The best NRL team of the past 20 years: Part one
By Curtis Woodward, 18 Sep 2012 Curtis Woodward is a Roar Guru & Live Blogger
- Tagged:
- Brisbane Broncos, Melbourne Storm, NRL, Rugby League
Melbourne Storm celebrating their teams win over the Manly Sea Eagles. AAP Image/Paul Miller
Related coverage
It is an argument that could quite possibly last forever, depending on which team you support. Over the coming week I am going to try and work out just who was the greatest premiership side of the last twenty years.
After finding one side from the 1990s and a side from the new millennium, we will have a fantasy match to find out whom is the greatest. This is going to be fun.
We will start with the 1990s and a showdown between the 1990 Canberra Raiders and the 1999 Melbourne Storm. Two contrasting styles and two very different sides.
The Raiders of the early 90s were as dangerous as any side I have ever seen.
This is when The Green Machine was truly a juggernaut and everyone feared their attacking ability. From fullback Gary Belcher to the monstrous Mal Meninga. Laurie Daley to Ricky Stuart and a forward pack that boasted Glen Lazarus, Steve Walters and Brent Todd.
The Storm played a completely different style. Under Chris Anderson and halfback Brett Kimmorley, Melbourne played flat and fast.
It may have finished with Kimmorley, but it started in the engine room. Captain Lazarus, Stephen Kearney and Tawera Nikau were the guys that got the Storm moving.
Unfortunately for them, the Raiders would have won 22-10 in a canter.
Next up is a clash between the 1997 ARL Champions Newcastle Knights and the 1998 Brisbane Broncos.
There should be plenty of opinion regarding this one considering all the scandal of the mid 1990s. With the competition split in ’97, the Knights and the Broncos won their respective competitions. Brisbane would follow up by winning the inaugural National Rugby League title.
You have to go with the ’98 Broncos. Despite the Knights having the Johns brothers and Paul Harragon, Brisbane were simply too dominant to pass up.
Alan Langer calling the shots behind a giant forward pack that included Gorden Tallis, Shane Webcke, Brad Thorn and Tonie Carroll. A backline with Darren Lockyer, Steve Renouf and Wendell Sailor?
Hate to say it, but Broncos by 28-8.
The next battle is between the 1995 Sydney Bulldogs and the 1993 Broncos.
Terry Lamb’s men did well just to get to the ‘95 decider after a tumultuous year. They then upset the Manly Sea Eagles at the Sydney Football Stadium to win the last Winfield Cup.
But in this contest, they come up against one of the great sides of the modern era.
The ’93 Broncos were littered with Internationals from 1 to 13 and could challenge any side from any era. Langer, Renouf, Kevin Walters, Willie Carne, Michael Hancock, Chris Johns and Julian O’Neill. That’s some kind of backline.
Broncos over the Bulldogs 32-12.
In part two, we will see the 1991 Penrith Panthers v 1994 Canberra Raiders and the 1992 Brisbane Broncos v 1996 Manly Sea Eagles, before revealing who is the greatest side of the 90s.
Sport, all day long. Does this sound too good to be true? We're searching for a Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. If you're a sales star who doesn't mind a hit, kick, throw, or cycle, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby League articles
- How to increase crowd numbers in the NRL (181)
- How rugby league should expand (133)
- All I am saying is give Pearce a chance (123)
- Why do NRL fans love empty seats? (115)
- Let me tell you why people don’t like Manly (107)
- Ease up on ASADA: NRL boss (90)
- It’s time for Channel Nine to get serious about the NRL (90)
- Once were Warriors, now are worriers (0)
- Wests Tigers at sixes and sevens for years (0)
- Listen Blues fans, let’s not kid ourselves (0)
- Pre-season draw sacrifices quality for quantity (0)
- Dave Smith’s crowd plan gaining credibility (0)
- How accurate is the NRL ladder? (0)
- Channel Nine’s Broncos love-in continues to frustrate (0)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Brisbane Broncos, Melbourne Storm, NRL, Rugby League

September 18th 2012 @ 10:15am
Damo said | September 18th 2012 @ 10:15am | Report comment
Im a Dogs fan and I hate to say it but that Broncos side would kill us
September 18th 2012 @ 10:27am
Curtis Woodward said | September 18th 2012 @ 10:27am | Report comment
Taking nothing away from the Bulldogs though. They were struggling as a club on and off the field and had a meeting half way through the year organised by Terry Lamb. Seemed to work because they came from nowhere to win it.
