Giant All Blacks backs a pointer to rugby’s future
Roar Rookie
By Bruce Ross, 3 Dec 2009 Bruce Ross is a Roar Rookie
New Zealand's Isaia Toeava, right, tries to fend off Australia's Lachie Turner in their Tri Nations International rugby match at Westpac Stadium in Wellington, New Zealand, Saturday, Sept. 19, 2009. AP Photo/NZPA, Wayne Drought
The Marseille game between France and the All Blacks was a wonderful display of purposeful ball-in-hand rugby and a clear demonstration of the importance of physical dominance in the backs.
There was limited but very judicious kicking and a notable absence of the cut-out pass. Players on both sides were prepared to engage tacklers before off-loading.
In the backs, the French were outweighed by nearly seven kg per man, putting them at a serious disadvantage in what developed into an intense, fast-paced physical contest.
After 20 minutes, France led 9-7, courtesy of three penalty goals. However, in the final 20 minutes, France failed to score, while the All Blacks ran in two tries against a very weary defence.
Former Wallaby coach Bob Dwyer enthused: “New Zealand is now playing the style of rugby that I love. It is ambitious, confident and accurate in its execution – shorter passes, straight running, finding opportunity on the outside or, when closed off, picking up a support player on the ‘natural loop’. Beautiful in its simplicity and effective in its outcome!”
Dwyer pointed out that the All Blacks had exposed the French through the channel between the half and five-eighth, noting that for opportunities to open up out wide, it was important to occasionally threaten, or appear to threaten, through this channel.
Significantly, the All Black half, Jimmy Cowan, outweighed his counterpart, Julien Dupuy, by 14kg, while Dan Carter had a 9kg advantage over François Trinh-Duc.
Dwyer rates inside centre Ma’a Nonu as the most improved player in world rugby.
While retaining his ‘crash and bash’ approach he “has added finesse and a real appreciation of the ways to ‘fix’ defenders and is now a far more difficult proposition altogether.” The heaviest back on the field at 104kg, Nonu outweighed Yannick Jauzion by 9kg.
New Zealand, the traditional home of the ‘two five-eighths game’, has now developed an outstanding backline which features a big, powerful direct-running 12.
The players outside Nonu – Conrad Smith, Sitiveni Sivivatu, Cory Jane and Mils Muliaina – are all committed to bending or breaking the defensive line when appropriate as well as exploiting defensive gaps.
The players also consistently and enthusiastically back one another up.
I am convinced that this Kiwi backline is a forerunner of what will become increasingly common in the next few years. Modern training methods are producing a new generation of seriously big, powerful and quick players.
The most effective way of exploiting their comparative advantage is to play a very direct ball-in-hand attack coupled with brick wall defence and to maintain this pattern over the full 80 minutes.
Smaller and weaker opponents may be able to withstand this type of pressure for long periods but eventually physical and mental fatigue will cause them to yield.
There will always be a place in rugby for the very skillful smaller player like Giteau. But loading up backlines with physically inferior so-called playmakers, particularly if they are tackle-shy, is not the way forward.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (178)
- Will South African rugby force a Super 21 by 2018? (171)
- Brumbies 2012: New coach, new players, new attitude (128)
- Pocock set to be named new Force skipper (56)
- Can the ‘Tahs win the battle after losing the Waugh? (51)
- What does the future hold for the Six Nations (50)
- Wales and France the early stars of the Six Nations (48)
- Wales’ Davies banned for ‘tip tackle’ (2)
- Graham Henry’s rugby future confirmed (12)
- Barnes to lead Waratahs in first hitout
- Harris and Lucas in Reds No.10 audition (3)
- Wales show Southern Hemisphere how to play running rugby (17)
- Dan Parks and the unsolved questions of expat rugby (59)
- David Pocock: a skipper my Force teammates will fight for (21)
- Wales show Southern Hemisphere how to play running rugby (17)
- What opening matches of Six Nations taught us (15)
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (198)
- Clinical Chiefs cost rusty Rebels in Corio (9)
- Six Nations shows rugby is a parochial game at heart (5)
- Goose’s Super Rugby up-and-comer XV for 2012 (29)
- What does the future hold for the Six Nations (50)
Billo said | December 3rd 2009 @ 4:01am | Report comment
I’m sure the article is correct in its analysis of the current trend in rugby.
