauses (so no more attendance benchmarks). There was a $50 million upgrade for New Orleans Arena, and $10m for additional improvements or practice facilities. The lease also resulted in New Orleans being awarded the 2014 NBA-All Star Weekend.
All the uncertainly hanging over the head of the organisation and every fan was suddenly gone. Not only had the negatives been removed, but they’d be replaced with some unexpected positives. This sale and signing of the lease was the turning point for the Hornets.
The good news didn’t stop there. On May 30 2012, at the NBA Draft Lottery, the Hornets won the number one pick despite having a 13.7% chance of doing so. Wild scenes of celebration broke out across New Orleans. Consensus number 1 draft pick and future star Anthony Davis was all but guaranteed to become a Hornet.
It should be noted that instead of being hounded by laughable conspiracy theorists, David Stern should be commended for not only the outstanding job he has done as commissioner and making the NBA what it is today, but also for what he’s done in New Orleans.
Without Stern taking the unprecedented step of buying the team and waiting until a local owner stepped forward, there is absolutely no chance there would still be professional basketball in New Orleans today. He saved basketball in a city where he knew it would flourish once again.
Just one season the Hornets had attendance benchmarks, no owner, no star player, an average roster, limited space to sign free agents, a poor TV deal, a lot of negative media attention, and a strong chance of leaving New Orleans.
A season later, they have two star players in Davis and Gordon, along with the #10 pick, a good young roster, and a great coach in Monty Williams – a man whose teams play hard for him, not to mention with an unbelievable defence. Dell Demps has proven himself to be a very shrewd GM. New owner Benson is a local with a proven track record – just ask New Orleans Saints fans.
The team will stay in New Orleans long term, with an upgraded arena, an All Star weekend, a much improved TV deal, new arena naming rights on the way, 10,000 season ticket holders with more to follow the Davis signing, and a huge amount of cap space freed by Dell Demps to sign major free agents in coming years.
The New Orleans Hornets story is a truly remarkable one. The organisation went through a complete transformation in one season, and now has one of the brightest futures in the league.
Less than 12 months ago, New Orleans fans didn’t even know if the team would be staying in town. Now they now have so much to look forward to.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Other Sports articles
- You can’t trust your sport to self-regulate (23)
- Nadal, Serena affirm favouritism for French Open (14)
- Cheap Seats Podcast: episode two (14)
- Durant is a superhero, but not super enough (13)
- Can boxing great Pacquiao return to his former self? (12)
- Protecting sport or an infringement of human rights? (12)
- Will Mayweather vs Pacquiao happen? (11)
- The significance of Steven Bradbury’s winter triumph, 11 years on (4)
- The endless talent that is Stephen Curry
- Lowndes leads way in V8s’ US debut
- Spain 2013: McLaren plays it safe (3)
- NFL off-season outlook: AFC North (6)
- Will Mayweather vs Pacquiao happen? (11)
- Swim team wounds all but healed: Missile (4)
- The significance of Steven Bradbury’s winter triumph, 11 years on (4)
- The endless talent that is Stephen Curry (0)
- Spain 2013: McLaren plays it safe (3)
- NFL off-season outlook: AFC North (6)
- Will Mayweather vs Pacquiao happen? (11)
- ‘Wild’ Will willing: Tomlinson targets American assault (8)
- Durant is a superhero, but not super enough (13)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Anthony Davis, Chris paul, NBA, New Orleans Hornets

July 2nd 2012 @ 8:43am
mushi said | July 2nd 2012 @ 8:43am | Report comment
I’m worried for NOLA with Gordon. He’s going to get a max offer from somewhere but do the Hornets have the finical backing to support a player like him on a max contract?
He’s an efficient slasher that is a decent defender. Whilst certainly room for upside max money contracts are doled out to quickly to above average players, especially scorers, and can hamstring the future of the team.
Give him a max contract and you’re saying the plan is long term to have him as one of your best two guys. Unless you’ve got three other Gordon “level” guys, which will be tough to afford if you max out Eric, I’m just not seeing how you construct the team without a few more slices of luck in the draft.
That said I like Gordon, (soft spot for Indiana for no real reason), I just think over paying a scorer is going to be the first step of the road to 6th seed purgatory.
July 2nd 2012 @ 11:37am
Ryan O'Connell said | July 2nd 2012 @ 11:37am | Report comment
Whilst I’m always a firm believer in the notion that you’re worth what someone is willing to pay you – and therefore don’t begrudge Gordon getting a max contract if someone offers it to him – he’s not a max contract player.
He could very easily be the second best player on a championship level team, but if he’s your best player, then you’re stuck in no man’s land. Not good enough to win the title, not good enough to win the lottery.
