Related coverage
- Rugby Union news
- Wallabies news
- Rugby World Cup 2011 news
- Sonny Bill Williams news
- 2011 Wallabies squad news
- Rugby 2011 news

Barbarians' Sonny Bill Williams of New Zealand, right, alludes being tackled by Wallabies' captain Stirling Mortlock, 2nd right, and Benn Robinson during their rugby match in Sydney, Australia, Saturday, June 6, 2009. The Wallabies won the match 55-7. (AP Photo/Rob Griffith)
Sonny Bill Williams’ first touch for the Barbarians (7) against the Wallabies (55) saw him step inside Stirling Mortlock. The big crowd at the Sydney Football Stadium erupted in an explosion of noise that carried the message: ‘He is going to make it in rugby union!’
He kept running through the gap and a try looked to inevitable. What a start, the now swelling roaring, seemed to state, a try with his first touch.
One more step on the inside when he should have straightened and he was hit by Luke Burgess covering, and then a swarm of other Wallabies. This time the roars were for the staunch defence of the Wallabies and against Williams as he struggled to break free for the last couple of metres to the tryline.
Then Williams did something that suggests to me, anyway, that he has the making, at age 23 and with a physique of a Jonah Lomu, to be a rugby superstar the way he was a league super star.
As the Wallabies piled in on him, grabbing legs, thigh, chest and arms, he somehow got the ball away, admittedly on the bounce, to his outside. One good further transfer and it would have been try time for the Barbarians.
And throughout the match, although he was feed several hospital passes, and balls so flat and high they could have been caught by defenders, Williams led the Barbarians who had very little ball to play with in off-loads.
He also made a sizzling break down the middle of the field that would have resulted in a try if Justin Marshall, the Barbarians halfback, had got to the ruck near the posts on time.
It was interesting to me to read the Sunday Telegraph’s James Hooper’s analysis of Sonny Bill Williams’ international debut in rugby union and the occasion itself, the first match played in Australia by arguably the most famous club in world rugby, the Barbarians.
The Telegraph stable has rugby league devotees running its sports section and they take every opportunity to denigrate a rugby union occasion. I remember very well, for instance, the opening match of the 2003 Rugby World Cup and seeing rugby league journalists everywhere in the news room. Why were they here, I wondered? Their bagging articles the next day provided the answer.
So probably the idea was to bag Sonny Bill Williams, the Wallabies and, if this fails, the rugby union game.
Hooper had to admit that Williams showed a lot of ability in his new code: ‘He might be on L-plates in his new game, but there was still enough to suggest Williams can be a force in the 15-man game …’
The sentence is stopped there because the next few words that finish it off give the game away, as it were. After the match Williams joked with some supporters and asked them if any of them had a spare rib as he might be needing some after the tackling he’d been subjected to.
The fierce tackling of the Wallabies, in fact, took away one of the traditional ‘complaints’ of rugby league writers about rugby union, that the tackling is weak. But here was a player who used to stride through rugby league defensive lines, as if they didn’t exist, being dumped and smashed by the supposedly cream puff rugby union defenders.
Now we come back to the last words of that sentence, ‘… if ever they can give him the ball.’
So it is a fault of rugby union that Williams didn’t get the ball very often. And hence the headline: It’s all a waste of Sonny’s talent.
In other words, he should never have left rugby league. And to ram home the message Sonny Bill Watch gave his ‘statistics’ for the match: Tackles 1: Runs 4: Offloads 5: Metres gained 25.
Are these accurate statistics? I saw Williams, for instance, make many more tackles than the 1 recorded?
Moreover, if we had the statistics of Stirling Mortlock they would have shown that he made numerous tackles, many runs, not many off-loads and lots of territory gained. The sort of statistics that were far better than, say, the meagre statistics produced by the NSW centres in the State of Origin match.
The fact is that the Wallabies dominated the Barbarians for most of the match the way Queensland dominated NSW for most of the match in the State of Origin contest at Melbourne.
