By David Wiseman
October 6th 2008 @ 8:32am
Related coverage
Trade week is much ado about nothing
If AFL Trade Week was a Shakespeare play it would be called Much Ado About Nothing because, while a lot of hype and speculation is generated, not much usually ever happens. And everything which does happen always seems to take place five minutes before the trade deadline.
The first problem with AFL trade week is the attitude of many of the clubs. If you want to receive something of quality you have to be prepared to offer something of quality in return, except of course if you are trading with Fremantle in which case you can do what you want. So there is this brinkmanship which goes back and forth for a week.
Every year the media writes the same articles… “Will the teams with the early picks trade the picks for established names? How deep is the draft?”
They are like the kids at a high school dance who stand on the sidelines waiting to see who is going to dance with whom so they have something to talk about after.
Something which tends to blur the negotiation process is when clubs announce certain players are up for trade or everyone but x is tradable, but this isn’t the case. They just want to scare these players and put them on notice.
A player can return fire but saying he wants to be traded when what he really wants to achieve is a bigger contract.
The major spanner in the works is the big-name off-contract player. This kind of trade can involve more than two teams and can clogs up everything until they are solved after which they cause a domino effect of sorts.
From Anthony Rocca to Brad Ottens to Jeff White and of course Chris Judd. This year it looks to be Ryan O’Keefe. It’s a double whammy for the club they’re leaving. They’re losing a player and they will be lucky to get 80 cents in the dollar for them.
The West Coast Eagles faced this conundrum last year – be prepared to accept Carlton’s good but not great offer or get absolutely nothing in return?
In recent years Swans coach Paul Roos has stunned people with his honesty policy. He wanted Essendon’s Ted Richards for Pick 19 and people thought him mad. In the three years since, Richards has played 70 games while Courtenay Dempsey who was Pick 19 has played 10. Now the Swans have put their hand up for Essendon’s Andrew Lovett.
When it boils down to it trades are completely random especially if one trades for an earlier pick and can only be judged in hindsight.
What if a team trades one of it’s best players for a top three pick in the draft and then the kid they draft does his knee in the pre-season and is out for the year? No one can foresee that.
Cyril Rioli was selected at 12 in last year’s draft and is now a star and a premiership player. Jarrad Grant went seven places before Rioli in the draft to the Western Bulldogs, was stung by a stingray and didn’t play a game all year. That’s how random things are.
It would be good if there were other trade windows opened throughout the course of the season such as the bye week. A club which is having a good season might wish to shore their run by trading a couple of young guns for someone established from another club. It would also give a club the chance to dump an out of favour player instead of waiting a few more months.
Fans complain about the lack of loyalty in sport but come Trade Week they show their true colours. They don’t care about the players – just the uniform. As Jerry Seinfeld said “all sport is, is cheering for laundry.”
A player they’ve always despised comes to their club and suddenly he is a fantastic player with great skills. A player they’ve always supported leaves their club and suddenly he is a soft receiver.
Don’t forget the real important thing about trade week and later the draft. They throw those football-starved people a bone some five months before the start of the new football season.
Get Australia's best AFL opinion emailed daily.
Like this content? Buzz it up!
Free Email updates:
Our daily emails are only sent if there is content for the sport or that author. You can subscribe to multiple daily emails; or get the daily Roar email with all our content in it. We value privacy. More...
(4)
Redb said | October 6th 2008 @ 8:50am | Report comment
I agree trade week is frenetic 5 munite exercise in fax machine speed and questions of adequate toner.
This year O’Keefe is a genuine get, wouldnt’ mind him at Essendon.
I dont agree about fans caring about player loyalty though. They do, usually the clubs are smart enough not to let their top 5-6 players go. Chris Judd was an exception to the rule regarding top line players being traded. Ask any West Coast fan how they feel about losing Judd (albeit a Victorian), they’re not happy and would have hated seeing him running around in the navy blue.
There is some truth to the one eyed nature of fans, a sinner can become a saint overnight by changing his jumper. A litmus test is a Cousins or Didak (true villians) – clubs need to be able to check the pulse of their club members and fan base before taking on such players.
The real trade week starts with the draft in November, this week is draft lite for the most part it’s a ‘has been’ swap.
Redb
David Wiseman said | October 6th 2008 @ 10:50pm | Report comment
Day 1 has passed and was mostly uneventful. Some players were put on the table but looks like it will be a quiet trade week.
Redb – Of course you can’t compare a Judd to a Caracella, Pickett or Playfair. The only reason a player of his calibre is involved in trade week is due to the absence of free agency in the AFL. Free agency would open up a Pandora’s Box of its own.
Bruce Walkley said | October 7th 2008 @ 8:28am | Report comment
And “free agency”, as the AFL so cutely calls it, will come as sure as night follows day, with the first court challenge to the present system. For a player who has completed his contract not to be able to then sign his next contract with the club of his choice is a clear restraint of trade.
LK said | October 7th 2008 @ 12:24pm | Report comment
Are the clubs hoarding their draft picks in lieu of GC17’s entry into next year’s draft? Or, not enough good players on the market?