September 18th 2012 @ 2:14pm
Ken said | September 18th 2012 @ 2:14pm | Report comment
Brisbane were far more dominant the year earlier, if I remember rightly (and I’m a Dragons fan so those years kinda stick in the memory a bit), the Broncs came from 5th, in a 5 team finals series, that year to win. I remember in ’92 Saints were just the team that won the right to lose to Brisbane in the GF, ’93 though they were vulnerable.
September 18th 2012 @ 10:19am
betts said | September 18th 2012 @ 10:19am | Report comment
Would knights really have lost by that much?
September 18th 2012 @ 10:21am
Curtis Woodward said | September 18th 2012 @ 10:21am | Report comment
Yes? Knights overachieved when they won in 97 in a split competition .. Broncos were unbeatable in 97 and 98.
September 18th 2012 @ 10:42am
Robert said | September 18th 2012 @ 10:42am | Report comment
Besides the one match that mattered in ’95,the Manly side of that year was incredible.They averaged only 8 or 9 points against a match
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download it now [http://itunes.apple.com/au/app/the-roar/id327174726?mt=8].
September 18th 2012 @ 10:52am
Curtis Woodward said | September 18th 2012 @ 10:52am | Report comment
@Robert .. do you think they were a better side in 1996?
September 18th 2012 @ 11:17am
Andy said | September 18th 2012 @ 11:17am | Report comment
Manly’s defence was better in 96 then 95 and they had better form going into the 96 GF. The team and coach had been in the grandfinal the year before so i think they were better prepared the second time around. So i would say at the time of the finals the 96 side would have beaten the 95 side. The 95 side made 17 errors, and 59 percent completion rate compared to 10 errors and 81 percent completion rate and missing only 21 tackles the the next year.
September 18th 2012 @ 11:20am
betts said | September 18th 2012 @ 11:20am | Report comment
If the Dogs get flogged by brponcos 93 shouldnt eagles 96 get flogged by broncs 92 in part 2?
September 18th 2012 @ 11:26am
Curtis Woodward said | September 18th 2012 @ 11:26am | Report comment
Not necessarily, Eagles had an unbelievable side going through the mid 90′s
September 18th 2012 @ 11:55am
Andy said | September 18th 2012 @ 11:55am | Report comment
The thing about the Manly sides from 93 to 96 they usually beat the broncos at Brookvale but they lost both finals to Brisbane in 93 and 94. 94 the scores were closer. But still it may suggest that the broncos of 92 if they played the Manly 96 side might of had an edge. The Broncos Finished 2nd in the regular season in 96 but they went out of the finals in straight sets and did not get to play Manly in the finals. If they had beaten Manly in the finals again in 96, i think there would be no argument that the 92 Broncos would most likely beat the 96 Manly side. Instead we will never know.
September 18th 2012 @ 12:25pm
Andy said | September 18th 2012 @ 12:25pm | Report comment
However if you want to base the contest purely off season statistics with the 92 Brisbane side being 506 for and 311against in 22 games. Compared to the 96 side which had 549 for and 191 against in 22 games then you would say that backing Manly might be a safer bet.
September 18th 2012 @ 12:30pm
betts said | September 18th 2012 @ 12:30pm | Report comment
Stats or controversy Curtis?
September 18th 2012 @ 12:33pm
Curtis Woodward said | September 18th 2012 @ 12:33pm | Report comment
Thats what part II is for sir.. you can wait :p
September 18th 2012 @ 1:45pm
Eagle1 said | September 18th 2012 @ 1:45pm | Report comment
Flip of a coin job Eagles 96 v Broncos 92 .. I expect a tight score if nothing else!!!
September 18th 2012 @ 2:02pm
Curtis Woodward said | September 18th 2012 @ 2:02pm | Report comment
Probably the hardest to call so far
September 18th 2012 @ 2:46pm
sledgeross said | September 18th 2012 @ 2:46pm | Report comment
Shame its premiership sides, I think the most statistically dominant side in NRL history was Parra in 2001, where I think they just lost the GF to the Knights.
