FFA should sanction Cahill for belittling McLaughlin
By Jesse Fink, 19 Jun 2009 Jesse Fink is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- football, Fox Sports, Melanie McLaughlin, Socceroos, Tim Cahill
185 Have your say

Australia's Tim Cahill celebrates after scoring the first goal for Australia during the World Cup qualifying soccer match between Australia and Qatar at the Brisbane stadium in Brisbane, Australia, Wednesday, Oct. 15, 2008. AP Photo/Tertius Pickard
Over at The Finktank, my column for SBS, I’ve leapt to the defence of Tim Cahill after he was smeared last weekend by the Sunday Telegraph for a nightclub incident it appears never happened.
But after his embarrassing performance in front of the cameras after Wednesday night’s Australia Vs Japan World Cup Qualifier, in which he scored two goals, he’s deserving of some rebuke.
Melanie McLaughlin has come along in leaps and bounds as a broadcaster with Fox Sports and she is a great asset for that company to have: telegenic with brains and something useful to say about the game she covers.
The same cannot be said for all of of her stablemates, male and female, at the pay-TV station. (For the record, let me state I’m a big fan of the work of Simon Hill and Mark Bosnich, both of whom call a spade a spade, and Paul Trimboli, whose enthusiasm for the game is infectious and who is turning into a great game analyst.)
So McLaughlin deserved much more respect than she got from Cahill, who chose to ignore the questions she asked of him in her now-obligatory post-match on-field interview and didn’t even doing her the basic courtesy of looking at her when she spoke.
Standoffish, his tongue rolling around in his cheeks, it was a disgraceful display from Cahill, who has every right to nurse a grievance with the way he was treated by the Sunday Telegraph but should have no issue with a bright, pleasant young woman just trying to do her job.
The opening question she asked of him was hardly threatening, a joke about how popular he now is in Japan.
But instead of smiling or offering a laugh, Cahill just turned away to look at nothing and muttered, “I’d just like to thank the crowd, the lads, a great turnout in Melbourne. I’m so proud to be here, so proud to play tonight so I think the credit just goes to the crowd, you were brilliant.“
She tried again.
Same response, after which Cahill scampered off without so much as even acknowledging her presence.
Cahill was deserving of sympathy for the way the Sunday Telegraph handled the nightclub story but in his exchange with McLaughlin he managed in one fell swoop to come across both as arrogant and self-regarding, and certainly undeserving of anyone’s compassion.
It is worthy of sanction by the FFA, especially considering Fox Sports is an official partner of the federation.
Fox Sports, which is owned by Premier Media Group, deserves better for the millions it puts into the game and which keeps the FFA in the black.
What happened in Kings Cross, meanwhile, is not and has never been worthy of sanction.
The problem for Fox is PMG itself is part-owned by News Limited, the publishers of the Sunday Telegraph.
So Cahill was making his own statement, albeit a misguided one. His beef should be with Neil Breen, the embattled editor of the Sunday Telegraph, not poor old McLaughlin or her bosses at Fox, who had nothing to do with that Tele story and who wouldn’t have known anything about it.
As most of you well know, I’ve worked at Fox myself, so I know intimately how various parts of the News Limited organisation function in splendid isolation.
“Synergy“ is the mantra but it’s not the reality on the floor.
So Cahill must be called to account by the FFA for this performance.
Short of that, McLaughlin and Fox deserve a contrite apology. He might have scored two goals and won his team the game, but Cahill also spoiled a great night by behaving like a petulant six-year-old.
Everyone loves a winner, but no one likes an ungracious one.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
- Explore:
- football, Fox Sports, Melanie McLaughlin, Socceroos, Tim Cahill

Timmypig said | June 19th 2009 @ 6:13am | Report comment
Maybe, Jesse, maybe …
On the other hand, why do broadcasters persist with these cringeworthy post match interviews anyway? Football, rugby, cricket, league, AFL ….. the players interviewed all trot out the same coached cr@ppy, anodyne tosh. Does ANYONE gain anything from their answers?