When the forwards are not winning the ball, in either code, the backs don’t get chances to run with it. It’s as simple as that.
On the evidence of this match, the Wallabies look to be a sharper side than last year’s team. The speed on the wings helped greatly, as did the overall speed of the side, especially in the loose forwards.
But how good were the Barbarians? Last week they beat England quite convincingly, although they let in three late tries. This England side over the weekend turned around and beat the Pumas, also quite comfortably.
But England were really an England third side, with players with the British and Irish Lions and others in Canada for a tournament. The Barbarians had also travelled from London to Sydney, an arduous journey. Then Rocky Elsom, their only forward currently playing Test rugby pulled out. Their defensive system was leaky and there didn’t seem to be much real pace on the wings.
But you can only play what is in front of you. The Wallabies conceded only one try. Their defence was tough and quick.
The lineout seemed to be good but the scrum folded every now and again. When they ran the ball (there was too much kicking for my liking) the side looked pacy and polished. But best of all there was a quickness about their play which has been lacking for some seasons.
So the verdict: Sonny Bill Williams was good. The Wallabies were much better than last year.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (198)
- Will South African rugby force a Super 21 by 2018? (172)
- Brumbies 2012: New coach, new players, new attitude (128)
- Dan Parks and the unsolved questions of expat rugby (61)
- Pocock set to be named new Force skipper (56)
- Can the ‘Tahs win the battle after losing the Waugh? (51)
- What does the future hold for the Six Nations (50)
- Queensland ready for Super challenge
- Australian teams at Super disadvantage (15)
- Foley excited about Samoan rugby challenge
- Force rugby coach praises his pack
- The real story of how John O’Neill turned Manchester City down (42)
- Wales’ Davies banned for ‘tip tackle’ (3)
- Graham Henry’s rugby future confirmed (14)
- Wales show Southern Hemisphere how to play running rugby (24)
- What opening matches of Six Nations taught us (16)
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (198)
- Clinical Chiefs cost rusty Rebels in Corio (9)
- Six Nations shows rugby is a parochial game at heart (5)
- Goose’s Super Rugby up-and-comer XV for 2012 (29)
- What does the future hold for the Six Nations (50)
- Explore:
- Barbarians, Justin Marshall, Luke Burgess, Rocky Elsom, Rugby Union, Rugby World Cup, Sonny Bill Williams, Stirling Mortlock, Sydney Football Stadium, wallabies

Mungehead said | June 8th 2009 @ 8:45am | Report comment
SBW is a young guy and he does have visible potential. The super-experienced Mortlock had his complete measure, but you couldn’t say SBW didn’t play well under the circumstances. However there’s a long way to go before we see whether SBW ends up starring, or just sinks without a trace.
He’s reiterated that he wants to play for the ABs in 2011 (very unlikely), so is this eligibility issue for the Wallabies a beat-up, or is he trying to put a bob each way? Anyone think a S14(15?) side will take him, and if so, which one?
couchnorm said | June 8th 2009 @ 9:13am | Report comment
I think SBW has huge potential. He was on the end of some terrible passing and still had some nice touches with the ball. I haven’t seen too many centres at full pace twist out of tackles and offload with one hand.
I was more disappointed with the Barbarians, I thought they looked like a bunch of individuals who are at the end of a long year and week in Sydney. Saying that the Wallabies were lucky that there kicking game was working well which transferred the pressure away from them and took away the ability of the Barbarians to attack
Good to see International rugby back at the SFS
WLN said | June 8th 2009 @ 9:41am | Report comment
SBW never had a chance outside Muppetsua and could only threaten with Macallister feeding. He would be seriously dangerous outside DC, Nonu and inside Mils or…perish the thought….Giteau, Barnes, and AAC….heck Cam Shep set free outside him would unleash hell…so just who will get his signature is now the big question. We can immediately cross out Samoa – his tatts are on the outside not the inside…..I dont think he’ll want to live in Wellington or Christchurch and the blues are a joke…he could live in Sydney with his fully sick boys surrounding him but I dont think the Tahs team culture would suit him…he should be eyeing up real estate in the GoldCoast…c’mon Digby give him a call!
