Socceroos achieve their goal in Brisbane
By Jim Morton, 4 Mar 2010 Jim Morton is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- football, mark milligan, Mile Sterjovski, Pim Verbeek, World Football
Mark Milligan’s first international goal was all Australia had to show for 90 minutes of domination against Indonesia but it still brought the desired reward at Suncorp Stadium.
The Socceroos’ 1-0 victory in their final Asian Cup qualifier on Wednesday night ensured a safe passage into the 2011 tournament in Qatar.
Requiring just a draw to ensure a second Asian Cup campaign, a determined Milligan sealed the Socceroos’ place in the 42nd minute with a scrambling goal from a Luke Wilkshire free kick.
One of just three foreign-based players in the mostly A-League squad, 2006 World Cup member Milligan had some luck on his side but Australia deserved to win by more as they 22 shots at goal to the visitors’ three.
The Japan-based former Sydney FC defender shouldered Wilkshire’s cross on to the cross bar before swivelling on a tight angle to hammer the ball into goalkeeper Markus Harison Rihihina, with it deflecting into the net.
It brought the 20,422-strong crowd to their feet.
“I don’t mind how it comes, it’s my first goal for the national team,” Milligan told ABC Radio.
“I was lucky it fell nicely for me off the cross bar, it doesn’t happen often.
“We obviously would have liked a second.
“We were solid in defence as a team and as a unit so we’re happy to be in the Asian Cup and that’s all that matters.”
The lacklustre Indonesians gave their stretcher bearers almost as much work as captain and lone striker Bambang Pamungkas, who pre-match promised a far more difficult assignment for the home side.
Indonesia’s last victory against the Socceroos came in the 1981 World Cup qualifiers and the visitors never looked like ending their 30-year drought.
Even when they went a goal down the Merah Putih were hesitant and failed to force the pace, leaving Pamungkas and fellow attacking spark Budi Sudarsono with little action.
The Socceroos enjoyed close to 80 per cent of the possession and had countless chances to kill off the visitors early in the second half.
In one five-minute period, striker Josh Kennedy missed two headers in the box and then spoilt a golden chance for Wilkshire by intercepting a brilliant Oar cross meant for the Dynamo Moscow utility.
Captain Culina also unleashed a series of long-range shots, further testing an up-to-the-task Markus with each.
Twin debutants Oar and Sydney FC defender Shannon Cole, highly impressive in his 72 minutes on the wet pitch, were among Verbeek’s best.
Older hands Culina, Wilkshire and Simon Colosimo were also stand-outs while Kennedy had an off night.
Right-side attacker Mile Sterjovski paid the price for a lacklustre first half, replaced at halftime for Wilkshire to move up field and substitute Matt McKay to add extra midfield spark.
The Suncorp Stadium surface was in amazing shape despite five days of persistent rain in Brisbane and the first half was played in wet and muggy conditions.
© AAP 2012Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
- Explore:
- football, mark milligan, Mile Sterjovski, Pim Verbeek, World Football


David said | March 4th 2010 @ 6:26am | Report comment
We should have won that like 8-0
markwakefield said | March 4th 2010 @ 10:11am | Report comment
like yeah, youre so like insightful…
DERBY COUNTY FC said | March 4th 2010 @ 3:01pm | Report comment
Now now.
Simmo said | March 4th 2010 @ 7:26am | Report comment
All the posssession, all the territory, 1 goal.
I think Pim needs to be less in love with the lone striker – it gets us no where.
Mister Football said | March 4th 2010 @ 7:45am | Report comment
It’s appropriate that Kennedy was in the A-League national team, becuase he is an A-League standard player.
Interestingly, Robbie Slater thinks Josh should be leading the charge in SA. Unbelievable.
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/kennedy-to-lead-world-cup-charge/story-e6freyar-1225835095657
whiskeymac said | March 4th 2010 @ 8:11am | Report comment
kennedy was very uninspiring up front. i was hoping that after 70minutes of fruitless walking to and from the penalty box to head things wide from a standstill he might have been replaced with someone else. Pim loves Kennedy, and loves the same tactic… crosses into towards him…. but if the simple tactic fails agaianst Indonesia, what chance germany and serbia?
AndyRoo said | March 4th 2010 @ 8:54am | Report comment
Kennedy was well marked, and it was pretty easy to do so because Jason Cullina is hardly second striker is he.
Sterjovski as a quasi winger striker should have been opening up some space for Kennedy but he was anonymous.
DERBY COUNTY FC said | March 4th 2010 @ 3:02pm | Report comment
Well marked against people 6 inches shorter than him and if he was well marked why wasn’t that opening up space.
AndyRoo said | March 4th 2010 @ 3:10pm | Report comment
That did create space just outside the box but Sterjovski was just jogging around and Cullina doing his best but not really oppening anyone up and Oar doing well but a bit goal shy.