It’s when the player goes off the script that it’s worth watching! My wife did comment on it though (shows she was paying attention): “Cahill didn’t answer the question!”
sportsfanslife.com said | June 19th 2009 @ 7:08am | Report comment
I am taking more and more interesting in Football in this country at both the A-League and National Team levels, and I have to say I did notice the way Cahill handled the interview. Surely his beef with the Telegraph had nothing to do with McLaughlin personally, and as you say, she was just trying to do her job. With all the positive steps Football is taking here, it doesn’t take much for casual observers (the ones whose money the FA is chasing to support their local comp etc.) to be turned off, and that sort of thing could do the trick for some. Timmy’s performance on the pitch would no doubt have won more fans than he lost with the post match interview, however I still think it was poor form….he’s much better than that.
MVDave said | June 19th 2009 @ 7:12am | Report comment
Spoiled a great night????????? Do you world for the Telegraph?? Is this your summing up of the nights events?? Give me a break. Surely there was some thing more worth while to discuss about the night?? You know the game, the crowd, the player performances, the Japanese performance, the prospect of the MCG holding the WC final when we win the WC bid etc.
MVDave said | June 19th 2009 @ 7:13am | Report comment
Should be’work’ for the Telegraph.
onside said | June 19th 2009 @ 7:26am | Report comment
Perhaps Tim should get advice from another media belittled superstar like Greg Norman .
Brett McKay said | June 19th 2009 @ 8:18am | Report comment
We all love Melanie McLaughlin, for sure, but would it have been better or worse if Cahill waved her away completely post-game, rather than giving the same question-ignoring answer twice?? Obviously, he knew the interview was for the MCG crowd too, and so thanked them for his support. McLaughlin was just the unfortunate mic-holder. On that, would this be as big an issue if it was Robbie Slater (who also teed off on the media during the call) doing the post-match??
Yes, Cahill may have come across both as arrogant and self-regarding, but realistically, what else could he have done??
Charles said | June 19th 2009 @ 8:23am | Report comment
Completely disagree with you on this one Jess.
.
The media do not own the words and actions of a player, doesn’t matter how much they pay for sponsorship and exclusivity rights. And nor should they be able to pay to control the way he responds. Tim Cahill is not answerable to Fox, and at the end of the day, we live in a land where he does have the freedom to express himself as he sees fit. Granted, you can’t say in one column that Australian political correctness is destroying sport, then complain when Tim Cahill decides to take a stand on something.
Added, to say that his antics are an insult to the Fox interviewer misses the point completely and further muddy’s the waters. Whatever Cahill meant or didn’t mean had nothing to do with the interviewer. To say anything otherwise is a mere diversion from the pathetic antics of some media outlets who have done their best to undermine football while appearing to be its supporter.
No, Tim Cahill is not the villain in this. To make him the bad guy reeks of media manipulation … which I’m sure you would never try and do.
Roman said | June 19th 2009 @ 8:24am | Report comment
Post game interviews are bollocks anyway. They regurgitate the same cliche’d answers night after night, and almost always look like they would rather be off celebrating the victory (or hanging their head in shame in the locker room). And personally, I dont blame them one bit.
Robbos said | June 19th 2009 @ 8:37am | Report comment
I thought Cahill handled himself brillantly, he was not ungracious or petulant, he was not rude. He thanked the people who backed him, the crowd, the fans on TV, his team. Notice the fans reaction to the interview.
I’m sure Mel McLaughlin knew exactly what had happened to him during the week & Jesse, you might know better, but most people see the daily Telegraph & fox sports as from the same side of the fence (noticed none of the Fox analyst apart from Bozza stood up for Cahill).
Sorry for Mel, but i’m sure Timmy knows her to be a very supportive football fan, but at that moment she was the face of News ltd (owner of Fox & telegraph) & the media. I’m sure she understands.
Totally disagree with you here Jesse.
Realfootball said | June 19th 2009 @ 8:39am | Report comment
Agree that it didn’t look good, even if it was understandable. Trouble is, professional footballers leave school early to live in a cocoon if they are successful like Cahill and then, from time to time, the media wolves latch on to them. It is a very difficult situation and one would hope that the FFA is in there giving them the support they need. If that support is there, then Cahill was badly advised over that post match interview. What he said was fine, actually, it was the delivery that was an issue. Everyone can understand his anger – he has been disgracefully treated by an editor who admitted to Alan Jones, on air, that the story was about evening the ledger for rugby league. He just needs to be careful with his targets in future. As for the Telegraph, its a Z grade paper employing desperate Z grade journos. I just hope Cahill sues them.