Free-to-air coverage vital for A-League’s future
By Adrian Musolino, 20 Nov 2012 Adrian Musolino is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- A-League, A-League television rights, FFA, football, Football Federation Australia, Fox Sports, SBS
Roar players celebrate following the A-League season 7 grand final between the Brisbane Roar and Perth Glory (AAP Image/Dave Hunt)
Related coverage
Since the announcement of Football Federation Australia’s four-year, $160 million media rights deal with current host Fox Sports and SBS, the debate that has kicked into life is which is more important, the value or the new partner?
The value, $40 million per season, for some is disappointing as it falls short of expectations and supposed previous bids. But it crucially covers the salary cap for the 10 clubs.
The partnership with SBS is more crucial, because it opens the free-to-air door for a league hidden away on pay television, at a time when it has the momentum to entice a new audience.
SBS’s coverage includes one live Friday night A-League match per week, all finals series matches, including the grand final, Socceroos World Cup qualifiers on an hour delay, and a weekly A-League highlights show in addition to online, radio and mobile rights.
All bases are covered – a live showpiece fixture in a regular and attractive timeslot, a highlights package that will showcase the best of the action and should feature prominently on the network’s schedule, and the finals series and Socceroos matches covered on a slight delay.
Irrespective of the sum, the salary cap is taken care of and it’s now up to the clubs to maximise the increased exposure of additional free-to-air coverage.
A league (and wider code) available to only those with enough disposable income for pay television is now open to those not so fortunate, and a potential new audience more likely to stumble across the coverage and give it a go, as opposed to a sports-only pay television network.
Some will claim the game has merely retreated to its former spiritual home, the home of ‘old soccer’. But it’s crucially a network that will respect the game and give it plenty of love and attention as it’s part of SBS’s fabric.
Super Rugby, the National Basketball League, V8 Supercars and the A-League’s predecessor, the National Soccer League, stand as examples of codes who have, in the past or present, paid the price of commercial free-to-air networks’ cut-throat, unsentimental approach to fringe code sports coverage.
Even if the potential audience is smaller than a Seven, Nine or Ten, who were seemingly never interested in the A-League anyway, the treatment it will receive with live prime-time coverage, only slight delays etc. is far more valuable than being treated as an afterthought elsewhere.
Remember, regardless of the numbers SBS may give away to the commercial networks, its reach far outweighs that of Fox Sports, putting the A-League for the first time in households who have never been exposed to it, at a time when the buzz around the league with star marquees and entertaining and unpredictable football is at an all-time high.
This is the most positive aspect of the new media deal, on top of meeting the requirement for the clubs’ salary caps, for the growth potential is clear.
It’s also an opportunity to do away with any talk the game’s ‘old soccer’ and ‘new football’ divide was reflected in the schism between SBS and Fox Sports.
Now FFA must ensure the money is allocated wisely, with clubs becoming viable propositions for their owners while also enticing potential new investors into the game, particularly if the likes of current club owner Nathan Tinkler are forced to vacate the league.
There are positive noises coming from FFA that expansion is on the backburner and a knockout cup competition remains on the agenda, with David Gallop now in charge and impressing in his early days as the game’s leader.
As for scheduling, FFA must ensure the Friday fixtures become the showpiece event of each round, like the AFL and NRL, in order to maximise the potential of the free-to-air debut. It becomes the A-League’s greatest advertisement.
Whether you believe the deal is strong or not, there can be no denying the game finds itself in a far healthier position than a year ago, when the league seemed to be unravelling as its faulty expansion plans collapsed and faith in the league and governing body was at an all-time low.
With a free-to-air presence added to the current coverage, the league can only grow in exposure and popularity. It’s a win-win.
Adrian Musolino is editor of V8X Magazine, and has written as an expert on The Roar since 2008, cementing himself as a key writer who can see the big picture in sport. He freelances on other forms of motorsport, football, cycling and more.
![]()
Passionate about your football? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily football email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.


November 20th 2012 @ 7:02am
MV Dave said | November 20th 2012 @ 7:02am | Report comment
So from $700,000 for the first HAL rights in season 1 to $120 million over 7 years with no FTA for the second set of rights. Now, if we were to extrapolate over a 7 year period, the new deal would be worth $280 million and has FTA, which adds even more value. The TV deals are certainly heading in the right direction…
As stated previously by others this TV deal will enable a consolidation phase and should HAL remain on an upward trend then expect an even bigger increase in 4 years time. This in term will enable a further planned expansion phase during the next tv deal period. Hopefully Gallop and co are up to the task.