Cullina did manage to get a fair few decent shots on goal because of that space.
Aljay said | March 4th 2010 @ 2:16pm | Report comment
What chance this tactic against Germany? Just check Kennedy’s club career and goal scoring record where he was playing against the same players he will be up against in S.A. They will know him, have played against him and have him all figured out.
Ben of Phnom Penh said | March 4th 2010 @ 2:48pm | Report comment
Kennedy works better in open play where he can run into a cross. Last night was a crowded stagnant box. Somehow I can’t see that being the case in the World Cup.
Al said | March 4th 2010 @ 8:31am | Report comment
Wow, you have commented on a football story without mentioning the world cup bid and how it’ll destroy the fabric of Australian society due to a few AFL games being disrupted.
markwakefield said | March 4th 2010 @ 10:13am | Report comment
robbie slater is completely irrelevant… he was a good player but has proved since he has nothing to offer the game…
Phutbol said | March 4th 2010 @ 12:27pm | Report comment
Did you actually read the story?
Second paragraph:
“It is 105 days before Australia’s opening match against Germany in Durban and I think Verbeek will favour Harry Kewell in that role”
stevo said | March 4th 2010 @ 10:43am | Report comment
i think kennedy has a bad influence on the team, we end up focusing only on kennedy as a point of attack, a good defence would have no dramas keeping us out, as it was it took some poor keeping to get our 1 goal against a team ranked outside of the top 100
does anyone else feel kennedy isnt as good as he was in germany? maybe playing in japan has had a bad influence, sure he’s getting game time but he’s there as a tall target man and that seems to be all he can do now, where he should have improved his skills by now and started playing the ball on the ground
AndyRoo said | March 4th 2010 @ 11:03am | Report comment
I wouldn’t say he has gone backwards.
In Germany he wasn’t expected to hold the ball up, he often came on as the second striker playing alongside Mark Viduka. If Gus played Kennedy up front by himself then we could compare and I think that would show his improvement better. He was really a one trick pony (and not even that great at it) in 06. He’s not light years better but I think he is a much better player than before just shoe horned in to a much tougher role.
David said | March 4th 2010 @ 3:43pm | Report comment
Ok people need to get this through their head playing in germany is a LOT better then playing in Japan. Of course Kenndy has got worst there were two clear sitters he had that he had that he should have put away.
Arguements against Kennedy
I never rated Kennedy as a starting player i think he’s better off the bench like Crouch for england. Kennedy is hopeless technically and he’s also quite slow he should of scored last night more then once times. Against Germany, Ghana and Serbia he isn’t going to touch the ball and i reckon after last night preformce he should dropped. He has scored (6 goals in 18 app) most of his goals were against Qatar and pretty much all were headers from poor defending he wont scored at the world cup against those kindas of defences.
Arguements for Kennedy
Kennedy has a natural height advantage and plays well off Cahill because usually Kennedy being marked results in Cahill slipping away and scoring. He’s the only proven goal score the Socceroos have at the moment with Scott Mcdonald not suiting the lone striker role (even though i think he holds up the ball better and runs more). Djit and Ruka havnt really been tested and are a bit of an unknown in terms of how that would handle a lone striker roll. As for Archie Thompson he’s proven to more “hopeless” for the socceroos.
Overall i think against Germany, Ghana and Serbia we would be better off playing Kewell up front.
David said | March 4th 2010 @ 3:47pm | Report comment
my starting line up fo the world cup
——————-Swarts———–
–Whilkshire-Neill-Kissa-Carney
———–Culina-Grella—————–
–Brecano——Cahill—–Emmo
—————-Kewell———-
Bench
Kennedy
Holman
Mcdonald
Covic
Ryh
Vidosic
Stevo said | March 4th 2010 @ 4:14pm | Report comment
What about Chippers?? Otherwise it’s pretty much the 2006 team which I thought was the only way forward given the current dearth of international qualtiy talent
AndyRoo said | March 4th 2010 @ 4:28pm | Report comment
Firstly despite his change in circumstances (it’s not like he was ripping it up in the Bundsiliga) he is a better player than he was in 06 in my opinion. That doesn’t mean I think he should start in South Africa I just think he is a better all round player than he was. Seems everyone else rated him much higher in 06 where I think he was a fringe selection that filled his minor role well (worry people from set pieces when we were chasing a game) but didn’t provide anything else. I really didn’t rate him as a 90 min outfield player at all in 06 and I think he has improved since then. If we played a two striker system I wouldn’t cry if he was one of those strikers selected to start…..I would never have said that in 06 and not just because we had better cattle (Viduka).
I am only defending him because he is getting slated for his performance last night when I don’t think any of the strikers available would have done better as a lone front man. He missed a few chances though but it’s a tough role especially when the attacking midfielders behind you are an 18 year old debutant, a defensive midfielder and an out of form Mile Sterjovski.