July 2nd 2012 @ 12:57pm
Reece Jordan said | July 2nd 2012 @ 12:57pm | Report comment
I second mushi’s point. I don’t think Gordon is max. contract player. He’s a great scorer and could be a key part of a championship team, but you may have another Joe Johnson-like contract if you max him out and he busts. C’mon New Orleans! You have Anthony Davis! Don’t screw this up from here!
July 2nd 2012 @ 6:25pm
Nick Jungfer said | July 2nd 2012 @ 6:25pm | Report comment
mushi and Reece Jordan – Bare in mind that max deals aren’t the same for every player. It depends how many years the player has played in the league and a few other factors in certain cases. The max for Gordon is around $75m/5yrs, he couldn’t be offered an 100M/5yr deal that Amare got.
mushi I think you’re under selling Gordon. He’s an elite defender, a force at getting to the ring and has a good stoke from outside. I do share your injury concerns, as do most people. If it wasn’t for his injury history, I think the Hornets would give him $75m/5yrs without hesitating. All indications so far are that they’re going to roll the dice and match any offer.
I agree that Gordon is the 2nd best player on a championship team Ryan, if Davis becomes everything he’s predicted to be he’ll overtake Gordon and become the franchise guy, an interesting event in itself.
July 3rd 2012 @ 8:48am
mushi said | July 3rd 2012 @ 8:48am | Report comment
Well aware of how the max deals work and are dependent on years in the league.
First on under/over selling Gordon – I think you are over selling him. Yes he gets to the basket and that is his shinning quality and what he’s great at. This si what makes him an above average palyer.
But shooting and D? His shot is average for a 2 guard with 80% FT shooting and 37% ish from deep.
And as a defender yes he’s an above average man on man defender, with the ability to get better using his strength, but he has never posted a beneficial defensive +/- number in his career suggesting that his team defence has been a negative.
He’s also a below average rebounder and passer for the position. So what you’ve got is a 2 guard who takes very little off the table, will probably need a good distributing PG to play alongside and is a definite plus as your scoring wing. To me I struggle to see how that is worth 25% of your cap space.
If he is your second best player you are at a minimum going to need two other “plus” players rounding out behind him and Davis.
That will be difficult without going into tax territory given you eventually will have circa 50% of your cap tied between Davis and Gordon. (which will go to 60% if you want to keep it in tact)
Look at the math like this if we assume the cap is circa 60m of today’s dollars and the luxury tax circa 70m then you’ve got around 31m to fill out fill out 3 through 8 in your rotation (after paying for an average 5 year vet to fill the other spots at 1.3m a clip) before heading into tax territory.
That means the rest of your rotation has to be filled with mid level players (5.15 average). This si where you hit major problems as you still need at least a second tier PG (assuming the top is Rondo, Rose, Paul, Williams, Westbrook). These guys, unless on their last legs, cost a lot more than the mid level.
So essentially you need to either keep hitting max value in the draft or pay tax to put together a roster that is going to be anything other than a perenniel low seed
July 3rd 2012 @ 9:41am
mushi said | July 3rd 2012 @ 9:41am | Report comment
My apologies got the vet minimum wrong (used wrong year) you will have 5.5 per player 3 to 8
July 3rd 2012 @ 9:59pm
Nick Jungfer said | July 3rd 2012 @ 9:59pm | Report comment
While we’re going to have to agree to disagree about exactly how good Gordon is (I did read your argument and numbers), I agree that the Hornets could really hurt themselves down the line if they give Gordon the max. If he keeps getting injured it obviously really kills them, but even if there was some magical guarantee he wouldn’t, I’d still be wavering. Like I said I have a feeling the Hornets wouldn’t be, in that case.. but I would because if you look at the teams who gave max deals to players who arent ‘best on a championship team’ players – they’re regretting it now and trying to dump those contracts. It’s so hard to not keep a really good player when you can match anything. However, with Gordon’s value around the league seeming to be high, if they can find a good sign and trade deal it’s probably best for the future.
July 4th 2012 @ 2:31pm
mushi said | July 4th 2012 @ 2:31pm | Report comment
Suns just gave him the max. Hornets will be on the clock next week with a chance to ruin their franchise.
Can’t sign and trade him on a matched offer sheet.
July 6th 2012 @ 10:52pm
Nick Jungfer said | July 6th 2012 @ 10:52pm | Report comment
True, although that still leave option open of signing and trading him elsewhere this season (although Gordon would have veto power) or see how things go this and trade him next season (no Gordon veto power) if they feel that’d be best.
I don’t envy Dell Demps right now.