The Roar
The Roar

AFL
Advertisement

AFL to appeal two-week ban on Houli

28th June, 2017
Advertisement
The AFL has responded to the resignations of Simon Lethlean and Richard Simkiss.
28th June, 2017
40
1019 Reads

The AFL will appeal the two-week suspension handed to Richmond’s Bachar Houli for knocking out Carlton’s Jed Lamb, believing the sanction to be “manifestly inadequate”.

In a ruling on Tuesday night, the AFL Tribunal deemed Houli’s strike on Lamb as intentional and of high impact to the head, but chose to ban him for just two matches.

The appeal will be held on Thursday at 1730 AEST.

AFL football operations manager Simon Lethlean informed Richmond shortly before midday on Wednesday that the AFL was taking the case to the Appeals Board.

Lethlean said the appeal had been lodged on the grounds that “the sanction imposed was manifestly inadequate”.

The AFL had initially argued for a four-week sanction.

The tribunal jury – comprising David Neitz, Hamish McIntosh and Wayne Henwood – dismissed Houli’s argument the incident was careless instead of intentional conduct.

But they sparked outcry when they handed down the two-game sanction, citing Houli’s exemplary character.

Advertisement

References from Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull and media commentator and academic Waleed Aly were a key part of the tribunal’s penalty deliberations.

Match review panel member Nathan Burke criticised the weight the tribunal placed on the character references.

“I would probably much prefer if you just looked purely at the incident and graded it on that,” Burke said on Fox Sports News.

“If you start bringing in ‘this bloke’s a good bloke, this bloke’s not a good bloke’, who are we to actually judge who is a good bloke and who isn’t in the first place?

“And then what we end up with are disparate sentences.

“If somebody goes in next week and does exactly the same thing but doesn’t know Waleed Aly, doesn’t know the prime minister, does that mean they get three or four weeks?”

Former tribunal member Daniel Harford said Houli’s ban was “absolutely, manifestly inadequate” and rubbing him out for six weeks could be considered a fair punishment.

Advertisement

“You cannot have a situation with a player willingly, which was deemed by the tribunal, hitting someone … with force enough to knock someone out cold, to serve a two-week suspension,” Harford said on RSN radio on Wednesday.

The case was referred directly to the tribunal under the match review panel guidelines but the sanction was the same as if it had been assessed as careless conduct with high impact to the head – three games down to two with an early plea.

close