But what happened to the idea that rugby is a game for all shapes and sizes?
katzilla said | December 3rd 2009 @ 4:41am | Report comment
Mortlock at 2nd five? Ioane at Centre?
Ouch.
jus de couchon said | December 3rd 2009 @ 5:29am | Report comment
Is rugby becomming too much like league? The hits are bigger. The players are huge now compared to 20 years ago. Skill and attack have given way to defence and physicality. Despite professionalism Rugby is becomming less of a spectacle. Soon Rugby will be under pressure to reduce the number of players on the field and reduce the “boring” scrums and other contests for posession. Then the game is lost.
Sam Taulelei said | December 3rd 2009 @ 6:48am | Report comment
The differences in sizes of rugby players particularly backs is not a recent trend. If you compare the size of players from the early 20th century to even the 1980′s you’ll find that big and tall has been redefined. Professionalism has definitely enabled players to have more time available for training and they have access to the best of everything to provide that competitive edge. There was a good article written by one of the Lions trainers following their tour to SA that analysed the impact super athletes were having upon the game and whether it could be sustained.
While there is still a place in the game for less powerfully built players, they are the exception and the first thing they do when they play at the highest level is spend the summer months bulking up. The width of attacks is more compressed with defensive lines stretched across the field and there is less space on the field compared to 10 years ago so more often than not players have to try and barge their way through defenders rather than go round them. I wouldn’t say that the current All Blacks backline is a pointer to the future as the future has already arrived. Look at teams rated in the top 10 and it’s possibly Australia who has the lightest and smallest backline compared to their peers. That’s a reflection of Deans selection policy and the players available and not an indication the Wallabies are bucking the trend.
As for the game becoming too much like league, there are certainly some league influences with defensive lines, second man plays and banana kicks but union is still very different from league and any NRL fan will happily tell you that until the’yre blue in the face.
jus de couchon said | December 3rd 2009 @ 7:06am | Report comment
Thanks Sam , the Lions Med wrote, as you mentioned, that unsustainable impact injuries are prevelant at the top level. No matter how much a player bulks up, his joints and otherorgans, bones etc are even more subject to trauma.
Bruce Ross said | December 3rd 2009 @ 7:30am | Report comment
“I wouldn’t say that the current All Blacks backline is a pointer to the future as the future has already arrived. ”
I would agree with you, Sam, if the article was intended to be just about player size. The title that I submitted for this article was “A glimpse of rugby’s future – physical imposition by big, fast backs”. For some reason Roar’s sub-editors don’t like the titles I choose and frequently change them, with the occasional result, as in this case, that the focus of what I have written is obscured.
The main point is not that the All Blacks backs were big but rather that they have taken the advantage available from superior size and power to its logical conclusion. For 80 minutes they physically imposed themselves on the French, looking for heavy engagements rather than aimlessly kicking possession away or throwing pointless cut-out passes. Eventually the French backs were worn out and ground down.
By contrast the Springboks have achieved short term success by using tactics which are not really suited to their big players. Putting up high kicks with long hang times could be exploited by great chasers like Habana and Pietersen but it tended to take their big powerful backs out of the game. Once opposing teams learnt how to cope with the bombing raids the ‘Boks no longer looked a super side.
stillmissit said | December 3rd 2009 @ 8:21am | Report comment
Guys let’s get this into context before we become totally terrified of a bunch of guys wearing black shirts. They had the ‘granny’ knocked out of them by smaller backs from South Africa. Christ even we took them close on a couple of occasions.
As stated in the great NZ movie Once Were Warriors – “All weight work, not enough speed” and so it has been proven. Ma Nonu on his day is unstoppable but he doesnt have many of those days. Giteau seemed to me to have his number tackling him and didnt give him a highway to the line. OK they played very well against France but the All Blacks love it when we write this ‘how can we ever beat the AB’s’ stuff.
