By Tom Wald
July 10th 2009 @ 3:34am
View The Roar's top cricket writers.
Love new art, fashion, music? Check out Aussie site which unearths all things cool and creative.
Katich and Ponting score tons to put Aussies on top
Simon Katich and Ricky Ponting have started burying their demons from the 2005 Ashes series by scoring centuries and grinding England into the Cardiff turf.
Katich (104no) and Ponting (100no) knuckled down to put on 189 and completed a great day for Australia by scoring their hundreds just before stumps on day two of the first [...]
This article is over 2000 days old and has been trimmed.
Get Australia's best Cricket opinion emailed daily.
Like this content? Buzz it up!
Free Email updates:
Our daily emails are only sent if there is content for the sport or that author. You can subscribe to multiple daily emails; or get the daily Roar email with all our content in it. We value privacy. More...
(24)
Spiro Zavos said | July 10th 2009 @ 8:35am | Report comment
England made the mistake of trying to bounce of Philip Hughes. Hughes is clearly out of form, for whatever reason. The balls he middled scooted away for boundaries. But he wasn’t timing any legside shots (a techincal problem according to Ian Chappell on radio) and he missed some off-side shots. He eventually was dismissed by Andrew Flintoff after a scratchy inning.
But the effort Flintoff exerted in trying to bounce Hughes reduced his effectiveness and softened up the ball. This enabled Simon Katich and Ricky Ponting to score their unbeaten centuries and put Australia in the position where, if the runs continue to flow, they’ll have the chance to bowl at England in their second inning with a lead of 150 plus.
The new ball tonight (our time) will be crucial. If Ponting (now with 38 Test centuries and confirming his all-time great standing) and Katich, the silent achiever, kick on England are in trouble.
On the first day I was impressed with the field-settings and the plans the bowlers used to try to dismiss the various England batsmen. Praise is due to the coaching staff for getting the bowlers up to speed. England did score well over 300 runs on the day at about 4 an over. Now we know why. Once the ball goes soft, the pitch is easy to bat on and the boundaries are relatively short, especially behind the wickets.
On the second day though, Australia seemed to loss the plot. And England got away from them, especially the uninhibted hitting of Swann. What does one make of this? The second inning will provide answers to this question.
Nathan Hauritz picked up 3 wickets, and lost a wicket to a no-ball. How a spinner can bowl a no-ball is beyond my understanding. Clarrie Grimmett apparently, in a career that extended over 20 years did not bowl one no-ball in first class cricket. My feeling about Hauritz is that he does not put enough arm on the ball. He floats it down to the batsman rather than darts it down. He gets the ball above the eye-line a lot, which is good. But batsmen generally have too much time to swat his balls away. When he put extreme spin and a slightly faster trajectory on a ball to Panesar, he dismissed the stubborn number 11 easily.
I’d like to see more twist and arm in his bowling, along with the flight, in his bowling. Once he gets this he will be a much better bowler. If he gets it during England’s second inning, he could be a handful for them.
Brett McKay said | July 10th 2009 @ 8:52am | Report comment
A pair of patient, grinding, rewarding tons to swing the balance back Australia’s way. I was hoping above hope at the start of the innings that Australia could peg England’s lead to less than 200 by stumps, but never in my wildest dreams did I think it would be done one down.
Both Katich and Ponting were the epitomy of determination and concentration, especially against the spinners. They kept out what they needd to, and put away what they could. Shot selection looked very deliberate from both – Ponting didn’t play the pull as much as he does, and Katich seemed intent to push singles. Patient, determined batting.
Just as Peitersen and Collingwood did as they got “in”, Katich and Ponting now have the chance to bat the opponents out of the game. It’ll be interesting tonight to see how bad or not so bad the injury concerns for Flintoff and Broad are, and likewise, how Andrew Strauss adjusts his attack with perhaps a lessened role from his spearheads.
SouthernWaratah said | July 10th 2009 @ 9:14am | Report comment
Hughes will be kicking himself. He only needed to put his head down for a few overs and Flintoff was out of the attack. He’s young – he’s already figured it out I’m sure.
davido said | July 10th 2009 @ 9:57am | Report comment
Unfortunately it is going to be difficult to not draw this match.
Our bowling seems as sharp as a wet lettuce on a humid day. I just dont think we can take ten wickets in a day.
