McDonald’s World Cup place is looking shaky
By Paddy Higgs, 13 May 2010 Paddy Higgs is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- football, Pim Verbeek, Scott McDonald, Socceroos, World Cup football

Australia's Scott McDonald and Iraq's Haidar Hussain during the Australian Socceroos v Iraq World Cup qualifier. AAP Image/Dave Hunt
Pim Verbeek may have trimmed his list, but the battle for a place among the final 23 to represent Australia at the World Cup is still fierce. Just ask Scott McDonald. The diminutive forward needs little introduction, but to cast light on his situation one will be given nonetheless.
The 26-year-old’s career looked in danger of winking out just five years ago, until a successful move to Scottish Premier League club Motherwell.
Celtic came calling next, and McDonald plundered 51 goals in 88 appearances before shifting to Middlesborough in January.
After some early difficulties, McDonald settled at the Championship club and began to find the back of the net again.
But while the goals have not eluded the plucky striker at club level, the same cannot be said when representing Australia.
He has not scored in 15 appearances for the Socceroos; a fact that weighs heavily on his mind. It has not all been his own doing.
A fundamental difference between Verbeek and predecessor Guus Hiddink has not helped McDonald.
Hiddink’s formation was dictated by the players he had at his disposal. He recognised depth was a luxury the Socceroos did not have, so formulated his playing style around the nation’s best players.
Verbeek has taken a different approach. He has stuck with his chosen formation which – although sometimes talked up as otherwise – tends to be a fluid 4-5-1.
Players are then selected on their ability to play the roles within the formation.
It’s meant the likes of McDonald – and Nick Carle – have had trouble slotting in and making an impact.
McDonald has been a somewhat peripheral figure in Australia’s World Cup qualification campaign, becoming increasingly isolated from Verbeek’s formation.
He was even passed over for selection for the Socceroos’ game against Oman late last year.
Anyone with a pedigree such as his would seem a shoo-in for a World Cup spot, but speculation surfaced yesterday that McDonald would only gain a place if injuries to Harry Kewell and Mark Bresciano worsen.
And where there is smoke, there is fire.
While he has ploughed a lone furrow for Boro on occasion, McDonald seems uncomfortable up front alone.
It means Kewell and Josh Kennedy are well ahead in the pecking order for Verbeek’s lone striker’s role.
If taken to South Africa, he would most likely have to settle for a spot on the bench. But Nikita Rukavytsya’s goals for Belgium outfit KSV Roeselare have placed further pressure on McDonald.
McDonald is a classic poacher: crafty, slippery and always in the right spot.
But Rukavytsya has pace and a desire to take on defenders, lending him an X-factor McDonald simply can’t match.
Who is more likely to provide spark of the bench if Australia finds itself a goal down against Serbia?
The answer is not one in McDonald’s favour. Attacker Dario Vidosic’s versatility – a quality Verbeek cherishes – is another poor omen for McDonald.
McDonald may well get his ticket to the World Cup. But even then it may be fair to say that he – and a handful of other Verbeek ‘outsiders’ – will be looking forward to the Dutchman’s exit after the finals.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
- Explore:
- football, Pim Verbeek, Scott McDonald, Socceroos, World Cup football

The Bear said | May 13th 2010 @ 8:09am | Report comment
Agreed. Furthermore, Holman has more chance of playing up front than MacDonald.
Australian Football said | May 13th 2010 @ 8:55am | Report comment
Bear,
let’s hope it never comes to that. What could be worse is a twin strike force of Holman and Maccas.
____
AF
The Bear said | May 13th 2010 @ 4:57pm | Report comment
Holman alone, no that would never do. My Jack Russell probably do better.
And a twin strike force ? I’d actually prefer that then pinging balls to Kennedy every 5 minutes.
Realfootball said | May 13th 2010 @ 9:01am | Report comment
I sincerely hope that the Socceroos after Verbeek have a very different caste to the current squad. Verbeek’s rigid system and negative vision for our game have suppressed some of our most talented players. I note that no significant clubs have come calling for Verbeek’s signature – the market, after all, provides the surest appraisal of a coach’s abilities.
Verbeek’s limitations as a coach are one thing, but his arrogant, tactless and brutal public dismissals of fine players like Ognenovski are unforgivable. He is lauded by Jesse Fink, among others, as a charming man, but he displays barely the semblence of grace and good manners in his public appearances, where he comes across as a graceless, inflexible and thoughtless individual. Quite apart from his needless waste of fine players like MacDonald and Carle, he has significantly damaged the value of the Socceroos brand with the wider Australian public and likewise damaged – needlessly – the standing of the A-League.