Reality guys let’s stick to reality. They are just a bunch of guys in shirts the same as our guys, the difference comes from all the small things that make teams strong ie good coaching, faith in the other members of the team, skills and of course that deep feeling that you will not let these bastards get the better of us.
Blinky Bill from Bellingen said | December 3rd 2009 @ 9:40am | Report comment
I have to agree. Let’s not beat the NZRU team’s drum for them.
What I’m actually hoping to see is a Wallaby coaching team that actually delivers a game plan that plays to our strengths and exploits opposition weaknesses. Wouldn’t that be nice?
stillmissit said | December 3rd 2009 @ 12:04pm | Report comment
Agree generally Sam and I am not trying to sink Bruce’s fine article that needs consideration. What gets me is the idea that a small, tough fast guy has no place in the backline anymore. I would love to have an example to hand to prove my point but we have had big guys for a fair while. I think Horan was the last one we had and he stood out with his speed, step and aggression.
The other obvious player was Alfie Langer most probably the consummate small guy in a big guys game.
The other part about the size of the backs is that forwards can leave them to work for the turnover. There is not a lot of extra weight the forwards are going to bring unless it is Palu, Horwill or Elsom. Both props are not that big. This is obviously both good and bad.
stillmissit said | December 3rd 2009 @ 12:08pm | Report comment
Blinky Wouldn’t that be bliss, rather than going through whatever is the current faddy trend in coaching. Kick chase is soooo! last year don’t you agree?
Can we get someone with an original thought in S14?
Yokel said | December 4th 2009 @ 1:17pm | Report comment
I guess that would be the Ma’a Nonu who scored a try in two tests against the Wallabies this year. Did any back on either side do better?
Sam Taulelei said | December 3rd 2009 @ 10:07am | Report comment
Stillmissit I don’t think anyone here has an inferiority complex about the All Blacks nor was that the intent of Bruce’s article.
Bruce your point about NZ possessing “big, powerful direct-running 12″ is a throwback to All Black backlines of the past where you had a confrontational player in close and a playmaker out wide like the Bill Osborne/Bruce Robertson midfield. That changed in the mid 1980′s when Joe Stanley played centre and was partnered with players like Warwick Taylor and John Schuster. Then we had the Little/Bunce combination and recently Mauger/Umaga.
As Stillmissit correctly mentioned Nonu can still be shutdown by a smaller player tackling him round the legs but his general play has improved, particularly his decision making, passing and defence. Although I disagree with Stillmissit that the Springbok backs are smaller than NZ’s backs.
Mortlock, Ashley-Cooper, Cross, Ioane are powerful runners. Brian O’Driscoll is no midget and neither is Jamie Roberts, Gavin Henson and Tom Shanklin from Wales. Mike Tindall, Stuart Abbott, Damian Hipkiss, Cueto and Banahan don’t lose in any size comparison and neither do Jauzion, Traille, Heymans and Rougerie. Don’t even get me started on the PI teams who feature some giants masquerading as backs.
The difference between the top teams and the rest as Stillmissit states are player and coaching skills, belief, mental toughness and confidence. The relative size of your backline is just the icing on the cake really.
stillmissit said | December 3rd 2009 @ 12:06pm | Report comment
Sorry Sam see above posted to wrong thread.
mattamkII said | December 3rd 2009 @ 10:27am | Report comment
This article is wrong… the trend for game breakers right now is smaller guys than it was 4 years ago.
Hoy said | December 3rd 2009 @ 10:32am | Report comment
I understand Bruce you didn’t mean this to be a future directions piece, however looking back to last century, I believe the Wallabies had the heaviest backline, with the average being around 101kg I think. That backline was Gregan, Larkham (lightweights) Horan (easily mid 90s), Herbert, Tune, Roff, Bourke (around the tonne I believe).
They were all big, fast and skillful, and at that time played a fantastic gameplan under McQueen.
I think the French when they beat New Zealand in 1999 were giving away massive Kilos, but they still won. There will always be a place for small players, provided they are good enough. A big man can be tackled by a strong defender, just like a big man can break weak tackles.