Jameswm said | July 10th 2009 @ 9:58am | Report comment
Spiro – rather than arm, I’d say it’s shoulder and follow-through that Hauritz needs. That’s what gets you most of the energy on the ball.
And unlike you Spiro – I didn’t think Hughes’s innings was that scratchy. I barely recall him playing and missing, and his pushes were timed beautifully and racing away to the boundary. I agree though it was a mistake to try to bounce him out – the two from Harmison in the previous match would have got just about anyone, and if you get the line slightly wrong, he will punish you.
I am not convinced he will have a long and fruitful career if his back foot continues to move towards square leg. He gets too square on, which makes it too hard to play on-side shots. He does have a very good eye and fast hands though. But he is restricting his effectiveness. Time will tell.
Ponting did what I wanted him to – knuckle down, don’t go for the big drives early, and grind it out. When he goes in to bat with this frame of mind, he usually makes a century.
I was screaming at the TV when Ponting persisted with Hauritz against Swann. “Stop screaming”, my wife said. “We’re losing the test right now”, I replied.
Swann was having fun and being cheeky, and we needed Johnson and Siddle to be bowling at his throat. That would take the smirk off his face – Hauritz’s off-spinners certainly didn’t. And for those glad Lee isn’t playing, this is where he does his best work – 153kmh late reverse-inswinging yorkers are too much for nos. 9-11.
It’d be great for us to be 350 at lunch and only 1 or 2 down. There is an awful lot of batting to come, but I’d really like us to pile on 600, which will probably take until an hour into the following day. That’s a lot of runs of course, but it’s the only way to put us ahead. I don’t think 500 will be enough.
Finno said | July 10th 2009 @ 10:26am | Report comment
We need a spinner and I have trouble believeing that Hauritz is or best spinner, I think Warne should announce a come back just to stir the pomps.
Harmison got Hughes out twice with the short ball hence the short stuff, he played soem wonderful strokes and Im really looking forward to him playing some good innings, I like him as he isnt going to doe wondering
Punter and the Grub just great test cricket, it would be great if both of them could pile on another hundred get up over 300 then let the other play some shots. I cant see it happen and it might be used get the Australians some good exposure to Panesar, Swann and Anderson. I was disappointed by how the english tail wagged not a good sign, spose im use to the last 3 wicket falling for 10 -20 runs. It was a good effort to get over 430 odd. Would have liked to keep them under 400. This outcome of the 3rd day will give you the result of the Test Match..
LeftArmSpinner said | July 10th 2009 @ 10:30am | Report comment
every coach will tell you that if you get a start, you need to go on with it. starts are sooooo valuable. POnting and Katich did just that. the first innings of the first test, give them both barrels. no better time!!
SouthernWaratah said | July 10th 2009 @ 11:24am | Report comment
Hay Spiro! Is Stuart MacGill ever going to write another article? I quite enjoyed his first but that was a while ago….
Brett McKay said | July 10th 2009 @ 11:24am | Report comment
Actually James, that’s something we’ve discussed during the tour games – Ponting definitely put that wafty wave of the bat outside off away last night, which means he’s learned from his mistakes. A few times that he did play and miss outside off, but he was just beaten a good ball…
Benny said | July 10th 2009 @ 11:32am | Report comment
How rubbish are Anderson and Broad…so slow and predictable
SouthernWaratah said | July 10th 2009 @ 11:47am | Report comment
I loved Michael Holding as the 3rd Man last night, he gave a very non bias English view of events, Athers and Nasser kept going on and on about Hughes V Harmisson. Katich in 2005, Bowling ninety miles an hour (As if thats the most important thing when bowling).
MH just came on and said, here’s a fairly handy batting attack….. fast forward one wicket down at stumps!
Benjamin Conkey said | July 10th 2009 @ 12:44pm | Report comment
Southern Waratah, that was funny when Holding did that. And it’s a point that gets overlooked. Yes Australia has lost Warne and McGrath, but the batting is as strong as ever. It’s hard to see Australian getting bowled out for under 450..although the English are already talking about what happened in 05 when AUS were 1 for 264..and crumbled to be all out for 370. Lightning surely won’t stike twice.
onside said | July 10th 2009 @ 1:07pm | Report comment
looks like a draw to me
Jameswm said | July 10th 2009 @ 1:12pm | Report comment
Brett – yes, that was me having a go at Ponting for not building an innings. Maybe it was just because it was a tour match and he didn’t have the same patience, but then he did it in South Africa as well.