I know I am not alone in wishing him gone as soon as possible. This, in its own terms, is a blunt, Verbeek-like dismissal of Verbeek himself; however, as he says himself “You can write what you like. I don’t care.” And so I shall, Pim, safe in the knowledge that you won’t care one jot.
And just as well, because if the blogs are any indication, I am certainly not alone.
Rob said | May 13th 2010 @ 11:54pm | Report comment
100% agree RF
whiskeymac said | May 13th 2010 @ 9:24am | Report comment
I agree Paddy.
Sad but true regarding McDonalds career with the Roos to date. Hopefully it will turn around for him because we aren’t blessed with strikers, and certainly not with many who have played reasonably successfuly at Champions league level.
2011 onwards holds a lot of interesting times for the roos regarding the changing of the guard, new ideas, new players and bigger struggles. scant consolotaion for those like Macca and Carle if they are watching the 2010 tournament from home. at 26-30yrs old this is their time football age wise.
Robby72 said | May 13th 2010 @ 9:45am | Report comment
Oh please. Scott McDonald scores goals in average leagues. Nick Carle can barely get a game in an average league. They have been given chances. They have not taken advantage.
whiskeymac said | May 13th 2010 @ 1:35pm | Report comment
maybe but they still play at higher levels than many of the other challengers for positions, and in Maccas case he has scored against AC Milan in Europe and now as a regular in the Championship, which is more impressive IMO than the odd header in the J League or goals in the Belgian 2nd divisions.
Harvey the Scouser said | May 13th 2010 @ 10:07am | Report comment
I think the analysis and conclusion is spot on, Scotty is as much a victim of the “formation” as anything else.
It looks like he’ll be in dicky’s meadow, that’s for sure.
Coach said | May 13th 2010 @ 12:27pm | Report comment
Few Aussie strikers abroad could match McDonald’s goalscoring in ‘average’ leagues, or those competitions below it.
McDonald never seems short of confidence at club level, but seems to have little of it as soon as he pulls on a yellow jersey.
That’s Pim’s fault.
Mick of Newie said | May 13th 2010 @ 12:36pm | Report comment
I think there is a role for Macca off the bench. If we are chasing a game we will go more direct to Kennedy and if so Macca would be the best option to play off him.
I would take all 4 strikers and leave Garcia, Carle, Oar, Holland, Lowry, Beauchamp and North out.
Coach said | May 13th 2010 @ 12:51pm | Report comment
I’d leave out Beauchamp, Holland, Lowry, North, Vidosic, Valeri (he’s good, but how many defensive mids do we need?) and Garcia. Galekovic obviously already out.
whiskeymac said | May 13th 2010 @ 1:22pm | Report comment
lowry at 20 has a lot ahead of him, and just signed 2 more years at Aston Villa. i wldnt mind him being in the 23, if only to slot in once moore et al retire we have someone who is ready in defence. same for R Williams. but wont be surpirsed if the 23 is made up of more experienced/ verteran type players.
then again before predicting who will be cut from the squad it might be worth waiting to see who survives training and practice games first up…
Luke10 said | May 13th 2010 @ 1:35pm | Report comment
McDonald a victim to formation I think not! If other players can adapt and change their game to suit a particular formation or situation, then McDonald has to do the same.
Shaky as Scott’s position maybe, he is in a far better situation than late last year where Pim preferred players like Archie Thompson or Alex Brosque. He should be counting his lucky stars he can even battle it out for the final cut. The World Cup is a long competition and with only 4 strikers named I don’t think our Mr Pim Conservative can afford to risk taking less than the 4 strikers named.
No doubt McDoanld is an exceptional player, I really hope he takes this opportunity to really cement his place in the final 23. There would be no other better place for him to loose his green and gold goal virginity than at the World Cup with the world watching, if he can get on the pitch!
The Bear said | May 13th 2010 @ 4:46pm | Report comment
If there is only one striker in Pim’s formation and it’s not a Viduka type, then it has to be aerial (Josh) or aerial/slippery (Kewell). Scotty has no place in the formation as he is a poacher/opportunist with the additional knack of beating the keeper at obscure angles. Something only that a second striker can do…and that’s what Scotty is. End of.