Is image part of the Hiddink effect?
By Jesse Fink, 4 Mar 2009 Jesse Fink is a Roar Pro
Interesting story over at the British Daily Telegraph regarding Chelsea’s mini-renaissance under the part-time stewardship of Guus Hiddink, which will resonate with anyone who was privy to his handling of the Australia team in 2005 and 2006
Hiddink denounced his predecessor Luiz Felipe Scolari as presiding over a “lax regime” at Stamford Bridge and has accordingly instituted tough new rules for players. As the Telegraph writes: “[This] involves players being punctual for training, increased fitness regimes, restrictions on mobile-phone usage on club grounds as well as fines for any of the aforementioned regulations being broken.
“He has also clamped down on the players’ images, insisting that the club’s Armani suits be worn when travelling for home or away games and when leaving stadiums after matches.
“Hiddink, who is never seen on the sideline out of a suit, has also made specific reference to how the players should knot their ties.”
The “Hiddink effect” seems to be working. Back in fourth place just weeks ago, Chelsea are now in second position and challenging hard for the title, just as Hiddink said they would.
As I write in my 2007 book 15 Days in June, I sat behind Hiddink at the Australia Vs Brazil match in Munich and spent most of my time taking photos of the big guy. The owner of a fascinating, character-filled face, Hiddink spent most of the match turned away from the action and lost in thought, his fingers cradling his chin, his brow furrowed. He also looked super sharp in a beautifully cut grey suit and had an undeniable aura about him – something which his players attested was part of what made him such a great coach. They wanted to impress him.
Even one Graham Arnold had some of the Hiddink effect rub off on him.
He too was wearing a grey suit that day and, amazingly, even to me looked managerial.
(It’s a shame when he got the big job himself he was not so preoccupied with sartorial concerns and more often opted for his usual clobber of tracksuit or polo top than the full get-up. Pim Verbeek, as we all know, follows the Hiddink suit-wearing trick to a tee, and it helps.)
Could Arnold’s rough-and-ready appearance explain some of his poor results and his fractured relationship with parts of the senior team?
It seems ridiculous but it’s not beyond the realm of possibility.
I recall an instance of John Kosmina slouching and wearing shorts when he was assisting Arnold for the Asian Cup but to his credit the former Sydney FC coach wore a suit when he was on the sidelines in his A-League job. Only problem was you can put a guy in a suit but if he’s lacking class it’s going to show. Kosmina persisted with his habit of slouching in his seat. Kosmina lost the respect of his dressing-room and look at how Sydney’s season subsequently fell to pieces.
I wrote long ago about the importance of thrall in the make-up of any coach and, with Hiddink, a significant part of his thrall has to with image. It’s undeniable – and it would be something our own A-League coaches would do well to replicate.
Aurelio Vidmar consistently wears a suit but still looks cheap with shirt collars that double as an advertising hoarding. Frank Farina, another suit wearer, makes a decent effort but is usually to be found sans tie. Ricki Herbert and Lawrie McKinna seem undecided whether they prefer a suit or tracksuit. Tracksuit devotee Ernie Merrick, though hugely successful, looks like a bloke on his lunch break you might find drinking beer and pulling the one-armed bandits in a backroom at a local pub. Ditto David Mitchell and Gary van Egmond.
Hardly thrall getting.
The sharpest-looking A-League coach I can remember was Pierre Littbarski, who always looked immaculate when leading Sydney FC in “Version 1.0” and look what he went on to achieve.
His successor, Terry Butcher, who liked to wear a T-shirt, tracksuit pants, sneakers and baseball cap on match days, came a complete cropper.
It’s a left-field theory, and I’m sure there are exceptions that shoot holes in it, but I’m convinced a well-cut suit makes a huge difference when coaching a football team – as Hiddink, the master of image, continues to prove.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.


znotty said | March 4th 2009 @ 7:22am | Report comment
gotta face facts the guys a coaching genius!
whiskeymac said | March 4th 2009 @ 7:59am | Report comment
Might be onto something there…Jose’s suits were more attractive than his gameplans, but he was, and is, an undoubted success. Like wise Arsene….
Luke W said | March 4th 2009 @ 8:03am | Report comment
Haha! Nice article Jesse. Reminds me of the article with the study that claims that football teams that wear red are more likely to be victorious given the primal fear and intimidation they strike in opponents from thousands of years of genetic programming. Who knows? A large part of form is mental, and perhaps a large part of being mentally prepared for a game involves the sub-conscious. Maybe Manchester United is a champion team because sub-consciously they know the fact they are wearing red intimidates their opponents, plus they have to impress a coach that dresses and carries himself in a way that demands respect?
David V. said | March 4th 2009 @ 9:42am | Report comment
Blue has always been the colour of class- Everton used to be synonymous with class, and it’s not the first time Chelsea have been a p owerhouse club on the field as they had been in the 60s and early 70s.
Red can mean forces of evil (Man Utd, Liverpool) or good (Arsenal, Nottingham Forest).
Albert Ross said | March 4th 2009 @ 9:43am | Report comment
The Germans say “Clothes make the man and rags make mice.” Mind you I have sympathy with Frank. I wouldn;t be wearing a tie sitting on the sidelines in the sun.
cosmos forever said | March 4th 2009 @ 12:29pm | Report comment
A suit also makes a distinction between the manager and players. A suit says “I am not one of you I am leading you. I do not want to play I want to manage”. It’s important. Too often managers who dress in the kit of the team come across as nothing more than players who never grew up.
dasilva said | March 4th 2009 @ 12:48pm | Report comment
The manaer has to command respect of the team. the clothing is one aspect of many that contribute to hte respect.
So yeah I agree that manager have to dress a bit formally compare to the players.
However to be fair on Arnie, he was coaching in the Asia cup with heaps of humidity. I’m quite sure he didn’t want to wear an expensive armani suit in that condition
Koala Bear said | March 4th 2009 @ 12:55pm | Report comment
The “Special One” always wore an overcoat… The first couple of seasons for Chelsea were fantastic … “Be Champions”…
Although Hiddink is not doing too badly in a suit…
~~~~~~~~
KB
Midfielder said | March 4th 2009 @ 12:58pm | Report comment
Guss … is he the best coach in the world right now.. hard to argue with … without doubt in the top 6.
Midfielder said | March 4th 2009 @ 1:04pm | Report comment
KB
It is a sad day…. even the mighty Gus cannot stop “another step to the right” .. sad because he will fail and the Red ones will march on over the Blue Smurfs….http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22fIsLwNy38&feature=PlayList&p=0AC9D90A9CB8D52A&playnext=1&index=14 complete with a Russian dancing Bear LOL.