September 18th 2012 @ 2:53pm
Curtis Woodward said | September 18th 2012 @ 2:53pm | Report comment
Lost? They were flogged sir. But yes you are right. They were an awesome side.
September 18th 2012 @ 3:43pm
Andy said | September 18th 2012 @ 3:43pm | Report comment
Year of the fast play the ball Parramatta 2001 for 839 Against 406. Year of the wrestle Melbourne 2007 for 627 Against 277. Year of the first wrestling coach Manly 1996 for 549 against 191. Dont ask me what happened to the first wrestling coach.
September 18th 2012 @ 4:03pm
Curtis Woodward said | September 18th 2012 @ 4:03pm | Report comment
Ripping off a yellow t-shirt in World Championship Wrestling?
September 18th 2012 @ 5:00pm
Go warriors said | September 18th 2012 @ 5:00pm | Report comment
What about the Roosters side from 2002 to 2004. To be in 3 consecutive grand finals during those years when the competition was so even I thought would have been worth a mention.
Very well coached and lead by the great Freddy Fittler.
September 18th 2012 @ 8:54pm
Curtis Woodward said | September 18th 2012 @ 8:54pm | Report comment
Roosters 2002 are coming up
September 18th 2012 @ 6:53pm
Mantis said | September 18th 2012 @ 6:53pm | Report comment
Weve had this debate at the pub a few times, and we always end up with 3 teams: The early 90′s raiders, the late 90′s early 2000′s Broncos and the 2004ish Bulldogs. I am of the opinion that the early 90′s Raiders are the best side I can remember. I could rattle off all the names but im sure you know who they are. My mate reckons they 04 Dogs, saying any team with Asotasi and SBW on the bench is unstoppable (although we do agree that the use of the bench has changed from early 90s until 04). The other side we agree on is the Broncs. Like the Raiders littered with legends.
Havent been able to get any further than that thus far.
September 18th 2012 @ 7:21pm
Andy said | September 18th 2012 @ 7:21pm | Report comment
Didn’t the dogs lose to leeds in the WCC.
September 18th 2012 @ 9:03pm
Curtis Woodward said | September 18th 2012 @ 9:03pm | Report comment
Leeds 39 Bulldogs 32
September 18th 2012 @ 10:27pm
Mantis said | September 18th 2012 @ 10:27pm | Report comment
Cant base it on the WCC. If the Aus teams actually cared about it, it would be a very different story.
September 18th 2012 @ 9:02pm
betts said | September 18th 2012 @ 9:02pm | Report comment
Gotta say early 90s broncos had that raiders side covered.. so im guessing we are going to see broncos vs early 2000s roosters or bulldogs in the fantasy match
September 18th 2012 @ 10:30pm
Mantis said | September 18th 2012 @ 10:30pm | Report comment
I dunno. I thought the late 90s early 2000s broncos were a better side, but maybe thats because I remember more from that time. For any team to be better then the early 90s Raiders though would have to be a cracker of a team. Especially when you look at the Raiders spine (Walters, Stuart, Laurie, Belcher/Mullins), then add to that superstars such as Meninga, Lazarus, Clyde, Furner, Nagus and Nadruku on the wings. Geez it was a good side.
September 18th 2012 @ 11:07pm
Curtis Woodward said | September 18th 2012 @ 11:07pm | Report comment
Broncos 93: O’Neill, Hancock, Renouf, Johns, Carne, Walters, Langer, Lazarus, Walters, Hohn, Gillmeister, Cann, Matterson.
Raiders 90: Belcher, Martin, Meninga, Daley, Ferguson, O’Sullivan, Stuart, Todd, Walters, Lazarus, Gaffey, Coyne, Lance.
Raiders 94: Mullins, Nagas, Meninga, Wiki, Nadruku, Daley, Stuart, Pongia, Walters, Osborne, Furner, Croker, Clyde.
Eagles 96: Ridge, Moore, Innes, Hill, Hopoate, Lyons, Toovey, Gillespie, Serdaris, Carroll, Menzies, Gartner, Kosef.
I’ve 1990 Raiders fourth in that pack.
September 19th 2012 @ 12:09pm
Mantis said | September 19th 2012 @ 12:09pm | Report comment
I think it’d be out of 94 raiders and 93 broncs. from there its a toss up