Hemjay said | June 8th 2009 @ 9:44am | Report comment
The funniest thing of all of this is all the talk is about the boy from Auckland. Every single story seems to come back to him. Noone really is that interested in the articles unless they are about SBW.
The winner on the day is SBW the amount of publicity he has got is phenomenal.
I think all too many people forget that he has only been playing Rugga for 7 months. Give the guy another season or two and we should see a big improvement
bennalong said | June 8th 2009 @ 9:58am | Report comment
A good point Mungehead.
I think it takes a brave man to switch.
If everyone (with the money) thinks it’s a good idea,you’ll get a guernsey.(AND lots of cash!) But you’ll also get heaps of criticism and be watched like a hawk for any mistake that indicates you’re not worth the (considerable) money. How much of the criticism of Lote relates to ‘value’ and how much to the entirely reasonable distrust the public has for its fickle, interfering bureaucrats? How much resentment for his STAR status?
You also face the reality that it’s a much harder game to stand out as a star, so I think the league journo has a point.
Numbers 6, 9 & 10 are the only ones blessed with time on or with the ball.
Sonny Bill would be snapped up like a shot here if he put his hand up. And in NZ. ———–He’s advertising!
Lote will be back! He’ll reinvent himself playing how Robbie Deans inspires him to play.
He’s lost his confidence playing in that ill fated Waratahs backline picking up scraps!
bennalong said | June 8th 2009 @ 10:18am | Report comment
Back to the Wallabies!
Did they perform well? Yes!
For a first time outing they were fantastic ! The hand skills were great and on a number of occasions the backline looked like the Crusaders with that two-line attack creating the inside pass option.
I’ve been waiting ! Is this season too early ?
The kicking was great and you’re going to see it, like it or not. Barnes and Giteau have both developed tactical nouse and kicking for the corners has always been a smart option, ELV’S or not.
And the high balls were high and contestable — Relief!
Talking about the Money , switching and pressure, what about Robbie Deans ! ???
Sure, the switch wasn’t codes but to leave his beloved New Zealand and expose himself to criticism from both side of the Tasman took guts and a fantastic amount of self belief.
Christ I’m glad we got him !
Mungehead said | June 8th 2009 @ 10:36am | Report comment
Hemjay, you’re right, SBW’s notoriety has made him an instant celebrity. Bennalong, you make good sense, the clubs will be all over him.
So will he return to his roots in Auckland, will he aim to improve his skills and move to Christchurch, or will it be the Force that make him the offer he’s looking for??
Oh, Wallabies bennalong? Who were they again? Oh right, I remember now… yeah, I thought they played well…
Working Class Rugger said | June 8th 2009 @ 10:45am | Report comment
This season we should see much more of his influence in the Wallabies. When does his contract run out. Note to John. Start working on keeping him permanently.
Nick said | June 8th 2009 @ 11:03am | Report comment
It wasn’t a great Baa baa side but i’ll take the 50 point win first up. It’s much better than the last 4 or 5 years where we’ve struggled to put away 2nd string NH teams in dire games. Last year Ireland, the year before it was Hoiles saving us from Wales.
Amazing Deans could get them to play like that after just 1 week together.
John Ryan said | June 8th 2009 @ 11:29am | Report comment
Spiros do you ever read the paper you work for speaking about denigrating big events in Rugby League,you have got to be kidding.
The Telegraph is to my mind a rubbish paper,but fairs fair do you mean to tell me with a straight face the only reason Williams was here and the farce took place was because Rugby League had State of Origin and O’Neil and the RU wanted a spoiler and to try however desperately to get some publicity and maybe interest from League Fans,look at Fitzsimmons in the SMH on Sat.
I don’t mind some of your stuff but often you and the rugger buggers never cease to astound me.