What’s really holding “soccer” back?
By Jesse Fink, 12 Jun 2009 Jesse Fink is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- Australian Football, football, Pim Verbeek, Robbie Slater, Socceroos
308 Have your say

Australia's Scott McDonald and Iraq's Haidar Hussain during the Australian Socceroos v Iraq World Cup qualifier. AAP Image/Dave Hunt
There were many talking points to come out of Wednesday night’s Australia Vs Bahrain WCQ, a major one being the continued and inexplicable international career of Brett Holman, which I have attended to in my Friday column for The World Game. It deserves a blog on its own.
Another is Scott McDonald, who couldn’t hit a barnyard door with a cowpat and whose time as a striker for the Socceroos must surely be up.
But what I found most interesting – and there wasn’t that much to find interesting at Homebush; it was probably the most tedious thing I’ve seen since one of those interminable Andy Warhol art movies from the 1960s – was the way Sydney’s Daily Telegraph launched a blistering character attack on Pim Verbeek in the lead-up to the game, blaming his media ban on players for the poor attendance.
It continued on Thursday.
Phil Rothfield, the executive editor of the sports pages, declared: “Soccer will never make it as a major sport in this country while Pim Verbeek is in charge of our national team. Forget about the boring style of soccer, it is Pim’s petulance and disdain for Australian culture which [sic] is holding the game back.”
Coming from a paper whose golden-boy reporter Nick Walshaw calls Scott McDonald “Scotty Mitchell” and which rated Holman’s performance as “6/10” you really have to question the wisdom of listening to anything the Telegraph says.
But it’s the biggest-selling paper in Australia’s biggest city, so we need to take notice.
Now I’ve made my own criticisms of Verbeek here and on TWG while also commending him, but the Telegraph has stepped over the line. We were all disappointed by the media ban, by the withdrawal of players including Tim Cahill, by the very late substitution of Nicky Carle for Holman, but they are the prerogatives of the national-team manager, whose job is to best prepare his team for South Africa 2010 as he sees fit.
He may not be right – in regards keeping Holman on the pitch I think he made a grievous error – but they are his decisions to make and we must respect his position, his experience and his reasons for making them.
So Pim himself is not holding the game back. Frankly how that can be said about someone who has just led Australia to the World Cup really is quite perplexing.
In my view what is holding the game back is the mediocrity of the media that reports on the sport we all love, chief among them the Daily Telegraph and its satellite papers in the News Limited family.
Four years on from our second World Cup qualification, they still have no idea what they’re writing about.
It is the stubborn persisting in calling it “soccer”, even on Fox Sports, the so-called “home of football”. It is the sequestering of live coverage of qualification games on to pay TV, where only those people who can afford it are able to watch our national football team while the vast majority of people are forced to go without.
Yes, I write for SBS, and it is thankfully how I earn a living, but even if I didn’t I’d still thank God for its very existence. SBS employs people with passion, fearlessness, knowledge and a real commitment to the sport – and has demonstrated that commitment through thick and thin, even back in the days when Socceroos was a dirty word.
That much cannot be said about many other media outlets when it comes to football.
There was a moment in Fox’s coverage before the Qatar match in Doha last weekend that summed up for me the fairweather nature of so much of the Australian media’s relationship with the biggest sport in the world.
Robbie Slater, the former Socceroo, was in the midst of praising Verbeek for getting Australia to the World Cup and then made an aside about criticism of the Dutchman as having come from “the usual quarters”.
The irony of this is that Slater, “soccer’s number one analyst” according to his column byline for News Limited, was the biggest critic of Verbeek’s appointment, even before he arrived in the country.
“Underwhelming” was his choice of word to describe how he felt about Verbeek being selected over the Frenchman Philippe Troussier.
Now Verbeek, if we are to judge by the tenor of the commentary on Fox, can do no wrong. Slater, particularly, is a Verbeek cheerboy.
Football cannot be held back in this country so long as there is a vibrant, knowledgeable, independent and committed media behind it that engages people with the sincerity of its passion and the sophistication of its debate.
The sport is just too big, too beautiful to be curtailed.
SBS is leading the way. Now it’s up to the rest of the side to pick up its game.
This is my 100th blog for The Roar and I’ve had a blast getting to know a lot of you. Special thanks to The Bear, Stifler’s Mom, Vicentin, Kazama, Midfielder, Ben of Phnom Penh, Millster, Sledgeross, Dasilva, Dickroo, Dazza Japan, Koala Bear, Mick of Newie, Pippinu and even the exasperating Slippery Jim (or Contrarian, as I’ve come to know him).