If Kewell, Macdonald, Djite or Ruka were in the squad last night or available and not chosen then I would be less forgiving of his performance.
But of those available if we have to play with one up front then I think Kennedy (even though he is only in his pre season) is a better choice than Thompson (who should play as AMR for the A league Roos), Griffiths, Brosque, Leckie.
Scott Mcdonald not suiting the lone striker role (even though i think he holds up the ball better and runs more)
Careful Dave, I got abused on here for suggesting I preferred to see Macdonald play as a lone striker than Kennedy.
Overall i think against Germany, Ghana and Serbia we would be better off playing Kewell up front.
If Cahill is fit I agree, if Cahill is injured (good chance) then Kewell could play in Tims spot and Macdonald up front.
agga78 said | March 4th 2010 @ 7:36am | Report comment
Pim plays one up front against Indonesia, and this is the result, Kennedy was isolated all night and never had a sniff, I thought the team played well, despite Pim’s usual negative formation, we controlled the game but really had no way way through a packed and fairly well organised defence, I think nearly every game under Pim has been the same, against decent but not great Asian teams we have failed to create anything and have used long balls and crosses to create opportunities (Pim are you Lawrie McKinna in disguise) I think we are doomed at the world cup, we won’t score a goal, this guy can’t leave quick enough I was hoping we sacked him and got Guus back for the world cup finals, but we are stuck with him.
Rob said | March 4th 2010 @ 9:17am | Report comment
Agga, Kennedy didn’t have a sniff? I must have watched another game. What really happened was that he didn’t finish the couple of very good chances he had. That might be down to his side being in pre-season, but it wasn’t good enough from one of the players likely to lead the line in South Africa.
I thought our movement in the attacking third was average, but not terrible. Culina played pretty well in that advanced role, and his shooting from distance was great. He was pretty unlucky not to score, really.
As for using crosses to score goals, I think the stats are that around 70-80% of goals are scored from crosses, so if you think about that, he’s playing the percentages. And how did we score?
We nearly scored from a few passing moves along the deck (esp. Culina’s shot from Wilkshire’s cutback in the second half), and on the whole, I was really pleased with the performance of the A-League players. Of course, Tommy Oar was a standout, and I would not be surprised if he didn’t come back from the trial he is about to have in Holland. There was just one occasion that he should’ve shot rather than chipped the ball towards Kennedy. Had he shot, I reckon he would’ve scored, but that’s ok. That’s confidence and experience, which he will get in spades in Holland!
DaMan3000 said | March 4th 2010 @ 10:47am | Report comment
Kennedy is massively unreliable. I have found myself nervously holding my breath whenever the ball comes near him, expecting him to make a mess of things but still hoping he doesn’t…
Joe FC said | March 4th 2010 @ 12:19pm | Report comment
Good summation Rob.
Lu said | March 4th 2010 @ 7:37am | Report comment
I know we didn’t have our “european stars”, but it’s always the same game plan.. and if we play that kind of football, we are going to get slaughtered at WC10.
Granted indonesia put 11 men behind the ball for the majority of the match, but with one (PREDICTABLE) striker, no runners, the one game plan (whipping it in at every opportunity), we might as well not bother.
And i’m not going to blame a-league players, cause i watch them week in and week out and they are better than that.. it comes down to the game blame.
Remember South Korea friendly? I fear it’s going to be much worst..
whiskeymac said | March 4th 2010 @ 8:13am | Report comment
i thought the HAl players did well against Indonesia on a decent surface.
crowd was Ok too.
but the roos are very predictible in attack. and unimaginative.
Oar was the only one to really put in good crosses all night.
Australian Football said | March 4th 2010 @ 8:59am | Report comment
Sterjovski should be dropped and retire from the national team and Leckie should have taken the other wing spot with Oar. Remembering this is not the team that will be the first XI in SA, but all credit to the HAL lads they performed well. The positives were we attacked (and that’s good) however, playing so long as a pragmatic defensive team we fell short of creativity in the top third because of it. Too often in the first half we sent in long crosses from the wings instead of taking the ball to the goal line then cutting it back to Kennedy to run on to with his head. The one striker up front did not work as per usual and should be abandon. Pim’s instructions were obvious send in crosses to Kennedy—sigh. Not good enough—-we need two strikers who can work off each other on the ground as well as the aerial attack.
~~~~~~~
AF
AndyRoo said | March 4th 2010 @ 9:29am | Report comment
Good Comments AF.
I was pretty dissapointed that Matt Mackay came on for Sterjovski, that’s not a very inspiring substitution, although some fans behind me (obvious Roar fans) were happy.
Nothing against Matt, just that it was a defensive midfielder on for Right Winger
Leckie on at half time would have been great.