The Friday night games should be the marquee matches of the weekend and this means lots of Derbies and rivalry games…so;
MV vs MH x 3, SFC vs WSW x 3, AU vs MVx 2, CCM vs NJ x 2, CCM vs SFC, NJ vs SFC, BR vs SFC, PG vs BR, AU vs PG off the top of my head. It also means WP should rarely be involved in the Friday night match unless they are playing in a top 3-4 game ie match of the round.
Watching on FTA should give the viewer the optimal HAL experience…big and noisy crowd with lots of color and few empty seats. You cannot guarantee the quality and excitement of one game but you can ensure the atmosphere will be worthy of a FTA showing.
Anyway congratulations to BB and co who have ensured the HAL is on an upward and onwards direction into the foreseeable future.
November 20th 2012 @ 9:27am
Dave said | November 20th 2012 @ 9:27am | Report comment
That’s actually a point I haven’t seen anything about: Is it on FTA in NZ as well? Doesn’t hurt to keep the game growing there also.
November 20th 2012 @ 11:51am
Kasey said | November 20th 2012 @ 11:51am | Report comment
As a fan I am happy that BB did not take the reported earlier deal of $42m pa IF it did NOT include a FTA component.
FTA (even on SBS) is a landmark achievement for football. In this day and age, today and right now it is good to be a football fan Well done to the true believers who held the faith through the trials of recent years.
November 20th 2012 @ 8:57pm
Fussball Nitwit said | November 20th 2012 @ 8:57pm | Report comment
Well done Ben Buckley!
November 20th 2012 @ 8:04am
Bondy. said | November 20th 2012 @ 8:04am | Report comment
Well written Adrian,
I’m happy with the deal .
November 20th 2012 @ 8:59am
striker said | November 20th 2012 @ 8:59am | Report comment
All good great to see SBS get the free to air rights at least they wont put the games at midnight like the other channels would, they game has never been more healthier in its history lets hope it grows even bigger in four years time.
November 20th 2012 @ 12:02pm
Kasey said | November 20th 2012 @ 12:02pm | Report comment
It’s a minor quibble but once again I found myself shaking my head whilst watching SBS report on the modern domestic game. In the World News Sport report last night, the voice over stated that the new deal of $40m/year is a big improvement over the previous deal that had FFA paying Foxtel $19m/year to broadcast A-League games…wtf??
November 20th 2012 @ 9:35am
Aljay said | November 20th 2012 @ 9:35am | Report comment
I’m not in a position to attend live matches and don’t have Foxtel. I have only ever seen about 3 A-league matches that have been on when I’m in a pub, but would happily watch 1-2 games from home a week. There must be thousands like me without Foxtel – dads with kids, kids who can’t go into a pub, people who don’t have 4 hours a weekend to go to live sport but do have 2 hours to record and watch it and now they can. The A-League will grow massively from here.
The impact of this deal is not just about the $40mil per year for the next 4 years. The exposure from the free-to-air component will let the game speak for itself and the next deal after this will be much, much, much bigger than $40mil per year.
November 20th 2012 @ 2:08pm
Timmuh said | November 20th 2012 @ 2:08pm | Report comment
I don’t have kids, but live three hours (probably four by the time actually getting to a stadium is taken into account) from the nearest team, don’t have Foxtel or Austar and don’t drive; so I’m quite happy to have something on FTA. As someone without a club to support, just hope we get a decent mix of teams on the Friday night and not just get the big clubs (Sydney and Victory) every week.
November 20th 2012 @ 9:43am
Midfielder said | November 20th 2012 @ 9:43am | Report comment
I am glad FFA went for FTA coverage for less money than putting it all on pay… the benefits will come in the next media deal…
November 20th 2012 @ 9:48am
Geordie said | November 20th 2012 @ 9:48am | Report comment
As well as the live Fri night game I’m looking forward to the highlights show. Just hope they opt for the EPL review show format without on screen presenters so it’s all action and not a gab fest like Match of the Day.
November 20th 2012 @ 10:14am
Steve said | November 20th 2012 @ 10:14am | Report comment
Who can tell me about the online viewing component or capacity from this deal? Will FOXTEL have similar to EPLonDemand or ESPN3.com for the A-League? Will SBS do what they currently do with the Champions League and stream the games online concurrently with their FTA Broadcasts?
Cheers
November 20th 2012 @ 10:35am
Fussball ist unser leben said | November 20th 2012 @ 10:35am | Report comment
Steve
I don’t have information about Foxtel’s proposed digital offerings.
But, SBS will provide streaming – via the SBSOnDemand website & SBSOnDemand mobile app – for all the products it owns.