Your input has been enlightening, entertaining and always challenging. This small corner of the world game is better off for your presence.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
- Explore:
- Australian Football, football, Pim Verbeek, Robbie Slater, Socceroos

dasilva said | June 12th 2009 @ 5:13am | Report comment
Thanks for the mention
To be fair for holman. He did link well with other players in the first half. However he became more poor as the game went on.
I have been a skeptic of Nicky Carle throughout the past year but even I was disappointed with only 6 minutes in this match. Why would you sub someone on for 6 minutes in a dead rubber? I can’t help think that Pim decision was purely a petty F*** you to the pro-Nick Carle media
Kurt said | June 12th 2009 @ 5:24am | Report comment
And in a huge surprise, we have a soccer fan claiming that the only reason the game is not more popular is because of -sob- the ignorant Australian media. So what if someone wrote an article in the Telegraph criticising the media ban, how does that constitute ‘holding back’ the sport? When will people such as yourself Jesse and the others who parrot the same tired line over and over again about how the nasty mainstream media are conspiring against your sport accept that because soccer is the no. 1 sport in other countries doesn’t automatically entitle it to the same position in Australia.
This looks to me like a smoke screen to obscure one very uncomfortable fact – the socceroos bandwagon this time around is much smaller, less shiny and not nearly so exciting as 4 years ago. People can go on and on about how the game is going from ‘strength to strength’, supporters of other codes are ‘afraid’ etc. but the bottom line is for a hugely hyped, supposed ‘celebration’ of the glorious achievement of qualifying for the WA, you managed less than 40K attendance. I think we can all recognise a downward trend when we see one, and soccer in this country is staring over the brink of one right now.
So in summary I suggest you either go and buy a jumbo box of tissues to share with Mike Tuckerman and have a big cry about how unfair it all is, or get over this utterly misplaced sense of entitlement and self importance.
Cpaaa said | June 12th 2009 @ 6:19am | Report comment
i was working with a hardcore afl nut from melbourne and he to cannot see the value of Holman.
the courier mail was kinda the same the day after, poor headlines, poor story. Broncos front page Broncos back page. but to the Courier Mails credit they do use the true name of Football.
MarkH said | June 12th 2009 @ 6:45am | Report comment
The Daily Telegraph in Syd devotes a whole section to soccer so I dont know where the complaints are with the media. I still dont think that soccer supports understand that Australians prefer contact sports. Im not having a go at the sport. It just happens to be a fact. AFL, RU and RL are the major sports in winter for people to watch. My guess its such a long game to watch if your only going to see one or two goals the whole game. I really cant see the numbers improving unless FFA get a team from Brazil, Germany or England to tour every year. Playing these other small out of the way places is of no interest.
The Bear said | June 12th 2009 @ 7:11am | Report comment
Lol, Kurt, how much will your tune change within the next 7 days? The last qualifier in Melbourne has sold over 70K tix already. Yep, let’s talk about “inadequacy” now. Onto the posting however, Jesse, and I found it refreshing that Jedinak was given a starting chance versus Bahrain. It does show that Pim WILL tinker for depth and selection decisions… perhaps he will now even tinker to the CAM position??
One thing I will say in regards to our Mr Verbeek and the FFA’s conservatively mandated approach to 2010 World Cup qualification, is that had we had qualification on the line in Sydney, and lost one of the earlier games (or drawn) like we probably “deserved” to, then this whole situation of a dead rubber after having a charmed run would never of happened. Lol, interesting thought, that conservatism courts contempt, and courage wins allies.
Even the substandard editors at this other media channel may have found another outlet to vent their frustrated lives that week… it’s usually the pattern, aint it? I hear the Sharks have another mess on their hands, dear oh dear. How about they report honestly on true matters of importance, not whether our National Coach is giving pass outs to his Players!!
Geeezs, what a beat up.
mitzter said | June 12th 2009 @ 8:12am | Report comment
ah yes the word soccer is always what’s holding back the game
Robbos said | June 12th 2009 @ 8:32am | Report comment
Jesse,
It’s called survival, in one of the last outposts where football is not dominant, they have come out fighting. You have jounalists devoting their time & media space to bag out our game & you people coming on this blog who clearly don’t like football yes, you Kurt & many others just to put the game down. Why I ask are they wasting their time?
Pip has accused me of anti-AFL, I must admit I don’t enjoy the sport & even though I’m Australian this game is far more foreign to me than football. But I’ve never gone onto a AFL related post to be negative, because my knowlegde & care of the game is minimal & have no need to degrade another sport. I don’t dislike the sport, if anything the only slight envy of how game is presented in the media in this country.