Benny – actually Anderson and Broad were a lot faster than I expected them to be.
Guys maybe stumps came at a good time for the Aussies. They can re-group, have a chat, and say we have to bat out the next day. We have to be max 2 wickets down at lunch etc. We need to knuckle down. Haddin seems to sing to a different tune, but Hussey and North will patiently build their innings. Hopefully Clarke will too. We can bat till half way through the fourth day as far as I’m concerned, and declare at 8 for 720. Wishful thinking I know…
I would love little more than to see Mitch Johnson come in for the last hour of the day at 6 for 500 and get going. Even better if Haddin is also on song at the other end.
RickG said | July 10th 2009 @ 1:23pm | Report comment
Seriously guys – Test cricket, how bloody good is it? Give me the twists and turns, trials and tribulations any day over the farce that is 2020.
Benjamin Conkey said | July 10th 2009 @ 1:30pm | Report comment
Rick G..it sure is. That one over by Flintoff to Hughes after lunch was better than a whole match of Twenty20.
Brilliant.
Worlds Biggest said | July 10th 2009 @ 2:00pm | Report comment
Watching Phillip Hughes was a little frustrating, he is unorthodox so to the viewer it looks like he could get out or score a boundary on every ball. Great day for the Aussies, hopefully they can go on and make a big score. I am bewildered England didn’t pick Harmison and Sidebottom as both are in form, this didn’t look the case for Anderson and Broad.
Finno said | July 10th 2009 @ 2:02pm | Report comment
RickG
agreed
test Cricket is brillant stuff
SouthernWaratah said | July 10th 2009 @ 2:22pm | Report comment
I think Holding calls it as it is as he’s been there and done it, England rise to the top in 2005 (& ‘81 for that matter) for 5 minutes and live off it. If Athers and Nasser had have performed at any consistent level other than 1 Test Century each against Australia they would realise that the big noting of Swann and Co means nothing until you perform each test, that’s why Ian Bell is off still trying to figure out why he’s not in the side, You can drive an Aston, live in Chelsea & generally strut around like a peacock but it means nothing if you don’t back your ability with consistent performance.
I’m happy for England to live off 2005 for the next 20 years because what happened then isn’t going to help them in the morning….. Harmisson’s off in Durham somewhere having lunch with his Mum, Haggard is on the shelf, Jones is using a walking frame and Freddie churned out 6 over’s of value….
JohnB said | July 10th 2009 @ 2:46pm | Report comment
Jameswm – after the second morning, I’ll bet Johnson would like to come out in the last hour tomorrow morning our time at 6-550 odd AND with Swann bowling about his 45th wicketless over!
While obviously you have to concentrate on this test first and foremost, remembering the next game is only 3 days after this one, and that some of England’s bowlers are fragile or carrying niggles, grinding them into the dust for another day and a bit would be no bad thing.
drewster said | July 10th 2009 @ 2:53pm | Report comment
It is going to be interesting to see what impact Swann and Panesar have from here. can’t wait til this evening!!!!
onside said | July 10th 2009 @ 2:59pm | Report comment
Rick G ,Finno Ben Conkey et al
Test cricket is awkward to digest if you are time poor or have a day job.(Need sleep or cant watch the match
whilst embalming). Ben Conkeys ,”Flintoff to Hughes” example is correct. Trouble is these nuggets are so few
and far between.It’s a bit like watching a golf tournament waiting for those few shots of pure magic.But even
though a golf tournament, like a Test match, lasts for several days, at least in golf you get a result. A winner.
The journey is more enjoyable than the destination for Test cricket purests. It has to be , because the game is
not result orientated, there does not have to be a winner. This concept is far more pleasant on those lovely
grounds in the UK with trees, grass,deckchairs, and old chuches in view. Compare that with Australian concrete
stadiums. .Enough said.’Its just not cricket’
Jameswm said | July 10th 2009 @ 3:06pm | Report comment
That’s a good point John, except my vision of winning has us putting on 650 and bowling them out for 300, leaving us only 50-100 to get. That woudn’t tire out their bowlers too much as they’d rest most of the last two days. They also have 5 genuine bowlers.
FIsher Price said | July 10th 2009 @ 4:05pm | Report comment
650…. there’s a long way to go.