So, SBS’s digital offering will include:
* LIVE streaming of 27 Friday night HAL matches
* 1 hour delayed streaming of all AUS NT competitive matches
* 1 hour delay streaming of all A-League finals
* streaming of the weekly highlights package of A-League
November 20th 2012 @ 10:50am
Steve said | November 20th 2012 @ 10:50am | Report comment
Thanks Fussball. It really is pretty basic stuff getting it online, hopefully Foxtel offer some sort of online package independently.
November 20th 2012 @ 10:42am
Football United said | November 20th 2012 @ 10:42am | Report comment
I hope we don’t go over the top in the search for friday night ratings when scheduling matches. Personally i hate friday night matches because it stops working fans from getting a decent pre game in but there are two more general concerns i have with it.
Fixtures with big away support should be played on saturdays to allow travelling fans, who’s trips are tricky and expensive enough, enough time to get to the match with plenty of time for pre match and home again. Both Adelaide vs MVFC matches are on a friday night which is a horrible time a match that traditionally sees so many fans cross the border to follow their team. Things like Derbies or top of the table clashes are a different matter and much more suitable for Fridays.
My other concern is that many clubs have now generally found their preferred time slots that works for both them and fans. MVFC saturday night, Adelaide Utd Fridays etc. Going all out for ratings and putting types like CCM on a friday night should discouraged due to the large amounts of families who might be unable to attend etc.
November 20th 2012 @ 11:22am
Krasic said | November 20th 2012 @ 11:22am | Report comment
well written. Great article. Love SBS !!
November 20th 2012 @ 12:28pm
SlickAs said | November 20th 2012 @ 12:28pm | Report comment
The next question is which games the FFA will schedule for Friday night. Given that people will be more likely to tune in when their team is playing, if the FFA wants the highest ratings possible it will schedule the 2 teams whom together represent the most supporters. Presumably this will be Sydney and Melbourne teams as a priority.
Last thing we would want to see is a Sydney centric focus as SBS are liable to do at times. But should it be fair? Obviously Wellington will hardly be shown … FFA owes them nothing. But will Brisbane, Perth, Adelaide, Central Coast and Newcastle only be televised when playing a Melbourne or Sydney team. Obviously before the season starts it will be impossible to know who the form teams will be in the coming season.
Food for thought.
November 20th 2012 @ 12:33pm
Fussball ist unser leben said | November 20th 2012 @ 12:33pm | Report comment
The CEO of SBS, Michael Ebeid was interviewed yesterday (video on TWG website).
Ebeid said the Friday night matches would be focused on clubs on “the eastern seaboard” – which is not surprising since this part of the continent has the 3 biggest consumer markets.
Ebeid also quickly added that all clubs would get good exposure, when they travel to play these eastern seaboard clubs.
With 27 matches to broadcast, I can’t see why we can’t have all 9 AUS teams featuring at least 3 times … of course, if MVFC were on every Friday for 27 weeks, I’m sure the FFA, SBS & I would be happy with that
November 20th 2012 @ 3:55pm
Kasey said | November 20th 2012 @ 3:55pm | Report comment
Its not as ominous as it sounds Perth and Adelaide fans, 7 of the 10 clubs are based on the Eastern seaboard(lets not even get into the bun-fight that is QLDers and Daylight savings!)
Wellington are a natural for a few Saturday games as their timezone leands itself well to starting the Soccer Saturday Marathons on Fox.
I dare say Syd & Melb will get the bulk of the home fixtures on a Friday, but with 27 odd rounds to filll, the other teams are sure to feature on a reasonale number of Friday night games.
November 20th 2012 @ 5:04pm
Andyroo said | November 20th 2012 @ 5:04pm | Report comment
The Eastern seaboard must be because they want the same 7:30 or 8:00 pm time slot every week to get people into the habit.
What happens in the AFL? Do the Crows or West Coast ever host Friday night games?
November 20th 2012 @ 5:59pm
Matt F said | November 20th 2012 @ 5:59pm | Report comment
I think the Crows/Power games start at around 7pm local time to fit in with the 1/2 hour time difference. West Coast/Fremantle games on Friday generally start at 8:30 in the Eastern states (6:30 in Perth.)
Perth would be an issue with Friday nights because the extra hour time difference in summer means that even an 8:30 kick-off (AEDT) is a 5:30pm kick off in Perth which could be difficult for fans to get to the game due to work etc. It’s difficult to start the game any later than 8:30 for commercial reasons so while the Glory will probably get one or two Friday games they’ll be away games, unless Foxtel choose to have a few Friday night double-headers, which has happened before.