We qualify to our 2nd World cup running & instead of rejoicing and celebrating as a nation at qualifing fo the world’s greatest sporting event. No, we get negative reports like this from Phil Rothfield & his cohorts. The bandwagon is not getting smaller, it’s more like the lasts outposts are starting look like Custer’s last stand for some of our niche sports & when you are in survival mode, you stike out.
It all reminds me of my time in Switzerland before WC06, watching an American channel (CNN for European Americans), not many other English channels in Switzerland, the sports segment was dominanted by the world cup & they flash back to the lead anchor, & her comments was “the WORLD cup, what’s all the fuss, it’s not as if it’s the Stanley cup”. Sort of sums it all up. Ignorance is Bliss Mr Rothfield.
Brett McKay said | June 12th 2009 @ 8:32am | Report comment
Jesse, congrats on bringing up the ton!! I often feel that my limited soccer/football knowledge holds me back from most discussions on this site, but this is one I can get into.
To start with, Phil Rothfield is a peanut. That’s not really ground-breaking news, but it needs to be said again. He’s a league hack who, like a lot of league hacks over the years, thinks their opinion carries into other sports. When you throw in desk-buddy Rebecca Wilson, you have the axis of balanced reporting right there. So yes, he writes for the biggest paper in the biggest city in Australia, but that still doesn’t make him informed. As has been said on The Roar plenty of times about plenty of sports, informed and knowledgeable sports fans rely on forums such as ours for their information. I’m sure the same could be said of TWG.
Speaking of SBS, I’m very glad they have the rights to the World Cup. I am one of the people you referred to who have to make alternate arrangements (which I may or may not have done on Wed night) to view the Socceroos. I could not agree more that limiting coverage to pay tv is definitely a hinderance to growth in Australia, although happily the Govt has said some time back that the Socceroos will be added to the anti-syphoning list at the expiry of the current Fox contract. I understand that the A-League wouldn’t have come about without Fox Sports, but again, surely the best way to get new followers is to have a free-to-air presence. Especially with new teams.
I think that mainstream media has come a long way on the whole, but yeah, there is still a long way to go. There was nary a mention of Perth Glory’s impending announcement today of Mile Sterjovski, yet Christiano Ronaldo was all over the news last night. But hey, at least Kenny Sutcliffe has been referring to the national coach as ‘Pim’!!
Baby steps Jesse, baby steps…
True Tah said | June 12th 2009 @ 8:38am | Report comment
Jesse
I wouldnt pay too much attention to the Telegraph, if someone uses that to make informed decisions about something, it says something about the person!!
I dont believe anything is holding futbol/soccer back, however the fact is the sport will never be like it is in say Brazil/England/Italy because of the fact that in Australia, unlike most countries, there are several powerful sporting competitors. When you view it from this persective, averaging 15K a game is excellent, in fact, its almost as good as the professional leagues in nations where futbol is the sporting behemoth.
Quite frankly, the main thing holding futbol back in Australia is the attitudes of some Euro-snobs…if someone like me, to whom futbol is not my no.1 sport, can see more HAL games than someone whose prized possession is an Everton jersey, despite never having left the country, then that says something, sorry for being blunt Jesse.
whiskeymac said | June 12th 2009 @ 8:40am | Report comment
poor old pim. his smug face is always going to be a target for some.
good call on Robbie Slater too. he was adamant that the FFA was wrong in its choice. as were a few others (Fossie for example)… so we got a roundhead and not a cavalier – roundheads won the war. there were just known as killjoys too.
Kurt, always fun to read your posts, but this bit ” the socceroos bandwagon this time around is much smaller, less shiny and not nearly so exciting as 4 years ago” needs some addressing.
I would much rather have meaningful games – qualifiers and cup tournaments against opposition like Japan, Korea, Iraq etc – than the do-or-die dramas which only happened every 4 years. Sure those one off games were bigger and more entertaining for some, but the constant competiton and exposure every year that Asia provides surely outweighs this. How can we compare 180 minutes to the hours we have now. More games, more exposure. It’s not even a question of quality v quantity because the number of games that meant anything pre asia was miniscule. between (2001-2005) the only other game we harped on about was a friendly win over the poms.
So for every turnout like that at ANZ (not too bad imo) wehave a sell out against Japan at the MCG. at the end of the year the number of viewers, media columns (always lower than it could be), turnstile receipts etc must be higher than your shiny bandwagon afforded us?
The sport is less reliant on one off games nowadays than it was a few seasons ago. to me this is a sign that it is in a much stronger and viable position. It would be nice if the media gave itmore exposure proportionate to it’s participation rates, the teams international standing etc.