Tellingly Sterjovski contributed as much in the second half as he did the first.
Rob said | March 4th 2010 @ 9:33am | Report comment
AndyRoo – “Tellingly Sterjovski contributed as much in the second half as he did the first.” LOL!
Australian Football said | March 4th 2010 @ 11:52am | Report comment
AndyRoo,
yep—-it would have been interesting.
keeper11 said | March 4th 2010 @ 10:24am | Report comment
Overall this A-league based team was much improved ‘technically’
( to quote one self proclaimed football guru )
and performance of rookie Oar was a bonus..
..but we are sooo slow and predictable from defence to attack…!!
..
opposition simply need to pushback, regroup and wait for our meaningless long balls in front third…
Quick thinking and pacy Euro/ Afrcian side will blow us away with those tactics…….
Realfootball said | March 4th 2010 @ 11:20am | Report comment
My views on Verbeek are well known to many on this site.
More of the same last night from the coach – no vision, no sense of adventure, no tactical imagination. The Verbeek 3 Ds – dull, dour, defensive.
McKay for Sterjovski when the team needs goals. That one substitution says it all about Verbeek
I can’t wait to see the back of him.
Australian Football said | March 4th 2010 @ 11:48am | Report comment
“McKay for Sterjovski when the team needs goals. That one substitution says it all about Verbeek”
RealFootball,
yes I agree with you on that sub—-what the “F” with 80% possession, he opts for another midfielder—-really why did he not bring on another young gun like Leckie on the other flank? We had the midfield sewn up and never looked under real pressure with Colosimo and Milligan who were in total control. Culina and Wilkshire pressing hard in the middle—-Ora and Leckie taking on the backs getting to the bye line and cutting it back to Kennedy, Culina, and Wilkshire—-we could have had 5 more goals easily.
Realfootball said | March 4th 2010 @ 12:51pm | Report comment
Could not agree more, AF. Such a wasted opportunity. As was Verbeek’s appointment.
DERBY COUNTY FC said | March 4th 2010 @ 3:05pm | Report comment
Thang God somebody is talking sense.
Punter said | March 5th 2010 @ 9:11am | Report comment
While I don’t disagree with most things you have said about PIM & his playing style (I too wish he was more adventurous).
But 2 things you have to bear in mind.
Firstly, you have to play to your strenghts, you don’t see many Aussies in the Champions league, there are less players in the premier leagues in Europe (PL, La Liga, & Serie A) than say in 06. So PIM has got them playing a dour, solid but result orienated way (yes I too am disappointing & have grave doubts about this style at the WC). But seriously, we needed to qualify for the WC, playing brillant flashy football but not qualifying for the WC would have not done this country any good either.
Secondly, PIM came on the back of Guus. In Guus, you are talking about a coach on US$7M, chased by some of the great clubs in the world, PIM is not in this class. I said it before & I’ll say it again, we were very, very lucky to get a coach of Guus’s experience (Uncle Frank’s legend will live long on this achievement alone). For all those complaining about PIM, let’s look back to the coaches & achievements of previous Socceroos coaches. How many other coaches would have got the result in Japan, while they (Japanese had been training for weeks in preparation), most Aussies arrived 24 hours before hand. Yes it wasn’t pretty, but…..
NUFCMVFC said | March 4th 2010 @ 2:22pm | Report comment
Kennedy or anyone else besides Mark Viduka is never going to excel as a lone striker, we simply don’t have the strikers to suit the system, put him up front with a McDonald or someone and we may do better, even if it does come across as the British big man small man combo
While not a spectacular performance, I guess it didn’t need to eb as they didn’t have to really push themselves, would have been good to have been a bit more clinical though
All in all a good result, we have ended up finishing top of our group, not 100% sure but I think this would then help us in terms of the Asian Cup draw at the tournament
Midfielder said | March 4th 2010 @ 2:24pm | Report comment
Most put the improvenment in the second to Pim’s half time talk… me I think it was because we were 1 – nil up and the pressure to score was off..
Pim did as Pim always does and got us the points… I tho there were some good signs coming out of tonight.. Oar was outstanding but we must remember who he played, Wilkshire goes goes from strenght to strenght and I tho he held us together last night… The passing was good we held the ball and on a different night would have scored some more goals… maybe it is making up for some games when we were lucky to score..Tho to that Mullo played well at the back and maybe he has his head together now..
On the negative side tho Fall Over Boy is showing without Harry & Bresh around him he is not a great player… from personal experience when I plan with a top team I go well… but my form if those around me don’t create space for me is no where near as good as when I am in the top team… me think this applies to Fall Over Boy as well.
Honestly I tho we needed to give another striker a go up front in the last 20 mis or so was disappointed that Leckie did not get a run…Tho the backs got caught square at times and against better sides this could hurt us..
TBH the A-League Socceroos won and that is good..